The receipt of long-range weapons by the Armed Forces of Ukraine requires a counteroffensive of the RF Armed Forces to the Dnieper

56

During the special operation in Ukraine, unfortunately, a number of rather serious strategic miscalculations were made. In particular, it was a mistake to completely withdraw the RF Armed Forces from the north and north-east of Nezalezhnaya, allowing the Armed Forces of Ukraine to reach the Russian border, as well as leave Kherson without a fight to the enemy and protect the "carcass" of Vladimir Zelensky, appointing him an important partner in the negotiation process. Now we will have to pay a high price for these decisions.

The price of mistakes


If our troops had remained at least in the north of the Sumy and Kharkiv regions, the Ukrainian terrorist artillerymen would not have been able to fire at the Russian border regions, and the DRG of the Armed Forces of Ukraine would not have calmly entered the territory of the Belgorod, Kursk and Bryansk regions. It was necessary to create a wide "security belt" similar to what Turkey arranged in northern Syria, as we proposed do it in April 2022. Another huge by mistake was the abandonment of Kherson without a fight. The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation not only lost the only and such a convenient bridgehead on the right bank of Ukraine, from which it was possible to attack either to Nikolaev with Odessa, or to Krivoy Rog with Zaporozhye, but now the enemy himself got the opportunity from the high right bank of the Dnieper to fire at the northern regions of Crimea and land transport corridor to it.



Why were these and not other decisions made at the time? The author of the lines does not have an unequivocal answer to it.

It seems that the Kremlin at a certain stage decided to limit small - the liberation of Donbass and the retention of the Sea of ​​\uXNUMXb\uXNUMXbAzov, and in early autumn, when the Armed Forces of Ukraine developed a counteroffensive in the Kharkiv region, it was finally formalized by hasty referendums. In business, this is called loss fixing. The strategy chosen by the then commander of the NMD Surovikin testified to the transition to strategic defense and keeping the bird in hand while trying to bring the Kyiv regime to the negotiating table by delivering massive strikes against Ukrainian critical infrastructure.

The problem with all such "cunning plans" is that they do not take into account the opposition of the enemy, who, unlike the Kremlin, does not voluntarily tie his own hands. The collective West has not abandoned its plans to inflict a military defeat on Russia and only increases the volume of militarytechnical aid to Kyiv.

Currently, another wave of mobilization is underway in Ukraine, which should make up for the losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine at the front and neutralize the numerical parity with the RF Armed Forces that was formed after our partial mobilization. Now the military commissars are actively catching and conscripting into the army residents not only of South-Eastern and Central, but also of Western Ukraine, which says a lot. At the same time, literally today at the Ramstein air base in Germany, the issue of providing the Kyiv regime with the largest amount of military assistance in the entire time of the North Military District is being decided. Its declared scale is impressive.

Thus, the United States will transfer to the Armed Forces of Ukraine 100 Bradley infantry fighting vehicles, 55 armored vehicles, 100 M113 armored personnel carriers, 18 M109A6 self-propelled guns, 250 M1117 BORs, 138 HMMWV armored vehicles, 100 Stryker armored personnel carriers, GLSDB guided precision bombs and 36 105-mm howitzers. The UK will supply 14 Challenger 2 tanks, 30 AS90 self-propelled guns, 200 infantry fighting vehicles/armored personnel carriers and 600 Brimstone missiles. Canada will send 200 Senator armored vehicles, one battery of NASAMS anti-aircraft missile systems to Ukraine, and Poland - 14 Leopard-2 tanks and S-60 anti-aircraft systems. Germany will transfer 40 Marder infantry fighting vehicles and one battery of Patriot anti-aircraft missile systems, France - 40 AMX-10 wheeled tanks, Sweden - 50 CV-90 infantry fighting vehicles and 12 Archer self-propelled guns, Denmark - 19 Caesar self-propelled guns. The Czech Republic will give the Armed Forces 26-30 Dana-M2 self-propelled guns, Estonia - more than 10 howitzers 155-mm FH70, more than 10 howitzers 122-mm D30, Latvia - man-portable anti-aircraft missile systems Stinger, 2 Mi-17 helicopters, machine guns, drones, and Lithuania - L-70 anti-aircraft guns and two Mi-8 helicopters.

As you can see, the new Russian regions can only dream of peace, but not only them. Pentagon Deputy Press Secretary Sabrina Singh said the day before that the United States supports Ukraine in an effort to "reclaim the territories" by any means:

The US is helping Ukraine, and this ministry has said that we will be with Ukraine for as long as it takes. <...> Of course, we support the Ukrainians in returning the territory by any means they can use, what weapons they use.

Tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, armored personnel carriers, artillery and air defense systems provided by the NATO bloc can be used in a large-scale offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the Southern Front. The goal of the Kyiv regime will then be to break through, regardless of losses, to Melitopol and Berdyansk and cut the land transport corridor to the Crimea, as well as destroy or render unusable the Crimean bridge. After that, with the help of GLSDB guided high-precision bombs fired from the HIMARS MLRS, the Armed Forces of Ukraine will arrange a real hell in the Crimea.

For more information about these ground-based bombs, we told previously. These are amazing hybrids of the American GBU-39 aerial bomb, crossed with the M26 rocket engine, which fire from the ground from the M270 or M142 MLRS, release folding wings and control rudders, can fly from 150 to 160 kilometers, actively maneuvering, and hit right on target. This is a fairly cheap, but very effective high-precision weapon that will create enormous problems for Russian air defense systems.

Then our military depots, command posts, artillery positions and other major military facilities will be in the zone of their destruction. Also under the fire of the Armed Forces of Ukraine from the line of contact will be not only the unfortunate Donetsk, but also the rear Luhansk, as well as the cities of Berdyansk and Melitopol, Mariupol and the north of Crimea from Kherson, who had been exhausted. Moreover, from the north-east of Ukraine, GLSDB adjustable bombs will be able to safely fly to Belgorod and Kursk. And then what to do?

There are few options left: either to make another “regrouping” already on the left bank of the Don, or to continue to sit on the defensive, incurring unjustified losses from the use of long-range precision weapons by the Armed Forces of Ukraine, or to go on the counteroffensive in order to push the enemy back at least to the right bank of the Dnieper . In other words, the "cunning plan", if it consisted in limiting oneself to a titmouse in the hands, turned out to be untenable. We will have to at least liberate the entire left bank of Ukraine in order to secure at least the old Russian regions, which we have already stated previously. The transfer of long-range weapons to the Armed Forces of Ukraine requires a large-scale counteroffensive of the RF Armed Forces to the Dnieper. Unfortunately, this will not solve the Crimean security problem. Nevertheless, it was impossible to leave Kherson so easily, no matter what difficulties its retention promised.

All this looks especially sad against the background of media reports about the appearance on the roofs of some administrative buildings in Moscow of the Pantsir-S1 air defense missile system. According to some reports, the Armed Forces of Ukraine will be able to launch strike UAVs with a flight range of up to 1000 kilometers, which we warned a long time ago. Now either President Putin will sit in a conditional bunker, or President Zelensky should do it.
56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    20 January 2023 15: 21
    Well, it is clear that the United States needs an escalation of the conflict, so they will pump weapons into Ukraine. We are waiting for our multi-move player to answer, but one thing is clear for sure, they won’t let us sit on the defensive, either we “regroup” or advance!
    1. +1
      21 January 2023 07: 03
      Obviously, a cutting strike on Lviv is needed (which I have been writing about for a long time), but it’s not yet clear whether it’s nuclear or conventional, I’m in favor of a nuclear strike, with a statement about the possibility of a strike on decision-making centers, that is, on Washington, etc., you don’t have to feel sorry for the Nazis
      1. -6
        21 January 2023 11: 49
        Are the 3-5-year-old kids there also fascists?
        1. +5
          21 January 2023 13: 57
          Provocateur? And the children's alley in the Donbass - terrorists and separatists. And in Berlin, all the cooks, drivers and the proletariat...
        2. +1
          24 January 2023 09: 33
          Bandera people are no strangers to hiding behind "kids"!
      2. The comment was deleted.
  2. +3
    20 January 2023 15: 22
    A good article, a little belated in my opinion, although the respected Mr. Marzhetsky has always been rightly committed to the idea of ​​​​ending OPG 95 as quickly as possible. From my point of view, there is a decent amount of disinformation on our part - especially with regard to the plans of the USG to allegedly stretch the increase in the size of the army right up to 2026. Well, well, what a 26th year!
    I believe that we will see more decisive actions by our Armed Forces in the near future. In addition, it seems that changes are brewing inside the fallow. To paraphrase the classic - But at noon there is no such courage, it shocked them, they are more afraid ...
    And as for

    either President Putin will sit in a conditional bunker, or President Zelensky should do it.

    - it would be time for both of them to play untouchables, military actions damn it!
  3. +7
    20 January 2023 15: 26
    There are few options left: either to make another “regrouping” already on the left bank of the Don, or to continue to sit on the defensive, incurring unjustified losses from the use of long-range precision-guided weapons by the Armed Forces of Ukraine, or to go on the counteroffensive in order to push the enemy back at least to the Right Bank of the Dnieper .

    There is another option, the best of all possible. This is to truly defeat the energy and transport infrastructure of Ukraine. It means to bomb the gas system of this country, the famous GTS of Ukraine, destroying ALL gas pumping stations. For well-known reasons, this is not being done yet, but it will definitely have to be done if Russia wants to win.
    1. +6
      20 January 2023 16: 34
      This must be done! ALREADY YESTERDAY!
      But our "peacekeepers" still do not touch power lines and 750 kV transformers ..... As well as bridges, etc.
      We still feel sorry for the Bandera population!!!
    2. +2
      20 January 2023 22: 35
      The war will ever end. Example Germany: 20-30 years - active trade, 41-45 war with Hitler, 46-53 years of reparations, 70-2022 active trade. The same Ukraine: if everything is demolished and then conquered, then a lot will have to be restored. Bomb wisely.
      1. +1
        21 January 2023 09: 13
        And what if you need to restore everything again? Is it better to give the Kyiv fascists the opportunity to receive military equipment and bomb our cities calmly?
        1. 0
          21 January 2023 16: 51
          I say. Bomb wisely.
  4. -3
    20 January 2023 15: 32
    Shout alarmists! Everything goes according to plan. Putin is doing everything right. Everything was as planned a year ago.
    1. +3
      20 January 2023 16: 12
      Everything was as planned a year ago.

      Rather, in 2000, or even in 1992. And not by us
      1. +2
        21 January 2023 13: 59
        This was all invented by Churchill, in the 18th year!
    2. +3
      20 January 2023 19: 50
      Quote: syndicalist
      Shout alarmists! Everything goes according to plan. Putin is doing everything right. Everything was as planned a year ago.

      laughing well, they made me laugh, good trolling
    3. +2
      21 January 2023 14: 01
      A joke showing the complete collapse of the Darkest as an office officer...
    4. 0
      21 January 2023 15: 20
      Limonia country, a country without worries
      An underground passage leads to the country of Limonia, try to find it yourself
      I won't teach you
      Difficult road and deception everywhere
      But in order not to go astray, I have a plan, but I won't let you
      And don't you dare blame me
  5. +6
    20 January 2023 15: 38
    In the zone of their defeat then they will be

    themselves to go on the counteroffensive in order to push the enemy back at least to the Right Bank of the Dnieper

    The United States has enough diverse means to hit at least Donetsk, at least Moscow time, even from Transcarpathia. So if, at the cost of great losses and problems, we reach the Dnieper, the United States will simply transfer more long-range weapons to Ukraine.
    1. -1
      20 January 2023 16: 23
      We still have to liberate all of Ukraine.
      We are the Russians.

      It may well be necessary, I'm still of draft age.

      Only 2 points -
      First, what will it bring to the Russian economy?
      The second - each n / a turns into Verdun. And the more successes the Russian Armed Forces have, the more assistance will be from NATO, including more and more long-range weapons.

      But standing "on the eel" - just may well lead to the topic leaving the second plan and a gradual reduction in supplies.
    2. +3
      20 January 2023 19: 38
      Of course, if you don't hit back, the shooting will go on forever. For example, they shot 152 mm in Belgorod - they answered 203 mm in Kharkov. A rocket flew to Voronezh - from the Russian Federation a rocket flew to Kyiv, only with a large charge, etc. By the way, there are no shellings at the 38th parallel in Korea now.
    3. 0
      21 January 2023 15: 54
      It just so happens that you should go to the English Channel with all the ensuing consequences!
  6. +7
    20 January 2023 16: 32
    Does anyone else in Russia doubt the advisability of using nuclear weapons?
    The enemy supplies half the world. Half the world is secretly at war with us, killing our guys, and we want to look "good"?!
    Why did the Americans hit the Yaps with everything they could, and they didn’t care what they would think of them?! They achieved victory, and saved the lives of their soldiers!
    (By the way, nothing. The Yapis treat them normally! Almost friends)
    1. +2
      20 January 2023 19: 44
      Since May, when I started talking about the use of nuclear weapons, I received continuous minuses. A-tu, A-tu .... him. In the fall, the deputies began to discuss nuclear weapons. Now that massive NATO support for Ukraine is looming, the possibility of dragging out the war indefinitely, the issue of nuclear weapons is already on the agenda. I think before the summer the leadership will take the first steps, declaring the possibility of its application. And then who knows....
  7. +7
    20 January 2023 16: 35
    This war does not fit into any framework. They never fought like that. Maybe only partisans. And the fact that the authorities, including Putin, constantly repeats that a nuclear power cannot lose, suggests that the authorities themselves do not know what to do. Halva, halva, but it does not get sweeter in the mouth. My assumptions were that by June, we would have to at least return Kherson. But it seems that no goodwill gestures followed again.
    I know what to do! Need to puff. Well, you upset me.
    1. +3
      20 January 2023 19: 49
      By the way, returning Kherson is not a problem. And the Dnieper is not a problem. There are few APU troops there. We need trained armed troops, which are also few. Otherwise, why would they leave Kherson.
  8. -4
    20 January 2023 17: 06
    The shells on the roof are cool.
    It seems that this was not even in Kyiv.

    But! According to all the news, it is how successful the Ukrainians are. So next to the article - that there will be no more offensive, but the volume ..
  9. +1
    20 January 2023 17: 45
    Article - the question is what to do? Breaking and breaking dramatically tea Russia is a country with nuclear weapons. Push and go to the borders of the recognized republics (territory of the Russian Federation). Make a formidable statement, like we do not want war, but we were pressed, forced, there was no one to talk to. But! With America and England, we are ready to speak from a position of strength with the use of all types of weapons. Give three days to think, or or, after three days with another shelling and casualties of the civilian population, shoot a simple rocket at England and America (oh yes, in a statement, make it clear to those who lead America and England that we swear to declare what kind of bunker you have there they didn’t cook (and why do we need a world where we won’t be) you will simply have nowhere to go out, and you will stay there until the end of your days)). Something tells me that everyone wants to live. Well, what next? Everyone will sit like mice while the nuclear powers decide how and what to do.
  10. -3
    20 January 2023 17: 57
    How is Kissinger going to include the collapsed state in NATO? request
    1. 0
      20 January 2023 19: 47
      Clarification, reaction to minus. laughing

      Ukraine was destroyed from within, it did not lose. On the contrary, the Maidan activists failed to capture the whole of Ukraine. People return with their territories to Russia and understand who did not let the new state live.

      Today, hiding the "intimate" connection between Zelensky and NATO is ridiculous. They were so confused that Kissinger came up with the idea of ​​declaring Ukraine a member of NATO. How Kissinger is going to include the collapsed state in NATO, posthumously or in advance? In the hope that the inhabitants of the disintegrated country will want to unite?
  11. +6
    20 January 2023 18: 20
    Obtaining weapons requires their destruction, and the offensive must be prepared.
  12. +3
    20 January 2023 21: 20
    Now the military commissars are actively catching and conscripting into the army residents not only of South-Eastern and Central, but also of Western Ukraine, which says a lot.

    Here is the option that there is already a catastrophic lack of people who can be drafted into the ranks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and I have a suspicion that Ukraine collects neither 100t but 200t or even more. Considering what will be transferred to Ukraine from the list listed by the author

    Thus, the United States will transfer to the Armed Forces of Ukraine 100 Bradley infantry fighting vehicles, 55 armored vehicles, 100 M113 armored personnel carriers, 18 M109A6 self-propelled guns, 250 M1117 BORs, 138 HMMWV armored vehicles, 100 Stryker armored personnel carriers, GLSDB guided precision bombs and 36 105-mm howitzers. The UK will supply 14 Challenger 2 tanks, 30 AS90 self-propelled guns, 200 infantry fighting vehicles/armored personnel carriers and 600 Brimstone missiles. Canada will send 200 Senator armored vehicles, one battery of NASAMS anti-aircraft missile systems to Ukraine, and Poland - 14 Leopard-2 tanks and S-60 anti-aircraft systems. Germany will transfer 40 Marder infantry fighting vehicles and one battery of Patriot anti-aircraft missile systems, France - 40 AMX-10 wheeled tanks, Sweden - 50 CV-90 infantry fighting vehicles and 12 Archer self-propelled guns, Denmark - 19 Caesar self-propelled guns. The Czech Republic will give the Armed Forces 26-30 Dana-M2 self-propelled guns, Estonia - more than 10 howitzers 155-mm FH70, more than 10 howitzers 122-mm D30, Latvia - man-portable anti-aircraft missile systems Stinger, 2 Mi-17 helicopters, machine guns, drones, and Lithuania - L-70 anti-aircraft guns and two Mi-8 helicopters.

    Here you can even organize not a single powerful offensive in one place, but two, and if successful, feed it with reserves, which the military registration and enlistment offices of the square will now catch, and by capturing territories, go further, plus gain a foothold on those that are recaptured.
    And why am I sure that Scholz and the leopards will be crushed and hundreds of tanks will go east to help the Ukrainians, and I have a suspicion that even the Abrams will be handed over, they are already being transported to Europe by echelons.

    In other words, the "cunning plan", if it consisted in limiting oneself to a titmouse in the hands, turned out to be untenable. We will have to at least liberate the entire left bank of Ukraine in order to secure at least the old Russian regions, which we have already stated earlier. The transfer of long-range weapons to the Armed Forces of Ukraine requires a large-scale counteroffensive of the RF Armed Forces to the Dnieper. Unfortunately, this will not solve the Crimean security problem. Nevertheless, it was impossible to leave Kherson so easily, no matter what difficulties its retention promised.

    This will not solve the problem, as they say here in the US thread, they will supply more long-range weapons and no matter which side of the Dnieper we will be on. Here we need a complete victory, and for this we need to mobilize another million, and our president has already repeated several times that there will be no more mobilization which means we are waiting for problems from the enemy and throwing shells on the roofs of houses to protect the Moscow Region and the Kremlin.

    Now either President Putin will sit in a conditional bunker, or President Zelensky should do it.

    He will move to us in Western Siberia and they will stir up a new capital here. This has long been in the plans, and they will put it into practice.
    1. +3
      20 January 2023 22: 05
      and for this you need to mobilize another million

      And the Russian economy, its MTO base and logistics routes to supply such a number of people are ready for this?
      And for such a number of soldiers, is there exactly the required number of intelligent, competent, experienced sergeants and officers?
      1. 0
        21 January 2023 18: 04
        No, perhaps that is why provocateurs and feeble-minded people are calling for the "bang" of nuclear weapons ...
    2. +3
      20 January 2023 23: 22
      Valera75 (Valery):
      ... The United States will supply more long-range weapons and no matter which side of the Dnieper we will be on. Here we need a complete victory, and for this we need to mobilize another million ...

      Again twenty-five.
      Well, over whom are you going to win a "complete victory"? Over a weak-willed weapon in the hands of the United States? Above the club, not its owner. Well, we will break this club, and the United States will take a new one. They have right at their fingertips: Poland, Germany, Romania, Moldova, Slovakia, Hungary, Norway, Italy, France .... Japan. Enough for all of our blood?
      Note that the US and UK are not on this list. They are the masters of this gang.
      This is how they should be forced. Nothing else remains. And there is only one way to do this. We have it and it's very good. Not only that - it was tested on the same population in 1962, and with success.
      The problem is different - just those who are not on the list have been "partners" of our government since 1992. So, until we change it extremely competently, nothing will shine for us, except for the continuation of the "Murleson ballet", and, in simple terms, death
  13. +3
    20 January 2023 23: 07
    Waiting for arrival in the Kremlin. The comprador power and the "elite" are tied to NATO with children, wives, capital, real estate, and all this in NATO countries. How can they fight NATO? Here their whole war comes down to defense and non-damage to the citizens of NATO countries.
    1. 0
      21 January 2023 15: 29
      Russia is great, but there is nowhere to retreat - behind Vladivostok!
  14. 0
    20 January 2023 23: 15
    All because of the GDP’s fear of heavy losses, one thing is not clear, did the person who leads our country really understand that the war cannot be won without losses ...
    Now the task at least is to liberate new regions, and take half of Ukraine under control ...
    1. +2
      21 January 2023 09: 26
      All because of the GDP's fear of big losses

      All because of the unwillingness to fight for real. Because then everyone should fight. Including the children of the elite. Including Chozy, Medvedev and Solovyov.
      And all the rest. And that means setting the elite against you.
      You can not set up, but drive the commoners, but the common people can also turn against, rightly indignant, and why are the children of the elite not sent to the front?

      Well, more. A real war is not only a front. It's hard work inside the country. For non-compliance with which you will have to strictly ask. And here, Peskov said that officially no one can forbid officials to rest abroad. That is - some to the front, and others - to rest abroad.
    2. 0
      21 January 2023 15: 31
      What do you understand in naval humor!
    3. +1
      21 January 2023 18: 06
      All because of the GDP’s fear of heavy losses, one thing is not clear, did the person who leads our country really understand that the war cannot be won without losses ...

      But of course, you are clearly not going to personally add to the list of losses ...
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. 0
    21 January 2023 00: 29
    will sit in a conditional bunker

    So he's been sitting there for a long time.
  18. +2
    21 January 2023 02: 01
    It's like an avalanche coming down from the mountain. And it all started with javelins. We laughed. Here is the answer, the real answer to Russian demands for guarantees. Security, yes.
  19. -2
    21 January 2023 04: 10
    or continue to sit on the defensive, incurring unjustified losses

    As much as you can write, since June we have been sitting along the entire front line in a deaf defense. Every day, American MLRS, artillery, self-propelled guns kill our soldiers. We carry 90% of Russian losses from the shelling of Ukrainian artillery. Yes, they have less of it, but they have it much more accurately than ours and is guided by jeepies. As early as six months ago, mobilization took more than 300 soldiers to the front. We were told - they will prepare - and ...
    So far and ... everything does not come. But the pressure on Zelensky's regime should lie in something else. In a massive missile attack. Days and nights through. Weeks. No rest or break. With all the missiles that we have - except for the ones we need on Judgment Day, if the West suddenly wants something more than a clash in Ukraine.
    The strikes should destroy the entire energy infrastructure of Ukraine related to the provision of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Not by 50%, as it is now, but by 90!. All bridges, railways and roads in Western Ukraine must be destroyed, so that even milk from Western countries could not be imported. To destroy all the warehouses that exist there.
    Yes, it's tough! Civilians of Ukraine will suffer. But this is the least evil of all possible for us.
    1. 0
      21 January 2023 09: 16
      Civilians of Ukraine will suffer. But this is the least evil of all possible for us.

      Fabulous. Russia entered a neighboring country to protect the Russian-speaking and loyal population of Ukraine from nationalists, Russia is not the same as the United States, Russia does not fight civilians, Russia does not hit civilian infrastructure, and as a result, it turns out that Russia has survived - now the civilian population Ukraine must suffer. Just great. Is this why we started NWO on February 24th? To survive at the expense of the suffering of civilians in a neighboring country?
      1. -2
        21 January 2023 15: 30
        Dear, this is war. Nobody is calling for the bombing of peaceful cities. These are your wishes and fantasies. Read carefully what is proposed to bomb. When applying these strikes, workers or guards of these facilities may suffer. If you were attentive, you would see the Russian Aerospace Forces strike at night or early in the morning. When these facilities have a minimum number of people.
      2. +1
        21 January 2023 18: 10
        now the civilian population of Ukraine must suffer

        For the "liberator" trolls and for those who are not friends with their heads - this goes without saying, alas ...
  20. +1
    21 January 2023 09: 16
    It is necessary to destroy the entire transport network in Ukraine, the western one on the border with Poland and the southern one on the border with Romania. When we finish with Ukraine, we will restore everything anew.
  21. 0
    21 January 2023 09: 41
    There were many more mistakes. The first six months showed the inability of the General Staff to competently conduct the operation, or they were not allowed to do so from the Kremlin. There they were stunned by the resistance, because in the reports of analysts - sycophants of the Armed Forces, only flowers were to be expected. The trouble is if all these analysts are still feeding the leadership with their creations. I don’t know what the General Staff is preparing next, but if, with any of his plans, Western weapons will again be delivered to the front line without hindrance, it means that the conclusions from the mistakes made have not been drawn.
  22. +3
    21 January 2023 10: 51
    During the special operation in Ukraine, unfortunately, a number of rather serious strategic miscalculations were made.

    Truth? I don't even believe it. And how it happened, how it happened. request
  23. -2
    21 January 2023 12: 58
    The author is just a "reposter". What's new in the article, a selection of materials from published articles by bloggers, and the tales of experts on TV, diluted with alarmism. Before giving advice to the army, you need to graduate at least from the General Staff Academy, while at the same time going through the difficult professional path of a military man. If you want to help, gather at least a branch of volunteers, learn a little and "go" to the front. And there and forward to the Dnieper ....
  24. -1
    21 January 2023 13: 15
    There is no point in discussing the issues of impotence of the Russian authorities. In the 1990s, a state coup was carried out in the USSR, the persons who committed the state coup are still in power and with money. To demand from the criminals who betrayed the Fatherland, the defense of the Fatherland - the Motherland - is naivety. What to do??? The people of Russia must demand from the President and deputies of the State. The Duma of the Russian Federation to adopt a law that the territory of the whole of Ukraine is an integral part of Russia. This demand must be published in all mass media so that the demand of the people of the Russian Federation reaches the authorities. The fear of power cannot exist indefinitely, it will have to decide with whom it is, with the people of Russia or with the West.
    1. 0
      21 January 2023 18: 49
      requirements - can develop into Maidans.
      with leaks...
  25. +1
    21 January 2023 14: 45
    Quote: vlad127490
    There is no point in discussing the issues of impotence of the Russian authorities. In the 1990s, a state coup was carried out in the USSR, the persons who committed the state coup are still in power and with money. To demand from the criminals who betrayed the Fatherland, the defense of the Fatherland - the Motherland - is naivety. What to do??? The people of Russia must demand from the President and deputies of the State. The Duma of the Russian Federation to adopt a law that the territory of the whole of Ukraine is an integral part of Russia. This demand must be published in all mass media so that the demand of the people of the Russian Federation reaches the authorities. The fear of power cannot exist indefinitely, it will have to decide with whom it is, with the people of Russia or with the West.

    And why only Ukraine? The USSR included many more republics. Why did you cling to Ukraine alone? Let's also Belarus is Russia. Kazakhstan is Russia. Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia is Russia. Georgia is Russia. Well, and so on.

    Only no one in the world will ever admit it. Don't care about the West. What about China and India? Or do you think - they recognize? Why hasn't Crimea been recognized yet? Even Iran does not recognize Crimea.

    What do you suggest - do not care at all? What for? For what? What will you personally get if all the countries of the world turn away from Russia in general? Will you revel in the realization of your own greatness?
  26. 0
    21 January 2023 15: 31
    To Scholz's ironic statement about leopard tanks for all that leopards will get to the sun only after abrams, the Americans answered that there will be no abrams in this aid package. The key word is "in this package", not "never never give abrams" or "we will give abrams only over our corpse"
    This means that in the next aid package Ukraine will receive abrams and Germany will probably also agree to the supply of lopards, and moreover, there will be, Bradley, Apaches in huge quantities, millions of shells
    And don’t think that NATO’s weapons stocks will run out, NATO’s weapons stocks won’t run out soon, read Wikipedia, there he has tens of thousands of old armored personnel carriers and tanks, centurions, the first loepards and challengers, French Rhinos with an automatic loader, Patons, Sheridans, M60, Chieftain Shermans , everything after decades of storage in a warehouse will be repaired, equipped with additional modern protection and will go to the front, Russia itself is doing this with the T62 now. NATO can still start producing new weapons from scratch, then Russia cannot win a war of attrition
  27. +1
    21 January 2023 17: 56
    In particular, it was a mistake to completely withdraw the RF Armed Forces from the north and northeast of Nezalezhnaya, allowing the Armed Forces of Ukraine to reach the Russian border, and also to leave Kherson without a fight to the enemy

    Yes, it seems that it was not a matter of mistakes, but of the threat of a very serious defeat of our troops.

    The problem with all such "cunning plans" is that they do not take into account the opposition of the enemy at all.

    Yes.

    There are few options left: either to make another “regrouping” already on the left bank of the Don, or to continue to sit on the defensive, incurring unjustified losses from the use of long-range precision weapons by the Armed Forces of Ukraine, or to go on the counteroffensive in order to push the enemy back at least to the right bank of the Dnieper . In other words, the "cunning plan", if it consisted in limiting oneself to a titmouse in the hands, turned out to be untenable. We will have to at least liberate the entire left bank of Ukraine in order to secure at least the old Russian regions

    Yes, but how?
  28. +1
    21 January 2023 21: 37
    If you remember how Putin was praised, how he endlessly outplayed the West, then the news about the Shells on the Roof (the Duma said it was fake) is included in the HPP and was planned a year ago!
  29. The comment was deleted.