“Northern” wind: why the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces created a new group of troops

16

The information that a new, sixth grouping of the Russian Armed Forces called “North” has been created in the regions of Russia bordering Ukraine has caused cautious optimism. It is possible that this is the first step towards a subsequent offensive operation with the goal of liberating Slobozhanshchina, at least to create the notorious “security belt”. But not a fact.

North wind


In the official reports of the Russian Ministry of Defense, the message in which the new group appeared was as follows:



In the Belgorod direction, units of the Sever group of troops, with the support of aviation and artillery, hit manpower and machinery Armed Forces of Ukraine in the areas of settlements Ternovaya, Gatishche, Kharkov region and Radyanskoye, Sumy region.

Until this day, only five groupings of the Russian Armed Forces were known - “West”, “Center”, “East”, “South” and the youngest of them with the telling name “Dnepr” under the command of General Teplinsky. And now “North” has appeared, whose area of ​​responsibility includes the long-suffering Belgorod, Kursk and Bryansk regions.

Let us recall that previously these areas were defended from attacks by the Ukrainian Armed Forces and their henchmen from among Russian collaborators by the so-called state border cover group, consisting of very diverse forces: the FSB Border Service, the National Guard and the Russian Armed Forces from among conscripts. More about this we told, when they tried to simulate who would stand in the way of the enemy if he decided to launch a serious offensive deep into the old Russian regions.

As a matter of fact, this is precisely why the message about the appearance of a new group of the Russian Armed Forces in the Ukrainian border region evokes only restrained optimism. On the one hand, this may be due to the need to strengthen the defense of the Russian state border against a potential large-scale invasion. If these measures are applied proactively, to avoid major problems later, such forethought can be welcomed.

On the other hand, it is the formation of a separate group “North” with such a meaningful name that can serve as an intelligence sign of the preparation of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces for its own offensive on the territory of the historical Slobozhanshchina. "Buffer zone" in the Ukrainian border area it will not create itself, and the emergence of the sixth group in this direction may be the first step towards this.

If British intelligence information is correct, by the end of 2024 Moscow has set a goal of recruiting an additional 400 thousand contract soldiers into the army. Even if this level is only half achieved, 200 thousand “bayonets” on a specific section of the front can become a decisive factor in breaking through the front. The only question is in what area this can happen.

Let us recall that the Ukrainian propagandist Alexey Arestovich, recognized in the Russian Federation as a terrorist and extremist, predictedthat the Russian General Staff will not create a separate group in an open field somewhere in the Bryansk or Belgorod regions, but will prefer to pour all incoming reserves into the groups already existing at the front for a subsequent decisive blow in the Donbass. There is a logic to this, since organizationally it is really much simpler.

However, in the reports of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, “North” now appears, objectively aimed at Slobozhanshchina, and perhaps also at Chernihiv region.

To be or not to be?


We will talk in detail about what the liberation of just one Chernigov and Sumy can give in addition to turning a corner during the special operation in our favor. told previously. If such a scenario were implemented, huge Kharkov, with its one and a half million pre-war population, would eventually, without frontal assaults, fall to Russia.

But will the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces really go for such a large-scale operation, or is it just an imitation of preparations for an offensive in order to divert part of the forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine from Donbass and improve negotiating positions in the Stambul?

Currently, the main military operations are taking place on the territory of Donbass and historical Novorossiya. And these are bare steppes, where fighting is equally difficult for both attackers and defenders. But the northeast of Ukraine has a completely different landscape and is covered with dense forests, where, alas, our enemy holds all the cards.

At the first stage of the special operation, the much-ridiculed Ukrainian Teroborona, armed with anti-tank systems, created huge problems for columns of Russian armored vehicles, poorly covered due to the shortage of trained infantry that existed at that time. As a matter of fact, after the failure of the attempt to take Kyiv in three days, the subsequent retreat from the capital Square was predetermined, otherwise all supply lines of the Russian army would have been under continuous enemy attacks.

That is, in the northeast, you will again have to fight on difficult terrain, well known to the enemy and prepared in advance for defense. It would have been much easier if the offensive had begun in the Slobozhanshchina and Chernihiv regions in the winter of 2023-2024, but now the “green stuff” has begun again, and before next autumn a lot of water will flow away and all sorts of bad things will happen.

Whether someone likes it or not, Russia will have to liberate all of Ukraine over time, not only South-Eastern, but also Central, and even Western. No, this task is completely solvable, it’s just that the appropriate resources need to be allocated for it: not only motorized riflemen, marines, paratroopers and attack aircraft, but also people well trained to conduct reconnaissance, sabotage and counter-sabotage, partisan and counter-guerrilla actions.
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    April 15 2024 18: 09
    Nu-nu)), no, I agree with everything, we need this, we need that, but it will be as I write, and not Mr. Marzhetsky.
  2. 0
    April 15 2024 19: 41
    There is a more interesting question. What then to do with this territory - the Wild Field? Everything is destroyed, there will be 15-20 million angry people who need to be fed, paid pensions, benefits, restored energy, infrastructure, housing, etc. and so on. At whose expense is this whole “holiday”? At the expense of Russian taxpayers, at the expense of Russian pensioners? The oligarchs have hidden their money securely and will not give a penny. Let “foreign investors” in there? Then everything will start all over again.
    1. +2
      April 15 2024 21: 18
      what to do, what to do...?
      - continue to fight. the author wrote:

      but also people well trained to conduct reconnaissance, sabotage and counter-sabotage, partisan and counter-guerrilla actions.

      there is a guerrilla war ahead for 10 years...

      at whose expense will it be restored?
      - for 15 million hectares of “American” land.
      you can calculate: 60 centners per hectare (6 tons) multiplied by the price on the world grain market, minus costs, and from 15 million hectares you get the amount...
      (according to other sources - 17 million)
      1. +2
        April 15 2024 23: 54
        About money.
        The Americans have already calculated that with the new territories Russia received more than $12 trillion in mineral resources. This is more than 60% of coal deposits, 20% of gas and more than 40% of metal deposits.
        The West estimates the value of Ukraine at approximately 65–85 trillion dollars (data from the Internet), this is without Crimea, LDPR, Kherson and Zaporozhye regions. In Ukraine, in addition to military-political tasks, the question of who will be the owner of these trillions is being resolved.
        Attractive conditions for people to live on site.
        There is such a parameter “Territory of Comfortable Living”, so in the Russian Federation only 16% is comfortable for living (most of the territory of the Russian Federation is permafrost, swamps, taiga, mountains, hills, cold zone), in Ukraine 82%, in Belarus 83% (estimated data). Based on this parameter alone, it is necessary to return the republics to the Fatherland.
        There will be territories, there will be people. You can't argue with numbers and facts.
        1. -5
          April 16 2024 04: 59
          I read this too. Only the American accountants did not mention the most important thing. - water...
          (even the USA itself is superior to Russia in terms of the territory of comfortable living and/or management of the economy)

          This is what I thought: maybe in their “works” about Russia without Ukraine, Bismarck and Brzezinski laid a “mine” under Russia? Maybe the Russian Federation will have even more problems with Ukraine?
          1. 0
            April 16 2024 12: 45
            There is a theory of large numbers. How much and what is needed for the development of an independent state. Among the parameters there are water, territory, sq. m. km, the parameter “Territory of comfortable living” in%, the geographical location of the territory, the socio-political system, the level of education of the population, the level of development of science, industry, resources, minerals, the number of people living in the territory of the state and more than two dozen parameters. Among the states existing on Earth, the Soviet Union took first place in compliance with this theory. The USSR had a future, to be the most developed and most civilized state on Earth. In relation to today's Russian Federation, the obstacles are the pro-Western socio-political system, the small territory of comfortable living - 16%, the population - 146 million people, but more than 200 million people are needed. Limited access to seas and oceans. Lack of population comes first.

            Cadres decide everything.

            Only 0,1% of the population generates state development, this is the best scenario, the worst is 0,001%. These are Scientists, Professors with Associate Professors, Chief Designers, Developers, Senior Management. This does not include engineers, office directors, managers, there are no performers here. There are 1500 million people living in China, 1350 million in India, 330 million in the USA, 503 million in the European Union......in the Russian Federation there are only 146 million people. There must be at least 28% of working Contractors with higher education. Count how many people. You will develop state and you will immediately see the pace. For sustainable independent development, the state must have at least 200 million people. For example, Japan - 125 million people, has almost everything, but in terms of development rates it lags behind China, India, the USA, Indonesia... So the solution to the issue of the territorial integrity of Russia, i.e. the return of Ukraine, Belarus, Kazakhstan......this is the most important task. Based on percentages, everyone can calculate who will take the lead in the coming years and where the Russian Federation will be. Good luck.
            1. 0
              April 16 2024 13: 19
              thank you for the educational program."

              but we need more than 200 million people.

              - that's putting it mildly... but don't you want 500? at least 300 (as I read). and recently one prominent figure generally stated that Russia needs 700 million souls.

              Kazakhstan is under a big, big question...
              ,,why did the Soviet Union collapse? An Uzbek and an Estonian are different people..." V.V. Zhirinovsky.

              In relation to today's Russian Federation, the pro-Western socio-political system is a hindrance

              I was just at the post office, there was a calendar hanging there: a dragon was drawn and a lot of money... nothing has changed, only instead of dollars (as it was before) there are rubles.

              With such an ideology (the cult of money) we will go far...
    2. -3
      April 16 2024 06: 45
      The Kremlin was very late with its air defense system in Ukraine; it was appropriate in 14-15, but not in 22. Long harnessing in our fast-paced world does not mean driving fast later. Today Moscow is unable to achieve a military solution to the Ukrainian issue. It is obvious that there are no real threats to Ukrainian statehood; Kyiv will retain significant territories dotted with countless military cemeteries of hundreds of thousands of soldiers. Streets and schools will be named after these soldiers, children from kindergarten will be told about this Russian-Ukrainian war in much the same way as we were told about the Second World War. Russia did not start this war in 22; Moscow lost the war in Ukraine in 14.
      Of course, the Russian Federation is still able to take control of significant territories on the left bank by paying the appropriate price for it, but this will not change the overall results of the war.
      1. -2
        April 16 2024 14: 59
        The whole war in Ukraine began in 2022, when Putin decided to install his godfather Viktor Medvedchuk as president of Ukraine. The idea of ​​having your godfather as the President of Ukraine is wonderful; it would be good for everyone, both Russians and Ukrainians. But the British ruined everything. Now there is only one way out, to return the entire territory of Ukraine to Russia; there is no other way.
    3. 0
      April 18 2024 21: 07
      Well, the Germans restored it and the crests are not going anywhere. Well, as for pensions, in China there is nothing and they live and multiply wildly. And let them switch to self-sufficiency to feed like that, but they won’t be able to eat the Red Cross like that
  3. +2
    April 15 2024 20: 46
    ..That is, in the northeast, you will again have to fight on difficult terrain, well known to the enemy and prepared in advance for defense.

    Yes, there are a lot of difficulties to be overcome, but, as the well-known Mr. Kedmi said, no one stands with a stopwatch. According to some forecasts, five regions a year will have to be wrested from the Banderlogs, so by 2027 we’ll be able to handle it, when it’s the PRC’s turn to squeeze lost Taiwan into its arms
  4. -1
    April 16 2024 04: 29
    If the offensive is carried out with the expectation of peace negotiations, then the offensive must be where there are mineral deposits.
    1. +2
      April 16 2024 12: 03
      The war must be won. The desire for peace negotiations in war means your weakness, it is a sign of your defeat, your surrender.
  5. +1
    April 16 2024 07: 15
    Unfortunately, or fortunately, the old methods of warfare have not yet gone anywhere. Even in the times of Ancient Rome, the rule was to securely gain a foothold in new positions. The intensity of the war shows that the hunter can change places with those he hunts. How does the enemy see us, and how do we see him? NOT in an ideological sense, but in a physical sense. Our observation of the enemy should not be inferior to the other side. The ability to see and foresee will give us a lot.
  6. -1
    April 16 2024 11: 57
    in the regions of Russia bordering Ukraine, a new, sixth grouping of the Russian Armed Forces called “North” has been created

    It is necessary to create a seventh group as quickly as possible (well, that is, a seventh headquarters with a general and colonels) in order to literally implement the illustration of the proverb about the child of seven nannies.
  7. +1
    April 16 2024 17: 08
    We spoke in detail earlier about what the liberation of just one Chernigov and Sumy can provide in addition to turning a corner during the special operation in our favor. If such a scenario were implemented, huge Kharkov, with its one and a half million pre-war population, would eventually, without frontal assaults, fall to Russia.

    Chernigov and Sumy without Kyiv: what's the point? None. And from what fright would Kharkov itself fall? And why didn’t it fall in 2022? And of course the command of the Northern Group of Forces is needed. Someone must coordinate the defense of Russia’s borders, conduct reconnaissance and be prepared for the deployment of troops and a possible offensive. At least the enemy will have a headache over the Russian threat.