To defeat the Kyiv regime, Russia must create its own “anti-Ukraine”

25

Today, when there is a question of keeping the Sea of ​​Azov and even the Crimea under the onslaught of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the plans for the post-war reconstruction of Ukraine may seem ridiculous and absurd to some. But those who now write with malice about the skin of an unkilled bear should remember that during the Great Patriotic War, plans to restore Minsk destroyed by the Nazis were built even in the most difficult period of the war, and smart hunters agree on the division of the skin in advance.

In order to try to find a way out of the pit-trap in which Russia found itself in the ninth month of NWO, it is necessary to honestly and impartially analyze the mistakes that led us into it. Only with an accurate diagnosis can one begin the treatment of a serious, dangerous disease and hope for a favorable outcome.



"Diagnosis"


Probably, the main mistake of the Kremlin at the start of a special military operation in Ukraine, in addition to the frankly insufficient outfit of forces allocated for its implementation, was a defiant refusal to “occupy” its territory and overthrow the Zelensky regime. Rather, at the very beginning of the SVO, on February 25, 2022, Vladimir Putin publicly called on the Armed Forces of Ukraine to revolt against the “gang of drug addicts and neo-Nazis”:

Once again I appeal to the servicemen of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Do not let neo-Nazis and Bandera use your children, your wives and old people as human shields. Take power into your own hands. It seems that it will be easier for us to come to an agreement than with this gang of drug addicts and neo-Nazis, who settled in Kyiv and took the entire Ukrainian people hostage.

That is, on the second day of the special operation, President Putin directly called Zelensky's colleague a "drug addict and neo-Nazi", which does not raise the slightest doubt. However, in the future, Vladimir Vladimirovich's rhetoric underwent noticeable changes. Unfortunately, his adherence to principles did not last long, and for the past nine months we have only been hearing about the Kremlin's readiness for negotiations, respectively, with a "gang of drug addicts and neo-Nazis." I'm sorry, but you can't take a word out of a song. Here, for example, is a quote from Dmitry Peskov, press secretary of the President of the Russian Federation, dated July 13, 2022, when the affairs of the Russian Armed Forces at the front were going pretty well, when compared with today:

President Putin said he was ready to meet with President Zelensky. And he said it more than once.

On July 24, 2022, what seemed to be a landmark event took place – Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov announced the need to overthrow the “anti-people and anti-historical regime” in Ukraine:

We feel sorry for the Ukrainian people, who deserve much better. We feel sorry for Ukrainian history, which is crumbling before our eyes, and we feel sorry for those who succumbed to the state propaganda of the Kyiv regime, and those who support it, aimed at making Ukraine become the eternal enemy of Russia...
The Russian and Ukrainian people will continue to live together. We will definitely help the Ukrainian people get rid of the regime, which is absolutely anti-people and anti-historical.

But, as you can see, this topic has not received development. On November 16, the “drug addict and neo-Nazi” Zelensky himself announced that the Kremlin was looking for opportunities to return to the negotiating table with him:

I have received signals from leaders of states who say: we think Putin wants direct negotiations. And I said: we will offer a public form.

Such inconsistency in the position of official Moscow is its huge diplomatic mistake.

At first, this undermines the authority of the Russian government itself in the eyes of the patriotically inclined part of the population, on which it itself relies.

Secondly, the unwillingness to divide the Zelensky regime, which must be overthrown and brought to the tribunal, and Ukraine leads to the fact that Russia has to fight with all of Ukraine and the Ukrainian people. Kyiv is consistently leading to the fact that for Ukrainians the NWO has become the "Great Patriotic War - 2", and certain aspects of the hostilities only simplify its task. Perhaps it would be more efficient to spend hundreds of cruise missiles and Geraniums on strikes against the enemy's transport infrastructure, depriving him of the ability to maneuver reserves and supply his groups, than against civilian energy infrastructure facilities. But the General Staff, of course, knows better.

The second strategic mistake, which follows logically from the first, was the fact that over the past nine months the Kremlin has not deigned to formulate any sane integration program for post-war Ukraine. In any case, the Ukrainian people were not informed about it, but in vain. Here, Poland has its own integration project for the former Square, and it has so far won the fight for the minds of the Ukrainian people against Russia with a devastating score, which we will discuss in detail told literally the day before.

"Treatment"


Having made a "diagnosis", you can proceed to the process of "treatment". How we are with you have established Earlier, all the problems of 2022 were laid in 2014, when the Russian leadership did not take advantage of the unique opportunity to disperse the Maidan and install its own puppet regime in Ukraine, from which anything could be demanded later - from federalization to annexation. What options do we have eight-plus years later?

It should be borne in mind that in 2016, in the Dorogomilovsky Court of Moscow, at the suit of the ex-deputy of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine Volodymyr Oleinik, Maidan was legally recognized as a coup d'état. This is a very important decision.

Literally the day before we are with you discussedthat Ukraine may be divided into Right-bank and Left-bank. This will become possible after the RF Armed Forces are saturated due to partial mobilization and will be able to move from defense to offensive. Then the main task will be to push back the positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine as far as possible from the Russian borders, preferably beyond the Dnieper, which will become a natural barrier to the Ukrainian “blitzkrieg”. The question is what status this territory of the Left Bank will have then.

The simplest solution seems to be to annex all this territory to the Russian Federation, but then Russia will legally again approach Ukraine, passing along the left bank of the Dnieper. This will enable the Kyiv regime, which controls the Right Bank, to fire at our settlements with long-range missile systems across the river, as well as to carry out “corsair” raids with its Dnieper flotilla. But there is another option, a transitional one.

So, having achieved the liberation of Donbass and the Sea of ​​Azov, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation should go further, to Kharkov, Poltava, Pavlograd and Sumy, but not alone. On the territory of the Left Bank, it is possible to proclaim the creation of a conditional “Ukrainian Federation” (the name can be any, for example, the Federation of Little Russia or something else), stating that it is she who is the legal successor of pre-Maidan Ukraine. Moscow, in turn, should then appeal to the decision of the Dorogomilovsky court and refuse to recognize post-Maidan Ukraine, establishing diplomatic relations with the “Ukrainian Federation”.

That is, instead of begging for negotiations from the regime of "drug addict and neo-Nazi" Zelensky, it is necessary to establish your own pro-Russian regime in the former Nezalezhnaya. For a transitional period, it may be headed by, say, the former Prime Minister of Ukraine Mykola Azarov. This alternative Ukraine, together with the Kremlin, should formulate and publish a program for the post-war reconstruction of the country, in particular: holding referendums on self-determination in various regions, its subsequent federalization, giving the Russian language the status of a second state language, equal status for Ukrainian and Russian culture, a radical reduction in the army, restoration industrial cooperation with Russia, joining the CSTO, the Eurasian Union and the Union State of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus. This is what Putin should have done in February 2022 by addressing the Ukrainian people directly.

The next step is creation on the Left Bank of the Ukrainian Volunteer Army (UDAr), of course, under the control and command of officers from the RF Armed Forces and NM LDNR. Together with it, the Russian army and the People's Militia of Donbass will have to deal with the liberation of the Right-Bank Ukraine. All this is quite real, and it is possible to create an “anti-Ukraine” to fight the “drug addict and neo-Nazi” regime in the coming months. Then Victory will be achieved much faster and paid for with less bloodshed on both sides.

There would be a desire.
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    18 November 2022 11: 51
    The inconsistent actions of our commander-in-chief are explained by children's complexes: wooden toys and a whipping boy. Hence, apparently, the love for power with its preferences, the good-natured attitude towards embezzlers of public funds and officials who do not carry out its instructions. Hence the foreign policy of a strong Russian Federation, based on the possession of nuclear weapons, with a weak and poorly equipped army. It's not worth talking about domestic politics. The collapse of the Soviet economy, on the basis of which it would be possible to build a more efficient one, if the oligarchy had not been nurtured. This uncertainty, and with the appropriate advisers blowing in the ears about greatness, is reflected in the course of fulfilling one's own.
    1. +2
      18 November 2022 19: 55
      The collapse of the Soviet economy, on the basis of which it would be possible to build a more efficient one, if the oligarchy had not been nurtured.

      Everything is so, but we must take into account the realities of the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries. The oligarchy was raised by Yeltsin. Seven bankers panimashsh ... The oligarchic system was inherited by the commander-in-chief from EBN. At the beginning of the 8s, GDP made some changes to this system: the oligarchs were "equidistant" - Khodorkovsky went to sew mittens, Abramovich served hard labor in Chukotka for 3 years, Gusinsky-Smolensky-Berezovsky (London, bathroom, scarf) went into exile, the irreplaceable Chubais took up " transformation" of the Russian energy sector, Potanin-Aven-Prokhorov-Deripaska quickly understood everything and went deep into their businesses, forgetting about politics. We can also recall authoritative businessmen such as Nevzlin and Sergei Pugachev, who claimed that it was he who brought VVP to power. Finally, as a legacy from Yeltsin, Putin inherited Prime Minister Kasyanov with a chic baritone, who did not know what he did for XNUMX years; most likely, he simply covered up some traces, after which he was dismissed, later turning out to be a great "oppositionist and democrat."
  2. +4
    18 November 2022 11: 55
    There are hidden Bandera lobbyists in the administration who act in the interests of the Bandera people and advocate negotiations with the Bandera war criminals. If not for the Bandera lobbyists in the Russian authorities, Kyiv would have been liberated from Bandera long ago. Even in the General Staff there is a pro-Bandera diaspora headed by Gerasimov, which handed over Raisins and a large number of settlements in the Kharkov and Sumy regions to Bandera. And now, from these regions, Bandera saboteurs are carrying out terrorist attacks and shelling of Russian cities in the Belgorod, Kursk and Bryansk regions. It's time for the FSB to take care of them.
  3. +1
    18 November 2022 11: 56
    In order to create an anti-Ukraine! It is necessary to write about the Ukrainization of 1925-32. But the central government of Russia, together with the talk-showers, deliberately hides this story. report in Kyiv “Russians and Ukrainians” 1864 V Rozanov “Little Russians about not a few Russians” 1913 Nechuy-Ivan Levitsky “The Crooked Mirror of Ukrainian Movies” 1914 F I Svistun, Maksimovich-Kievlyanin.
    Head Russian Rada and Galician-Russian Matitsa on Wiki Also Narrative about the origin of the word "Ukraine" Hey, Ukrainians! Where are you?
  4. +5
    18 November 2022 13: 23
    The Treaty "On Friendship, Cooperation and Partnership between the Russian Federation and Ukraine" dated May 31, 1997 ceased to be valid on April 1, 2019 due to its denunciation by Ukraine.
    The termination of this Treaty releases the Russian Federation from any obligation in relation to Ukraine.
    For a decision or action on the part of the Russian Federation, there is little desire, a Law is needed.
    Russia needs to legislate that the entire territory of Ukraine, seized by the separatists with the help of NATO, is an integral part of Russia.
    In the presence of the Law, all hostilities will take place on the territory of Russia.
    How to deal with enemies on the territory of the Russian Federation, there are many options.
    1. +2
      18 November 2022 13: 45
      It’s right that they posted this information! At one time I also laid out this source! But everyone doesn’t give a damn about it in the comments. Everyone considers their comments as the standard of truth! That is, they write what comes to mind, without any evidence of their opinion
    2. -1
      19 November 2022 10: 15
      Quote: vlad127490
      In the presence of the Law, all hostilities will take place on the territory of Russia.
      How to deal with enemies on the territory of the Russian Federation, there are many options.

      Name at least one option and what prevents it from being applied within the framework of the SVO? From the "Law" nothing on earth will change. And you offer the Russian leadership to become at the level of a hohloreikha and engage in posturing.
  5. 0
    18 November 2022 13: 40
    Everything is exactly like that. For a normal, pro-Russian Ukraine (Novorossia, Little Russia ...) the inhabitants of these territories themselves must fight. And not guys from Buryatia, Chechnya, Crimea or Vologda (of course, if they are not volunteers). Surely there are millions of them. You just need to organize and equip them. We have a lot of Ukrainian leaders who can be put in charge of these territories. And Russia should only help and recognize new territories, states, republics.
    1. 0
      18 November 2022 16: 27
      Quote: Igor Viktorovich Berdin
      Everything is exactly like that. For a normal, pro-Russian Ukraine (Novorossia, Little Russia ...) the inhabitants of these territories themselves must fight. And not guys from Buryatia, Chechnya, Crimea or Vologda (of course, if they are not volunteers). Surely there are millions of them. You just need to organize and equip them. We have a lot of Ukrainian leaders who can be put in charge of these territories. And Russia should only help and recognize new territories, states, republics.

      I agree with the post author. But it seems to me that everything is more interesting here. And the interest here is capital-oligarchic. Under the guise of denationalization and other things, an operation is being carried out to annex new territories with good resources. With the subsequent restoration of infrastructure and the transfer of tasty enterprises to the oligarchs from the Russian Federation or local pro-Russian ones. Local natives will get only a life that is calm from raids and places to work in tacked enterprises.
      1. +2
        18 November 2022 23: 27
        Those hints that you do in favor of the poor. In all countries everything belongs to the capitalists or the state. People everywhere just work and have almost nothing. But on the other hand, why should the resources and enterprises of these regions belong to non-Russian capitalists? Who, if not the Russians, annexed and developed these lands and built everything on them? Maybe the Anglo-Saxons, Germans, French ...? These territories are not new. They have been Russian since the time of Catherine 2.
  6. -2
    18 November 2022 15: 56
    nice article title
  7. +1
    18 November 2022 16: 22
    that the Kremlin is looking for opportunities to return to the negotiating table with him:

    - The topic of negotiations will be the same: the choice of the material of the rope on which Zelensky will be hanged ...
  8. -2
    18 November 2022 17: 33
    To win, it is necessary to carry out personnel changes. Firstly, to purge the top command staff from parquet generals. And secondly, to check the sanity of the average command staff.
  9. -3
    18 November 2022 18: 10
    The author and commentators are terribly far from understanding the situation inside Ukraine, just like the top leadership of Russia, so "Kyiv in three days" turned into the 9th month of bloody battles.
  10. -1
    18 November 2022 18: 38
    Quatsch! Eher eine Anti-NATO auf dem Territorium der EU oder in Cuba!!
  11. 0
    18 November 2022 18: 40
    What is there to guess?
    As the Russians say, we'll wait and see.
    As the French say, we will live - we will see.
    As the Moldovans say, we will live - we will see.
  12. 0
    18 November 2022 21: 37
    I agree with you. But time has passed. Cause? Russian laziness, Russian carelessness. Am I happy to admit it? In no case. But it's a fact. Wake up, gentlemen, comrades of the Russian government! Understand at last how the world functions: to eat or to be with one. Is it unacceptable to think like that? Take responsibility for the people you represent. Or surrender to the Anglo-Saxons, but the price will be high.
  13. -1
    18 November 2022 22: 06
    Tex, look ahead))
    In general, a great idea, I especially like the name of the Ukrainian volunteer - in defiance of this tongue-tied thug laughing
  14. +1
    19 November 2022 00: 01
    The main political and strategic mistake of our authorities was to expect that our troops would be met there with flowers. This did not happen, which was a real blow to those in power. And what to do in this situation, they simply did not know and, it seems, they do not really know. Which is very sad.
  15. -2
    19 November 2022 00: 33
    Sergei Marzhetsky is in a hurry to win, but is it worth it? Hurry up and make people laugh. Maybe everything is going as planned, based on the many possible scenarios for the development of events, taking into account the circumstances that arise.
  16. -2
    19 November 2022 09: 35
    Ukraine is the project for the destruction of Russia, this was written back in 1904. What is the author going to pare? A way to destroy multi-ethnic Russia?
  17. -1
    19 November 2022 10: 27
    Everything is great. It remains only to liberate the left-bank Ukraine. Can you tell me how?
  18. +1
    19 November 2022 14: 42
    To defeat the Kyiv regime, Russia must create its own “anti-gay Ropa” and hang traitors on Red Square
  19. +1
    19 November 2022 16: 16
    a circular division of the skin of a wild boar that has not been killed .. and dizziness from the political fantasies of adventurers cannot be cured. how many Russians still have to die embodying the ideas of conquering the "Russian" world
  20. 0
    19 November 2022 19: 24
    In order to rectify the state of affairs in connection with Ukraine, the entire top of our government needs to step aside a little from these affairs, appointing and instructing new people with patriotic views and not connected with oligarchic capital to conduct conversations and negotiations.