The offensive of the Russian Armed Forces in the north can prevent the attack of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the Southern Front

27

The tragic events of the past few days have clearly shown that the complete withdrawal of the RF Armed Forces from North-Eastern Ukraine was a huge strategic mistake. We are now reaping the bitter fruits of that extremely short-sighted decision: constant shelling of the border Belgorod, Bryansk and Kursk regions, active operations of enemy DRGs there, and even attacks on fighters and helicopters of the Russian Aerospace Forces from an air ambush.

Negative trends


In addition to all of the above, the situation in the Donbass and the Sea of ​​Azov is simply pushing for the speedy activation of the Russian army on the Ukrainian Left Bank. Having correctly used the time given to them, the Armed Forces of Ukraine conducted another wave of mobilization, underwent retraining under the guidance of experienced NATO instructors, and also received quite modern Western-style weapons. Given the superiority over the Russian Armed Forces in space and air reconnaissance, the Ukrainian army has become a big threat over the past year.



As we detail told earlier, there is a real danger that the Armed Forces of Ukraine will exhaust and bleed the most combat-ready Russian units and subunits in the positional “Bakhmut meat grinder”, and then make a swift blow on the Southern Front, breaking through to Melitopol and Berdyansk. Consequences of their cutting the land transport corridor to the Crimea and taking the peninsula under siege may be the most tragic. Unfortunately, the RF Armed Forces cannot fundamentally change anything there, in the steppes of the Sea of ​​Azov or among the continuous network of fortified areas of Donbass. Further continuation of positional battles, while the enemy receives more and more long-range and deadly types of weapons, is extremely disadvantageous for us.

We need to urgently change something, breaking the negative trend in our favor, but where and how?

Pain points


We have already told in detail. The priority are systematic attacks on the transport infrastructure of Ukraine, primarily on bridges across the Dnieper, railway junctions and crossings. It also requires the urgent equipping of the Russian army with the missing means of communication, reconnaissance, and other equipment, the formation of new units and subunits in the rear. This is a war, unfortunately, for a long time, and reserves will soon be needed in large numbers.

But still, the priority task is to destroy the transport infrastructure across the Dnieper in order to isolate the Left Bank as a separate theater of military operations. This in itself will deprive the Armed Forces of Ukraine of the opportunity to deliver a decisive blow on the Southern Front, since they will be left without supplies, rotation and replenishment. The accumulated resources of the Ukrainian army will only be enough for a local offensive, and not for a decisive one with strategic goals. This alone would allow the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation with high chances to repel the offensive and keep the Sea of ​​\uXNUMXb\uXNUMXbAzov without unnecessary losses.

However, there is an opportunity not only to break the enemy's ambitious plans, but also to reverse the emerging negative trend, leaving the upcoming summer-autumn campaign behind. To do this, it will be necessary to go on the offensive ourselves, striking pointwise, adequately commensurate with their real strengths and capabilities.

Pain point enemy number one - this is the city of Chernihiv at this stage of the war. The administrative center of the Chernihiv region, bordering in the north and northeast at the same time with Belarus and Russia, as if "hanging" over Kiev. It is no wonder that the adventurous throw of the RF Armed Forces on the Ukrainian capital on February 24, 2022 went just through Chernihiv. The problem was that in the city then there was a fairly strong garrison of about 7 thousand people. The Russian troops could not take it on the move, went around and rushed further to Kyiv. This was a big mistake, since the Armed Forces of Ukraine began to hit the extended rear of the RF Armed Forces, destroying defenseless columns.

It is not necessary to repeat this, again jumping on the old rake. It is worth forgetting about the next campaign against Kyiv, in any case, until the Black Sea region is liberated and the Ukrainian border with Poland is not blocked. It will obviously not be soon, even if you really want to. Nevertheless, the mere threat of an offensive by the Russian Armed Forces on the capital will force the Armed Forces of Ukraine to transfer significant forces to the north from the south. This permanent threat can be arranged if an offensive operation is carried out to liberate Chernigov specifically and a number of border towns and settlements of the Chernihiv region to form a security belt.

As we have already noted, it is absolutely not necessary to take cities by storm in the forehead. For a complete blockade of Chernihiv, a group of 20-30 thousand people will be quite enough. To create a reliable external security loop from an attempt to deblockade, to protect the rear and supply columns, to cover the border area, the same amount will be needed. It is necessary to come to Chernihiv region seriously and for a long time, with the arrangement of long-term fortified areas, on which the Armed Forces of Ukraine will already break their fangs. The remaining encircled Ukrainian garrison, deprived of supplies and replenishment, will be continuously bled by constant pinpoint shelling until it surrenders or is destroyed during the assault.

In order to think better, his command should be explained that the Wagner assault detachments will enter the blocked city with an uncompromising order. To speed up the liberation process, the number of the group directly involved in the cleansing of Chernihiv can be increased to 40-50 thousand people, strengthening the “musicians” with army men so that they also gain experience. A multiple numerical advantage over a bloodless and surrounded garrison guarantees a positive result.

The occupation of the RF Armed Forces in the border towns of the Chernihiv region will be a great military success. The border Bryansk and Kursk regions will be covered from continuous shelling by the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and the enemy’s daring sabotage attacks will be stopped. The transformation of Chernihiv itself into a Russian bastion, where it will be necessary to concentrate a large grouping of troops, will create a source of a permanent threat of an offensive for Kiev and will force the transfer of a significant military contingent under the capital, weakening, respectively, the shock fists in the Sea of ​​\uXNUMXb\uXNUMXbAzov and in the Donbass. The Ukrainian General Staff will no longer be able to concentrate one powerful shock fist on the Southern Front with decisive goals, because the risk of a counterattack by the RF Armed Forces on Kyiv will constantly hang over it.

The second pain point today it is Sumy. The Sumy region has also become a source of constant danger for the inhabitants of the Kursk and Belgorod regions. Unlike one and a half million Kharkov, the operation to encircle and blockade Sumy is quite realistic to carry out even with the available forces. The algorithm is the same - blockade everyone, let everyone out, without weapons, let no one in. It is necessary to surround the city with a network of fortified areas, bleed the garrison and force it to surrender, or destroy it as a result of an assault by many times superior forces.

The liberation of the Sumy region will have a huge positive effect. First, the Russian border area will be reliably covered. Secondly, the loss of Sumy following Chernigov will be a painful defeat for the Kyiv regime and partial moral compensation for the inglorious surrender of Kherson. Thirdly, having bridgeheads in the north of the Donbass and in the south of the Sumy region, it will be possible in the future to proceed with the blockade of Kharkov, cutting off the supply lines of its garrison, taking the roads under fire control. The liberation of the Kharkiv region as a result of the destruction or squeezing out of the Ukrainian garrison will allow the Russian army to recoup for the humiliating September “regrouping”.

More importantly, the Sumy and Kharkov regions can later be used as springboards for an offensive to the Dnieper: through Poltava to Kremenchug or through Pavlograd to Dnepropetrovsk. Together with systematic attacks on transport infrastructure facilities, this will allow blocking the most dangerous grouping of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the Donbass and destroying it there, avoiding senseless losses from frontal assaults on fortified areas. Most likely, the Ukrainian General Staff will not bring things to such a deplorable outcome for itself and will simply withdraw the Armed Forces of Ukraine from the territory of the DPR, LPR and the left-bank part of the Zaporozhye and Kherson regions. This result in itself will be a great strategic victory, allowing us to liberate new Russian regions without stupid losses and build the actual border along the Dnieper, protecting ourselves from the permanent threat of rapid breakthroughs by the enemy’s mechanized units.

After that, it will be possible to take a breath and prepare the army and the military industry for further confrontation, forcing the Dnieper and liberating the Black Sea region.
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    16 May 2023 18: 07
    The tragic events of the past few days have clearly shown that the complete withdrawal of the RF Armed Forces from North-Eastern Ukraine was a huge strategic mistake.

    The main strategic mistake was to launch the NMD with too small forces and means, which further led to the rest of the strategic mistakes. For such a beginning of the SVO, the main perpetrators should not only be removed from their posts, but should also be judged. Now, when we are completely bogged down in the war with Ukraine, we need a broad mobilization and the forces gathered by the mobilization of more than a million people to quickly defeat the Armed Forces of Ukraine, otherwise protracted actions lead to more and more armament of the Armed Forces of Ukraine with the latest weapons and obstacles to the defeat of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, not counting the side losses from expanding sabotage, propaganda and other actions. The mobilization and concentration of sufficient force of the RF Armed Forces to defeat the Armed Forces of Ukraine is not carried out today, which is the second main strategic mistake. Conclusion: as long as the former leadership of the Ministry of Defense and the RF Armed Forces is in charge, and politicians do not perceive the threatening situation in the NMD, further forecasts are very bad for the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and Russia, and victory is not realizable by the forces and means used.
    1. -4
      16 May 2023 19: 41
      Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
      The main strategic mistake was to start the NWO with too small forces and means

      The main strategic mistake was to start the NWO. And Moscow began to understand this. Otherwise, why tell us for a year and a half why it was necessary to start the NWO?
      1. -1
        16 May 2023 21: 54
        Do you remember how the eyes on the forehead of the chief intelligence officer Naryshkin went up on TV when he heard the news on 22.02.22/XNUMX/XNUMX about the NWO?
      2. +2
        16 May 2023 22: 55
        A clash between Ukraine and Russia was inevitable, because this is the US plan to weaken or fragment the Russian Federation as a strong enemy in the emerging US-PRC confrontation, where the Russian Federation became an ally of the PRC. That is why Ukraine was hyped up as an irreconcilable enemy of Russia with dancing in the squares and shouting: "Muscovite to Gilyak."
        1. +1
          16 May 2023 23: 13
          Yes Yes exactly! laughing
          That's just a military solution to the issue should be the last in line. Moscow, on the other hand, started the war without exhausting any economic, political, diplomatic or humanitarian levers. In addition, there was a catastrophic underestimation of the enemy and a society totally unprepared for war. Translated into normal Russian, Moscow behaved like an elephant in a china shop.
          1. +1
            16 May 2023 23: 20
            Moscow started the war having exhausted all political, diplomatic and humanitarian levers.
            I didn't use economic levers. But it is not too late now. But it is not done.
            1. -1
              17 May 2023 00: 14
              Are you what?
              Were NGOs funded by Moscow founded in Ukraine? Washington created such NGOs in batches.
              Moscow canceled visa-free travel for Ukrainians? Yes, Moscow created hothouse conditions for them, looking at which the Belarusian allies nervously smoked on the sidelines.
              Moscow stopped financing and actually sponsoring the Ukrainian economy?
              Moscow participated in the formation of civil society in Ukraine, like the same Americans?
              Has Moscow lowered the level of diplomatic relations to at least the level of an ordinary, and not an Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary?
              There were still many levers left before the use of force.
              1. +2
                17 May 2023 08: 47
                There were no more levers. No need to reduce everything to Ukraine. The question was about guarantees of Russia's security. Ukraine was given a chance to preserve the Donbass while implementing the Minsk agreements.
                What you write just refutes your words. Moscow gave Ukraine all possible goodies. So all possibilities have been exhausted.
                NGOs. Moscow does not sponsor NGOs anywhere. Not in any country. Russia's principled position is to work with the legitimate government and not support the opposition.
                Moscow gave visa-free Ukraine.
                Moscow continued to finance Ukraine even after 2014. And now it still continues to finance Ukraine. Does gas still flow through the GTS?
                Civil society is the same NGOs. Already explained them.
                Downgrading diplomatic relations means hostile relations. Moscow did not agree to this.

                What other levers were left? Or do you think that by applying all of the above, Ukraine would have turned its face to Russia?
                There were no more options. You don't seem to suffer from naivety.
                1. +1
                  19 May 2023 19: 57
                  Quote: Bakht
                  Moscow gave Ukraine all possible goodies

                  Nobody canceled the method of stick and carrot. You said that all possible goodies were given to Kyiv. But they were not balanced by the whip. That is why a non-state has grown up on our borders, guided in its policy by the method of irrational rationality.
        2. +1
          17 May 2023 09: 52
          Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
          A clash between Ukraine and Russia was inevitable, because this is the US plan to weaken or fragment the Russian Federation

          Yes, yes, before the NMD, Ukraine formed a powerful shock fist from the supply of Western equipment - the numbers are simply amazing - zero tanks, zero aircraft, zero self-propelled guns ... and a few Javelins.

          Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
          in the emerging US-PRC confrontation, where the Russian Federation became an ally of the PRC

          And it became not an ally of the PRC, but a semi-colony.
          This is exactly what the United States wanted, yeah ....

          NWO was started by ours, "having no real alternative", repeatedly popularly elected, President and Commander-in-Chief, may Allah keep his gray hair.
          1. +3
            17 May 2023 18: 06
            Prior to the NMD, Ukraine formed a powerful shock fist to capture and clean up the Donbass. What was in the arsenal was enough. Therefore, there were no deliveries of heavy equipment from the West.

            So no need to make a surprised face. Before the start of the NMD, the Armed Forces of Ukraine surpassed most of the armies of Western European countries in terms of combat power.

            I'm not talking about the fact that quite a "peaceful Ukraine" has been shelling the Donbass for 8 years. There are thousands killed over the years. CBO is not what was needed. She was very late.
            1. +1
              17 May 2023 18: 53
              Quote: Bakht
              Prior to the NMD, Ukraine formed a powerful shock fist to capture and clean up the Donbass. What was in the arsenal was enough. Therefore, there were no deliveries of heavy equipment from the West.

              So the LDNR was officially considered Ukraine until February 20.02.2022, XNUMX, respectively, the alleged "cleansing of Donbass" would be an internal affair of Ukraine.

              Ok, on February 21.02.2022, XNUMX, we recognized the independence of the LDNR and immediately our allies.
              Would Ukraine dare to attack the allies of the Russian Federation, with clearly made statements that we will protect them as our own?
              99% no than yes.
              Well, I would have decided - then everything is clear, the adversary attacked an ally, we are fulfilling allied obligations.
              1. -1
                18 May 2023 20: 02
                Do you know exactly the international precedents when other countries are attacked? Especially to protect their citizens. Take an interest in modern history. You will find many examples of invasions with lesser threats. For example, the US invasion of Grenada in 1983 was carried out under the pretext of protecting American students and tourists.

                Or read UN documents on "humanitarian intervention". Kofi Annan was a big fan of this concept. And a lot of documents were adopted on this subject.

                Ukraine would have attacked the Donbas under all conditions, regardless of Moscow's statements or actions. But this we can simply assert each his own. So your 99% do not impress me in any way.
                Moscow has urged Kyiv many times to stop killing ITS citizens. Did it really help?

                And I also ask you to take an interest in the economic side of the beginning of the Second World War. Why did Hitler start the war in 1939 and not in 1942 as previously planned?
                Ukraine is a bankrupt state. And without a war will not last even a couple of months. Therefore, in 2022, Kyiv no longer had an alternative. Or war or bankruptcy.

                Thus, the Ukrainian-Russian war was a complex conflict, which was based on many economic, political and social factors. However Economic factors played a significant role in aggravating the conflict. Trade policy, the energy sector and the historical context of relations between Ukraine and Russia created the perfect storm that eventually led to war.

                Understanding the economic causes of war is critical to developing effective strategies to prevent similar conflicts in the future.
    2. 0
      17 May 2023 12: 44
      Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
      Now, when we are completely bogged down in the war with Ukraine, we need a broad mobilization and the forces gathered by the mobilization of more than a million people to quickly defeat the Armed Forces of Ukraine, otherwise protracted actions lead to more and more armament of the Armed Forces of Ukraine with the latest weapons

      The main "inconvenience" of the speedy capture of Ukraine is the "ideologically indoctrinated" population. All of them have already seen themselves as full members of the EU, favored by the US itself. It was the United States that baited (through the media) that Russia would take Ukraine in three days. For this, Ukrainian oligarchic "sirens" were connected that they would "surrender the country" in the shortest possible time.
      That is why, our Armed Forces (with the alleged police functions of "green men") in parade columns, without reconnaissance and security, got stuck in Bandera ambushes. It is worth thanking God and the persons in the leadership that they did not involve the entire army.
      In general, the scam was built by the West, like "Afghanistan-2" for Russia, where Ukraine, in the role of the six-instigator, provokes our country to war.
      That is why the initial preparation of ukrov has a sabotage focus. That is why Ukraine was bombarded with a host of MANPADS, ATGMs. The main emphasis is a bloody war, from around the corner. "The war with the UPA, throughout Ukraine and Russia."
      The "slowed down war" makes it possible to digest significant masses of militants from around the corner. Drawing in more and more modern weapons makes it possible to work out methods of struggle (on a smaller scale), direct war with NATO.
      And the last thing - the offensive of the RF Armed Forces in the north ... isn't that what all the provocations are there for? The West needs to pull as many forces as possible to the north, then it will be faster and easier to go "ukronashup" in the south.
      Not so simple. Let's try to trust those who organize military operations against the "mercenaries of the West."
    3. +1
      17 May 2023 15: 04
      The main strategic mistake was to launch the NMD with too small forces and means, which further led to the rest of the strategic mistakes. For such a beginning of the SVO, the main perpetrators should not only be removed from their posts, but should also be judged.

      I am also a supporter of this point of view. And it looks like a lot of people are on the same side. The adventurous story of the beginning of the SVO is similar to a circus scene where Yuri Nikulin and his partner film the carrying of the Big Log on camera.
      As for the capture of Chernigov, Sumy and Kharkov, taking into account the current (according to my couch understanding) forces, it will not be possible to cover all this. However, a strike from Belgorod and further along the left bank under the cover of the Seversky Donets, including the Pechenegsky reservoir, further to Kupyansk would allow cutting off part of the troops of the Armed Forces of Ukraine without significantly increasing the front line. This would force the Armed Forces to organize a new line of defense. This would also reduce the threat of shelling of a significant part of the Belgorod region. To do this, it would not be necessary yet to break into the forehead in Artemovsk, and Wagner's troops should be used in this direction, supplementing them with paratroopers and mobilized. It certainly would not be a strategic victory if successful, but in the media it would be important. In addition, part of the troops of the Armed Forces of Ukraine would be surrounded and cease to exist.
  2. 0
    16 May 2023 18: 34
    Forget about Chernihiv. At least for the near future.
    The priority target is Sumy. And without Wagner and Akhmat. This is a task for the Russian Armed Forces. Not for PMCs or NM Donbass. Specifically for the personnel units of the Russian Army.
  3. +7
    16 May 2023 19: 18
    What to plan? If there is no goal. A war without a goal is called NWO. We are waiting for the roasted rooster to peck.
  4. +4
    16 May 2023 19: 58
    The United States hates the whole world, but they do not dare to enter into open confrontation with them, "the guts are thin." Many countries have already offered Putin their assistance in manpower. And if Putin had an education and a desire to finish the SVO, they would have finished long ago. Russia is so strong compared to Ukraine that it is not necessary to graduate from academies to defeat it within a year. That's for sure! Therefore, no matter who, whatever is offered, Putin will follow the most miserable scenario. Well, as you wished. There was already an arrival in the Kremlin, but he is still looking for his "gateway".
  5. +1
    16 May 2023 19: 59
    Mobilization will be June-September - these are my fantasies wink
  6. +1
    16 May 2023 21: 15
    Kyiv has landed in a very unpleasant fork, they expect success from it, and the situation for the Armed Forces of Ukraine is deteriorating daily and quite significantly. In fact, the spring-summer campaign has already begun. 14 weeks, that's the period after which the results will be summed up.

    If just a couple of weeks ago the offensive seemed to be something threatening and dangerous, now the word offensive demoralizes the Armed Forces of Ukraine themselves. When the Kiev regime itself demonstrates fear and uncertainty, this is transmitted to the brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

    The pressure on Kyiv to launch an offensive is gaining momentum, as is the Kyiv regime's fear of this offensive. "We need some more time." What will Kyiv say in 2 weeks?
    1. The comment was deleted.
  7. The comment was deleted.
    1. +2
      16 May 2023 21: 59
      detractor, to what extent should the Russians be weaker and dumber so that Zelensky's nerds can deal with them? laughing
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. +5
    16 May 2023 21: 49
    This cry of the soul may have been written and true, but it's all about the war, and we, as Peskov said, are conducting a Strange VO. What oddities are due to, no one knows about it except those who know. That is why we gnaw out hundreds of meters with our teeth, and rent out areas. It would be nice to take regions, but it's hard to believe. In the meantime, the initiative is lost and we are waiting for where it will fly in the jaw or in the liver.
  10. +2
    17 May 2023 01: 33
    What the hell???? What nafig offensive in the North???
    Here, you don’t need to graduate from military academies to understand that it’s impossible to advance in the forests with stuffed mines. Armored vehicles will be knocked out of the green at once. Hiding and leaving the forests is easy. In fact, unpunished partisanship will be along the roads, and burning columns. Last time, in order to suppress pockets of resistance, it was necessary to quickly bomb out Chernigov, Sumy and small settlements. Then it was possible to take control of the territory, but it was necessary to bring in 100 thousand Russian guards to maintain order, filter the population and evict the "pro-Ukrainian Bandera element" outside Ukraine ... In which direction - one could think. Either return them to the Euroliberals, or build the roads of Siberia, based on whether they are a fascist banderlog, or just a guide dill.
  11. 0
    17 May 2023 08: 37
    It is important for Ukraine to gain a foothold in the Donbass. For some, Bakhmut is not of strategic importance. But not for Ukrainians. They are not going to leave Donbass. And the whole future will unfold in this direction.
  12. +1
    17 May 2023 09: 46
    The tragic events of the past few days have clearly shown that the complete withdrawal of the RF Armed Forces from North-Eastern Ukraine was a huge strategic mistake.

    Putin, as you know, is not mistaken. Just not everyone knows his HPP.

    If we recall Naryshnik's "attachment" clause, it will be more clear.
    You can join only by killing all those who resist.
    Demilitarization and denazification will then be automatic. NWO will last a long time, until the disappearance of all those who resist. The problem with elections, democracy, and the dissatisfied is automatically solved. (What kind of democracy in the fighting).
    The oligarchs receive multi-year contracts from the state budget for the construction of "lunar landscapes" in new territories + they pocket the property of the "left" + they are given carte blanche for optimization. (reducing criminal prosecution for fraud)
    Officials - new positions and new property.

    So it is possible that there is no error. Everything is in the logic of imperialism.
    And Tajiks will still be brought in due to population reduction.
  13. -1
    17 May 2023 14: 29
    While the author was writing this article - a manual, the RF Armed Forces acted in their own way - in a few days of missile strikes, Western military assistance, which had been accumulating for several months, was minus. Now, as Ze said, a little more time is needed for the offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Looks like it won't be here until the fall.
  14. 0
    17 May 2023 21: 18
    Putin is now playing for time before the US elections in the hope of a Trump victory, since Biden does not want to negotiate with Putin. If Biden still wins, then Putin will have to decide whether to go to the end, what he does not want and cannot do, or agree to Biden's conditions.