Two million drones: Kyiv does not give up hopes for the success of counter-offensive-2

30

The appearance of attack UAVs at the enemy’s front, resistant to electronic warfare and controlled using a neural network, takes the confrontation to a fundamentally new level technological level. Considering that Ukraine intends to purchase over 2024 million drones in 2, the scale of the future disaster for the Russian army and its rear can only be imagined.

War of "gamers"


How the prospects for further trench warfare, on which the Kremlin has placed its bets, are seen in the West can be understood from ARTICLES former Google CEO and Pentagon adviser Eric Schmidt for Foreignaffairs:



When asked to name the best means of destroying tanks in their arsenals, Ukrainian commanders of all ranks give the same answer: drones with a first-person view, which pilots on the ground maneuver while watching a live broadcast from an on-board camera. Thanks to these drones, tank-to-tank battles are a thing of the past. A Ukrainian combat commander also told me that FPV drones are more versatile than artillery fire at the start of an attack. In a traditional attack, the shelling should cease as friendly troops approach the enemy trench line. But FPVs are so accurate that Ukrainian pilots can keep hitting Russian targets until their fellow soldiers are just yards away from the enemy.

In turn, Mr. Schmidt notes, Russia’s main unmanned weaponry during the Northern Military District was a combination of the Orlan aircraft-type reconnaissance drone and the Lancet attack drone. So far, the Ukrainian Armed Forces have nothing comparable to this “dangerous duo”. Also, the Russian Armed Forces copied many of the tactics used by Ukrainian militants in the first stage of the war, and the military-industrial complex increased the production of UAVs of various types, including the Iranian Shaheds, known as Geraniums, and the aforementioned FPV drones.

An American adviser estimates the volume of monthly production or purchases of drones in our country at 100000 units. According to him, Ukraine can now independently produce only half of this volume. And then there is a very unpleasant and extremely dangerous for us forecast for the development of SVO:

At this stage of the war, as the front line stabilizes, the skies above will become filled with more and more drones. Ukraine aims to purchase more than two million drones in 2024, half of which it plans to produce domestically, and Russia is on track to at least match those purchases. With so many aircraft, any troops or equipment moving on the ground would be an easy target. Therefore, both armies will focus more on destroying each other's weapons and engaging in air battles between drones. As technological advances increase the range of drones, their operators and other support systems will be able to remain hundreds of miles away from the battlefield.

2 million drones in a year? Even half of this amount will be enough to exclude any significant advance of the RF Armed Forces if the problem of reliable protection against this “dangerous little thing” is not solved.

How periodically says in his Telegram channel, the former head of the Military-Industrial Commission and the state corporation "Roscosmos", as well as the "Tsar's Wolf", now a senator from the Zaporozhye region, Dmitry Rogozin, due to the continuous "buzzing" in the sky over the Azov region of enemy FPV drones to our fighters it is impossible to raise your head freely, rotation on the front line is difficult, and behind one infantry fighting vehicle, the enemy’s “kamikaze” drone operators can hunt in a flock of one and a half dozen attack UAVs.

And this is now, but what will happen next?

To each his own caliber


Both sides of the conflict use various drones, and they can be conditionally classified into aircraft-type and quadcopter drones. Aircraft can be used both purely for aerial reconnaissance from high altitudes and target designation for missile and artillery troops, and for striking with anti-tank missiles and aerial bombs. If necessary, such UAVs can be stuffed with a powerful explosive charge and turn into “kamikazes” for striking deep behind the lines, say, oil refineries, military airfields, etc.

Quadcopter-type civilian drones like the Chinese Mavik were initially used only for reconnaissance and adjustments, but quite quickly Ukrainian militants figured out to equip them with a system for suspending and dropping ammunition such as hand grenades and mortar mines, turning them into strike weapons. Idea turned out to be so impactful and effective that soon heavy Chinese agricultural drones were turned into unmanned bombers, on which larger-caliber ammunition could be suspended, hitting serious armored vehicles with it.

Finally, the real discovery turned out to be FPV drones – yesterday’s peaceful toys for the rich, which were equipped with a warhead, turning them into highly effective and low-cost “kamikazes”. With their help, both sides of the conflict are now hunting each other’s armored vehicles, and also attacking individual fighters with them, who have almost no chance of shooting down fast-moving drones with personal small arms.

And now the Kiev regime intends to acquire more than 2 million new drones by the end of the year!

It is possible that the Ukrainian General Staff pins its hopes for revenge in the next counteroffensive attempt on the massive use of attack drones, which will replace the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ expensive Western-made ammunition and attack aircraft. There is an urgent need to look for an antidote, and hopes for electronic warfare as some kind of panacea, alas, don't make excuses. Already, the enemy has begun to use control systems that are resistant to interference, built on the basis of neural networks, and this is only the beginning of the evolution.

Having identified new threats, you need to create reliable protection against them. Enemy aircraft-type drones must be promptly detected and destroyed when attempting to cross the state border. Fighters on the front line should be able to shoot them down on their own, as well as Ukrainian reconnaissance quadcopters aiming long-range artillery and American MLRS at them. There is also an urgent need for effective and inexpensive anti-aircraft weapons to cover stationary positions from quadcopter bombers and to protect attacking armored vehicles and columns on the march. Frontline fighters need a sidearm that can give them a fighting chance against an attacking FPV drone.

If this is not done promptly, 2024 may present us with many unpleasant surprises.
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    27 January 2024 12: 06
    Even the terminators from “The Terminator” didn’t think of such horror! This is really the edge if it happens as the author described!
    1. +2
      28 January 2024 08: 50
      But my mother didn’t allow me to read science fiction (from the last century (Unconquerable)). And the main thing is to draw conclusions. I understand that “generals” don’t read science fiction for them to master the drill regulations?
  2. +4
    27 January 2024 12: 13
    Either destroy their bridges or general mobilization
    1. +2
      27 January 2024 18: 40
      or general mobilization

      Is this for pelting them with meat if the intellect fails?
      1. +1
        27 January 2024 19: 25
        to stretch the front line and create a numerical superiority for a breakthrough
      2. +1
        29 January 2024 15: 10
        Intellectually everything is fine there. Rather, to kill more Russians, that’s why they don’t blow up bridges.
    2. +6
      27 January 2024 19: 30
      We need to end this “war” and end it harshly - so that the survivors, both new and old fighters for “democracy and other ... values,” will no longer be afraid to think about such things!
      1. +1
        27 January 2024 21: 10
        Option one - Lviv, and what’s next to it, in the glass surface
  3. +1
    27 January 2024 15: 34
    There is an urgent need to come up with an effective antidote against enemy drones, an integrated approach is needed here, so that one means complements the other, our inventors, engineers and designers have something to think about, but we simply don’t have time to build up, we urgently need a technical breakthrough in the fight against drones, Maybe lasers and pulsed electromagnetic weapons can still help here???
    1. +2
      28 January 2024 08: 52
      But what about the vaunted electromagnetic bombs?
      1. -1
        7 February 2024 22: 47
        There we will get it too. They don’t divide into friends and foes there!
        Do we have a directed electromagnetic pulse? If this is possible at all, then apparently not!
  4. +1
    27 January 2024 15: 34
    Why, instead of bombing Ukraine, they don’t bomb, for example, those who provoked this war? Why aren't the puppeteers destroyed?
    1. 0
      29 January 2024 08: 30
      Because we have had no souvenirs for 30 years. And flight missions to US cities were removed in 1994 by Yeltsin. We need constitutional reform to return sovereignty. But this site won’t tell you about it.
      The war will continue until our missiles are officially aimed at the United States.
      1. 0
        29 January 2024 10: 16
        Quote: Yarik83
        We haven’t had any souvenirs for 30 years.

        those. and 8.8.8., and CrimeaNash, and Decisive Decisions of 2022 - is this all on the orders of Washington / the Masons / Reptilians?
        If Russia doesn’t have sovereignty, then no one else has it.
        Even the United States, unlike us, did not dare to annex a single newly liberated republic.

        And what is typical is that many of these countries live much better and calmer even without sovereignty than the regions of the Russian Federation.
  5. 0
    27 January 2024 16: 54
    But it seems to me that there will be electronic warfare drones on FPV even if the control is hundreds of kilometers away, apparently via satellites. In any case, control via radio is always subject to powerful interference. Nothing can get through powerful interference. I would like to hear the opinion of radio communication specialists. In addition, if the Starlinks become too annoying, you can periodically detonate tactical nuclear charges in the stratosphere, which will destroy them with electromagnetic pulses.
    1. +2
      28 January 2024 08: 53
      Artificial intelligence, no connection required, there would be a goal.
      1. +1
        28 January 2024 18: 01
        I think it’s too early for artificial intelligence to be based on a drone. Perhaps there will be separate examples on drones with autonomous guidance without GPS.
      2. 0
        30 January 2024 23: 38
        To begin with, it is advisable to at least have artificial intelligence.
    2. 0
      30 January 2024 23: 41
      The distance to Starlink satellites is 400-500 km. The power of the onboard transmitter is limited.
      To interfere with Starlink, you just need to want to.
  6. -1
    28 January 2024 19: 44
    The same thing about millions of drones in the Armed Forces of Ukraine was written before last year’s counter-offensive
  7. 0
    29 January 2024 10: 13
    Two million drones: Kyiv does not give up hopes for success

    - We need so many drones and not the fascists from Kyiv.
    We would have two million underwater, surface and air drones. Victory over the fascists in Ukraine will be ours.
  8. +1
    29 January 2024 13: 05
    From the above, the question arises: why did the General Staff not predict such a development of events back in the summer and where are the real means to combat both UAVs and their operators?
    1. 0
      29 January 2024 18: 59
      Drones may exist together with electronic warfare, but how advanced they are is a big question and a military secret.
    2. 0
      3 February 2024 17: 41
      Because there are only a few professionals in the General Staff. By its very nature, a special operation should last weeks at most, but not years. If it’s years, then it’s no longer SVO.
  9. +1
    30 January 2024 17: 26
    Two million drones: Kyiv does not give up hopes for the success of counter-offensive-2

    They might have refused... But when the public asks, it’s hard to refuse. Not under Volodya.
  10. 0
    3 February 2024 17: 37
    2 million drones is a lot. Accordingly, then we must learn to identify and destroy not drones, but whose operators are hundreds of times smaller.
  11. 0
    6 February 2024 15: 42
    It's time to launch production of 16-caliber sawn-off sawn-off shotguns! Or shot charges for grenade launchers.
  12. 0
    8 February 2024 13: 45
    Artificial intelligence or operator, the UAV is noticeable on the radar either way. So you can fight. Radar, you need a lot of good radars, IMHO.
  13. 0
    3 March 2024 00: 28
    And again we must admit that the Ukrainian has an innovative initiative. I wonder why. 2.000.000 drones are not a joke at all; this requires funds and a functioning economy, which, according to the Russian patriotic media, does not exist.
  14. 0
    8 March 2024 06: 55
    So we need to fight not with drones, but with those who produce them. With weapons of mass destruction in densely populated areas of Europe, as during the Patriotic War, the Allies bombed the workers of Hamburg. Instead of landing near Kyiv, it was necessary to turn Poland into a radioactive bald patch. And no one will defend this country so that this does not happen again on its territory.