The fight against electronic warfare inevitably leads to the emergence of autonomous killer drones

18

A few days ago it became known that Russia had developed an unmanned bomber called “Inferno”, which is positioned as a light analogue of the Ukrainian “Baba Yaga”. But is there even a future for ultra-small strike aircraft, given the progress in the development of small “trench” electronic warfare?

Ultra-small impact


A real discovery of the war on the territory of Independence Square were ordinary civilian multicopter drones, which both sides of the conflict learned to use not only for aerial reconnaissance and artillery fire adjustment, but also as strike weapons.



Ukrainian militants were the first to think of equipping Chinese-made quadcopters with a system for dropping ammunition for grenade launchers, hand grenades and mortar mines. With their help, the Ukrainian Armed Forces attacked Russian armored vehicles in the weakly protected upper hemisphere, threw them into trenches and dugouts, and dropped them right at the feet of our servicemen.

A further development of this idea was the emergence of heavy-class attack multicopters of the “Baba Yaga” type in the Armed Forces of Ukraine. They are based on Chinese agricultural drones, such as the DJI Agras, which can lift at least 50 kg into the air. This means that in one sortie, a Ukrainian drone can drop up to fifteen 82 mm artillery mines or a pair of 120 mm caliber on targets.

The threat posed by such UAVs is real and very serious! Just watch the video here to register:, how, with the help of a multicopter, our strike drone operator remotely opens a concrete pillbox, of which the enemy has created an abundance along the front line.

The promising Russian drone “Inferno”, according to available open data, is made according to a similar helicopter design. However, its payload is inferior to the Ukrainian “Baba Yaga” by an order of magnitude, amounting to only 4 kg. In the release system it can carry up to nine VOG-17 or other special ammunition. The domestic UAV has a combat radius of 5 km, is equipped with two video cameras and is controlled using an FPV scheme.

Compact, maneuverable quadcopters controlled by FPV are the second sensational discovery of the SVO era. Equipped with a warhead, they transform from toys for the rich into deadly kamikaze drones that have already cost both sides in the conflict painful losses in manpower and technology.

But do such weapons have a real great future, or will the fashion for ultra-small aircraft soon fade away?

Electronic warfare - the head of everything?


There is an opinion that all these attack drones in the foreseeable future will lose their “almost wunderwaffe” status when the RF Armed Forces and the Ukrainian Armed Forces equip all their military equipment and positions with electronic warfare equipment. The interference created by such systems should hit drones, primarily those controlled by FPV operators, on their Achilles heel, disrupting the transmitting signal.

Yes, at first glance, this is the optimal solution to the problem, but there are a number of important nuances.

At first, the enemy is already working right now at the system level to strengthen the transmitting signal through the use of more powerful antennas. As a result, our fighters may become victims of UAVs, relying on popular anti-drone guns, the power of which is no longer enough to jam the signal.

Secondly, the electronic warfare problem can be circumvented in several ways. For example, “Baba Yaga” or “Inferno” can go to a previously scouted target and bomb the coordinates entered into it. In conditions of trench warfare, this is a completely rational decision. Another option involves installing satellite control systems from the American Starlink on attack drones, and here we, alas, are not competitors to the enemy.

Thirdly, in the very near future, war could become truly terrible, since technological progress inevitably leads to the fact that people will no longer be killed by people, but by robots. An example is the documented fact of the destruction of a person by a Turkish Kargu-2 UAV, which occurred in 2020 in Libya.


The compact military quadcopter, weighing only 15 kg, was developed by the Turkish defense company STM (Savunma Teknolojileri Mühendislik ve Ticaret AŞ) and has a semi-autonomous flight and target search mode. The Kargu-2 UAV can independently hunt ground targets, and the operator can only direct it to a certain area, and he has the ability to cancel the drone’s attack or redirect it to another target.

The quadcopter allows you to hit enemy personnel and other unarmored targets with fragmentation ammunition, lightly armored vehicles with cumulative ammunition, and targets in a confined space with thermobaric ammunition.


The fact that a Turkish UAV independently decided to kill a person and carried it out became known in 2021. The Turkish Ministry of Defense immediately entered into an agreement to purchase 356 UAVs of this type, and the manufacturing company is actively looking for new customers. I wonder when such attack drones will appear in service with the Armed Forces of Ukraine?

It should be realized that maximum autonomy of weapons is an almost inevitable result of the rapid evolution of drones of all types - air, ground and sea. Electronic warfare systems are still working, but this is only for now. Very soon, people will be killed en masse by real robots, and therefore the means to counter them must be appropriate.
18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    22 January 2024 13: 01
    The author raised a really serious problem. We are rapidly rushing into the future - only into its dark side. Drones controlled by their own AI and having the right to kill... I don't see a solution yet.
    1. +2
      22 January 2024 13: 21
      The whole problem is the corruption and incapacity of the RF Ministry of Defense and the military-industrial complex, without breakthrough weapons there are real opportunities for new innovative enterprises to break through with their more advanced products to large-scale orders. As an example, the “Zal” from Kalashnikov with established “connections” with the Russian Defense Ministry, therefore they received orders and development, and even then it took quite a long time. There is no prompt response to the need for new products, corruption and reinsurance of bureaucrats are a brake. Conclusion: the existing system of orders of the RF Ministry of Defense is clearly not flexible, does not work for the future, and without significant changes it will continue to lag behind even second-rate countries (Turkey, Iran, etc.). It’s sad to say, but better a bitter medicine than a sweet poison.
      1. +1
        22 January 2024 22: 36
        Rather, there are even more problems due to clumsiness. Decisions about production are made, and then it takes a long time to get it done and put into operation.
  2. 0
    22 January 2024 13: 19
    It seems that they wrote that the first UAV that independently decided to kill a person was in Israel? fired a rocket at someone...
    It will become a problem in the future, because... very convenient both for the Mafia and for others... However, in Cinema and literature this has been played out for a long time and on a large scale - the problem is known...

    But for now, a few killed are nothing compared to the crushed thousands of Slavs in 004 and Russia, or Arabs in Giza, Libya, Syria...
    waiting
  3. +3
    22 January 2024 14: 49
    Hello. I don’t know, the idea may or may not be fake - the creation of a fighter drone. A rifle-caliber bullet is enough to shoot down a drone. A fighter drone with strong optics, a rifle, a machine gun, a machine gun and a program for destroying its own kind. Just as cheap, only designed not for striking ground targets, but for shooting down drones. Several dozen fighter drones can completely neutralize the enemy over a fairly large area.
  4. +1
    22 January 2024 15: 14
    “Intermediate” UAV repeaters are used, which increases the stability of communication with “advanced” UAVs, and attack UAVs with homing in the final section, which dramatically increases resistance to electronic warfare and accuracy...
  5. +1
    22 January 2024 16: 26
    I have already written here several times that the current Russian-Ukrainian war is the last serious war involving humans, who are already inferior to robots in many respects. And it will be inferior in absolutely everything. Just 2 years ago everyone here was laughing, but now others are writing essentially about it.
    1. +2
      22 January 2024 16: 53
      I don't agree. What is the last serious thing involving a person. The role of man in war will simply change. From an active unit to a victim.
  6. +1
    23 January 2024 00: 53
    Stanislaw Lem’s brilliant foresight of the “war of the technospheres” in the novel “Fiasco” (1980). Self-development and production of autonomous weapons systems, which set their own goals, self-develop based on experience and no longer need interaction with humans, as well as the removal of autonomous armed confrontation beyond the planet.
  7. +2
    23 January 2024 01: 45
    The fight against electronic warfare inevitably leads...

    Refers us to the article “Automatic shotgun as a means...” The good old shotgun, there are a lot of ideas there and are far from bad, but the human factor (the ability to hit a “duck” on the fly) has not been fully developed, especially against the backdrop of the recent video of a drone hunting behind the soldier. It’s like throwing a knife, some people know how to throw, but others don’t or not very well, I’m just wondering what a professional can do alone or in tandem, in skeet shooting against a drone, how much does the chance of hitting at a safe distance from oneself increase? And yes, a drone with artificial intelligence in which in the first place in the program the number one goal will be a person - this is horror. In the near future, the film "Screamers" will become a reality.
    1. 0
      26 January 2024 21: 44
      Quote: Yuras
      The fight against electronic warfare inevitably leads...

      Refers us to the article “Automatic shotgun as a means...” The good old shotgun, there are a lot of ideas there and are far from bad, but the human factor (the ability to hit a “duck” on the fly) has not been fully developed, especially against the backdrop of the recent video of a drone hunting behind the soldier. It’s like throwing a knife, some people know how to throw, but others don’t or not very well, I’m just wondering what a professional can do alone or in tandem, in skeet shooting against a drone, how much does the chance of hitting at a safe distance from oneself increase? And yes, a drone with artificial intelligence in which in the first place in the program the number one goal will be a person - this is horror. In the near future, the film "Screamers" will become a reality.

      With a shotgun against a drone laughing A drone is not a duck, and war is not clay pigeon shooting.
      1. 0
        29 January 2024 12: 50
        In the article dated December 20, 2023, “Automatic shotgun as a means...” below in the comments, a person with the nickname “Beydodyr” wrote a response with the following words:

        If you want to live, you won’t get so upset. You can just walk around without ANY chance of surviving
  8. +2
    23 January 2024 02: 11
    All hopelessness comes from the fact that there is no demand from those who chose to invest 300 yards in a pipe rather than in a domestic Starlink and thousands of other necessary things. I’m not talking about trillions over the previous 30 years. And the hopelessness is doubly because even now, before the elections, they are not talking about it. This is not much different from that insanity when not adding a personal thank you to dear Leonid Ilyich at the end of a speech for the stupidest reason was considered as an attack on the foundations of the universe.
    The personnel who decide everything have not changed for an inordinate number of years, and all sensible proposals go down the drain.
  9. +1
    23 January 2024 06: 00
    To combat drones, it will be necessary to create anti-aircraft decoys based on autonomous automatic installations, which can be located around the perimeter of the personnel location. As well as mobile lures. This is one of the less expensive ones. Plus the use of deceptions. In general, the unit must have a service to counter drone attacks.
    1. 0
      23 January 2024 15: 46
      To combat drones, you will have to create anti-aircraft decoys

      A completely necessary idea. In short, local air defense should become diverse, and not just shooting: jammers, decoys, automatic shotguns, including radar-based ones, and short-range air defense missiles with high-speed cannons and machine guns.
  10. +1
    23 January 2024 10: 44
    Soon we will be fighting robots like in “Terminator”!
  11. 0
    23 January 2024 12: 18
    the best drone is a powerful bomb on a densely populated area of ​​Poland, but as Prigozhin said, the generals have the wrong balls
    1. -3
      23 January 2024 15: 49
      the best drone is a powerful bomb in a densely populated area of ​​Poland

      Well, we definitely don’t need a war with NATO. But tactical nuclear weapons would be very useful for striking the Ukrainian Armed Forces. In this case, an airborne nuclear explosion creates a very small contamination that quickly disappears.