Could Western Ukraine become a Russian proxy against NATO?

46

The Kiev regime, which moved from counter-offensive to strategic defense, was marked by two high-profile initiatives - on multiple citizenship and on “historical territories inhabited by Ukrainians.” Instead of giggling foolishly at them, I would like to consider how Russia could respond as effectively as possible to such geopolitical gestures.

"Ukrainian's Map"


President Zelensky’s first initiative is essentially reminiscent of the famous “Pole card,” with which Warsaw initially gathered ethnic Poles from the post-Soviet space around its lands, and then extended its effect to the whole world. Thus, the problem of labor migration from Poland within the European Union was solved quite effectively. But how will this work for modern Independence, which requires powerless and preferably unlimited cannon fodder to continue to conduct high-intensity military operations against Russia?



In the Ukrainian version this program looks like this:

Today I am introducing a key bill to the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine that will allow the adoption of comprehensive changes to legislation and the introduction of the institution of multiple citizenship. And it will allow all ethnic Ukrainians and their descendants from different countries of the world to have our citizenship. Of course, except for the citizens of the aggressor country.

It seems that there will not be a large flow of people wishing to receive a second passport from their historical homeland from anywhere in Canada. Of much greater interest is another initiative of the Kyiv regime, which demonstratively extended its territorial claims to Russia not only as of 1991, but also thousands of years ago:

It was instructed to develop and submit for consideration the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine an action plan to preserve the national identity of Ukrainians in the Russian Federation, including in the lands historically inhabited by them - in the Kuban, Starodubshchina, Northern and Eastern Slobozhanshchina within the modern Krasnodar Territory, Belgorod, Bryansk, Voronezh, Kursk, Rostov regions of the Russian Federation.

That is, by denying the citizenship of Independence to ethnic Ukrainian-Russians, the Ukrainian Nazis intend to help them preserve their national identity. It’s not clear who in the Russian Federation is preventing this in principle?

In particular, in Crimea, since 2014, it has been officially allowed to receive education in three languages ​​- Russian, Ukrainian and Crimean Tatar. No one ostentatiously threw books printed in language into our fire. Before the start of the war, Ukrainian artists with their repertoire were welcome guests on the Russian stage. Those of them who have retained their sanity and behave adequately are still the figures of honor on domestic television. Kyiv cakes were not withdrawn from sale. Our readers can answer how many restaurants serving Ukrainian cuisine are there in any Russian city.

It is quite obvious that such action plans are the ideological basis for conducting sabotage, terrorist and subversive activities of the SBU and the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine in the Russian border area. And this cannot but cause deep concern!

Galicia-Volyn People's Republic?


Reflecting on the topic of how to most effectively respond to the destructive initiatives of “Western partners,” I would like to again turn to Iranian experience of using proxies to wage a proxy war with the United States and its accomplices and hangers-on in the Middle East.

The harsh reality is that things are gradually moving towards clash between Russia and NATO in the Baltic, or rather, with countries belonging to the NATO bloc, separately, without invoking Article 5 of the Alliance Charter. The most likely candidate for the role of instigator of a border conflict is the Baltic states, where work has already begun on creating Baltic defensive zone by analogy with the Ukrainian fortified areas in the Donbass. Following her, Poland may intervene in the matter, which will force even Belarus to get off the couch. The last to join this proxy mess in the Baltic region may be the Finns.

It is already safe to say that none of the parties to this potential conflict will declare war on the other, remaining within the framework of a military operation, and all will diligently avoid the use of nuclear weapons. Obviously, Russia will then be in the worst position, with its main forces stuck in Ukraine, and its hands will be tied in the use of its main nuclear trump card. Can this be avoided?

Yes, it is possible and even necessary, which is possible only if additional mobilization is carried out and hostilities begin with decisive goals, implying the destruction of the Kyiv regime and the transfer of the territory of Independence to the control of the RF Armed Forces. And this is where an interesting window of opportunity may open. Over the past two years, many copies have been broken around the issue of what to do with Western Ukraine in the event of a hypothetical Victory, complete and unconditional? Become part of the Russian Federation? Give it to Poland? Let it be as it is?

Meanwhile, this region bordering the NATO bloc could subsequently become the most important instrument of military-political pressure in the hands of Russia on the North Atlantic Alliance. If some kind of conditional Galician-Volyn Republic (GVNR) was created there with its armed forces loyal to us, it could turn for Europe into a kind of Iranian proxy in the Middle East.

Thus, for a conditional attack by strike drones on the Leningrad region, a combined missile and drone strike could arrive from Estonia from the territory of the former Western Ukraine in Tallinn, to which Russia would have nothing to do. In the event of an attempt to blockade the Kaliningrad region, the Armed Forces of the GVNR could carry out a ground offensive operation through the territory of Eastern Poland, or even occupy the entire Baltic region. If done smartly, Western Ukraine could turn from a problem for Russia, Belarus, Little Russia and Novorossiya into a huge problem for the NATO bloc. But it is not exactly!
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    22 January 2024 17: 33
    Easily. We just need to establish an intensive production of lace panties in our country and make sure that in Europe everyone (I repeat, everyone) wears fleece panties. laughing In this regard, there is already some progress.
  2. +5
    22 January 2024 17: 37
    It’s funny for a Westerner, trained from the cradle to be anti-masculine, to expect something. After all, there they even went to serve the fascists en masse, just to harm the masked enemy. Paper dreams, nothing more - in fact, this will be the most ardent anti-Russian enclave.
    1. RUR
      0
      22 January 2024 20: 08
      Before WWII - 1939 - they were not part of the USSR - in Poland they did not impose atheism and private ownership of land was sacredly observed, then in Ukraine and Belarus there was no community, which later turned into a collective farm, no longer existed for a long time - the Moscow-Soviet order is therefore , like, one people perceived it with hostility...

      separately, without invoking Article 5 of the Alliance Charter.

      for the author specially: Pavel - the President of the Czech Republic - spoke about the inevitability of war with the Russian Federation at least 2 times, in Germany - the Ministry of Defense - they foresee it in 12-15 months, in Sweden the Ministry of Defense and the Chief of the General Staff - Byden - are warning the people about the upcoming war with Russian Federation... Norway - similarly, the Slovaks, of course, also foresee it, therefore, it seems that they are distancing themselves from the West, neutrality can probably be expected... Poland is strengthening cooperation with Ukraine, Macron is making tough statements, there is no doubt that Britain will not remain aside...
      Here, at a minimum, we need to talk about a very likely collision with the northeastern flank of NATO, and, one way or another, with the rest of the members...
      1. +4
        22 January 2024 20: 35
        (R.U.R.) Somewhat wrong. The Poles pressed the Ukrainians, tried to Polonize them, while the Western Ukrainians fought back militantly. (terrorism by S. Bandera and accomplices against the Polish authorities). The Ukrainians got back in WWII (with the approval of the fascists, Polish-Ukrainian enmity played into their hands) by massacring civilian Poles (Volyn massacre, etc.). The Poles also took revenge. Only under the Soviet regime everything was covered up and seemed to be forgotten. But recently the Polish minister recalled the Volyn massacre, where tens of thousands of civilians were killed. The squabble between Poland and Ukraine is still waiting in the wings. The main thing is that such “Westerners” were previously created by Austro-Hungarian strategists over decades in the territories of Western Ukraine under their control, so that there would not be a single strong Ukraine. Only the Soviet government was able to unite them. After the collapse of the USSR, nationalist bacchanalia began according to the Anglo-Saxon scenario, and as the pinnacle of the anti-Slavic strategy, the Russian-Ukrainian war. Now we are like a “white African colony”, who are being hunted down and destroyed, so that we can then mercilessly exploit them.
        1. RUR
          0
          22 January 2024 20: 53
          Do not forget that the Volyn massacre happened during a brutal war, until 1939 everything more or less creaked, but there were obvious and massive crimes against the nation. there was no soil in pre-war Poland, I heard that the Germans seemed to incite the Ukrainians, but how true this is - I don’t know, Russification took place both in the Empire and in the USSR - many historians think so, for example, Vernadsky - his works in Russian are on the Internet - for free ... In general, the west of Ukraine has been different since ancient times - the Prague culture is the archaeological culture of the ancient Slavs (V-VII centuries), widespread in Central and Eastern Europe (from the Elbe to the Danube and the middle Dnieper). And beyond the Dnieper, some other culture existed, perhaps even a non-Slavic one - Baltic, I don’t remember exactly... That is. the difference has been going on since ancient times...
          1. +2
            22 January 2024 21: 25
            Stop fantasizing, look up some historical information. It all starts with the migration of peoples from the 8th century to the 10th century. That further settled life was established. According to history, earlier in the Carpathian region there was Red Rus' (10-14 centuries), (still the city of Yaraslav, (Poland) from the ruling prince.) which the Polish kings mercilessly exterminated. Further, over the past centuries, with various admixtures, the Slavs outgrew the Ukrainian Carpathian branch with a further history in the Austro-Hungarian Empire.... S. Bandera, for terrorism and murder of Polish officials, was sentenced to death, later commuted to life... Griznya with the Poles was irreconcilable, and later resulted in a great massacre. Russification was under the Republic of Ingushetia, under the USSR, on the contrary, de-Russification, because the main ones in the USSR were not Russians with all the flirting with local nationalists. Please, my dear, at least learn the basics of history.
            1. RUR
              -3
              22 January 2024 22: 31
              https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Пражская_археологическая_культура

              Prague culture is the archaeological culture of the ancient Slavs (V-VII centuries), widespread in Central and Eastern Europe (from the Elbe to the Danube and the middle Dnieper).

              https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Корчакская_культура#/media/Файл:East_europe_5-6cc.png

              On the map you can see that there are 2 more eastern archaeological cultures: Kolochin and Penkovskaya, the first is attributed to the Balts, and the second is considered multi-ethnic... -

              Penkovites were narrow-faced and characterized by mesocrania. It is assumed that genetically they are the heirs of the Chernyakhov population with an admixture of Iranian-Sarmatians and subsequently became part of the South Russian, Ukrainian, as well as Serbian and Croatian peoples.

              Some scholars define Penkov culture as non-Slavic or multi-ethnic. M.I. Artamonov considered this culture Bulgarian. I.P. Rusanova attributed the Penkov antiquities to the Chernyakhov population, which, in her opinion, was not Slavic. The Penkovo ​​population included Bulgars, Slavs, Sarmatians and other nationalities, and only over time, at the very late stage of their existence, the Penkovo ​​people became Slavic under the influence of the northern peoples.

              Even further to the east is the territory of the Chuds, Mordovians and other Ugro-Finns

              I don’t know much about Bendery, but the OUN carried out massive terror just under the Soviets, starting after 1939 and until the mid-1950s

              Tuzakov, start with the wiki, at least...
              1. +1
                22 January 2024 22: 58
                You know how to read and think, the Migration of peoples in the 6th-10th centuries came and went, Rome was destroyed, the settlements changed three times, peoples squeezed out and assimilated one another.!!!, And what happened before the 10th century CHANGED more than once, therefore for the future there is no suitable.. The latest formations of peoples have started since the 14th century. You haven’t even mastered the school history curriculum. Wikipedia is for the illiterate, whoever wants to write there and whatever he wants, and is not responsible (they have replaced responsible encyclopedias from academicians).
                1. RUR
                  -5
                  22 January 2024 23: 40
                  Listen, literate, there, on the wiki, links to serious Russian specialists are given, which are confirmed by foreign specialists... Tuzakov, of course, has great scientific works in this field, but still, you need to be more modest
                2. 0
                  23 January 2024 18: 43
                  I support Tuzakov, because I was interested in the history of the Slavs (not Fomenkovism), this is also the picture that has developed. And the wiki is an Internet prostitute, everyone is raped.
                  1. RUR
                    -2
                    23 January 2024 20: 53
                    History is a science, and needs exclusively facts, and not your “I also support”
                    1. +1
                      24 January 2024 10: 18
                      Facts can also be different, they can also be far-fetched, how can you verify events that took place several centuries ago, and all these references to the supposed conclusions of academicians are inappropriate because they do not provide direct and indisputable evidence, and the authority of some of them is also very doubtful, since they are mixed with a political component.
                      1. RUR
                        0
                        24 January 2024 16: 55
                        This was confirmed in the EMPIRE, for example, Klyuchevsky about the Slavization of the Chuds, Mordovians, Tatars, Dal, etc., and in the USSR - I cited the names of doctors of science below, in the Russian emigrant environment - Trubetskoy in her work On the Turanian Element in Russian Culture, and foreign researchers - Polish - Duhinski (still 19th century), Koneczny, Czech, Swedish - Lundqvist, etc., Finnish... - this is a LONG-recognized fact in serious science... it’s just that European education came to Russia late, for example, LOGIC IS A BOURGEOIS Pseudo-SCIENCE... banned in the USSR - how can we think without it? - it is clear that it does not work out, in general, before 1917, and even decades after, most of the population was illiterate, - THEREFORE significant difficulties arise with understanding in an unfamiliar area among the ordinary Turanian population
                    2. 0
                      24 January 2024 19: 20
                      Something is wrong with your logic. Facts serve to form a picture, and they can also be very different - confirmed, contradictory, etc... the fact that you pulled different statements is nothing at all.
                      1. RUR
                        0
                        24 January 2024 21: 23
                        well, it’s not for me - but for you, since you are a rather bad team, it’s better to say that it’s a community, against doctors of sciences arrogantly and self-confidently, while being far from the topic, and from archeology, shouting various general stupid phrases:
                        “the conclusions of academics are inappropriate”, “the picture does not add up”, etc., etc. I have a different explanation - the picture is emerging - the community in Russia disintegrated only in the 20th (!!!) century, and the community is only the first formation after the primitive system, i.e. it is directly adjacent to the primitive communal system - they have not gone far...
            2. RUR
              0
              22 January 2024 22: 38
              https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Червенские_города

              The “Cherven cities” were first mentioned in 981 [4], when the Prince of Novgorod and Kiev Vladimir I Svyatoslavich, as a result of his campaign against Poland, annexed them to Kievan Rus.

              “Volodimer went to the Poles and conquered their cities: Przemysl, Cherven and others
              cities that exist to this day under Russia.”

              — “The Tale of Bygone Years”

              Those. Red Rus' is not Rus' at all, it never was... and this territory is neither Ukrainian nor Rus' - in accordance with the Russian Tale of Bygone Years
              1. +1
                22 January 2024 23: 19
                Red Rus' with the princes (Yaroslav and others, destinies), take an interest, then speak, because I am having a conversation with an amateur (with Wikipedia). Polish-Ukrainian relations from the 15th century to 1950 are not known to you, so what are we talking about? Learn (x3)...
                1. RUR
                  -2
                  23 January 2024 17: 51
                  The wiki contains links to the works of A. T. Smilenko, V. D. Baran, V. K. Mikheev, O. M. Prikhodnyuk, O. V. Suhobokov, etc. - all doctors of relevant sciences, you will find their biographies on the Internet, .. .and Tuzakov and Voo, of course, will be from AkdEmikov... give us links to your works
              2. 0
                23 January 2024 04: 46
                Tell me, what do they say in Wicca about the Ostrogoths, Huns, Pechenegs, and Cumans? And finally... Tatars? And there were also Hungarians, Romanians, and Lithuanians rubbing shoulders there. And this is in addition to the Slavs. There were also Scythians, Sarmatians, Greeks, and Jews, to name a few. There is an opinion that they got the current coat of arms of Ukraine from the Khazars. I almost forgot about the Romanians. And after all, they all lived, one way or another, in the vastness of Ukraine.
                1. 0
                  23 January 2024 17: 41
                  The topics are too broad to answer in a comment. If interested, look for academic publications and monographs. In various historical novels, there is complete fiction with some hints of facts. This is a read for passing the time only. According to the trident, it came from the personal seals of the Kyiv princes Yaroslav and Vladimir. Initially, on old seals (11-13 centuries) there were two, then three letters, with a stylized V-Vladimir on the left. In the center with an elongated A.-. On the right I am Yaroslav. Somewhat later, the Gediminovichs had a sign on their seals, also a trident, like Ш with a central double closed pillar. Further, the stylized trident may have been imitated by local princes and nobles, for Lithuania was becoming the dominant principality in the Ukrainian lands. This version looks closer to the foundations of the origin of the trident. The modern Ukrainian nation has nothing in common with the trident, because the foundations of origin and formation are completely different - a hodgepodge from all of south-eastern Slavic Europe with an admixture of Turks and others. They can be called heirs of Kievan Rus only by place of residence, but not by genetic inheritance.. (Exaggerated: like the Turks in Constantinople, heirs of Byzantium).
                  1. RUR
                    0
                    23 January 2024 20: 57
                    The conversation wasn’t about the trident - you jump to other topics, of course, on purpose, since you can’t say anything on the topic
                2. RUR
                  0
                  23 January 2024 17: 57
                  We were actually talking about western Ukraine, if you haven’t noticed, which, of course, is not difficult given such and such greatness...look, however, at the map where Romania and the Greeks are. Khazars, etc., and where is the west of Ukraine, Poland, etc.
                3. RUR
                  0
                  23 January 2024 18: 11
                  The article was published in the journal “Questions of History”. 2002. No. 11.
                  Part of the article was reproduced in the Turkish magazine “DA - diyalog avrasya”. Istanbul, 2003. No. 8. P. 34-40.

                  It is well known that European ambassadors and travelers who came to Russia in the 1680th-XNUMXth centuries considered “Muscovy” a country of the East. “Comparisons with Turkish sultans have even become a commonplace for foreign writers when characterizing the Moscow sovereign,” noted V. O. Klyuchevsky. Comparisons with Turkey and Persia were made in passing, casually, as something completely natural. “Manners are so close to the Turkish ones...” wrote Jerome Turberville, and Sigismund Herberstein and de la Neuville noted that Russian clothing is very similar to the clothing of the Tatars and Turks. “...And to this day they have few European features, and Asian ones predominate,” noted Jacob Reitenfels in XNUMX. The Tuscan ambassador wrote about the oriental pomp of celebrations, about Asian methods of government and “the whole system of life,” so different from the European one.

                  A hundred years before Reitenfels, Queen Elizabeth's ambassador, Giles Fletcher, visited Russia. The learned diplomat carefully studied Russian customs and left a description of the country, executed in the best traditions of enlightened England. Fletcher described in detail the organization of the Moscow army, the administrative and financial system - so that his work was considered “encyclopedic” in the West. The English scientist did not make detailed comparisons - but on every page of his work the same vision of the East was invisibly present. In the end, it materialized in the form of a conclusion - decisive and final, like a judge’s verdict:

                  “Their mode of government is very similar to the Turkish,” wrote Fletcher, “which they apparently are trying to imitate, according to the position of their country and to the extent of their abilities in political affairs...”

                  ***

                  How did Russian historians react to this verdict? Very simply: they ignored him. The Ottoman Sultan was a great enemy of Orthodox Russia, and admitting any connections with the Ottomans was tantamount to admitting a crime. Moreover, Fletcher did not present any evidence - he did not make a detailed comparison of the military or administrative systems, he considered the similarities obvious. Several centuries later, all this was covered with the haze of time and became by no means obvious - there is an opportunity to not notice what you don’t want to see.

                  Why were they compared with Turkey? Because Muscovy is from the Tatar Horde

                  I am fulfilling your order about the Tatars, but Tuzakov, of course, would have done a better job, judging by the Turkic-Tatar surname (from Tuzak)...
                  1. 0
                    23 January 2024 19: 11
                    Nothing new, the conquerors left their traces. The Horde ruled the fragmented Russian principalities for almost 250 years, enough for cultural influence throughout. .(India was also ruled by the Genghisids for a long time). Ottoman Turkey of the 14th-16th centuries, the most developed empire throughout, which was feared by all of Europe. (Almost half of Ukraine was under it). Everything has its roots and explanations.. (In particular, the surname has roots in the Voronezh region, where the Turks (Tatars) only raided.) Your efforts to justify yourself are unnecessary, it’s better to take up education.
                    1. RUR
                      0
                      23 January 2024 21: 53
                      from the same article:

                      http://book.uraic.ru/elib/Authors/NEFEDOV/Science/Russia/Osman.htm

                      The similarities between Russian landowners and Turkish timariots were pointed out by Krizhanich and Reitenfels back in the 10th century[11]; Later, such famous historians as R. G. Vipper and G. V. Vernadsky drew attention to this similarity [XNUMX]. Indeed, detailed similarities in the organization of the manorial and timar systems leave no doubt that the Russian estate is a copy of the Turkish timar. Thus, the manor system, which was the basis of the Russian state, was adopted from the Ottoman Empire. When, why and under what circumstances did this happen? And weren’t other social principles and institutions adopted at the same time? Perhaps Fletcher had more than just the manorial system in mind?

                      The answer to these questions lies outside the traditional course of Russian history; the researcher needs to turn to the history of the Ottoman Empire. In order to understand the history of Russia, you need to understand the history of the great civilizations of the East.

                      The answer to these questions lies outside the traditional course of Russian history., but you’re not doing very well with the traditional course, to put it mildly

                      This last post of yours above is also your scientific works? They didn't give any links... hence your 'legitimate' feeling of superiority over doctors of science?

                      Nothing new, Ottoman Türkiye 14-16 centuries .. Almost half of Ukraine was under it),

                      - Ukraine was part of the Principality of Lithuania and then the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, and not part of the Turkish Empire. It doesn't seem like anything is new to you. Local system, i.e. state ownership of land and estates is an Asian method of production; in the Mongol Empire and the Horde, which included the Principality of Moscow, absolutely everything belonged to the Khan, including the land and lives of his subjects, while the Polish, Belarusian and Ukrainian gentry were the owners of their estates and lives ... and disputes were decided by the noble court, and not by the Khan/Tsar and for a long time, in the European manner, by the Emperor...

                      PS. This will help Marzhetsky too...
                      1. 0
                        24 January 2024 23: 16
                        (R.U.R.) You are not only an amateur, but also a fool without understanding the basics of historiography. The following are excerpts from biased individual judgments. Conclusion from all your graphomania on this topic. Don't blame me for telling the truth.
              3. 0
                23 January 2024 18: 50
                Yes, the territory is not Ukrainian, even without taking into account that in those centuries there was no Ukraine... and which Rus' to attribute to is already the deceit of historians.
    2. +3
      22 January 2024 23: 00
      Western Ukraine, if captured, could simply be the Western occupation zone of Russian troops without any statehood. And it could be managed by the occupation administration. Speaking of trust in these Westerners. In the USSR he served in operational-tactical missile forces. There was not a single Westerner in the unit.
  3. +2
    22 January 2024 18: 08
    I used to read the author’s articles with interest and respect. I read this article and was simply amazed. How can the same person deeply cover serious issues and write downright stupidity?
    1. +1
      23 January 2024 12: 08
      I agree. Maintain a proxy state so that it does not work, but fights for you and is not bought out. This is how much money you need. Fantasy is unscientific.
  4. 0
    22 January 2024 18: 23
    No.. these are baseless fantasies.
    Firstly, there were already proxies - LDNR. AND? Nothing but poverty of the population.
    The Strelkovs and Co. quickly left back to Moscow, and the locals got carried away and were quickly replaced by Edr. All that remains is the PR of the provocateurs: they say the LDPR will instantly throw the Ukrainian Armed Forces into the Black Sea...
    Secondly, everyone has long understood that there are no proxies. They’ll just twist their finger at your temple.
    Thirdly, the Nazis had proxies in the Second World War (some kind of republic) and the Amers had all sorts of puppet, rapidly disappearing governments in Asia... Bad experience. Should I stand in line behind them?
  5. -5
    22 January 2024 18: 25
    In western Ukraine, Soviet enlightenment ended earlier than in ours. To take western Ukraine, Brusilov had 1,2 million people. And it stalled in Lvov for several weeks. In my opinion, nothing has changed since then. It happens that some thought comes to mind, and it seems that you have already found a way out. And when you talk,,,
  6. 0
    22 January 2024 18: 42
    Well, when the West demands the money back, these will run to Russia
  7. +2
    22 January 2024 21: 28
    Eka had enough - to make proxies out of Bandera’s supporters. Most likely it will be dushmans. But this troubled region can be exchanged. For example, the Suwalki corridor. If they want to go to Europe, let them go, but for the benefit of us. Let the Poles have a headache. The corridor will cut off the Baltic states from NATO. I think smart people there will want to exchange the backyard of the EU for a showcase (USSR) of Russia
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. DO
    +2
    23 January 2024 02: 33
    Could Western Ukraine become a Russian proxy against NATO?

    Western Ukraine will be able to fight against the NATO bloc only in one case - after the complete victory of Russia in the Northern Military District, the unconditional surrender of the Kyiv regime, and the accession of Western Ukraine to Russia and the Russian legal field.
    And until the above mentioned happens, the answer to the title’s question is obvious to the whole world - Western Ukraine is and will be at war against Russia. Because in the videos from Ukraine one can see the forceful methods of the Ukrainian Reich in mobilizing, among other things, the population of Western Ukraine into the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
  10. 0
    23 January 2024 03: 44
    Mr. Marzhetsky, are you serious? Galicia-Volyn People’s Republic? And who are you going to make a proxy there, I’m embarrassed to ask? Even if the Russian Federation gets there, which is very unlikely even in the current conditions, then approximately 80-90% of the population He will definitely leave from there, and those who remain will gnaw telegraph poles with their teeth out of hatred for the Russians, so that they block the path for the equipment of the RF Armed Forces.
    Even in the south-east of Ukraine, which was once pro-Russian, the level of “calm attitude towards the Russian Federation” is now at the level of statistical error. And then what kind of Western Ukraine can we talk about?
  11. 0
    23 January 2024 06: 47
    the war in Ukraine can be ended in a couple of days by distributing Kalash to the Russians, but the authorities are afraid of the Russians more than nuclear weapons
  12. +2
    23 January 2024 09: 29
    We will not be able to digest all of Ukraine, except perhaps the Odessa and Nikolaev regions. The rest of Ukraine, including the Galicians, needs to be conquered and turned against NATO. I agree with the author - the experience of the USSR in re-educating Ukrainians will be useful.
    1. -1
      24 January 2024 00: 17
      Where is the USSR and where is the Russian Federation?! The Russian Federation in the existing economic paradigm is not able to digest small parts of the Donetsk and Kherson regions. How can it cope with the Odessa and Nikolaev regions then?
      1. 0
        24 January 2024 10: 29
        But there is no need to rush to conclusions, the only question is time, and no one has given up on the final goals of the Northern Military District, and will never give up, this is now our most important task, the question is about the survival of the country, and here you are sweeping some kind of inappropriate blizzard .
  13. +1
    23 January 2024 11: 21
    Yes, it is possible and even necessary, which is possible only if additional mobilization is carried out and hostilities begin with decisive goals, implying the destruction of the Kyiv regime and the transfer of the territory of Independence to the control of the RF Armed Forces.

    - oh-oh-oh-oh when will this happen again... How many times have the “exact” dates been called? It is necessary to make a territory controlled by a proxy, but for this it is necessary to reach the Polish border, taking control of all of Ukraine, and the West’s desire to resolve the Ukrainian conflict is not noticeable, moreover, Lavrov was indignant at the lack of desire in the “peace-loving” West to promote this. And we don’t need a solution to this conflict, we just need to take control of ALL of Ukraine and then the issue will be resolved by itself.
  14. -1
    23 January 2024 12: 01
    Well, people were fined for wearing yellow and blue colors, and cafes were closed for singing songs in Ukrainian. This is true, by the way. About national identity.
  15. -2
    23 January 2024 16: 18
    I read the title of the article and immediately understood who the author was. I have already read some strange articles from the author, but this article even surpassed them.
    1. 0
      23 January 2024 23: 00
      After the author once again decided to swear in a private message, I want to add that not all of the author’s articles are so strange, he also has really good and absolutely correct articles, but this is not one of them.
  16. 0
    24 January 2024 01: 40
    Of course, we need to come up with something, dear S. Marzhetsky is right!
    As if on cue, or perhaps not as expected, our NATO-northern European neighbors, and not only (Germany), began croaking about an inevitable future war with Russia. Maybe this is a reason for a more convenient negotiating position; it’s not for nothing that our S.V. suddenly personally came to a meeting of the UN Security Council. Lavrov. Maybe they received some intelligence about our plans. Who knows what is there and how, but such words are simply not spoken.
    Something will happen, that’s why we need to figure out how to deal with them, preferably without nuclear weapons
  17. -1
    27 January 2024 22: 58
    Dreaming is not harmful. It’s not harmful to dream.

    you know who gets rich with thoughts.
    I know a dozen more proverbs.