Kadyrov unexpectedly supported the withdrawal of troops across the Dnieper

November 10, 2022 16

The head of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov, unexpectedly supported the withdrawal of Russian troops from Kherson, which is great value not only in military terms, on the left bank of the Dnieper River. He announced this on November 9 in his Telegram channel, explaining his point of view.

I fully agree with Mr. Prigozhin's opinion on Surovikin's decision (commander of Russian troops in the Northern Military District - ed.). Yevgeny Viktorovich very accurately noted that Surovikin saved a thousand soldiers who were actually surrounded. After weighing all the pros and cons, General Surovikin made a difficult but right choice between senseless sacrifices for the sake of loud statements and saving the priceless lives of soldiers

He wrote.

Kadyrov noted that the Kherson direction is a very difficult sector of the front, highly dependent on logistics. So Surovikin did the right thing. At the same time, the head of Chechnya asked not to talk about the “surrender” of Kherson, since they were “surrendering” along with the fighters, and Surovikin saved them, transferring them to more convenient and safe defensive lines.

The functionary even referred to the information he received from the Chechen fighters who fought near Kherson. They are sure that it would be possible to keep the bridgehead on the Right Bank, but at the cost of heavy losses. According to him, Surovikin was not afraid of criticism and took responsibility. He thanked the commander for this, assuring him, summing up that "we will not stop beating the enemy and we will not get tired."

Recall that the founder of Wagner PMC, Yevgeny Prigozhin, called the decision taken by Surovikin responsible. Note that on October 1, the Russian Ministry of Defense announced the withdrawal of Russian troops from Krasny Liman in the Donbass. After that, Kadyrov hard commented on the incident, laying the blame on the commander Alexander Lapin, who also motivated his decision by taking care of the personnel.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Mobius

0

10 November 2022 12: 27

Kadyrov unexpectedly supported the withdrawal of troops across the Dnieper

In this case, I treat his statement as an opinion private person , on which actually (in this particular case) nothing depends.
Everything was decided without him, in "high headquarters and offices."
1. isofat
  
  -4
  
  10 November 2022 13: 23
  
  ... and Kadyrov confirmed the correctness of the decision, I respect it.
2. Kofesan
  
  -1
  
  11 November 2022 08: 39
  
  Kadyrov unexpectedly supported the withdrawal of troops across the Dnieper
  
  No. Not certainly in that way.
  Kadyrov went against himself. It is obvious! And he is not alone. But why?
  It is very likely that because he and others (like Dugin yesterday, for example) put an end to tsarism. And on the king. Everything! There is no king. All over.
  
  And now some psheks are sitting at the helm in the Kremlin. And it is not necessary to argue with them (they are temporary). There is nothing to waste energy on dialogues with corpses (political ones). And it is so clear that the autocrat overthrew himself. ...
  
  It's already past. And you need to think about what will happen instead of Putin. Dugin now proposes a commissariat and an ideology. Elected or partially appointed - this is a question. But the fact that the autocracy turned out to be untenable is a fact.
  
  So, if Kadyrov and anyone else is not hysterical... it just means that mentally they have buried KhPP. Written off the accounts. And in these conditions of "timelessness" it is impossible to rock the boat once again. That's why I "supported"
Sapsan136

+8

10 November 2022 12: 34

A dubious decision, because the storming of Kherson will be as bloody as the storming of Mariupol, and only very narrow-minded people can hope that after the US elections everything will resolve itself, any traitors who have no place in power, because the Russian Federation is one of them harm and troubles ..... While I see signs of another rotten agreements, such as the new Khasavyurt, and apart from troubles, they will not give Russia anything ...
1. isofat
  
  -5
  
  10 November 2022 13: 38
  
  Alexander, a plan for a lightning war, in a different way a blitzkrieg, this is not our plan. We simply prevent the spread of armed conflict.
  This is a good plan, especially since winter is coming and other events.
prior

0

10 November 2022 13: 05

Kadyrov to contradict the Kremlin is the same as going with an ax to a steam locomotive.
zuuukoo

0

10 November 2022 14: 00

Well, in this particular situation, there were no special alternatives.
Fighting without supplies is a rather dubious idea.
But the sequence of events and decisions that led to the current situation is much more interesting.
And, it seems to me, these events began long before the start of the NWO.
The comment was deleted.
In passing

+5

10 November 2022 14: 31

It used to be called goodwill gestures, then regrouping. Then they held a referendum and now it's a retreat. At the same time, ukrlogistics worked as it does, the weapons are regularly delivered, and Donetsk has been shelled and continues to be shelled.
Nelton

-1

10 November 2022 15: 12

I looked at the climate of Kherson.
average temperatures in January do not even reach -2 degrees.
And what, with such temperatures, the Dnieper gets up in the ice so that they cannot be taken by an icebreaker?
those. we can provide year-round navigation along the northern sea route, but not through the Dnieper?

And what were they thinking about when the referendum was held?

Here is what Vicki writes about Kherson port:

Due to the slightly frosty and almost snowless winters of the Northern Black Sea region, navigation in the port takes place all year round.

https://ru.wikipedia.org
Bakht

-2

10 November 2022 16: 49

Suppose that in 1942, Stalin would have ordered the abandonment of Stalingrad due to the impossibility of supply and to save the lives of soldiers of the 62nd Army.
Or leave Leningrad in 1941. How many lives would it save?

I'm afraid not at all.
1. Albert Shi
  
  0
  
  11 November 2022 07: 22
  
  What does Stalingrad have to do with it. There was behind Moscow and Russia (USSR). Here it's the other way around.
2. Fourth
  
  -2
  
  11 November 2022 12: 39
  
  You still remember Kutuzov and Moscow, you are not very smart.
The comment was deleted.
alexey alexeyev_2

-2

10 November 2022 22: 47

The eggs were pressed and confirmed the correctness of the solution.
Dmitry Paly

0

12 November 2022 00: 45

How not to remember Stalin! If instead of Putin (the first time he wrote it with a small letter) there was STALIN, then we would have killed all the bridges and railway nodes in the Zhytomyr and Vinnitsa regions long ago! Either with the help of strategic aviation, or with the help of Iskanders with tactical nuclear weapons. , well, it's obvious: well, cut off all the sources of supply to Khokhls - and we'll win right away!
Not, ! They play according to the RULES written for us by the "world (fuck) community".
That is OK...
Soon it will reach everyone who stupidly merges us ...
Full tin...
Watching

0

12 November 2022 01: 20

Kadyrov is a real man, a real fighter and a real patriot. I trust him more than the Kremlin gang of semi-liberals. Minister of Defense Kadyrov!
lord-palladore-11045

-1

15 November 2022 10: 22

Ramzan, decide on yourself, otherwise it’s somehow not solid. What will you do towards General Lapin? What is planned for the Russian city of Kherson? What are the plans for the capture of Nikolaev and Odessa? How are you going to solve the problem with Transnistria? When will we reach the Polish border? When will we exchange the Suwalki corridor for Galicia from Poland? There are many questions - no answers, time passes and trust falls.