The second economy in the world: what China learned from the Soviet Union


In a new iteration of the Cold War, the United States has designated China as its No. 1 adversary, not Russia. The reason is simple - the American elites are more afraid not of Russian missiles, but of the colossal financial and industrial power of the Celestial Empire, which in just a few decades has become a real competitor to the "hegemon". What can we learn from the Chinese comrades?


When talking about the "Chinese economic miracle", as a rule, they list the following factors: cheap labor, a capacious domestic market of China with great growth potential, huge investments of Western capital and a free attitude to someone else's intellectual property. All this is true, but it is not the whole truth. According to this logic, at the click of a finger, India or Vietnam should become a new “world factory”, but for some reason it just doesn’t work out that way, which we will discuss in detail told earlier.

The truth is that Beijing has done work on the mistakes of the USSR, and now the CCP is leading the country to build socialism in its own, Chinese way.

NEP in Chinese


This topic we concerned, discussing how applicable the Chinese experience is when trying to build a new superpower based on the Union State. Appeal to the PRC as a good example caused a clear misunderstanding among some readers. How so? What kind of socialism can there be in a country where the market system operates? economy, there is private ownership of the means of production and more dollar billionaires than in the capitalist Russian Federation?

Indeed, all this is rather strange. Socialism and capitalism are two essentially opposite socio-economic formations, the fundamental difference between which lies in their attitude towards the means of production. Under socialism, they are in state, more precisely, in public ownership, under capitalism - in private. The means of production is a set of means of labor and objects of labor used in the production of material goods (plants, factories, steamships, etc.). Note that under socialism personal property is allowed - property used for personal purposes without the purpose of generating income. Therefore, the liberal propaganda myth that the Bolsheviks supposedly wanted to take everything away from people and socialize it is false.

Strange, at first glance, the contradiction between the leading role of the Communist Party of China, its declared goal of building socialism with Chinese characteristics, and the de facto capitalist mode of production can be explained quite simply. The fact is that China is now in a transitional period, the NEP, which Deng Xiaoping spied on in the USSR. And this NEP seems to be coming to an end.

In the Soviet Union, the new economic policy operated from 1921 to 1924 (formally - until 1931, when private trade was banned in the USSR), which was caused by the need to overcome the Devastation. A banking and monetary reform was carried out, the ruble became a freely convertible currency. In the villages devastated by the Civil War, the surplus appropriation was replaced by a food tax, radically reducing fees. The free market was returned, and foreign capital began to flow in the form of concessions. Joint-stock companies were created to invest in industry. Previously nationalized enterprises were leased out to private owners, including their former owners. Small businesses with up to 20 employees remained inviolable in private ownership. Industry was consolidated into trusts and syndicates. Cooperation developed rapidly, and a flow of labor from abroad began to flow into the USSR.

In fact, the restoration of capitalism began, which caused disappointment among many ideological Bolsheviks. However, in the conditions of the post-war Devastation, the NEP was an exceptionally necessary measure, since it was necessary to quickly relieve tension in society and strengthen the social base of the RCP (b) in the form of an alliance of workers and peasants. It was necessary to create an economic basis for the further construction of a socialist state, which was done.

The results of the NEP are evaluated in different ways. In just a few years, significant economic growth has been achieved, but liberal-minded researchers complain that it could have been much more if "effective private owners" were allowed to "command heights in the economy." For us, it is interesting that the experience of the Soviet NEP had a huge impact on modern China.

The Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping was very impressed with the works of N.I. Bukharin, who substantiated the possibility of combining planned state regulation and a market economy, and supported the creation of the "Institute of Marxism-Leninism and Mao's Ideas". In fact, now the PRC has its own version of the NEP, aimed at building socialism with Chinese characteristics and a "prosperous society." This is precisely what explains the apparent contradiction between the capitalist "base" and the socialist "superstructure" in the form of the leading role of the Communist Party and state ideology. At the same time, the new economic policy will obviously undergo a serious transformation.

Colleagues from RIA News at the end of 2021 year drew attention to how all the leading Chinese state-controlled media reprinted an article by a certain Li Guangman, editor-in-chief of a small newspaper, where he published the following theses:

If we still have to rely on big capitalists as the main force in the struggle against imperialism and hegemonism, or if we still cooperate with the American "mass entertainment" industry, our youth will lose their strong and courageous energy, and we will suffer the same collapse. like the Soviet Union, even before we come under real attack.

It was about the fact that in China they began to tighten the screws, taking by the bridle who knows what about themselves oligarchs like Jack Ma, introducing censorship and new standards in the field of culture and show business, restricting children and teenagers' access to American computer games. The next step is to strengthen state control in the field of education and medicine in order to increase their accessibility to the population. The CCP will intensify the fight against social inequality through "property reform", as Guangman argued:

This is a return from a group of capitals to the masses of people and the transformation of a capital-oriented model into a people-oriented model. Thus, this is a political change, and the people again become the main body of this change, and those who will interfere with the implementation of this change towards the people will be discarded. <...> It is also a return to the original intentions of the CCP, <...> a return to the essence of socialism.

The era of the Chinese NEP is objectively coming to an end. Ahead is either the victory of the ideas of building socialism and subsequently communism, or the restoration of capitalism as a result of the inner-party struggle in the CCP. However, Beijing claims to have learned a bitter Soviet lesson. Why are we so interested in the experience of the Middle Kingdom?

Because this is an evolutionary path that can be acceptable both to our “tops”, who are deathly afraid of nationalization, and to the “bottoms”, who dream of real social justice. This "revolution from above" is the only sane and acceptable alternative to "revolution from below" for building socialism in Russia, more precisely, the future Union State.
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Pat Rick Offline Pat Rick
    Pat Rick 12 August 2022 11: 09
    +1
    The truth is that Beijing has done work on the mistakes of the USSR, and now the CCP is leading the country to build socialism in its own, Chinese way.

    The truth is very doubtful, to put it mildly. One of the basic tenets of socialism (as I was once taught) is the absence of private ownership of the means of production. And there is no "Chinese way", but there is Chinese revisionism.
    1. Pat Rick Offline Pat Rick
      Pat Rick 12 August 2022 11: 33
      -5
      that under socialism personal property is allowed - property used for personal purposes without the purpose of generating income. Therefore, the liberal propaganda myth that the Bolsheviks supposedly wanted to take everything away from people and socialize it is false.

      Absolutely everything the Bolsheviks could not take away purely physically: household items, personal items (shoes, clothes, dishes), it was possible, but not very much. If a lot - speculation with all that it implies.
      In the villages, it was possible to keep vegetable gardens, but only for oneself, if the sale was to generate income; well, and on trifles - a cow, a pig, birds.
      And so everyone who could fled from that country. Three waves of emigration - post-revolutionary, post-war, from the 60s to the mid-80s.

      Further there goes about "Devastation". Professor Preobrazhensky said the best about her, so I won't repeat myself.
      And in conclusion - again about the construction of socialism. It's a pity that a hundred years have passed, but the delusional hallucinations about the welfare society have not gone away.
      1. Michael L. Offline Michael L.
        Michael L. 12 August 2022 12: 00
        +1
        The idea of ​​social justice cannot be killed.
        And "a delusional hallucinations about a society of general welfare" - originated more than a hundred years ago among ... capitalists who saw the shortcomings of this system.
        Yes, and the bourgeois economist D. Ricardo came to the conclusion that the law of the downward trend in the rate of profit determines the boundary of the capitalist mode of production!
        These are hallucinations!
        Apparently Professor Preobrazhensky went too far, turning a dog into a man!
        1. Pat Rick Offline Pat Rick
          Pat Rick 12 August 2022 12: 30
          -1
          And "a delusional hallucinations about a society of general welfare" - originated more than a hundred years ago among ... capitalists who saw the shortcomings of this system.

          Come on, capitalists. Thomas More, Tomaso Campanella, Henri Saint-Simon, Gracchus Babeuf, Charles Fourier and other Marxes.
          "Heart of a Dog" is a fantastic satire. Fantastic, not real.
          1. Michael L. Offline Michael L.
            Michael L. 12 August 2022 13: 41
            +2
            Why this list of intellectuals (Thomas More: Lord Chancellor of England)?
            The not mentioned R. Owen is a capitalist.
            If "Heart of a Dog" is a fantastic satire. Fantastic, not real" - why mention Professor Preobrazhensky?
            If in fact there are no objections, then why was I "corrected"?
            1. Pat Rick Offline Pat Rick
              Pat Rick 12 August 2022 14: 45
              -1
              The utopian philosophers were not capitalists. There were, perhaps, but not all. This time.
              Because the Professor best of all expressed the essence of the concept of "Ruin". This is two.
              I write comments on the text, and you write comments on the comments, so I don’t really understand who corrects whom here. It's three.
              1. Michael L. Offline Michael L.
                Michael L. 12 August 2022 14: 55
                -1
                So much cheap "misunderstanding": to shut my mouth?
                It was enough to limit ourselves: "I write comments to the text, and you write comments to the comments" - these are four!
                And the comment to ... my comment below is a five! ;-(
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. The comment was deleted.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Michael L. Offline Michael L.
      Michael L. 12 August 2022 11: 38
      0
      Good "revisionism" from Deng Xiaoping:

      It doesn’t matter whether the cat is black or white. A good cat is one that catches mice.
      1. Pat Rick Offline Pat Rick
        Pat Rick 12 August 2022 12: 00
        0
        The Chinese leader explained this idea with the following words: “In real life, not everything is a class struggle”. Thus, he proposed to separate the actual ideology and the urgent tasks of modernizing the Chinese economy. In the 1980s this phrase of Deng Xiaoping became the unofficial motto under which pragmatic economic reforms were carried out at that time ...
    3. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
      Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 13 August 2022 02: 48
      +1
      Pat Rick
      And there is no "Chinese way", but there is Chinese revisionism

      Ideas and concepts are part of our consciousness and do not belong to an infinitely varied and changing world. Especially old dogmas from textbooks. The theory of socialism is advanced by Chinese practice. This is not revisionism, but normal development
  2. Michael L. Offline Michael L.
    Michael L. 12 August 2022 11: 34
    +1
    One can agree with the theoretical messages of the respected Author.
    But with his statement that "we are so interested in the experience of the Middle Kingdom" ... half.
    The hibernation of the Russian "tops" shows that they are not interested in the Chinese / Soviet experience!
  3. Pavel Mokshanov_2 (Pavel Mokshanov) 12 August 2022 13: 10
    +1
    The Chinese are good. They are able to quickly use the achievements of advanced technologies, developing on their basis goods of everyday and industrial demand. But it is now. And under the rule of Mao Zedong, they freaked out with the construction of Chinese socialism. Either sparrows were caught and destroyed, then blast-furnace production was set up in every yard, then a cultural revolution was started and a lot of intellectuals were killed, then they fought with us in the Far East. When a stupid person is at the head of the country, he brings a lot of trouble to the country and its citizens who blindly believe him. Deng managed to straighten China's domestic and foreign policy. Therefore, it began to develop and reached today's heights. Russia could use its Dan.
    1. Vova Zhelyabov Offline Vova Zhelyabov
      Vova Zhelyabov (Vova Zhelyabov) 12 August 2022 18: 34
      -2
      Russia would do well to be more careful with China. Today they bare their teeth and pat on the shoulder, tomorrow they will bring a poisoned glass or plunge a sharpening into the heart.
  4. Jacques sekavar Offline Jacques sekavar
    Jacques sekavar (Jacques Sekavar) 12 August 2022 13: 18
    +1
    The Chinese communists thoroughly studied their previous experience of the Mao era, the Lenin NEP, the industrialization of the USSR, the so-called. the Stalinist economy, the revival of the Nemetchyna and Japan defeated in the 2nd World War, the Asian "tigers" - Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, and the decay and subsequent collapse of the USSR proved the correctness of the conclusions drawn and the course of the Communist Party to build Socialism with Chinese characteristics.
    The two opposites are Capitalism and Communism, and Socialism is a Transitional stage, which has signs of two different social systems, and Capitalism and Communism.
    The Chinese experience is not applicable in the Russian Federation due to the absence of a party and the dictatorship of the proletariat, but in the era of V.V. Putin of the Russian Federation, elements of the Lenin NEP are clearly traced, which consist in the regulation of entrepreneurship, the subordination of large oligarchic capital to the interests of the state, state planning (national programs and projects), pricing, lending , taxation, education, health care, culture - in all spheres of public life without exception.
    What is the basis for all this, the foundation - V.V. Putin and the United Russia political party he created.
    Can EP become that iron hoop that pulls the barrel together and prevents it from falling apart into separate planks of which it consists? Whom, what social class represents and whose interests does it express?
    That is why our Western colleagues-partners had such high hopes for sanctions on big Russian capital and its owners, that is why they can’t wait for Vladimir Putin to leave the political arena and adopted the program of “decolonization” of the Russian Federation in advance.
    1. Pat Rick Offline Pat Rick
      Pat Rick 12 August 2022 13: 54
      +1
      Whom, what social class represents and whose interests does it express?

      Represents and expresses the interests of large and senior officials, the so-called "siloviki", the oligarchy in power; a certain number of tribal provincial nobility (Arashukovs), opportunists (Sliska) and outright rogues (Maksakov) adjoined the party.
    2. Vova Zhelyabov Offline Vova Zhelyabov
      Vova Zhelyabov (Vova Zhelyabov) 12 August 2022 18: 36
      -1
      Chinese communists live according to the precepts of medieval satraps and know no pity in the struggle for a place under the sun.
    3. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
      Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 12 August 2022 23: 47
      +1
      Jacques Sekavar (Jacques Sekavar)
      ...in the era of V.V. all spheres of public life without exception.

      Unfortunately, this statement is wrong, both in general and in parts:
      - elements of the NEP are "traced" in the oligarchic capitalism of Russia exactly the same as in any other capitalist country. But only a retreat with the aim of a subsequent offensive (remember Soviet history) is not here at all
      - "the subordination of large oligarchic capital to the interests of the state", in the conditions of corruption and the power of this state over the media and the statistics system, are a fiction
      - "state planning", as well as geopolitical and strategic, is completely absent
      - "lending", alas, is not autonomous, but is subject to the recommendations of the IMF subordinate, in turn, to the Hegemon
      - "education, health care and culture" are subordinated to the West through the "fifth column" in them and degrade according to its program

      Jacques Sekavar (Jacques Sekavar)
      What is the basis, the foundation for all this - V.V. Putin and the United Russia political party he created

      In this, perhaps, we can agree.

      Jacques Sekavar (Jacques Sekavar)
      Can EP become that iron hoop that pulls the barrel together and prevents it from falling apart into separate planks of which it consists? Whom, what social class represents and whose interests does it express?

      These questions are correctly posed in the commentary, but remain unanswered (meaning that the answer is apparently yes)
      If.
      United Russia cannot become this "hoop" in any way, if only because it is not a people's party, but a bureaucratic party and does not even have a connection with the people, not to mention being a part of it. But only the people, by virtue of their nature, have access to every element of the country, to the smallest, and to all its problems. It is he, and only he, who can be an interested tool for their solution.
      But the government is not interested in the people. She is interested in financial flows.
      About the social class that EP represents, the answer lies before everyone's eyes. And who else?
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. Vova Zhelyabov Offline Vova Zhelyabov
    Vova Zhelyabov (Vova Zhelyabov) 12 August 2022 16: 44
    -2
    China never had socialism. Stalin called Mao a radish for his petty-bourgeois insides (they say it is red on top and white on the inside).
    1. Pat Rick Offline Pat Rick
      Pat Rick 12 August 2022 17: 17
      -3
      Stalin called Mao a radish for his petty-bourgeois insides (they say it is red on top and white inside).

      Please provide a link about the radish, Stalin's "expert".
      In my opinion, the shoemaker's son did not know about the existence of radishes at all.
      1. Vova Zhelyabov Offline Vova Zhelyabov
        Vova Zhelyabov (Vova Zhelyabov) 12 August 2022 17: 36
        0
        Type "stalin mao radish" into any search engine.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Jacques sekavar Offline Jacques sekavar
      Jacques sekavar (Jacques Sekavar) 13 August 2022 00: 06
      +1
      K.Marx is a brilliant theorist and founder of scientific communism. In Das Capital, Marx gave an exhaustive analysis of the capitalist mode of production, but did not write a single word about building a socialist society.
      The greatest contribution of V.I. Lenin is that he outlined the fundamental principles of building socialism, the essence of which is the symbiosis of private capitalist property with public socialist property and tested it through the NEP, which showed brilliant results.
      Mao Zedong is a revolutionary and one of the greatest theoreticians of Marxism. In a more difficult situation than in Russia, Mao defeated internal and external enemies, outlined his program for building a new socialist China, carried out land reform, and created industry with the assistance of the USSR. Along with great merits, there were also great mistakes, but in the PRC they do not rewrite history and do not mix Mao with dirt, as in the Russian Federation, the founders and leaders of the USSR.
      Deng Xiaoping corrected earlier distortions and returned to the Leninist principles of building socialism in relation to time and conditions.
      If Russia has broken through the impregnable wall of capitalism and taken one step into the unknown, then China has gone much further and is not going to stop, and its successes are undermining the entire world capitalist system.
  7. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 12 August 2022 17: 13
    +3
    History will judge everything.
    While China, combining socialism and capitalism, is on horseback and rushing forward.
    Ship- and other structure, high-speed roads, development of science, space,
    Even the lag in the engines is shrinking before our eyes. They wrote that the quality of aircraft engines is increasing by 5-7% per year. 5 years ago they bought from us for their fighters, now they don't.
    1. Vova Zhelyabov Offline Vova Zhelyabov
      Vova Zhelyabov (Vova Zhelyabov) 12 August 2022 17: 42
      -2
      Maybe they bought further, but Russia no longer sells. It's not about the engines as such, but about the unique materials and alloys from which they are made. A similar scientific school in China has not yet been properly formed.
  8. The comment was deleted.
    1. Vova Zhelyabov Offline Vova Zhelyabov
      Vova Zhelyabov (Vova Zhelyabov) 12 August 2022 18: 57
      -1
      Rabies is a bad adviser. Russia cannot be contained. Rather get serious, otherwise you will lose.
    2. Vova Zhelyabov Offline Vova Zhelyabov
      Vova Zhelyabov (Vova Zhelyabov) 12 August 2022 19: 37
      -1
      Stepping on the rake of Charles XII and Napoleon.
  9. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
    Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 12 August 2022 19: 06
    0
    the respected author shows an inner instinct, feeling that the wise Chinese have something to learn .... however, Sergei’s reasoning is superficial, and he shows a misunderstanding and factual history, due to his youth ..... firstly, no one forbade private trade in the USSR, the state took over only large-scale industry, transport and key industries, meanwhile the state supported cooperative property in trade and agriculture, where it occupied the vast majority (collective farms and consumer cooperation), while before the start of Khrushchev's abominations, the share of agricultural products from private farmsteads was also significant .. ... The NEP ended not with an imaginary "ban on private trade", but with increased responsibility for theft and planting of plunderers, it was not private industry that went into a cooperative form that went bankrupt, but those "horns and hooves" that, under the leadership of Koreek, sucked the juices from state enterprises ... .. at the same time, the key method of supporting development was to reduce requisitions (surplus appropriation) and replace it completely e permissible requirements of the state up to the permanent write-off of debts to collective farms and industrial enterprises.....what to do in the Russian Federation? the first is to reduce taxes to the Chinese level, that is, by almost a third (and taking into account oil and gas revenues, taxes can be reduced three times), and the second, to stop the embezzlement of budgets, the third to disperse the extortionists of controllers of all stripes ..... only then industry and agriculture will begin boom
    1. Vova Zhelyabov Offline Vova Zhelyabov
      Vova Zhelyabov (Vova Zhelyabov) 12 August 2022 19: 13
      +1
      In the textbooks of the history and geography of the Beijing dragon, the Far East is depicted within the borders of China. Isn't that enough to stumble, slap your forehead and alert???
      1. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
        Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 12 August 2022 19: 26
        +1
        if the government of the Russian Federation continues the IMF line of artificially destroying domestic production, then all the neighbors and non-neighbors of the Russian Federation will rush to share the skin of the killed Russian bear .... but if the country's leadership shows wisdom and stops strangling the people and entrepreneurs with exactions, then no one will dare to encroach on our a sacred land with a developed industry a thriving agriculture and an increasing population
        1. Vova Zhelyabov Offline Vova Zhelyabov
          Vova Zhelyabov (Vova Zhelyabov) 12 August 2022 19: 33
          -1
          Let's say wisdom abounds. More than two million Schengen visas have already been issued to Russians. Russian is still heard on the streets of Rome and Vienna.
          1. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
            Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 12 August 2022 22: 38
            0
            why did you write it? what about schengen visas? there will always be stupid people who can easily be brainwashed by Hollywood and the media .... and convince them of the greatness of the west, (where toilet washers are required), ... but even when they get there, working hard and hard for a penny in general, they still believe to the west ..... there is nothing deeper than human stupidity
            1. Vova Zhelyabov Offline Vova Zhelyabov
              Vova Zhelyabov (Vova Zhelyabov) 13 August 2022 01: 52
              0
              Who is the West for us today? Robber and rapist? Or maybe a friend and teacher? Russians go to visit him with euros and dollars in their pockets, and he yells at them, spits and flogs them in the stable.
    2. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
      Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 12 August 2022 19: 18
      +1
      the amount of taxes in China is simply ridiculous by our standards, therefore industry and agriculture are developing there, .... while China has no oil and gas revenues ..... but it has enough of what is collected by taxes ... our state is choking on the instructions of the IMF domestic industry, and what is going to be stolen by officials ... .
      https://visasam.ru
  10. Vova Zhelyabov Offline Vova Zhelyabov
    Vova Zhelyabov (Vova Zhelyabov) 12 August 2022 19: 59
    -2
    Some lizards and insects are eaten alive in China. And vodka or the elixir of life is prepared from snake venom. In Russia, in the heat of pro-Chinese propaganda, they do not feel and do not understand this.
    1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
      Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 13 August 2022 03: 11
      +1
      You shouldn't hate so much those who have done nothing wrong to you. Unjustified evil harms its owner
      1. Vova Zhelyabov Offline Vova Zhelyabov
        Vova Zhelyabov (Vova Zhelyabov) 13 August 2022 05: 42
        0
        The Russians were surprised to find that China is punctually implementing anti-Russian sanctions...
        1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
          Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 13 August 2022 12: 14
          +1
          And yet he is not a friend to us, but only an economic partner. How can he be friends with a capitalist country, which at any moment can defect to the enemy camp, or be bought by the enemy?
          Now, if we also build socialism, and we have a common future with them - a world socialist system - then the time will come for them to be friends for real.
          That's it, Vova
  11. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
    Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 13 August 2022 00: 08
    -2
    Great article
    1. Vova Zhelyabov Offline Vova Zhelyabov
      Vova Zhelyabov (Vova Zhelyabov) 13 August 2022 05: 46
      0
      The article correctly points out the excessive romanticism and inappropriate idealism of Russia and Russians.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  12. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
    Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 13 August 2022 03: 01
    0
    The place of the USSR in the "matrix" of the world and among the remnants of the socialist system has not yet been occupied by anyone. I think that China's interest in us is connected not so much with the economy, but with the need to fill this place, because. China itself, in its mentality and cultural traditions, cannot and does not want to lay claim to it.
    The mutual benefit of China and Russia from its restoration of the goal of building socialism and restoring the world socialist system is now becoming apparent to both countries. This is the same geopolitical goal-mission that Russia and the whole world so lacked after the collapse of the USSR
  13. Alexander Ponamarev (Alexander Ponamarev) 13 August 2022 16: 45
    0
    I agree with the author
  14. 1_2 Offline 1_2
    1_2 (Ducks are flying) 13 August 2022 18: 00
    +2
    China has drawn conclusions, and first of all, this is a purge of the ranks of the CPC, (Khrushchev canceled the KGB monitoring of members of the middle and highest party nomenclature), constant covert control over those members of the CPC who are worthy of promotion, who in 10-20 years will rule the country and the CPC, so that it didn’t happen again as with Judas Gorby (Jew), Yeltsin (Jew), Andropov (Jew), Primakov (Jew), Chernomyrdin (Jew), Yakovlev, Shevardnadze and other careerist harlapans who lied to everyone (forward to Communism, our cause is just, Glory to Lenin, etc.), if only to occupy the highest posts, and then .. destroy the country and enrich ourselves, we will appropriate it and national wealth. in our case, I would generally ban leading positions for Jews, because it is no secret that it was the Jewish party nomenklatura of the CPSU that did their dirty deed, they were not communists, they were hypocrites Trotskyists whom Stalin did not finish, it was they who destroyed the party from the inside, putting their Judas on everything significant posts, when the supreme power thus ended up with them, they set about dismantling the USSR, inventing "Perestroika". I don’t know if there are Zionists of the Asian race)) but the Chinese of the CCP, of course, admit that traitors can be among pure-blooded Chinese)), you don’t have to go far, just remember the island of Taiwan, inhabited by the Chinese ... enemies of the PRC, who voluntarily serve the US Zionists - enemies of the Chinese people.
    in the economy, the CCP, first of all, took the State Plan and state control over strategically important sectors of the economy from the USSR, and in order to lure and copy technologies from all over the world, the Chinese sharply increased duties (closed their market) and began to create joint ventures (joint ventures), thus they received the necessary documentation, and if they managed to successfully copy complex products, they threw foreign partners and kicked them out of the joint venture and out of the country. as an example, these are Chinese high-speed trains, which were originally German)) they also have joint ventures with automakers from the West of Japan, and with Boeing Airbus. plus the West mistakenly allowed the Chinese to buy Volvo (the United States did not allow Sberbank to buy Opel), with all the developments. and other eminent companies (almost all fashion houses in Italy belong to the Chinese). Now we are seeing a qualitative leap in the development of the Chinese automotive industry, electronics, shipbuilding, consumer goods, etc. The West actually raised a dragon that will devour them)
    Of course, you also need to be afraid of the Russian Federation, if you do not develop your industry and technology, otherwise you will have to give away goods for China (when resources run out), as the Kyrgyz, Tajiks, Africans, Uzbeks do, who are mired in debt to the Chinese
    1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
      Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 13 August 2022 20: 00
      0
      I don't think that in a multinational country like the USSR was and what Russia is like, anti-Semitism adds credibility to the logic. If we want our ship to stay afloat, we must respect all classes and all nationalities of our people. Don't please our enemies
      1. 1_2 Offline 1_2
        1_2 (Ducks are flying) 18 August 2022 00: 11
        0
        you don’t confuse anti-Semitism with anti-Zionism, I have nothing against the Semites of Arabs and ordinary Jews, and I’m not going to close my eyes to the vile and hostile activities of the Zionist Jews in the history of Russia, and I don’t advise others, there is a saying "they take water to the offended", so let the Zionists carry water, and not destroy our country while sitting in the power of Russia. if they so want to be bureaucrats, let me go to the USA or Israel, they will be given the position of a senior scavenger foreman, and believe me, they will not consider this a manifestation of anti-Semitism. but over the words of the high bureaucrats of Israel - "Israel is a country only for Jews", you need to think about it, here is already a pure manifestation of Nazism, that is, local Jews allow themselves what they do not allow others in relation to themselves
    2. zenion Offline zenion
      zenion (zinovy) 17 August 2022 14: 53
      0
      1_2 (Ducks are flying). You have already recorded so much in the Jews that the duck began to stink. When there was a meeting between Brezhnev and the American president, and he told Brezhnev that you do not have a single Jew in the government. Brezhnev replied that we don't have a Jewish Deputy Minister of Light Industry. But the rest, whom you wrote down as Jews, are not Jews. Although under Stalin there were many Jews. And he said the most important things I trust the Jews, and they are all very efficient. He said this before the war, during the war and after the war. None of them spoke out against Stalin, and Khrushchev sent everyone to retire, far away from Moscow. And that's when it all started with Khrushchev's cult of personality. Russians and Ukrainians licked his ass.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  15. zenion Offline zenion
    zenion (zinovy) 17 August 2022 14: 41
    +1
    They forgot a little about the fact that small means of production were not loaded into huge plants and factories, but transferred to small enterprises that I found during my lifetime and these enterprises were called artels. And this was under Stalin and after him until 1956. When Khrushchev decided that brushes and other little things could be made by factories like Uralmash and similar enterprises. In the district of the town, under Stalin, the number in the city was 5 thousand people, half worked in artels and worked a lot as homeworkers. When all this was closed, two hundred people were left without work in artels. Homeworkers held out for a few more years. These were women who had lost their husbands during the war, but they had children. They paid tax to the financial department. This is what socialism was like after the death of IV Stalin. And the USSR was broken until it was broken. Such was the idiocy, and so it remained. The Chinese didn't go for it. Fountain pens, as artels made in China, continue to be made and they are bought, the quality is good. I have a pen that is about 60 years old and it writes and does not leak. But even such a trifle in the USSR cannot be done. Under Stalin, the car was built at the level of the United States, after that it was at such a level that, apart from three types, there was not and never will be a damn thing for the people. We switched to galoshes.