Double blow to Iran: Israel will bomb the reactors, the USA will overcome Khuzestan

56
The situation around Iran hung in the air. US Air Force drone shot down by Iranian air defense, and for Washington, and "washing powder" in vitro as a casus belli. However, President Trump, instead of starting the bombing, unexpectedly extended his hand to "American friendship." He promised to make "Iran great again" and bring it to prosperity. The price of the issue is the abandonment of plans to create nuclear weapons, which alone is a guarantee of security on the part of the United States. What will happen if the Islamic Republic rejects the proposal “which cannot be rejected”?





What might a real military operation against Iran look like?

Tehran is strong enough, which we detail told earlier. He has a large army, and the IRGC has 130 well-trained, armed, and motivated fighters. It has its own air force and navy, missile forces. Iranian air defense, although it does not cover the entire territory of the country, has taken a big step forward in its development. More importantly, Iranian soldiers will defend their homeland from the invaders, and no one has canceled the importance of morale.

It is extremely difficult to imagine that Iranian leaders sign an act of surrender somewhere in the trailer, and the victorious American troops are standing near Tehran. So what is Washington counting on?

Some time ago, the Western press reported that the Pentagon could send 120 soldiers to the Middle East. Their goal is clearly the Islamic Republic, but such a contingent is not enough to defeat and bring to the knees of such a strong enemy. But maybe there will be enough of them if we are talking about a military operation with limited goals?

Accidentally or not, the Pentagon published data from the Pentagon under the title “2018 Gulf War Plan in the 80 Edition” in the American media. And this plan of war with Iran looks quite realistic. According to him, the Americans, instead of going to Tehran, will capture only one province of Khuzestan and several coastal cities. Why is Khuzestan? About XNUMX% of the hydrocarbon deposits of the Islamic Republic are located in this province. And ports are necessary for their export. Depriving Tehran of the economic basis of the ruling regime should force the Iranian elites to accept any conditions in Washington.

You can’t refuse American strategists in deceit and subtle calculation. Not only is Khuzestan a “hydrocarbon pantry”, it is also inhabited not only by Persians, but also by ethnic Arabs who can support the interventionists if they promise them sovereignty and a “roof”. The US Air Force will carry everything from the air, from the sea will support the fleet. Next door is Iraq, where the Pentagon has military bases. The mountainous terrain itself will prevent the Iranians from recapturing the province.

In addition, U.S. Israeli allies may be involved. Tel Aviv is completely unnecessary for Tehran and other neighbors to have nuclear weapons. So, in 1981, the Israeli Air Force bombed the Iraqi nuclear reactor, rendering it completely unusable. In 2007, they did the same trick with regard to Syria’s nuclear program. There is no doubt that Israeli pilots will be happy to bomb on the relevant infrastructure of Iran. True, for this it will be necessary to fly over the territory of the SAR and agree with Jordan and Iraq.

But nothing will probably solve the issue. Israelis and Americans know how.
56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    24 June 2019 11: 57
    Israel will bomb the reactors, the United States will squeeze out Khuzestan

    - as an option, they may well plan it this way. This is very similar to them, and here it is difficult to disagree with the author. But everything can end in the same way as the plan, when "... we give the Italians and Romanians the south of Ukraine, we take everything else to the Urals ..."
    How correctly noticed

    Iranian soldiers will defend their native land from the invaders, and the value of morale has not yet been canceled.

    Yes, and that the United States and Israel have no real friends in the region on whom you can rely. After everything that has happened recently, the Turks will definitely not get into this adventure, at least not on the side of the United States and Israel ... From the rest, such as the sheikhs in the Gulf, apart from pumping out money, there is very little military sense. On the other hand, both have more than enough enemies, and they will certainly help Iran, if not openly, "quietly".
    In short, if the Americans are not ready for the actual use of weapons of mass destruction against Iran, then popping in there without a chance - they will not pull such a war by ground operation and in a conventional way. And if we use WMDs, then most likely that they will practically never have any friends or allies in the world ...
    1. -3
      24 June 2019 12: 34
      there are no real friends in the region

      ah, these couch strategists and their couch reasoning)))
      What friends are we talking about ???
      States have no friends.
      Well of course there are exceptions ...
      For example Russia & Turkey or Russia Ukraine Friends and Brothers forever !!!
      Asked you a question about age ...)))
      1. +7
        24 June 2019 15: 28
        ... what is it? Did I again again offend the greatness of Israel again ??? request Tada immediately apologize, it was unintentional! ... laughing There, this state has some friends all around, ranging from Palestinians inside and ending with Turks outside, and even fish in the Mediterranean Sea hiccup from adoration ...
    2. +3
      24 June 2019 18: 45
      The United States muddied in Georgia precisely in order to use the airfields and territory of Georgia to attack Iran, and in response, Iran (and what remains for it) will hit Georgia ... And here it is important for Russia to close the border with Georgia in order to close the road to Russia with the Georgian nationalists and other elements hostile to Russia
      1. +2
        24 June 2019 19: 28
        An interesting idea, by the way .... I don’t think it’s true that some airfields will be used there - the United States has enough bases in the region, so building a new infrastructure somewhere is hardly advisable. But somehow you can use the territory of Georgia completely. For bacteriological diversions, for example ...
        1. +2
          24 June 2019 21: 02
          The United States has many airfields in the region, but the territory of Georgia for attacking Iran is good because rockets and planes will attack Iran, appearing from behind the mountains, which will complicate the work of Iran’s air defense ... An attack from the territory of Iraq, for example, will not be a plain for Iran ... which clearly visible radar
          1. +1
            24 June 2019 21: 30
            With all due respect to your opinion, don't underestimate Iran so much. They have quite adequate modern means of tracking, if not on a global scale, then on a regional scale. So "attack from behind the mountains" in our time is unlikely to bring much benefit. Moreover, the movement of some launchers and their placement behind these very mountains in Georgia, if one imagines it in theory, will definitely not remain unnoticed for anyone. And then it is a matter of technology and agents to trace them.
            To achieve this goal - a launch surprise, it’s easier to fire missiles with a missile from an underwater position. And you don’t have to carry anything to Georgia.
            1. +2
              24 June 2019 21: 45
              An attack from behind the mountains will reduce the time from the moment when the target is detected by Iran’s radar, until the enemy’s missile or a salvo from a carrier aircraft hits the target. An attack on Iran will not be an easy walk for the United States, but an attack from Georgia will make the task of defending Iran more difficult ... In the bays of Iranian submarines, and again the plain and the sea, from this side the attack in Iran will be noticed earlier.
              1. +1
                24 June 2019 22: 48
                Well, I won't argue about the details ... I'm not an air defense officer. Perhaps there are some advantages in this in terms of the speed of the response. I just think that it is possible to detect these launches earlier than the Iranian radar stations by completely different means, Iran and not only have them. It is far from being beneficial to everyone that these missiles hit their target, including among those who are not profitable, and the Russian Federation. And also Azerbaijan and Armenia, through whose territory these same missiles will have to fly, if "from behind the mountains." That is, it will be necessary either to coordinate the flight with them in advance, or violate the airspace with combat missiles ... and this, to put it mildly, is fraught with complications ...
                1. +2
                  25 June 2019 07: 28
                  Now you understand correctly. Certain advantages and they are essential for the operation of the radar ... As for undercover intelligence, here you are right, no one canceled it. They will monitor the Yankees and their allies and adjust the retaliatory strikes of their missile units at their launchers and air bases. It’s hard to say how Armenia and Azerbaijan will behave. In recent years, Azerbaijan has made great friends with Turkey, and this can play against the Yankees, due to recent conflicts between Turkey and the United States. It’s even more difficult to predict how Armenia will behave. It, of course, depends on Russia, but Putin has spoiled them too much and does not put pressure on all these Armenia and Belarus as the Yankees put pressure on their allies, to whom they give money.
                  1. +1
                    25 June 2019 09: 36
                    Let us hope the main thing is that both Armenians, Azerbaijanis, and Turks understand that they will bring the war with Iran under their nose. This, after all, is not even the matter of who is tilted in whose direction, but purely in the national security of these peoples and states. And the war with Iran will complicate the situation in the region many times worse than the same Syria or Iraq ...
                    1. +2
                      25 June 2019 11: 06
                      You are right, but the United States will hamper Turkey and Azerbaijan, let alone Armenia ... Pressure can only be exerted by China and the Russian Federation ... and partly North Korea, which under any conditions does not consider the United States to be a friendly country, but to have At the disposal of several nuclear warheads and missiles for their delivery to US bases may ...
                      1. +1
                        25 June 2019 11: 34
                        ... even as they become. Especially Turkey ... unless, of course, they are incomplete and qi ... And the Turks are not qi iota for sure. It’s hard to imagine that this is what the Americans can offer in exchange for obvious suicide ... But don’t forget that in Russia there are troops of the Russian Federation, that is, it’s unlikely that a flight there just is possible, it will be necessary to ask the Armenians and the RF Armed Forces. And Azerbaijan has just begun to feel very good, having turned into a kind of oil emirate, so it is unlikely that they will want to part with all this, for the sake of the American war, in their own home, in the Caspian, which feeds them ...
                      2. +3
                        25 June 2019 11: 43
                        Turkey today is not ready to openly oppose the United States, and even less so ... Armenia, like Belarus, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, loves to pull money from Russia, but as soon as it smells fried they will declare, as always, their independence and the right to an independent policy ( try to stay away) Now, if they are attacked, they will run for help to Russia, and Russia will not wait for help from them, in case of an attack on the Russian Federation.
                      3. +1
                        25 June 2019 11: 48

                        I think you can talk endlessly on this subject, but these are just our personal opinions and speculations, and only reality itself will resolve the dispute. smile wait and see...
                        But in the event of a conflict with Iran, none of them will be able to stay "aloof", that's for sure ...
                      4. +2
                        25 June 2019 11: 51
                        I agree. One thing is for sure. Not easy times and crowds of refugees on our borders await us all. The Persians are good fighters, but the Georgians will quickly give a fight to Russia, against which they are rallying with such enthusiasm today, and Putin, unfortunately, will let them into the country, which will bring Russia only grief and new Kondopoga and Khatkovo ... alas, alas ,a long...
                      5. 0
                        25 June 2019 11: 56
                        ... I'm an optimist by nature, I hope that I can still avoid the worst scenario ... recourse
                      6. +3
                        25 June 2019 12: 00
                        We’ll see, but it’s unlikely. The USA today lives only by plundering other countries, and the dollar exchange rate is held only by the bayonets of the US Army ...
                      7. +2
                        25 June 2019 14: 00
                        Something one will still fall earlier - either bayonets or a dollar ... and after that another thing is inevitable ...
                      8. +3
                        25 June 2019 15: 10
                        I agree that the United States has made many enemies. The idea of ​​world domination has always led to the defeat of those who dream of it.
                      9. +2
                        25 June 2019 15: 42
                        In addition to the plus, there is nothing to add ... smile
          2. +1
            25 June 2019 21: 53
            The United States has many airfields in the region, but the territory of Georgia for attacking Iran is good because rockets and planes will attack Iran, appearing from behind the mountains, which will complicate the work of Iran’s air defense ... An attack from the territory of Iraq, for example, will not be a plain for Iran ... which clearly visible radar

            Only Iran frankly does not care at all airfields that do not float. Why? Because the INF, the Iran has MANY ROCKETs, if necessary, they will plow the entire region and will be right, because they were hit from these airfields. Unless, of course, the owners still allow from their territory to strike at a neighboring state. https://olymp2010.ria.ru/infografika/20090917/185455470.html
            And Iran also has one AWACS ... well, it’s so that you still don’t feel the urge to fantasize about the possibility of sudden trepidation from behind the mountains, one agrees, but pawns are not nuts either.
  2. +3
    24 June 2019 12: 54
    -Oh, I don't want to get involved in this "Iranian theme" .., but apparently I have to ...

    -That's not at all clear ...
    -What's not clear...? -And it is not clear that why Russia today generally support Iran ...
    -Russia today is almost the only state (except Israel), which does not need Iran at all ...- neither as a partner, nor as an ally, nor as a powerful economic prosperous state in the Middle East ... -Iran is not at all Russia needs "not any" ... -Moreover ...- with the strengthening of Iran's position, Russia finds itself in a difficult conflict situation ...- And, if we take into account the explosive religious specifics of Iran, then it may even reach hostile armed confrontations between Iran and Russia ... -And even today Iran itself does not hide its ambitions and attitude towards Russia ...
    -And if the "Iranian genie" is released from the. Vessel ......, then for Russia everything will immediately change for the worse ... -and all the Russian already suffered human casualties and all the material resources spent in the Middle East .. . -all this becomes in vain ... -Russia will simply lose everything ...- and its military base and political positions in the Middle East ... -And Russia will just have to leave the Middle East ... -the party will be completely lost .. -And today, and so things in Russia in Syria, to put it mildly ... -not brilliant ...

    -But, at the same time, today for Russia there is a very successful situation (for once), when you can get rid of this Iran by "someone else's hands" ... -It is to stop supporting Iran in any way and generally pretend that nothing happens ... - just sit on the threshold of your house ... - And let the Americans and Israel deal with this Iranian monster ...
    -Russia is not worth it at all and get into these showdowns ... -Russia should save both its soldiers and its resources and make the necessary decision ...
    1. +1
      24 June 2019 16: 51
      a very successful situation has developed for Russia (for once) when it is possible to get rid of this Iran by "the wrong hands"

      And if Iran begins to "kill" seriously, do you think millions of refugees will bypass us? Will everyone run to Europe? For all the complexity of relations with Iran, I think that a large-scale war in this region will not help Russia in any way, rather the opposite is true. And in Syria, by the way, this will not improve the situation either.
      1. +3
        24 June 2019 18: 36
        This does not mean that Russia needs to urge Iran to surrender ... Any damage caused by NATO today will only benefit Russia ...
        1. -1
          24 June 2019 19: 25
          I did not say anything about the change. I'm talking about the fact that it is best to avoid a heated conflict there at all. But if the Americans are still so fucked up that they decide to start it, then Iran will need to be helped. And best of all not in the open.
          1. +3
            25 June 2019 22: 10
            No, it’s not better, we’d better have the USA drunk on its own, and the war with Iran, in terms of the totality of consequences, would mean exactly that. The strongholds of Zionism and democracy must suffer irreparable damage equivalent to destruction and Iran is the best candidate for this.
            And of course, help, without any "buts" and "ifs", so that even a small percentage for the defeat of Iran ... We did not have enough in the Caspian to get a US base.
    2. +1
      24 June 2019 18: 39
      Here it is not necessary to drive. Iran today is fighting in Syria on the side of the Syrian government, and this is in Russia's hands ... Iran is a country that is holding back Saudi Arabia and the company, with their radical Islamic terrorism ... So Russia is more likely to benefit from Iran than just nothing no harm ...
  3. +2
    24 June 2019 13: 12
    So what is Washington counting on?

    Ponte.
    Trump broke off with North Korea, and it will be the same with Iran.
    In the event of military aggression by the United States and its vassals, the entire Persian Gulf will be flooded with burning oil and clogged with sunken ships, including tankers, plus huge casualties. There will be a worldwide environmental disaster. The fairway is mined, oil supplies will stop.
    Does it need the United States, Saudi Arabia, the Emirates, other countries of the region and the West?
    The Islamic Republic has nothing to lose, why does it need such a World if it does not have a sovereign and independent Iran.
    1. 0
      25 June 2019 22: 46
      In the event of military aggression by the United States and its vassals, the entire Persian Gulf will be flooded with burning oil and clogged with sunken ships, including tankers, plus huge casualties. There will be a worldwide environmental disaster. The fairway is mined, oil supplies will stop.
      Does it need the United States, Saudi Arabia, the Emirates, other countries of the region and the West?
      The Islamic Republic has nothing to lose, why does it need such a World if it does not have a sovereign and independent Iran.

      + milion
  4. +1
    24 June 2019 13: 18
    And horseradish tea with Jerusalem, and Tel Aviv, which can also suffer greatly. Jews give birth to new ....
  5. +3
    24 June 2019 13: 55
    With Khuzestan, as with Kuwait it will not work. If the States use WMD there, they will liquidate their allies and set the remaining living against themselves. States will not be able to fight on earth - their soldiers have no motivation either. And Israel, if it intervenes, will receive a strike with medium-range missiles made on the basis of Ukrainian technologies that were transmitted to S. Korea. So it’s dangerous to throw stones in a glass house.
  6. -1
    24 June 2019 14: 47
    Are Iranians like that good? what
    For whom to root, it is not clear yet request
  7. +3
    24 June 2019 18: 35
    Iran, this is not Iraq; local generals cannot be bought there. The IRGC guys are ideological and not badly armed ... They have already thrown out the pro-American Shah from Iran and simply will not give up their positions ... Iran also has cruise and ballistic missiles with a decent range ... I remember the antediluvian Scud missiles made at the base The Patriot SAMs were not 60% able to intercept the Soviet models of the 100s of the last century, and part of the missiles nevertheless reached Israel, causing minor damage. In the case of Iran, everything will be much worse for the USA and Israel ...
  8. +1
    24 June 2019 18: 40
    Some agree on everything, even nuclear war, just not to go to jail. But there are some who like it. At one time, he liked Hitler, until he drank confidence in the USSR.
  9. +1
    24 June 2019 18: 44
    Everyone has long been talking about refugees like a mantra; about the Ishilovites, who, if not defeated in Syria, will flood into Russia and the republics of Central Asia ...
    -And they lose sight of Iran, which will become worse than ISIS and other scumbags when it gets access to the open space and starts trading its hydrocarbons with might and main ... -Iran will very quickly create its own nuclear weapons, a powerful modern army and ... and the whole world will only have God pray that another religious "scumbag-ayatollah" does not come to power in Iran ... -And all this ISIS and North Korea, compared to that Iran, will seem like a child's prank to the whole world ....- Hahah ...
    - Look, today even the USA cannot cope with Turkey, which does not have such raw material reserves as Iran ... Yes, Russia is becoming more and more an obedient manager for Turkey and forgives her all the pranks and whims .., in anticipation of what Turkey can create muck for Russia ... anytime ...
    -And Iran, having become powerful in a short time (which is quite realistic) ... -In general, will not stand on ceremony with anyone ...

    -And for some reason, no one fears that, having become powerful, Iran will begin to "strongly influence" all Islam both in Russia and throughout Sr Asia (look how strongly Turkey "influences" Tatarstan and the North Caucasus today ... -And ISIS will simply leave for secondary roles ...
    -Do not let this evil go free ...- the whole world will suffer ...
    1. +1
      24 June 2019 18: 49
      No need to drive nonsense. Iran is a country holding back Saudi Arabia and a company, with their Islamic terrorism, and is fighting in Syria on the side of the Syrian government, and this is in Russia's hands ...
      1. 0
        24 June 2019 18: 57
        -Are you a "student minus", or what?

        -Russia and Turkey all the time in their "comrades-in-arms" are listed ... and also constantly "fights terrorism" ... -Only for all the time she inflicted more damage on Russia than the very "terrorists" ...
        -Okay, if you brainlessly put down the cons ... then talk to yourself ...
    2. +2
      24 June 2019 20: 42
      Irina, completely different people, who, by coincidence, are enemies for Iran, have been trying to influence Islam in Russia with attempts to create various "caliphates" and the collapse of our country. Although, of course, this does not automatically mean that Iran is our friend. Iran, of course, like Turkey, is hardly an absolutely friendly country for the Russian Federation. (Although in the Second World War the Persians were just on our side, they released small arms for the spacecraft under license and were a transit country for the Land Lease) But firstly, both Iran and Turkey, unlike the United States, are our neighbors, which, as we know they don’t choose, but with whom it is better to have pragmatically normal relationships, simply because they are geographically closer to us. Secondly, even Iran and Turkey have recently become clearly more predictable and adequate in their actions than the United States again. Yes, they are good at bargaining, they are good at protecting their interests, not ours, but what's wrong with that? This is how all governments should behave in the interests of their states and peoples. And thirdly, no matter how strange it may seem, but we have with Iran and Turkey, with all possible historical antagonism, now there are just a lot of common interests in the region, and at the same time the Russian Federation, and the Persians, and the Turks, figuratively speaking are now sitting "in the same boat", which the Americans are intensively "rocking". And in my deep conviction, being willy-nilly in this "boat", all three of them must first jointly focus on preventing it from overturning, putting aside the existing contradictions. They can be solved later, in a calmer atmosphere ... if it works out ... Now, for example, it is important for all three to avoid a really big war. And if Iran flares up, then neither Iraq, nor Afghanistan, nor Syria, nor Turkey, nor Russia will remain on the sidelines, with all the countries of the Caspian region at least ...
      1. +2
        25 June 2019 08: 54
        - To a very, very, and once again very great regret, Russia has some kind of innate fatal property to constantly climb into the "swinging boat" (or even completely ... - into someone else's, which started to sink, a leaky boat) ...
        -This is just some centuries-old curse for life ... for Russia ... -to find mortal danger and try to play other people's games, where Russia is always doomed to a monstrous bloody loss ...

        - Nothing (in this regard) has changed for Russia today ...

        -And today we have no common interests with Iran and Turkey (as they have never been before, in all ages) ...
        -Moreover ...- all these "interests" are diametrically opposed ...
        -And to count on the fact that today Russia, Turkey and Iran are "united" by a common enemy ...- The USA ... is a great delusion ...
        -Turkey for the USA has always been and will always be its ... mmmm ... "our son of a bitch" ... -Hahah ... -Turkey itself knows this and will never (in its "anti-American whims") step over " allowed forbidden line "...
        - But Turkey can "get rid of it in full" with Russia ... - it is already waiting, it will not wait for the "Turkish gas pipeline" to start ... - this is where for Russia "all Turkish delights" will begin "...

        -With Iran, Russia is doing much worse ... -Iran has everything that Russia constantly sells to Western Europe and other states .., but "Iranian goods" are of better quality and can be supplied at a lower price ...
        -Iran has the largest economy in West Asia and the Islamic world and is one of the most technologically advanced states in the region. This is an agro-industrial country with a developed oil industry.
        In terms of natural gas reserves - 27,6 trillion cubic meters - Iran ranks second (after Russia) in the world.
        -This is not a poor Syria ...
        - Moreover ... - Iranian oil is of much higher quality than Russian oil, and in terms of "prime cost", it is generally beyond competition ...
        -Moreover ...- in the constitutional decrees of the Islamic Republic of Iran there is a ban for foreign companies to own mineral resources. In the energy sector, foreigners cannot own property in any form; the possibility of shared production sharing is also excluded.
        - Only since 1995, foreign companies have been granted the right to conclude service contracts, called “buy-back”, in which the contractor finances all work on the development of the field or exploration in exchange for a certain compensation.
        -International oil companies are dissatisfied with a rate of return that is too low, in their opinion, and too complicated, and the terms of contracts are constantly being revised.
        - Nevertheless, and under these conditions, foreign companies are quite active in the oil and gas sector of Iran.

        - It should be added that Iran can always instantly carry out "another nationalization" ... - and simply throw all foreign companies out of its "hydrocarbon business" ...

        - And what does compassionate Russia expect here ... - and in what kind of "boat" and with whom is Russia going to "sway over the waves" ... - only God knows ...
        - One thing is clear. That at the first opportunity these "two fellow travelers" will simply throw Russia overboard, and then they themselves will begin to fight among themselves "for a place in the boat" ...
        1. +2
          25 June 2019 09: 30
          I disagree fundamentally with your approach. First, Russia itself does not climb into any boat - it is simply geographically located in a region that the Americans regularly and purposefully rock. Nowadays, to think that for example Iran or Afghanistan will fight with someone there on their own, and the Russian Federation can observe it all from the side without any harm to itself, at least it is not reasonable.
          Secondly, the presence of some kind of competitive soil for the two states does not automatically mean a reason for hostility, especially since the hunger for energy in the modern world is huge, so the market is quite enough for Iran and the Russian Federation, these are just the Americans and us and they are actually trying to destroy them deliberately, and not only and not so much because of oil and gas competition with them themselves, but because of moral and value contradictions. This is the third. By the way, the moral codes we have at the moment with Muslim Iran and even with not very clear secular Muslim Turkey seem to be much closer than with the United States and even Europe.
          And as for Turkey, it is definitely not pro-American, not pro-Russian or pro-European, it is pro-Turkish throughout its history, and when the Turks need it, it will easily "cross the forbidden line" in relation to someone was not. It's just that in relationships, this must be taken into account. And the United States has never been strong in understanding other peoples and their mentality ... Russia has always historically been better with this understanding. Let's hope so ...
          1. +1
            25 June 2019 12: 09
            -Ah, I don’t want to get into this controversy, this jungle .. but I’ll answer ...

            -Russia has already climbed into a sinking boat, which has only one "way-hope" ... is to manage to somehow taxi in shallow water ...

            - Poor Syria, which will fight for another 10 years .. until Assad is somehow removed (whether he himself does not disappear) ... - But it will be too late ... - and new, about the same "Assads" will come. etc...
            - Does Russia like this? -And yes (more likely to end the war) and no (delay the continuation of the war) ...
            - "Yes" (continuation of the war) ... - because, after the war, it will be necessary to do something further ... - And what to do next ???
            - "No" ... - so how long can you already fight ...
            -And in any of these cases, it is Russia that will have to restore and supply Syria with everything necessary (which has already been done for a long time) ...
            - Here it is ... - the people of Russia are "adopting" the whole overgrown Syria ...

            -Next ... - "the presence of a certain competitive ground for two states" (as well as peoples) ... -This is the most, that neither is a "causal reason" for war and bloodshed ... in the Middle East .. ...
            -Shiites, Sunnis, Alawites, etc. .., ready to fight to the death for any reason (economy, politics, influence, etc.); Turks and Kurds have been at enmity for centuries ... -And this has no end and will never be until some cut out others ... -that's the only way ... -The East is a vile and cruel thing ... -Americans and Israel use it with might and main dragging chestnuts out of the fire with someone else's hands ... -Moreover, if suddenly some oriental despot suddenly calms down and pacifies all this "boiling Babylon" with his merciless cruel methods, then it is immediately removed ... ..

            -And Russia, on the contrary ...- is always ready to burn its beautiful hands, but continue to get all kinds of benefits out of the fire for others .., without paying attention to the fact that this destructive fire will never die out ...
            -I'm opening up hackneyed truths here ...

            - As for the "moral and value codes", "spiritual bonds", "brotherly unity" and so on ... - all this is great Russian nostalgia, a blue dream and a swan song ... - you can just cry ...
            -But in real life, everything is far from so ... -Who only did Russia not try to "think of as friends" ...- all this turned out to be ephemeral and ghostly ... -While Russia fed its "friends" from hands and stroked them on fur .., then everything seemed to be relatively normal ... - But as soon as she stopped ... then immediately all these "friends" showed her fangs, horns and claws ...
            -What is there to remember the "strangers" ...- "European Turkey" and "secular Iran" .. when the whole of Western Europe, starting from the "Bulgarian brothers", Czech Slavs and ending with Poles Slavs, to put it mildly, walks in such Russia’s enemies, that we don’t need real enemies either ... -And I will keep silent about the "brotherly" Ukraine ... -Hahah ...
            1. +2
              25 June 2019 13: 56
              I disagree. We have different approaches in general. In no boat (once again) the sinking RF did not climb. Where she sat, she sits there, along with her neighbors. You just need to kick out the one who swings the region (boat), and this is the USA. And since it is more convenient to do this to all interested together, then this should be addressed. And here we are with Iran along the way.
              About the competition with Iran: do you think the US is climbing into Iran why? For the next forcible making happy the next people with the "blessings of democracy"? Or because of the same oil and gas, and everything else is just an excuse? What do you think, if Americans take possession of Iranian deposits, it will be easier for us to negotiate with them than with Iran? Or will they fill them with sand and arrange a sanctuary for the animals there? Well, this is absolutely everything on the surface! If there is this oil there, then someone will still extract and sell it. The Iranians will do this for themselves, for a normal price and under normal conditions, in compliance with the same environmental standards, they will live there in the end. And the invaders do not care, they can extract at least TNT and sell it at dumping and whatever they like, just to suck it up quickly. The Americans, on the other hand, even do hydraulic fracturing at home and do not care about the environment if the money is dripping, so what about Iran. So which competition is more profitable for us ???
              And about moral values ​​codes you are in vain. It has nothing to do with Ukrainian, Georgian, etc. "brotherhood" and "scrapie", this is what the regime in the state and the self-identification of the people themselves are based on inside each country, and this is with us, and the Persians, and the Turks are exactly closer to each other than with the modern West ...
              And it is in these countries that it matters, as in the PRC, for example, or in Israel itself ... If you don’t think so, it means that you personally do not have these moral value codes, but therefore you should not think that they are not most Russians, Turks or Persians.
              1. 0
                25 June 2019 16: 20
                -Ah, well, I didn’t want to get involved in all this ... bodygirl ...

                -Ah, nonetheless ...

                -Well, what are you writing ...

                You just need to kick out the one who swings the region (boat), and this is the USA. And since it is more convenient to do this to all interested together, then this should be addressed. And here we are with Iran along the way.

                -Yes, with no Iran we are "not on the way" ...

                -We have made a lot of friends today with the CSTO-eshnym state ..?
                -We even with Belarus have such strains that both ... and so on ...
                -And you are talking about Iran ...- Hahah ...
                -Well, we will supply weapons to Iran, and they will send us a barge with dates instead ... -this is our whole "common path" ... -And then our paths are already ...

                - Who are we with "on the way" today ... - so this is with the hated USA ... - Yes, it is with the USA ... - But this is "on the way" ... - a very short distance ...
                -The USA today in the Middle East ... is a kind of Saddam Hussein, who ruled a multi-tribal Iraq; or Muammar Gaddafi, who ruled multi-tribal Libya ... -Both of them were destroyed along with their states ... -The USA can also "follow" the same path .., so they dodge as best they can, but maybe they are not so much today and more...
                -And it is not a war in Iran that should be feared today (this war, if it takes place, it will end quickly) ... -And one should fear the defeat of the United States in the Middle East ...- as well as Saddam Hussein's "departure" in Iraq and " leaving "M. Gaddafi in Libya ... -The US eliminated them, and they themselves were in their place ... -Hahah ... -Then a large-scale war could break out ...

                -The territory of the Middle East is "alien" for everyone ... -and for NATO countries, and for Russia, and for China ... -so why not fight ... -But how such a war can end ... -this is already another question ... -And then no one will remember about Iran ... -Who remembers today about the former mighty stable Iraq and about the once-prosperous Libya ... -Hahah ...

                And why are you writing., About "moral and value codes" and about "self-identification of the people themselves within each country."

                .... this is with us, and the Persians, and the Turks are exactly closer to each other than with the modern West ...
                And it is in these countries that it matters, as in the PRC, for example, or in Israel itself ... If you don’t think so, it means that you personally do not have these moral value codes, but therefore you should not think that they are not most Russians, Turks or Persians.

                -Why is it that I have no "this" .. ???
                -I live in Western Siberia ... -in this former and current stronghold of the Russian State ...
                - Young people are recruited from our region, as before, to the Presidential Regiment, and to the border. troops, and in the navy (there is even the Russian strategic missile nuclear submarine "Omsk", where Siberians are mainly served) ...
                -And all my relatives ...- also served and serves in the most combat units, many have passed hot spots (starting from Afghanistan and Chechnya and ending with the same Syria ..) .. -This spring, my nephew came after service in the Pacific Fleet (he served as some kind of "holulaister" ... - a very strong athletic young man) ... - strangely they jumped there with parachutes and scuba diving ... in the police after mobilization they put "on record" ...
                -Where are some Turks and Persians here ... -Hahah ...
                1. +1
                  25 June 2019 18: 08
                  I have already said that our initial positions are different. About moral codes and their absence, you started it. You deny it, not me. And if you deny it yourself, then you don’t have it. And the fact that you do not have this personally does not mean at all that it is absent in your family and especially in the region. And it doesn’t mean to offend you in any way - most Europeans and Americans have not had this code for a long time, and nothing, they live for themselves ... maybe we are just backward, and you are advanced. smile I live far from Western Siberia, but the code seems to have been preserved for now ... wink
                  What you say, they say "on the way with the USA", the absence of this code only confirms that they are "anti-code" for us, and we cannot be on the way with them by definition. And if Iran and Turkey are our neighbors, possibly dangerous and suspicious, then the United States is simply an enemy and everything, an enemy in its pure form, the United States is an enemy of our country politically and even geographically, they are an enemy to everything that we value and believe in. And this is written in our code. If you became with them along the way, then your code was erased or it simply was not there ...
                  By the way, I know very well about this "extremely strange service in the navy" wink
                  But do not flatter yourself, thinking that the same Iran or Turkey does not have the same specialists. There is. And even worse, unfortunately ...
    3. 0
      27 June 2019 13: 58
      And how Shiite Iran will influence the Sunnis Of Asia? This is how the Moscow Patriarchate for Catholic Poland and France ...
  10. 0
    24 June 2019 19: 14
    I agree with the author. Just bomb everything in the trash. And is China keeping silent?
    1. +1
      25 June 2019 11: 54
      Yes, including Israel and US bases in the SA and Kuwait. A few more units of the American fleet will be drowned, not to mention the massive air fall. After the use of nuclear weapons by the States in Iran, I would not have put the ruble on the survival of New York after the use of portable WMD by Iranian agents.
      1. 0
        25 June 2019 11: 59
        A gloomy scenario, but possible, unfortunately ...
        1. 0
          25 June 2019 12: 01
          How else to bring the "masters of the world" back to reality?
          1. 0
            25 June 2019 13: 57
            Show that they are not the owners. But this can be done differently ...
  11. +1
    25 June 2019 09: 11
    Yes, the author fantasized from three boxes, although it looks believable, but everything is very simple and obvious. You might think that Iranian strategists are so simple and naive that they can’t guess where they have a storeroom with hydrocarbons, where the ports are located and what the situation is with geography. Yeah, they will sit and wait for the Americans to snatch this Khuzistan. Even the European allies of the Americans position themselves on the side of the Persians. I suspect Trump is bluffing for a stupid one and this is already visible with an unarmed look. He clicks his teeth and cleans away, as was already the case in the DPRK.
    1. +2
      25 June 2019 11: 56
      This is most likely. Or shoot past with axes, as always, to save face muzzle.
      1. 0
        25 June 2019 14: 06
        God forbid, if so ... And this will be another blow to the American image ...
  12. DPN
    +2
    25 June 2019 14: 06
    It turns out that Antei 350 sold to Iran is an analogue of the S-300 linden, if they are not taken into account.
    So it all depends on who the people will be - Iran, I can’t believe that HE is all corrupt.
    We are also interested in how the ANTEY-350 defender of the sky of the Russian Federation will work.
  13. +1
    25 June 2019 21: 30
    As soon as the Zionist fascists allow themselves something like this, their life will turn into a hell of daily rocket attacks and there is nothing they can do about it, they will be buried in Lebanon. And the United States will first be destroyed in Syria, opening the Hazballah’s land supply corridor, and only dreamers can dream of Khuzestan.

    Firstly, nobody will give them a take-off at once, they will need preparation, but no one will even let them land safely. Iran not only has anti-aircraft defense, but they will be healthy, as well.
    Secondly, why did the author get the idea that native mountains would interfere with Iran? Is that seriously written? The USA has already surrendered all the mountains of Afghanistan, although according to the author’s logic, this should have helped the defenders ... I’ll remind you that Iran once fought in Afghanistan, so there’s something that it understands in this matter.
    Thirdly, why did the author decide that these US bases in the region will be: A - workable and B - will generally be, I mean all the same INF, and in Iraq I’m also a proxy of Iran.

    You can’t refuse American strategists in deceit and subtle calculation.

    I refuse, because stupidity is utter, a typical trading strategy. It does not work with rotten capitalist Russia, but here an idealized society. Iran has militarized since the Iran-Iraq war and continued to gain experience in conflicts. Again, the Zionist fascists teach Iran well.
    Once again, a stupid strategy, it is useless to fight Iran. Either destroy right away - or you shouldn’t even start, because they will only make it worse.

    P.S. The United States in Afghanistan could not do anything, they poured out the partisans. And then the cunning and subtle calculation))) IMHO the US plan for 18 was written for their puppet ISIS, only the curse "Assad must go" destroyed their puppet. The idea was interesting - to demolish both Russia and China with black hordes, but who will give them something to grow so much))))) And they themselves will not climb, only if they want to kill themselves. No, no one will take over the United States, but this is not required. For the United States now, in general, any war with a sane adversary is tantamount to death, even Venezuela, even Korea with Iran (the last two are quick options). That's it, the advance of trust has long been spent, the bottom is scraping, then only the burial itself.