Persian “fist": how will Iran respond to US invasion

30
Apparently, the United States seriously decided to “teach a lesson” to Iran. He has too many hydrocarbons, and he is too independent to possess such wealth, and he wants to get his own nuclear bomb. Previously, the Pentagon sent its aircraft carriers to the shores of the Islamic Republic, now 120 thousand US troops can be deployed to the Persian Gulf region. Does this mean a full-scale US war with Iran, or will Washington try to “punish” Tehran in another way?





The threat is extremely significant: 10 divisions - this is about a quarter of the enlisted personnel of the American army, the most technically equipped in the world. Such a group, with the support of the aviation and navy, is capable of "doing business" and trampling almost any enemy into the Stone Age. However, Iran is a tough nut to crack even very large teeth. This is known in Tehran, promising to give "on the head." What is the Iranian leadership really counting on?

120 thousand “defenders of democracy” will be opposed by a well-trained and armed army of the Islamic Republic, the number of which is about a million people. Plus, the Corps of Guardians of the Islamic Revolution (IRGC), numbering 130 thousand people. All these people are well motivated to defend their country from external aggression, they know the terrain and are adapted to climatic conditions. In the case of ground operations, American interventionists will have a hard time.

Maybe the Pentagon is counting on technical superiority? However, here, too, everything is not entirely unambiguous.

Iran has its own aviation and air defense forces, which number over 3 thousand weapons, including: S-200, S-300, Cube, Tor-M1, Buk Russian-made, as well as local analogues of the 3rd Hordad and SAM Bavar-373. It is possible that Tehran also has electronic warfare systems purchased from friendly countries. All this power is capable of landing American aircraft and cutting through massive salvos of cruise missiles, dramatically reducing their effectiveness. The Islamic Republic also has aviation, although it is of little use for a direct clash with the US Air Force, but it can be used to raid American targets and their allies.

As for the navy, Tehran has 400 combat units, including 33 submarines, and more than two hundred patrol boats. Perhaps by themselves they will not be able to send three US Navy carrier groups to the bottom, but Iranian anti-ship missiles, for example, Khalij Fars, with a range of up to 300 kilometers will help them. Iran also has Nur, Fajr Darya, and Gader copied from the Chinese by RCC Nazir. Yes, the Americans have Aegis, but the question is, to whom ammunition will end first. A sunken aircraft carrier is a terrible blow to the prestige of the United States.

If the Americans nevertheless land and move to Tehran, then they will be met by the Iranian army, which has 1616 units of armored vehicles and 1533 missile launchers. This operation will definitely not be like beating the natives. In addition, Tehran is almost guaranteed to block the Strait of Hormuz, flooding a couple of supertankers in it, and will rigidly drive away anyone who tries to raise the vessels. To do this, there are both missiles and powerful howitzers. The blockade of the strait will inevitably lead to a global energy crisis.

It turns out that 10 divisions will not be enough to defeat Iran, and even occupy it, a country with an 80-million population with the goal of “bringing democracy”. Obviously, this is precisely why the Pentagon announced that 120 soldiers would not participate in the ground operation, but would be stationed in the countries of the Middle East neighboring Iran.

Most likely, missile strikes, if any, will be carried out on key infrastructure facilities in Iran, primarily related to the production and sale of oil. It will blow economic the basis of the ruling regime, which could lead to its change in favor of Washington.
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    17 May 2019 08: 08
    Obviously, this is precisely why the Pentagon announced that 120 soldiers would not participate in the ground operation, but would be stationed in the countries of the Middle East neighboring Iran.

    Key moment. Where to place 10 divisions? In Iraq? In the territory inhabited by Iraqi Shiites? Maybe in Pakistan? Or in Afghanistan? There is also Saudi Arabia. Something tells me that the Saudis are unlikely to want to become a target. Almost all Saudi deposits are located in areas inhabited by Shiites.
    Yet in the Middle East, religion plays an important role.
    1. +2
      17 May 2019 08: 22
      In Saudi Arabia. All infrastructure has been preserved there since the beginning of the 90s
      1. +1
        17 May 2019 08: 28
        Yes, there is infrastructure. But how to fight through the strait? The ground forces are not aircraft or ships.
        And it seems to me that the Saudis will not want to become a target for Iranian missiles. You can post, but can you fight?

        Shiite oil fields
        1. +3
          17 May 2019 08: 44
          A ground operation, if any, is planned, will be preceded by a grand air campaign.

          As for Iranian missiles, their accuracy is extremely doubtful. Yes, of course there will be attacks, and many of them will end successfully. This is a war. The United States will be prepared to bear the loss. But the total superiority in the air of the US Air Force will do its job sooner or later. The Iranians have virtually no air defense. The delivered S-300s cover only Tehran and some nuclear facilities.

          By the way, pay attention to the location of the main oil fields in Iran. In fact, these are areas bordering Iraq and Kuwait, as well as the waters of the Persian Gulf. Americans do not need to invade deep into the territory of the Persians, it is enough to take control of the oil-bearing areas.

          1. +3
            17 May 2019 09: 01
            Yes, oil fields are important. And, apparently, this is the main goal. The problem is that any attack involves war. And in this case, Iran has good chances to take control of Saudi oil. All Shiites of the Middle East will rise in holy jihad. And not only against the United States, but also against Israel. Shiites have such a fad. As you can see, I am not moving away from the religious component.
            The difference from past wars is that now the United States does not have a coalition. Europe will not harness. Saudis can only provide territory. The war in Yemen has already shown the value of the Saudi army. They would be beaten off by the Hussites .... The transfer of American troops will take several months. And the Americans will not fight alone. I am convinced of this.
            Only air and missile strikes remain. That is, it is necessary to test the Iranian air defense and .... American air defense. And prepare for the cessation of shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. With the corresponding oil price.
            There are more questions than answers. So far, I estimate the probability of war low. Iran’s determination to resist is great, the determination to fight specifically with the Americans is low.
            We will see ....
            1. +2
              17 May 2019 09: 07
              When Iraq was attacked, no one climbed. And there, almost half of the population are Shiites. Shiite Iran helps Sunni Syria, most of them Sunni Yemen. Now politics comes first. And it doesn’t matter who you are.

              While talking about the war is pointless. Now, if the States really deploy hundreds of thousands of military to BVs, drive 3-4 carrier groups, then it will be possible to draw conclusions. So far, the Iranians will be squeezed economically.
              1. +1
                17 May 2019 11: 13
                Once again I can say - we will see.
                Clarification about Iraq. The ruling regime was Sunni. Shiites were beneficial to break the power of Saddam. As a result, the power in Iraq now belongs to the Shiites. In Yemen, Iran helps Shiite troops. Like Hezbollah. Theocracy is strong in Iran and they will never help Sunnis.
              2. +1
                22 May 2019 10: 01
                In Iraq, the entire top of the armed forces was bribed, which is impossible to do in Iran, and another sinking of at least one aircraft carrier Iran will repulse the US desire to fight, this is too high a price for the government in its country, and Iran is quite capable of sinking, as officially announced , not on twitter or facebook!
    2. +1
      18 May 2019 16: 01
      Quote: Bakht
      Key moment. Where to place 10 divisions? In Iraq? In the territory inhabited by Iraqi Shiites?

      It is there, Bahrain, for example, is completely Shiite, but this does not prevent him from being an enemy of the Islamic Republic of Iran and deploying the largest US Navy in the BV on its territory ...

      Something tells me that the Saudis are unlikely to want to become a target.

      I don't know who tells you what, but almost the entire aviation group of the US Air Force and MNF was stationed in the SA during operations - "Desert Shield", "Desert Sword" and "Desert Storm" ...
      At the moment, the United States has VVB in Turkey and the largest of them in the BV in Qatar ..., in addition, the United States is now transferring three AUGs to that region ... (about 300 combat aircraft) ....
      1. +1
        18 May 2019 17: 42
        Iraq has already abandoned confrontation with Iran.
        To place - not to fight .... Large bases throughout the Middle East. But nobody really takes them seriously. And then, Iran makes no sense to fight with the amers. But with the Saudis - a completely different matter.
        In any case, to date it turned out that no one is sending any troops. 10 divisions is practically all that the Americans have. There are no free troops. The words "if", "maybe" are spreading.
        Forever Living Wikipedia

        At the moment, the basis of combat-ready formations is 10 divisions and some separate units (special purpose, army aviation, intelligence and control, etc.). By 2015, it was planned to reduce the real strength of the formations and individual units of the US Army to 32 (so-called “field” or “modular”) brigades with a total number of 490 thousand. personnel.

        The National Guard and the Reserve additionally subordinate 10 reserve divisions, 15 reserve brigades and numerous separate units of the reserve troops for various purposes. The Commander-in-Chief of the US Army, General R. Odierno, plans to further reduce forces to 2018 thousand people until 450. l / s, the National Guard up to 335 thousand people. and the number of reserves up to 195 thousand people.

        Three AUGs are power .... Apparently, the Iranians will not have a shortage of goals .... Americans would venture to test Iranian air defense? What about Iranian anti-ship missiles?
        PS. Military axiom: "any battle is considered lost until the enemy surrenders."
        1. 0
          18 May 2019 17: 52
          Quote: Bakht
          Iraq has already abandoned confrontation with Iran.
          Place - do not fight ....

          Meanwhile, the United States received permission from Saudi Arabia and a number of other Gulf countries to place on their territory American troops and ships in territorial waters.

          https://topwar.ru/158016-vashington-predupredil-ob-opasnosti-poletov-nad-persidskim-zalivom.html
          1. +2
            18 May 2019 18: 16
            Well yes ... Saudi Arabia and a number of other countries. Will they swim through the bay?

            The article is old in 2015, but the bases are the same. They were there ....
            https://fishki.net/anti/1563952-vosem-kljuchevyh-voennyh-baz-ssha-po-kotorym-iran-mozhet-nanesti-udar.html

            The main question is whether the States will decide on a full-scale war? It seems that they are not going to send ground troops. Airstrikes remain. Well, or axes. According to analysts, half of Iran will be knocked down. Even the Americans cannot completely destroy the entire air defense system. So unit losses will be all the time. But with the marine component is not so simple. A couple of successful missile attacks are enough and Trump can pack his suitcase. It seems that the Argentines have shown how to successfully attack modern ships. Iran does not need to drown the entire group. Enough pair not even aircraft carriers, but destroyers. Even Iraq managed to disable the destroyer Stark with a single aircraft.
            1. +1
              20 May 2019 00: 29
              Quote: Bakht
              Well yes ... Saudi Arabia and a number of other countries. Will they swim through the bay?
              The article is old in 2015, but the bases are the same. They were there ....

              Exactly the VVB in Qatar and the Navy in Bahrain have not gone away ...
              No one will be able to swim ... The SA will provide the Anglo-Saxons with its own VVB in its territory, as well as the naval and military base in the Persian Gulf and in the Red Sea ... The SA will not participate in land operations against Iran (unless it puts at the disposal of Anglo-Saxons special forces) ....

              The main question is whether the States will decide on a full-scale war? It seems that they are not going to send ground troops. Airstrikes remain. Well, or axes.

              The Americans already have experience in the war with Iraq, and this experience is positive, and the Iraqi forces were much more powerful than the Iranian ones ...
              The main emphasis will be on air and missile strikes against the main strategic targets of the Islamic Republic of Iran, with their strikes they will drive the Islamic Republic of Iran and the IRGC deep into the territory, at the first stage this will be enough, we will look further ....
              google on the internet the location of the oil fields on the territory of Iran and put a map of Petersen on this map and then you will understand what goals Anglo-Saxons will achieve to the maximum ...

              According to analysts, half of Iran will be knocked down. Even the Americans cannot completely destroy the entire air defense system.

              go to the neck of your analysts, Iran’s air defense has not been updated since the Iran-Iraq war ended at short intervals, all B and BTs, the old ones mostly American-made, remained from the Shah’s regime or supplied by the Americans and Europeans during the above-mentioned war .... and indicated the Iranian air defense system (focal, rather than continuous-zone) does not go to any comparison with the one that Iraq had in the 91st ....

              It seems that the Argentines have shown how to successfully attack modern ships.

              In the "War at the End of the World", as I recall, the first losses were incurred by the Argentines (including their flagship of the Navy, the cruiser and submarine), and the Argentine Air Force planes that made trouble for the British, the British SAS, then destroyed them at the airfield where they were based .. ...
              And do not compare the water area of ​​the Persian Gulf (Strait of Armuz) with the South Atlantic ....
              Do not take the Americans for fools, the first blows will fall on the coast of Iran (fuel and lubricants depots, berthing lines and SCRC) ...
              A real threat to the Navy of the Anglo-Saxons can only be a submarine (Soviet project) of the Iranian Navy, drunk in the mid-90s of the RF ....

              Iran does not need to drown the entire group. Enough pair not even aircraft carriers, but destroyers.

              And you are "kind". Who will let them do this, as soon as the US Navy AUG receives signals about the irradiation of the radar by the Iranian SCRC (old Soviet projects), "axes" will fly into the air ....
              1. +1
                20 May 2019 07: 02
                The mistake is that when you strike Iran, the answer will come to Saudi Arabia. This is the basis of Iran’s planning. Iran’s response will be to prejudice the Saudis. And of course, a blow to Israel. If Israel doesn’t manage to cause serious damage, then the Saudis don’t have to sweetly.

                Iran’s air defense is certainly not continuous. And who is it solid? The system has been updated and is being updated. And they have a lot of new designs. And its own manufacture and Chinese. At the moment, Iran’s air defense is the best among the Arab countries. Recent developments at the C300 level (according to the Iranian military). The exercises were carried out, but really were not in battle. But no one really experienced both the C300 and C400.

                Argentina used Exoset rockets. Iraq using the same rocket damaged destroyer Stark. The sloppiness of American sailors certainly took place. But who said that this is impossible to repeat?

                Regarding the map of Peters and the oil fields of Iran. If the task is not to capture the oil fields, then this makes no sense. Without a ground operation all this fuss makes no sense. But nobody wants to participate in the ground operation. I myself have posted the Peters map many times. But what is interesting. Did you watch her carefully? On it, all oil fields should belong to the Shiites. That is Iran. So you can throw it away. It was relevant 10-15 years ago. Now it has already become a fossil artifact. By the way, on this map, Saudi Arabia should not be at all.

                Summary. There will be no land operation. When hitting Iran, the answer will fly to the CA and Israel. If Iranian oil production is destroyed, the oil industry of CA will be destroyed or damaged and the Strait of Hormuz will be blocked. Oil prices skyrocket. Iran will definitely test AUG anti-aircraft defense and there is no guarantee that the Americans will withstand it. Believe me, the Persians are not limited to concern.
                1. +1
                  27 May 2019 00: 09
                  Bakht (Bakhtiyar) The system has been updated and is being updated. And they have a lot of new designs. And its own manufacture and Chinese. At the moment, Iran’s air defense is the best among the Arab countries.

                  How could it be updated if Iran was under sanctions and an embargo was imposed on it to supply B and BT, we even refused to drink the S-300 with DAM ...
                  In this regard, it (air defense) cannot be not only the best in the war, but also just good ...

                  Summary. There will be no land operation.

                  I didn’t say that it would be, I just said that the Anglo-Saxons have forces and probably about 8-10 divisions:

                  - "small fire brigade" - 173rd DShBr .;
                  - "big fire brigade" - 18th VDK (4th division);
                  - 1,5 forwarding DMP;
                  - 2-3 "heavy" divisions from the continent of the US Army;
                  - 1-2 "light" divisions from the continent of SV NG;
                  - individual AA brigades, artillery, etc .;

                  From the British BTBr. and 16th DShBr.
                  These forces are enough to organize a "sanitary corridor" between Iraq and Iran ...

                  If Iranian oil production is destroyed, the oil industry of CA will be destroyed or damaged and the Strait of Hormuz will be blocked.

                  I have a suspicion that the Anglo-Saxons do not give a damn about the SA, as well as about the IRI .... about the closure of the Strait of Armuz, in this regard, the threat may be posed by the submarines of the IRI Navy, which can be engaged in laying mines, but in the case of a "nix" they have nowhere will return ....
                  Here is an article on this topic:
                  https://topwar.ru/11392-chem-iranu-zakryt-ormuzskiy-proliv.html
                  The Iranian Navy will be destroyed, and the Coastal Forces of the Iranian Navy and SV IRI / IRGC will be driven by the US Air Force inland ....

                  Iran must test AUG air defense

                  IRI does not have such long-range SCRC, and AUGs will not be anchored off the coast of the Persian Gulf ....

                  Believe me, the Persians are not limited to concern.

                  Willingly I believe. However, when the ayatollahs spoke about the destruction of Israel, one had to think that just like that nobody would calmly look at the development of the Iran’s nuclear missile program ... and Israeli Jews would not wait for the ICBMs from Iran to fly to them ...
                  1. +1
                    27 May 2019 09: 19
                    I’m afraid that you have outdated data on Iran’s air defense. They have their own counterparts to the C300. The latest air defense exercises were conducted in November 2018. Recognized as successful.
                    There are also anti-ship missiles. They can simultaneously launch up to 200-300 missiles at sea targets in the Persian Gulf. True, experts believe that 8-10 Ticonderoges will be able to repel such a blow. But will Americans risk checking expert opinions?
                    The ability of the United States to conduct land operations is very, very limited. Yes, they have already voiced their unwillingness to conduct a ground operation. It is because of a lack of strength and fear of large losses.
                    Today, the likelihood of an attack on Iran is low precisely because of Iran's sufficiently strong air defense, anti-ship missile systems and vulnerability of the oil infrastructure of the Gulf countries.
                    PS Topwar has long left because of the inadequacy of the site admins. And in general, I'm not interested in what they write there.
                    1. 0
                      27 May 2019 21: 18
                      I’m afraid that you have outdated data on Iran’s air defense.

                      Where do you get fresh from?

                      They have their own counterparts to the C300.

                      The DPRK has relatively recently also had these "analogues" and they also had exercises, this does not mean that they have strong air defense ...

                      There are also anti-ship missiles. Can simultaneously launch up to 200-300 missiles at sea targets

                      this is how many PU they have, in the whole Navy of the Russian Federation there is so much ...

                      The ability of the United States to conduct land operations is very, very limited.

                      So I wrote about a limited operation, why the hell is Tehran ....
                      In case of loss of ports in the Persian Gulf, oil refineries, pipelines, and part of the fields, Iran will slide into the Stone Age, as her B and BT, this is a pile of idle military exhibits ...
                      1. +1
                        27 May 2019 23: 19
                        There is no point in a limited operation. The destruction of oil infrastructure will pull prices up. Iran is a minimum of 3,5-4,0 million barrels per day. Plus the blocking (even temporary) of the Strait of Hormuz and the price of oil is 200 bucks.

                        So, against the ground forces only in the IRGC there are 130 thousand motivated fighters with real combat experience.

                        Iranian Air Force is not considered. Most likely they will live a couple of days.

                        But air defense is more than 500 missile systems of various types - such as Buk, Cube, Tor-M1, S-200, S-300, Hawk and loose change. Plus, its own Iranian systems, such as the 3rd Hordad air defense system, very similar to the Buk-M2, and the Bavar-373 air defense system, are somewhat analogous to the S-300PMU. Plus more than 1100 anti-aircraft guns of various types. Plus portable anti-aircraft missile systems such as "Needle" and "Arrow". They will not bring down all tomahawks, but they will be able to thin out. Plus Chinese-made electronic warfare systems. Little is known about them at all. But there were rumors that were being served by Chinese troops.

                        Anti-ship systems are Khalij Fars ballistic anti-ship missiles with a range of 300 km, Mach 3 speed and a 650 kg warhead. It is believed that the American Aegis SM-3 and SM-6 anti-aircraft missiles are capable of intercepting them, but no one really knows. In 2006, not even Iran, but Hezbollah knocked out the Israeli corvette Khanit.
                        Iran has many other modifications of the anti-ship missiles (Nur, Gader, Fajr Daria, Nazir and others), many of which were Chinese missiles.

                        The Strait of Hormuz is blocked not only by MLRS, but also by barrel artillery fire. The northern fairway, the main one for tankers, passes generally in the territorial waters of Iran.

                        And the main thing. The purpose of war is not to destroy the enemy. This is not a computer toy. If there is no goal, then the war loses its meaning. Full-scale war will lead to chaos. The aim of amers is to change the government in Venezuela and Iran to control oil. When was the famous phrase spoken? "Whoever wants to rule the world must control oil. All oil. Wherever it is."

                        Summary - the capture of Iran is impossible. States cannot stay in Iraq and Afghanistan. What to say about Iran? The destruction of oil infrastructure is not good for the West. The goal is a change of power in Iran, but so far this is not expected. A purely military operation is risky and not useful.
                      2. +1
                        27 May 2019 23: 24
                        This method is much more efficient, but it did not work in Iran. Filmed following the election results of Ahmadinejad. So he is already five or six years old. I just like this song. And the video was shot beautifully.

                      3. +1
                        27 May 2019 23: 33
                        Quote: Bakht
                        There is no point in a limited operation. The destruction of oil infrastructure will pull prices up.

                        And it will hit primarily US competitors - the EU, China, Japan, Kazakhstan, etc ...

                        So, against the ground forces only in the IRGC there are 130 thousand motivated fighters with real combat experience.

                        Well, they will run in an isolated theater of operations, without equipment (or with equipment falling under the blows of the US Air Force), without control and communications, gradually turning into "Houthis" ...

                        The Strait of Hormuz is blocked not only by MLRS, but also by barrel artillery fire.

                        Until they were driven deep into the country ...
                      4. +1
                        27 May 2019 23: 51
                        Wait and see. An isolated theater of operations is for the States. For Iran, this is their country. All those who were on the video against the rule of the mullahs will become against the States. All other "allies" of the States will be blown away at lightning speed. The Saudis cannot do anything against the Houthis. Where are they against Iran. There will be nothing, believe me. It takes 5-6 months to transfer troops from the States, And how many goals are there for Iran to create logistics support? Cover everything? The States will burst. Brzezinski wrote about this in his famous book. Rome was great, but overstrained covering the Empire. There were not enough troops. Brzezinski prophesied the same to America. The solution is to create conditions for the local elites to be on your side. Neither Venezuela nor Iran can see this. Why the States are not conducting an operation against Venezuela or the DPRK. There, conditions are much more favorable for amers? There are some basic concepts of operational art that the Americans have transferred to the strategic level.
                      5. +1
                        28 May 2019 00: 16
                        Quote: Bakht
                        It’s 5-6 months to transfer troops from the United States. And to create rear support is how many goals for Iran? Cover everything? States will tear.

                        There will be nothing to cover if the transfer of troops begins after the destruction of the Iranian military organization ...
                        Well, for three months, they will inflict missile and bomb strikes on Iran, but six ... The USA has nowhere to rush ...

                        Why States do not oppose Venezuela or DPRK.

                        Behind the DPRK is the most numerous "marching unit" and half of the planet's storeroom, incl. endless arsenal ...
                      6. +2
                        28 May 2019 07: 51
                        So you can argue ad infinitum. I am just sure that the States will not decide on a forceful reception. Well, there is an element of hope ...

                        Two dudes are watching a movie with Stallone "Rock Climber". One says:
                        “Let's bet the bubble that he won't get to the top of the mountain.”
                        - Here you go.
                        They watch movies to the end, the hero, of course, could not help but reach. Loser:
                        - With me a bubble.
                        - Come on, actually I already saw this film and knew how it would end.
                        “So what, I saw it too.”
                        - And in FIG suggested to argue?
                        “Yes, I’m still waiting for him to break loose ...”
  2. +1
    17 May 2019 13: 51
    Apparently, the US has seriously decided to “teach a lesson” to Iran

    - Yes, no ... - apparently ... - there will be no "lesson" ... - The United States could have struck test strikes against Iran for a long time with "tomogavki", and Israel with its Air Force ... - and no " full-scale war "and would not need ...
    -But what Obama wasn’t afraid to do repeatedly, the elderly white yuppie Trump is obviously afraid ... -Quod licet Jov, non licet bovi (Which is allowed to Jupiter, is not allowed to the bull) ....
    -It is obvious that "the era of hostilities" has irrevocably ended for the United States "on Trump" ...
    -A bummer with North Korea, a bummer with Venezuela, and now another bummer with Iran ... -Hahah ...
  3. 0
    17 May 2019 16: 35
    In addition to missiles and planes, Iran also has sabotage groups (partisans) in stock, which can spoil nerves and mats. part of the States and their allies.
  4. +1
    18 May 2019 16: 13
    If the Americans nevertheless land and move to Tehran, then they will be met by the Iranian army, which has 1616 units of armored vehicles and 1533 missile launchers. This operation will definitely not be like beating the natives.

    First, why should the US take Tehran?
    The task of the United States is to destroy / seize oil fields in the border areas, to drop the Iranian armed forces deep into the coast and destroy the entire Iranian industry ... for this, strikes against the KR KR and MB and enough air strikes are enough ...
    At the final stage, operations of the NE and US MPs, with the SV SA and the military, the formation of Kurds and Sunnis will cut off the territory of Iran ...
    According to Peterson’s map, Iran should lose access to the Persian Gulf, and most of Iran will go to the created Kurdistan .....
    1. +1
      19 May 2019 00: 50
      What you have listed is not the task of Washington. And "Kurds and Sunnis will cut the territory of Iran" is from the realm of fantasy.
      Neither in Libya, nor in Venezuela, nor in Iran is there a task to destroy industry, and especially oil fields. Washington's task is to use the oil of these states to their advantage. And who is sitting in a chair they absolutely do not care. The main thing is to pump oil in the right direction. For example, Washington is absolutely not interested in promoting democracy in Saudi Arabia. And for some reason, it is very concerned about the problems of democracy in Iran or Venezuela.
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. +3
    18 May 2019 19: 29
    A donkey loaded with gold will take any city. What we saw in Iraq .. Already the generals swore allegiance to Saddam ... but betrayed ... The better the Iranian generals? Rhetorical question
  7. 0
    22 May 2019 10: 19
    The United States is capable of fighting an unarmed population and Papuans in trees. And as for the serious confrontation, they are trying to bribe the sales part of the military, and conduct barbaric bombing of the civilian population, as was the case in Korea, Vietnam and all other wars unleashed by them! Nobody has ever attacked the United States, except Japan, which was provoked by Roosevelt himself, so that the US population changes its attitude towards joining the war. The States unleashed all other wars themselves, under the pretext of Casus belli!
  8. +2
    23 May 2019 17: 43
    Not everything is as rosy as we would like.
    I remember Iraq also issued advances. Yes, and Libya, too. Moreover, Libya was torn without even using massively regular land units. Mostly special forces of some NATO countries. And everything else was done by paid barmalei.
    Therefore, to the 120 thousand American Marines, all sorts of trash will probably be added. Who will be called "rebels". And career NATO officers will plan the actions of the "rebels". And they will be armed according to NATO standards.
    The next fly in the ointment is the ethnic composition of the population of Iran. And he is very heterogeneous. The figures on the Internet for the population of Iran are very contradictory. So for the Persians themselves, the spread is from 36% to 60%. A very significant proportion of the Iranian population (up to 40% in some sources) is Iranian Azerbaijanis. There are also quite a few Kurds (about 10 million). Even from these data it is clear that there is no national unity in Iranian society. And that could be Iran’s Achilles heel. The same Azerbaijanis, who are already not big lovers of war, can offer to create their own state. Well, we also know about the Kurds in Syria.
    As for the Iranian Armed Forces directly, the situation is extraordinary. Yes, the same guards have considerable combat experience. But that is not enough. Since most military equipment is outdated. Moreover, in all military branches. If there is not enough modern equipment, then the number of troops does not solve anything.
    Personally, I am for Iran punching the American military in the teeth. But facts are stubborn. Iran alone will not pull.