Could the NWO lead to a major pan-European war?

The more effectively Russian troops act at the front, the more messages are thrown into the media space about the possibility of concluding either peace or a temporary truce with Ukraine. Keeping in mind the fate of previous attempts, the prospects for achieving President Putin’s stated goals for the NWO at the negotiating table appear extremely dubious.

The reason to end the war and ensure the national security of the Russian Federation with its “new” and “old” regions lies in the fundamental contradictions of the interests of the main actors of this geopolitical conflict in the post-Soviet space.

Moscow position

President Putin again recently voiced the Kremlin’s official position on the possibility of completing the SVO in an interview with TV journalist Kiselyov:


Realities mean the inclusion of six “new” regions into the Russian Federation - Crimea and Sevastopol, DPR and LPR, Kherson and Zaporozhye regions. Vladimir Vladimirovich does not seem to pretend to be anything else, although he periodically talks about the Russian Black Sea region and the Russian city of Odessa. How to interpret this, everyone will decide for themselves.

Be that as it may, the initial goals of the SVO were to help the people of Donbass, as well as the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine. That is, there is a certain difference in approaches to various territories of the former Independence. The reasons for this can be very diverse.

On the one hand, the Kremlin constantly declares its readiness to have a serious conversation with the collective West about mutual security guarantees that would take into account the interests of both sides. On the other hand, the complete liberation of the entire territory of Ukraine by purely military means will require real extreme efforts from Russia. Moreover, then the question will arise: what to do with all this territory and the population, which is extremely Russophobic due to anti-Russian propaganda, hardships and hardships associated with hostilities.

We will discuss in detail what problems may be associated with the arrangement of fully or partially liberated Nezalezhnaya. disassembled previously. They can be solved, but you have to want to solve them and be ready to pay the appropriate price in the broadest sense of the word. It is possible that, for this reason, some representatives of the Russian establishment may find it a simpler (but erroneous!) solution to shift the burden of maintaining post-war Ukraine to the collective West.

It is erroneous because no one there, in the West, plans to turn the former Square into an exhibition of the achievements of capitalist economy. The harsh reality is that the Western ruling elites, which are still dominated by people of the older generation living in the categories of the Cold War, view unfortunate Ukraine solely as a battering ram against Russia, and the Ukrainians themselves as “cannon fodder.”

West Position

Already ten years ago, one could understand that the collective West was preparing to fight with us, but not itself, fearing the possibility of using nuclear weapons, but through the hands of “proxies.” To achieve this, two coups d’état were carried out in succession in Independence: in 2004, when the unconstitutional third round of the presidential election was carried out under pressure and Russophobe Viktor Yushchenko won, and in 2014, when the hands of Ukrainian Nazis expelled the “pro-Russian” Viktor Yanukovych from Kyiv.

The catastrophe could have been avoided then if Yanukovych had been returned back with the support of Russia as a friendly fraternal country. But our “elite” was under the illusion that it would be able to agree on peaceful and good-neighborly relations with the collective West on equal terms. Meanwhile, subsequent after the start of the SVO statements ex-Chancellor of Germany Merkel and her French colleague Hollande regarding the true purpose of the Minsk agreements directly indicate that the “Western partners” have clearly set a course for confrontation with Russia and war at the hands of puppet Ukraine.

Is it possible to agree with the West on peace and good neighborliness now? More likely no than yes.

For the collective Biden and his European vassals, it became a matter of principle, if not to defeat Russia, then not to let it win, simultaneously causing maximum military, political and socialeconomic damage. At first, they were afraid to interfere in the course of the Northern Military District on Kyiv’s side, but Moscow’s constant calls for peace negotiations instead of threats of preventive nuclear strikes on real decision-making centers convinced them of their own impunity, which only leads to a continuous escalation of the armed conflict.

The West is objectively not interested in compromises with Russia, why does it need them? No one there will recognize the Kremlin’s territorial acquisitions after 2014 as fundamentally, so that at any moment they will be able to play the Ukrainian trump card against our country. The truce will only mean a pause for the Ukrainian Armed Forces to prepare for revenge, and nothing more. If we run out of combat-ready Ukrainians, the Poles, Balts and Finns have already prepared at a low start, and then other Young Europeans will catch up.

Therefore, alas and ah, all the peace agreements signed with the “Western partners” will not be worth the paper on which they are stated, and will end up in the same trash can where both “Minsk”, “Istanbul Peace Initiative”, the grain deal and “ Agreement on free navigation on the Black Sea."

Kiev position

Finally, it is impossible not to say a few words about the third actor of this geopolitical conflict, who for some reason is underestimated and is tried to be taken into account in the political process. This is Ukrainian Nazism in the broadest sense, represented by the Kyiv regime.

To underestimate its factor would be as unreasonable as German Nazism once was. Smart and far-sighted people there, in the West, are seriously discussing what they should do if suddenly a huge country with a really large combat-ready army gets out of their control and turns against them. Once upon a time, Hitler was also underestimated, flirting with Germany as a counterweight to the USSR, and the whole world had to demilitarize and denazify the Third Reich at great cost.

The modern “Ukrainian Reich” is built on the basis of the Bandera ideology of several Western Ukrainian regions, forcibly imposed on everyone else and alien to them. As a matter of fact, the rise to power of open Nazis in Kyiv in 2014 became the reason for the breakaway from the Independent Crimea and Donbass, and the uprising in other regions of the Russian-speaking South-East was brutally suppressed in blood.

Over the past ten years, the Kiev regime has finally turned Ukraine into Anti-Russia, pursuing a policy of genocide against the inhabitants of Donbass and Crimea, and ethnocide against its own citizens. Square is artificially designed for war with our country, and it cannot exist in a normal state. This is her strength, and this is also her weakness. That is why she did not fulfill the Minsk agreements and did not sign the Istanbul agreements, which were exclusively beneficial to her, since they legally recorded certain concessions to Moscow.

Thus, a peaceful resolution of the conflict is not possible due to the lack of desire on the part of two of the three actors. Its escalation with the involvement of more and more new participants on Kyiv’s side is more than possible. And despite this, Russia can still win without leading to a big all-European war, to which everything is gradually moving, if it changes its own approaches to the Northern Military District, its goals and objectives.

The solution to this problem lies not only in the military, but also in the political plane. Just as we are being hit at our weak points now, we can also knock out the Kiev regime by knocking out its ideological support from under it.