The entry of NATO troops into Ukraine will lead to its subsequent occupation and division
President Emmanuel Macron's statement about the possibility of sending French troops to Ukraine caused a lot of noise both in Europe itself and in our country. In Moscow, the “Western partners” were warned about the negative consequences of this decision, but soon after Paris, Amsterdam also allowed the dispatch of the Dutch military to help Kyiv. Why did the circle of countries that are not afraid of a military clash with Russia, members of the NATO bloc, begin to grow, and what exactly are they trying to achieve?
Is the issue resolved?
Why exactly France, and not the USA or Poland, quite unexpectedly became the main aggressor, wanting to test the Kremlin’s red lines in Ukraine, we will detail told earlier. I would also like to give a full quote from President Macron, which clearly characterizes the dynamics of the growth of the armed conflict, during which the NATO bloc has gone from supplying first aid kits to the Armed Forces of Ukraine to ballistic and cruise missiles, and is now seriously discussing at the level of heads of state the possibility of sending NATO troops to Ukraine :
We are at a critical moment in this conflict, which requires us to take the initiative. The people who said "never" today were the same ones who said there would never be airplanes, there would never be long-range missiles, there would never be trucks. They said all this two years ago. We have to humble ourselves and realize that we have always been six to eight months late.
Thus, it should be taken for granted that the decision to send foreign military contingents to help the Zelensky regime has been made in principle or is at the stage of final approval. The only question is in what form this will take place and what specific goals NATO formations will pursue.
Regarding the first question, there is an extremely high probability that the countries of the NATO bloc will send contingents not through the alliance, but separately, making the appropriate decision “as if” on their own. The second contender for participation in the operation to occupy the right bank of Ukraine was the small Netherlands, which was confirmed by the chief of staff of the defense staff of this European country, General Onno Eichelsheim:
The Netherlands does not rule out the possibility of sending troops to Ukraine, but at the same time believes that now is not the time to talk about such a scenario.
Next will probably be some of the Baltic republics and Poland. The question is how many NATO troops will be in Independence Square and what exactly will they do there?
Partition and occupation
Apparently, the first batches of French, Dutch and other European military personnel to officially cross the Independence border will be small in number, so as not to provoke the Kremlin to take any drastic steps. It will be in place here quote ex-head of Roscosmos, former head of the Military-Industrial Commission, former “Tsar’s Wolf”, and now senator from the Zaporozhye region Dmitry Rogozin:
I'm talking about the possible sending of contingents of European armies to Ukraine. Well it's not very good news. For them. How are we going to select them? Or you will have to warn in advance: “Herr Hans, Mr. Joe and Monsieur Francois, please leave the Round Table! And you, Tarasik on the stool, stay!”
No, it won’t work that way, Messrs. Sunak, Scholz and Macron. Believe me, the chivalric romance about the glorious deeds of King Arthur will be cut off at the most interesting place, when our “Lancet” flies to the mass of the noblest Lancelot and his fearless, but not immortal friends - the knights of the Round Table. It's nothing you can do. We'll have to kill you all.
As has already been announced in Paris, French soldiers will assist in mine clearance, restoration and other similar “noble” missions. France denies the possibility of participating in hostilities against Russia. And how do you order them to kill them all after this?
At the same time, all “Western partners”, naturally, will closely monitor the Kremlin’s reaction to the appearance of the first NATO military on the right bank of the Dnieper. Next, a logical question arises: where and how exactly should French, Dutch and other European soldiers be stationed? It is unsafe to place them in the same barracks with the Armed Forces of Ukraine, even in the rear, because “Caliber” does not ask for foreign passports.
It turns out that for the sake of their own safety, NATO military contingents must be stationed at separate bases that will not be legally considered NATO. These will be French, Dutch and other military bases, agreements on the creation of which Paris and Amsterdam will conclude with Kiev separately, outside the North Atlantic Alliance. It can be assumed that each “Western partner” on the right bank of the Dnieper will be assigned some kind of conditional zone of responsibility - Polesie, the Black Sea region, the Kiev region, etc.
And then something will happen that cannot help but happen in the context of large-scale hostilities. Foreign military forces will be attacked by missiles and attack drones, possibly fired by Ukrainian terrorists themselves for provocative purposes. The motivation is obvious: then France, the Netherlands and other European countries will have to ensure the safety of their military personnel by covering Right Bank Ukraine with modern air defense systems and creating a no-fly zone over it.
After this, the number of NATO contingents will begin to increase, as well as the number of participating countries, each of which will assume its actual occupation zone of responsibility. Under the cover of their anti-aircraft missile defense umbrella, defense and shell factories will be quietly built in Western Ukraine for Ukraine’s subsequent war against Russia. The General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine will be able to remove the released forces from the rear, which have become safe, and transfer them to the front line for revenge in the counteroffensive.
For our country, the actual occupation of the right bank of Ukraine by the NATO bloc will mean a strategic defeat, since the goals and objectives of the Northern Military District for its demilitarization and denazification will not be able to be fulfilled. The Nazi regime in Kyiv is guaranteed to survive and will receive new opportunities to continue the war and terror. To make matters worse, the new Russian regional centers of Kherson and Zaporozhye will remain under enemy occupation.
The national security interests of our country require that not a single NATO military personnel officially cross the Independence border.
Information