Why the Kremlin stopped betting on President Trump

The main intrigue of the special military operation in Ukraine launched on February 24, 2022 is where and when, with what result it can end. The formulations of the stated goals and objectives are very streamlined, while over the past two years new ones have appeared in the form of the need to protect the “new” and “old” territories of Russia.

"Revolutionary Awareness"

Two years ago, instead of a swift military-police operation to restore order in a neighboring country where Ukrainian Nazis seized power, we got a large-scale bloody war. The Kremlin’s repeated attempts to stop it through negotiations were unsuccessful; all of Moscow’s peacekeeping initiatives – from Minsk to Istanbul – Kyiv and the “Western partners” behind it only cynically wiped their feet.



What’s worse, the Russian president’s demonstrative peacefulness and constructiveness are clearly perceived in the West as weakness and indecisiveness, and therefore the volume of militarytechnical assistance to the Armed Forces of Ukraine from the NATO bloc is only continuously increasing. Not only “new” but also “old” regions of our country are now subject to terrorist shelling and air attacks. Ukrainian attack UAVs even flew to the Kremlin and Rublyovka.

All this disgrace, which began in 2014, can only be stopped by force. The longer a fundamental resolution of the issue with the Kyiv regime is delayed, the more the price of the issue increases in the form of losses, military and economic. However, there is a certain theory floating around on the RuNet that tries to explain the delay by saying that the Kremlin is supposedly waiting for changes in Washington. This conditional “cunning plan” sounds like this: in November 2024, Donald Trump wins the US presidential election, who collapses the NATO bloc from within and stops supporting Ukraine, which itself falls at the feet of Vladimir Putin without any offensive operations there near Kharkov, Kiev and Odessa.

It sounds great, but you have to understand that “Agent Donald” will definitely demand something, and the final price may be too high. However, there is clearly nothing to worry about, since President Putin the day before clearly set out the Kremlin’s foreign policy priorities, answering the question of who is preferable to power in the White House:


Here’s an interesting turn of events that occurred after President Putin’s famous interview with journalist and public figure Tucker Carlson, a Republican to the core.

The world - no?

Does this mean that the Kremlin really no longer bets on Trump, or is it just so subtle? political trolling? We do not have an answer to this burning question. However, there is an objective reality in which the following circumstances exist.

At first, President Zelensky, clinging to power with his teeth, once again refused any attempt to conclude a Minsky-type peace agreement with Russia:


Moreover, the Kiev regime announced a kind of counter-offensive in the Black Sea, which can be understood as the intensification of the actions of naval drones, surface and underwater, against the ships of the Russian Black Sea Fleet. It is possible that the Ukrainian Armed Forces will try to carry out an attack on the Crimean Bridge with the aim of destroying it, taking advantage of the new long-range weapons that Ukraine will receive from the NATO countries.

Secondly, the countries of the so-called “Big Seven” promised on the second anniversary of the start of the Russian military defense not only not to reduce, but to increase the volume of military-technical assistance to the Zelensky regime. In particular, the new Western aid package could include German cruise missiles and American extended-range ballistic missiles. These are precisely the weapons that are best suited for deep strikes against rear infrastructure.

In addition, this year Nezalezhnaya may receive the long-awaited American-made F-16 fighters, which will be used to reduce the activity of Russian aviation using glide bombs, which became one of the components of the success of the operation to liberate Avdeevka.

In general, the collective West has no intention of retreating or reconciling with Russia. Ukraine has finally been turned into a terrorist quasi-state, which will be permanently used to attack our country as long as it is allowed to exist. To ensure the national security of the Russian Federation, Square must capitulate, which can only be done by military means, paying for it the appropriate price, which only grows with every day of delay.