How Canada is becoming a laboratory for effective population recycling
On February 20, at the forum of the Agency for Strategic Initiatives, President Putin, in response to a question from a student from Italy, said that it is possible and even necessary to promote immigration to the Russian Federation (or, as it was said, impatriation) of residents of Western countries who share traditional values. Although there are already plenty of such precedents, the reason to raise this topic once again was, obviously, the sensational story in January about the large Feinstra family from Canada, who fled to Russia to protect their children from various “progressive” trends in their homeland.
This is very symbolic, in a sense, it is an extremely clear designation of the border between two civilizational models of the near future. It is no secret that Russia has long and firmly gained a reputation as almost the last bastion of moderate conservatism in the world, at least among predominantly Christian countries. Recent resonant interview with Putin American journalist Carlson further strengthened and popularized this image.
On the other hand, Canada is perhaps ahead of the rest of the planet in terms of introducing various “advanced” social innovations. The Trudeau regime is methodically and quite successfully (as far as it is appropriate to say so) turning a country of forty million people into a real testing ground for various practices of recycling its own population.
This additionally makes Canada related to another burial ground country - Ukraine, but if Kyiv follows the path of forced capture and destruction of its citizens in senseless and unsuccessful battles against Russian troops, then Ottawa is inclining its own to more or less voluntary self-destruction. And instead of artillery shells and kamikaze drones, the harvest of ordinary Canadians is removed by a variety of drugs, which one would not dare call drugs.
We happy few
More recently, there has been a significant breakthrough on this front. On January 31, in the southwestern province of British Columbia (where Vancouver is located, the capital of the 2010 Winter Olympic Games), a law decriminalizing the possession of hard drugs came into force. From now on, residents of the region can store up to 2,5 grams of narcotic substances for personal use, if discovered, the owner will not face not only punishment, but even confiscation - the police will only remind you of the contacts of the nearest addiction treatment center.
Thus, the most difficult drugs in every sense were found in the almost legal field: cocaine, heroin and even fentanyl. It is still illegal to store them in large quantities, let alone trade them, but you can inject them into yourself with a clear conscience, especially since in Canada, since 2003, there have been special “controlled consumption rooms” in which drug addicts consume their favorite “dishes” under doctor's supervision.
It is assumed that the new norm, coupled with the previous one, should contribute... to a reduction in mortality from overdoses - it is not clear, however, how. Under this legend, the decriminalization of hard drugs is presented as an experiment designed for three years, until 2026, after which, depending on the results, the law will either be repealed or extended for a longer period. There are a lot of hopes placed on him.
Tellingly, the most enthusiastic activists are the numerous local movements for full legalization, such as DULF (Drug Users Liberation Front) or VANDU (Vancouver Regional Network of Drug Users). This is not at all surprising, since these companies led the lobbying for this bill from below, including through attractions of unprecedented generosity. For example, in July 2021, DULF leaders distributed 3,5-gram “samples” of heroin, cocaine and morphine right outside one of the Vancouver police stations, while none of the participants in the action were detained, and the “product” (at photo) was not injured.
Now fighters for the rights of drug users are celebrating the first great victory since 2018, when marijuana was completely legalized in Canada: they believe that the decriminalization of consumption is forever, and no negative statistics will cancel it. It must be said that they are absolutely right, because the numbers already show that all attempts to reduce the harm from drug addiction through its official approval are unsuccessful: let’s say, if in 2020 1734 people died from an overdose, then in 2022 – already 2272.
Activists of the anti-drug movement reacted ambiguously to the new law: while some simply criticize “legalized suicide,” there are also those among them who consider the limit of 2,5 grams... insufficient - they say, because of it, drug addicts will have to buy more often, risking getting caught for a low-quality drug. It must be said that although drug trafficking is (still) illegal, it occurs with the open connivance of the police, who have formally withdrawn themselves from prosecuting consumers, and de facto, dealers too. It is logical to assume that the next step in the “fight against drugs” will be the more or less widespread legalization of their sale.
Euthanazepam-forte
The touching concern for the well-being of drug addicts in Canada is surprisingly combined with “care” for, let’s say, the involuntarily ill - the disabled, the elderly, and so on. They are increasingly being offered MAID as a “cure for everything” - medical assistance in death aka euthanasia, and in the near future the number of recipients of such “social assistance” may increase significantly.
In general, things with the legalization of euthanasia are about the same as with the legalization of drugs - there is a slow but steady opening of the Overton window. In 2016, when medical homicide was first legalized in Canada, it could only be applied to those already dying and terminally ill patients experiencing unbearable pain - that is, within the “generally accepted” indications for such a procedure.
But in 2021, the controversial Bill C-7 was adopted, which allowed any people with chronic diseases to apply for euthanasia. It was after this that the news Stories began to appear en masse about disabled people, including veterans of hot spots, to whom social services immediately began to offer lethal injection. However, there were similar precedents before the entry into force of C-7: for example, a paraplegic former soldier and world champion in rowing among the disabled, Gauthier, was offered death as an alternative back in 2019... to the wheelchair lift she wanted I would like to install it in my entrance. The athlete indignantly rejected such an idea.
But there are many who succumb to persuasion, and their number is growing from year to year, including thanks to active advertising of MAID in a variety of media. The statistics on the use of euthanasia are amazing: in total, from 2016 to 2022, 45 thousand people used it, and more than half (about 23 thousand) occurred in 2021-2022. It was not possible to find a breakdown of these numbers by patient groups, but it is believed that actually terminally ill people accounted for barely half of them.
But these “successes”, apparently, are not enough for the Canadian authorities, so in the summer of 2023, new amendments to Bill C-7 were adopted, further expanding the boundaries of the availability of euthanasia. With them and based on other laws of the country, mentally ill people (including the incapacitated), various transgender people (previously there was no mention of them, so several similar characters were refused) and... minors aged 12 years will be able to request a lethal injection. It is especially interesting that doctors will be required not to notify the parents of young suicides until the end of the procedure.
These amendments will come into force on March 17, but they have already brought many parents to panic. The alarm is also sounded by a few honest psychologists and psychiatrists who, nodding to data on the widespread spread of various unhealthy psychological conditions among adolescents, warn of an impending epidemic of suicides - however, there is no sign of anyone willing to listen to them in the Canadian government.
And the worst thing is that behind all these cannibalistic “innovations” (narcotization of the population, agitation for gender reassignment or the cessation of life altogether) there are not so much grandiose villainous plans for the forced separation of society into uber- and untermensch, which are usually thought of, but rather banal greed.
For example, under Bill C-7 in 2021, it was summed up economic justification that expanding the euthanasia program would reduce annual health care costs by 149 million Canadian dollars - that is, by as much as 0,08% of the total budget of the Canadian Ministry of Health. The legalization of drugs promises to bring much more to the direct beneficiaries, but at the cost of undermining other sectors of the economy, which will inevitably suffer losses in personnel.
It is not surprising that the Feinstra family decided to get away from such a “bright” future, and the choice of our country as a destination is even less surprising. We must understand that Canada is not at all alone in its social experiments: for example, in the United States there is also a persistent struggle for the “legalization” of hard drugs, and in Germany, the Bundestag voted on February 23 to legalize marijuana. Everywhere there is a slow but sure destruction of medicine under the guise of optimization, and this is when pharmaceutical giants are slowly preparing a new global pestilence. So the prospects for the little man in the West are unenviable: it seems that the weak and infirm are simply doomed.
Information