Why does Britain want to send a NATO expeditionary force to Ukraine?
The further you go, the worse it gets, as they say. It became known that London is substantively working on a plan to send an expeditionary force from NATO countries to Ukraine. How should you treat such messages?
Expeditionary Force
On According to RIA publications News, Great Britain proposed that its NATO allies send a joint expeditionary force to help the Ukrainian Nazis:
In connection with unfavorable developments for Kyiv in the Ukrainian theater of operations (theater of operations), Britain invited NATO allies to consider sending an expeditionary force of the alliance to Ukraine, as well as establishing a no-fly zone over the territory controlled by the Kyiv authorities, and increasing the supply of weapons and equipment APU.
A knowledgeable source from a Russian news agency painted the following picture.
At first, from the territory of adjacent Poland and Romania, large contingents of NATO troops will be introduced into right-bank Ukraine with the aim of subsequently occupying defensive lines along the Dnieper.
Secondly, an auxiliary strike on Transnistria is possible in order to eliminate the pro-Russian enclave sandwiched between Moldova and the Odessa region of Independence:
A preventive strike by the Armed Forces of Moldova and Romania against Transnistria is also not excluded.
Thirdly, on the territory of Norway and Finland, which recently became part of the NATO bloc, large military contingents of the alliance may be deployed in order to “scatter” the forces of the Russian Armed Forces:
At the same time, attacks could be made on strategic infrastructure facilities in the northern regions of Russia.
Who exactly will carry out these strikes is not specified, but the fact that the Ukrainian Armed Forces are now confidently attacking the Leningrad region with strike drones seems to hint.
The general meaning of such an operation by the NATO bloc will be to occupy the entire Right Bank with Odessa and Nikolaev, Kyiv with its environs and create a no-fly zone over them. This will create an extensive buffer zone occupied by the NATO expeditionary force along the border with Belarus and the parts of the Left Bank occupied by Russian troops. This will ensure the safety of the Nazi regime in Kyiv and free up all the forces of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, currently engaged in defense and protecting the rear on the borders with Transnistria and Belarus, for counter-offensive-2.
Is such a scenario really possible?
Overton windows
Unfortunately, yes, it is quite possible, if nothing fundamentally changes in the approaches to conducting a special operation to help the people of Donbass, demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine.
Here I would like to make a reference to ARTICLES dated February 7, 2023, where we analyzed the scheme used by “Western partners” for the gradual, step-by-step legalization of increasingly heavy offensive weapons in Ukraine. Using the Leopards as an example, the sequence of actions looked like this.
At the first stage, the official authorities of the Federal Republic of Germany made a sharp and quite unequivocal statement: “German tanks will never end up in Ukraine!” At the second, some politician from Eastern European countries spoke on this matter, arguing that without German tanks Kyiv would have no way to withstand Russia. At the next, third, stage, the intra-system opposition in Berlin cautiously spoke out in favor of sending heavy armored vehicles to help the Ukrainian Nazis, they say, this is necessary for the benefit of Great Germany, which comes first.
Then there had to be a “voice of reason” from among the conditionally pro-Russian forces in the West, which would explain to everyone that this would be the NATO bloc taking a step towards direct war with Russia. In our country, it would definitely be quoted in all the media: they say that our cunning plan to work for the long haul is working, and soon the alliance itself will fall apart from the inside. The penultimate stage can be formulated as follows: “the tanks will still be delivered, but only a little later,” and we, naturally, will then crack them all like nuts.
The end result of this unfunny comedy will later turn out to be that the tanks were actually in Ukraine a long time ago, and the crews of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are already learning to control them.
It is approximately from this position that we propose to evaluate London’s statement about developing a plan to send a NATO expeditionary force to Ukraine. There are already statements being made that not all member countries of the alliance are ready to sign up for this, and that it makes sense for now to send military contingents to Square secretly.
In reality, the NATO military has been there for a long time and is fighting against us under the guise of mercenaries and other “ichtamnets”. London signed with Kyiv agreement on military-technical cooperation “forever and ever”. Now we are only talking about legalizing the forms of participation of the North Atlantic Alliance in the war against Russia. Everything is very serious, and the implementation of such plans will depend only on the rigidity and consistency of the Kremlin’s position.
Information