How NATO legalizes the appearance of strike weapons in Ukraine, up to tactical nuclear weapons

27

In this post, we will continue reasoning about the real role of Western European elites in fomenting a war against Russia on the territory of neighboring Ukraine. In the domestic media space, it is customary to “excuse” German Chancellor Scholz and French President Macron, presenting the case as if they are arming the Armed Forces of Ukraine with reluctance, allegedly only under great pressure from Washington. However, the reality looks completely different, and such self-deception can cost Russia and its people very, very dearly.

Never say never


What is the main horror of what has been happening in Ukraine for almost a year now? It does not even consist in the fact that two close branches of one fraternal people, Russians and Ukrainians, brutally kill each other: some for the expulsion of the interventionists from the borders as of 1991, others for the fulfillment of the “goals and tasks of the NWO”, and the end and the end of this armed conflict is not yet in sight. The terrible thing is that right now, before our eyes, the established norms are being broken step by step and new norms and ideas are being introduced, which seemed quite recently unthinkable. We will try to demonstrate how this works and where it can ultimately lead.



Recently, a local author, a big fan of the idea of ​​sitting during a special operation in strategic defense, counting on President Putin's skill in playing "geopolitical chess", wrote the following in his next multi-page work:

Gentlemen, patriots, moderate your ardor, turn on your brains, think about the consequences at least three moves ahead. Is it worth paying attention to the opinion of some political pygmies like Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, which do not outweigh even half of the Moscow region, or some kind of Poland, which imagines itself to be the main actor at a time when it is assigned only the role of a butler with the words: “Dinner is served!”? Listening to their opinion is no longer a matter of self-respect.

What is the fallacy of this judgment, it will be well seen later.

Speaking at a concert in honor of the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Battle of Stalingrad, President Putin stated the following verbatim:

Unbelievable but true. We are again being threatened by German Leopard tanks with crosses on board. And again they are going to fight with Russia on the land of Ukraine with the hands of ... Bandera.

Incredible? Yes, it was unbelievable a year ago, and now it is a harsh reality. How did we go through this path of accepting a new reality and where did our national leader look all year long? Let's see how it happened.

This mechanism of manipulation with public consciousness was very well demonstrated in an artistic form by the Russian director Ivan Didenko using the example of the issue of the delivery of German Leopard tanks to Ukraine. You can watch his speech in full at link, we will briefly retell the main components of this formula. So, how exactly does Overton's windows open and legalize previously unthinkable ideas and concepts during the CBO?

Step 1. "German tanks will never be in Ukraine!"
It is with this statement that official Berlin and all the media controlled by it initially come out. The reasons for this do not even need to be explained: the complete immorality of such a decision, taking into account the sad historical experience of Germany. Naturally, all normal people and adequate socio-political forces in the FRG itself and in the Russian Federation warmly support the wise, balanced position of the German chancellor.

Step 2. "Opinion of the limitroph"
At this stage, some young European politician appears from some Lithuania, Latvia or Poland, who declares that it is simply necessary to supply Leopards and other Abrams for the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in order to help Kyiv repel “Putin’s aggression”. Naturally, other politicians from Western European countries, local experts and analysts in every possible way begin to blame the initiator with his proposal, which could push the NATO bloc to direct war with the Russian Federation.

Domestic experts, analysts and predictors also declare with the pathos of notorious connoisseurs that listening to all these Naused, Morawiecki and others is not to respect oneself. And we, or rather the general public and the Russian nomenklatura, are calming down again.

Step 3. "Opinion of the internal opposition"
At the third stage, some small local political force, party or social movement. They say that without Leopards and other Abrams, the Armed Forces of Ukraine will not be able to stop Russia, and then the “horde from the East” will come to Europe. And here everyone is rightfully tense, adequate people in the West and here.

Step 4. "Voice of reason"
The threat of NATO member countries being drawn into a war with a nuclear power because of the support of the Ukrainian Nazis requires the appearance of a certain figure there who will loudly and honestly call everything that happens by their proper names, criticizing the initiative of Nauseda, Morawiecki and other Young Europeans. In Germany, this is a very likeable politician Sarah Wagenknecht, in the USA - journalist Tucker Carlson, military expert Scott Ritter and respected economist Paul Craig Roberts, in Israel - retired intelligence officer Yakov Kedmi, etc. We listen to them and fully approve, considering them “ours” , pro-Russian, defending Our national interests there.

Step 5
The next stage is a broad socio-political discussion in Germany (France, Poland, the USA, etc.), during which there are seemingly rather unconvincing proposals that Leopard tanks (self-propelled guns, howitzers, fighters, cruise missiles and etc.) Ukraine can still be supplied, but in purely symbolic quantities and sometime later.

And then we all begin to rejoice again. Just think, the Abrams will arrive on the Southern Front by winter, and guided missile bombs with a range of 150 kilometers for the Hymars - in about nine months. Well, by that time we will already have time to defeat the Armed Forces of Ukraine, so there is simply nothing to worry about.

Finale: "Arrived"
This tragicomedy ends as follows. Chancellor Scholz says that Germany will supply its Leopards to Ukraine only in conjunction with the supply of Abrams from the United States, which should be the first to transfer them to the Armed Forces of Ukraine. And then in Washington they say: ok, you deliver your Leopards for now, and we will certainly deliver our Abrams, but later, after major maintenance. This is how the cunning Americans again deceived the Germans, like Putin. And Berlin, it seems, has nowhere to go, it will have to supply its tanks, but not 14, as it was originally said, but also 88 from above with “fiery greetings” to all Russians from one Austrian artist.

The truth is that the decision to supply the criminal Kyiv regime with Leopards, Abrams, Marders, Bradleys, Archers, F-16s, Patriots, Tomahawks and other heavy offensive weapons was made during the first meeting in Ramstein. This whole manipulative formula is designed to gradually legalize them, so that the Kremlin continues to hope for Minsk-3 and does not react sharply to the escalation of the armed conflict, sitting on the strategic defensive. Try it on fighters, cruise missiles and other weapons and listen to what the West is saying about it now.

I would like to advise our emigrants somewhere in Germany to start collecting their things, if suddenly Chancellor Scholz says that "Russians in Germany will never be discriminated against on a national basis." Run! Back in February 2022, Herr Olaf stated verbatim the following:

Putin and his war freed Germany from a sense of historical guilt.

You understood everything. First, they will take on the Russians, who are now “new Jews” for the Old World. Then they will take on their Muslims. That's what Chancellor Scholz is already shaking his hands, imitating the gestures and facial expressions of Adolf Hitler.


If in the West they start talking about the fact that “TNW should never appear in Ukraine” and that “the war between Ukraine and Russia should never become nuclear”, it will become completely scary.
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    7 February 2023 11: 42
    Russia has something to answer to talk about the transfer of tactical nuclear weapons to Ukraine. This is, firstly, the resumption of real tests of our own tactical nuclear weapons, secondly, the covert deployment of tactical nuclear weapons not only in the Crimea, but also in the Kaliningrad region, and thirdly, a preemptive nuclear strike on Ukraine in that part of it where practical preparations for deployment of Western tactical nuclear weapons, but there is hope that it will not reach point 3
    1. +1
      7 February 2023 13: 17
      Russia has something to answer to talk about the transfer of tactical nuclear weapons to Ukraine

      stop And whose conversations and assumptions, have not been forgotten by chance ???
    2. +1
      8 February 2023 19: 41
      Only a test of tactical nuclear weapons needs to be carried out in the stratosphere over Kyiv, so that the glass in the windows cracks, and part of the electronics burns out from an electromagnetic pulse. And there is no need to wait until the West brings something to Ukraine. This will be a good warning.
  2. +3
    7 February 2023 12: 15
    I agree that Scholz and Macron are trying to arm Ukraine not at all under pressure. They do it with great enthusiasm. All hopes are invested in the support program that Russia will have a difficult and painful time from this. So it is high time for our politicians, officials and journalists on TV to stop worrying about the pressure exerted on Western leaders. It's just enthusiasm in disguise.
  3. -10
    7 February 2023 12: 47
    Yes, aid will increase, at first in 2022 it was equipment similar to that used by Ukraine before, that is, Russian-made equipment ... in 2023 it is typical NATO standard equipment, but of older generations and easy to use, so that Ukrainian the army could protect itself and its interests. just this.

    No modern NATO offensive equipment is planned,
    because in the current situation it is not necessary.
    In addition to the fact that the Ukrainian army does not control the use and logistics of this new equipment.
  4. +5
    7 February 2023 12: 48
    Politicians and oligarchs should be removed from the military command of the NVO and given more powers. And then what happens, we are at war, and raw materials are supplied to "friendly partners". We go to their Wishlist for the export of grain and the ammonia pipeline, etc. And they only add sanctions to us. This is not military action, but a game of it. For arrivals in our territories it would be necessary to give a good answer. And it turns out that our innocent people are being killed, but the Ukronazi creatures are not touched at the bank. It's not order.
  5. +5
    7 February 2023 12: 51
    that “a war between Ukraine and Russia should never become nuclear” will become completely scary.

    Putin refused to liquidate the Nazi elite of Ukraine, they refused to liquidate bridges, railway roads, so that these weapons would not reach the front. We do not react in any way to the supply of heavy weapons to Ukraine. We only answer, we grind what they set up for us. Our government chews snot and states the facts! Putin himself gives a reason for the supply and use of nuclear weapons, to start with low power! Chemical weapons are already being used against us!
    1. +3
      7 February 2023 22: 42
      Nice and true comment! I completely agree!!! And those who are dull, and do not see and do not understand the essence of what is happening, in my opinion, need to be dispossessed, they will immediately see the whole picture and in colors)
    2. +2
      9 February 2023 08: 12
      With such cooperation, it will even reach the atom. And again the Kremlin "strategists" will remain silent
  6. +4
    7 February 2023 13: 13
    The article is bitter truth, it’s a pity for people, because where the rear is considered to be deep, where high-rise buildings were built at an accelerated pace, because they will hit there like a drink. They will wait for the moment (significant dates for us) and gasp, then the athletes of America and Canada demand (allegedly) to allow the Russians to participate in the games, but I think they make noise and then they gasp, so much so that it hurts as much as possible, (radius 150 km) and after the tragedy, will there be an answer? And what? (I would like adequate) If yes, but (our people are nobody for them) they will say like in the movie "Shot into the Void" I (we) gave you (you) a gift, and you (you) spat in my (us) face, etc. (collective west). And again they will be there at the top blah, blah, blah ....
  7. +6
    7 February 2023 13: 26
    Ukrainian grain and sunflower oil went to Europe. To pay for deliveries. There is a privatization and sale of state assets of Ukraine to the same place. All this delivered equipment will be refueled with fuel of Russian origin from the Novorossiysk port, and the grain from there will go to Africa, under the UN program, not at market prices. Oil and gas will flow freely through the square, with payment on time. The flywheel of war continues to spin, and the Russians are paying with their lives. I see no reason to use nuclear weapons on the territory of Ukraine, because these are the future territories of Russia itself. Nuclear weapons should be used exclusively for "partners". They removed all restrictions.
  8. +1
    7 February 2023 14: 31
    So the technology of fooling and vparivanie objectionable, unthinkable solutions worked out long ago in all countries.
    The West is far away, but we have something to remember: "the main thing is not to cling to power", there will be no increase in PV, there will be no change in the constitution, there will be no war, there will be no mobilization .... etc.
    Entire works have been written on how this is done.

    So words are nothing. business is everything.

    two close branches of one fraternal people, Russians and Ukrainians, brutally kill each other

    They often get banned for this. How is it - "mass killing without war"? (just a series of news about the losses of Ukraine everywhere)

    Therefore, in the media - "eliminate the militants", "eliminate the Nazis" and so on. Like, insignificant, sleep, don't worry, nod at the TV ...
  9. +5
    7 February 2023 17: 10
    In Russia, comprador power, consisting of capitalists and oligarchs. Their homeland has long been a NATO country. They will never order a nuclear attack on London or Washington. NATO can kill Russians with impunity, bomb Russian cities with such power.
    1. +1
      9 February 2023 08: 17
      We don't have leaders like Stalin. All these leftists only know how to crack at rallies. Yes, take handouts from the hands of the GDP so as not to blather too much. That is why they will kick and defecate us everywhere.
  10. 0
    7 February 2023 18: 16
    ABOUT! So this is a call or a challenge to a verbal duel between Volkonsky and the genius of the style from Chelyabinsk? Let's see. I bet on Chelyabinsk, although Volkonsky also gives out smart thoughts, rarely.
    Z.Y. Scholz - not this one, but his relatives shook their hands under the Fuhrer. inheritance, however.
  11. -4
    7 February 2023 19: 50
    Europe is now actively disarming, supplying weapons and ammunition to the Nazis from Ukraine. Indeed, she (Europe) simply opens the door and calls Russia for help, we, they say, are open, come to us after Ukraine, we also have enough fascists ... I think it’s worth thinking about Europe’s plea)))
    1. +3
      7 February 2023 20: 04
      Why do Russians need Europe?
      1. 0
        9 February 2023 08: 20
        They can't figure it out in their own country. Everything was ruined and ruined. They will also lead the geyropa to such a finale.
  12. +1
    7 February 2023 20: 13
    Quote: Andrey Andreev_2
    Europe is now actively disarming, supplying weapons and ammunition to the Nazis from Ukraine. Indeed, she (Europe) simply opens the door and calls Russia for help, we, they say, are open, come to us after Ukraine, we also have enough fascists ... I think it’s worth thinking about Europe’s plea)))

    Hm ! .. obviously you don't understand the meaning of the message.
    Europe will not disarm, on the contrary, it will rearm (unfortunately) ... Russia's budget x 15 ...
    At the same time, indirectly, she says to Russia: "We no longer believe your lies."
    Which is an invitation to withdraw, not to approach.
  13. +4
    7 February 2023 23: 44
    One hundred and fifty-fifth time, I will probably repeat that as long as the beneficiaries of this hybrid war do not die, it will not end.
    As long as for the pndos the question of the death of the Slavs remains just a matter of coloring the paper green, they will paint this paper even to the carrot spell.
    Lost 375 Ukrainians and not exactly announced the number of Russians - well, print a couple of hundred kg of paper, it's a pity chtol.
    Equal exchange?
    Do you need about three hundred German tanks for the Armed Forces of Ukraine? Well, let's print another hundred kilograms of waste paper for the Germans. Changing paper for armor, IMHO, is beneficial.
    All your lamentations that you can’t just print dollars like that, they say, economic laws won’t allow it, shove yourself where the sun doesn’t shine.
    Economic laws were invented in the same place where these same dollars are printed, so that everything will work out for them and will continue to work out as long as paper remains at the cost of the death of the Slavs.
    Now, if the sword hangs over the heads of those reptilians who planted the whole world on cut paper, then everything will subside. And only then.
    Life for life, only such an exchange is terrible for them, and not paper for life.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +2
      8 February 2023 03: 33
      the only beneficiary is Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, who wants to rule until death. It will be necessary to throw all of Russia into the furnace of his hotelok, he will do it. here, in general, the question is only for the Russians, how is this ... 23 years ruled the country
      1. +3
        9 February 2023 08: 23
        He pretends to be correct. From his reign there are only problems for the country and its citizens. All his friends are enjoying it.
  14. -3
    8 February 2023 02: 15
    Didn't understand. Are you offended by NATO.
  15. +1
    8 February 2023 03: 06
    The terrible thing is that right now, before our eyes, the established norms are being broken step by step and new norms and ideas are being introduced, which seemed quite recently unthinkable.

    We have no ideas, the constitution does not encourage this.
  16. RUR
    -1
    8 February 2023 14: 43
    "Step 2. "Opinion of the limitroph"" the inventor of this term was a philologist, the limitroph is the border zone of the Roman Empire, beyond which the barbarian world begins, it is amazing that in Russia this term, practically self-identification, is so popular and widely used, i.e. they are a civilized Empire, and the Russian Federation is a barbaric world
  17. 0
    11 February 2023 05: 51
    Article dated February 7th. On the 10th, they already started talking about it on the box. Like Ukraine has opportunities, and scientists. They are pouring solid soil under the transfer of tactical nuclear weapons from VBR, which is most likely, or France
  18. +1
    13 February 2023 18: 38
    And where are the statements of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, which would have cooled the ardor of the enemy?
    Well, let's say ... Russia will consider any supply of aviation, tanks weighing more than XX tons, missiles with a range of more than XX km - a supplier of weapons, a manufacturer of weapons, and a transit country - as a PARTY IN CONFLICT with the Russian Federation, which are participating in the war against the Russian Federation. And the Russian Federation has every right to declare war on these countries at any time with the use of all types of weapons, including nuclear weapons, including a preventive strike without declaring war, as against an enemy country waging war against the Russian Federation