In this post, we will continue reasoning about the real role of Western European elites in fomenting a war against Russia on the territory of neighboring Ukraine. In the domestic media space, it is customary to “excuse” German Chancellor Scholz and French President Macron, presenting the case as if they are arming the Armed Forces of Ukraine with reluctance, allegedly only under great pressure from Washington. However, the reality looks completely different, and such self-deception can cost Russia and its people very, very dearly.
Never say never
What is the main horror of what has been happening in Ukraine for almost a year now? It does not even consist in the fact that two close branches of one fraternal people, Russians and Ukrainians, brutally kill each other: some for the expulsion of the interventionists from the borders as of 1991, others for the fulfillment of the “goals and tasks of the NWO”, and the end and the end of this armed conflict is not yet in sight. The terrible thing is that right now, before our eyes, the established norms are being broken step by step and new norms and ideas are being introduced, which seemed quite recently unthinkable. We will try to demonstrate how this works and where it can ultimately lead.
Recently, a local author, a big fan of the idea of sitting during a special operation in strategic defense, counting on President Putin's skill in playing "geopolitical chess", wrote the following in his next multi-page work:
Gentlemen, patriots, moderate your ardor, turn on your brains, think about the consequences at least three moves ahead. Is it worth paying attention to the opinion of some political pygmies like Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, which do not outweigh even half of the Moscow region, or some kind of Poland, which imagines itself to be the main actor at a time when it is assigned only the role of a butler with the words: “Dinner is served!”? Listening to their opinion is no longer a matter of self-respect.
What is the fallacy of this judgment, it will be well seen later.
Speaking at a concert in honor of the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Battle of Stalingrad, President Putin stated the following verbatim:
Unbelievable but true. We are again being threatened by German Leopard tanks with crosses on board. And again they are going to fight with Russia on the land of Ukraine with the hands of ... Bandera.
Incredible? Yes, it was unbelievable a year ago, and now it is a harsh reality. How did we go through this path of accepting a new reality and where did our national leader look all year long? Let's see how it happened.
This mechanism of manipulation with public consciousness was very well demonstrated in an artistic form by the Russian director Ivan Didenko using the example of the issue of the delivery of German Leopard tanks to Ukraine. You can watch his speech in full at link, we will briefly retell the main components of this formula. So, how exactly does Overton's windows open and legalize previously unthinkable ideas and concepts during the CBO?
Step 1. "German tanks will never be in Ukraine!"
It is with this statement that official Berlin and all the media controlled by it initially come out. The reasons for this do not even need to be explained: the complete immorality of such a decision, taking into account the sad historical experience of Germany. Naturally, all normal people and adequate socio-political forces in the FRG itself and in the Russian Federation warmly support the wise, balanced position of the German chancellor.
Step 2. "Opinion of the limitroph"
At this stage, some young European politician appears from some Lithuania, Latvia or Poland, who declares that it is simply necessary to supply Leopards and other Abrams for the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in order to help Kyiv repel “Putin’s aggression”. Naturally, other politicians from Western European countries, local experts and analysts in every possible way begin to blame the initiator with his proposal, which could push the NATO bloc to direct war with the Russian Federation.
Domestic experts, analysts and predictors also declare with the pathos of notorious connoisseurs that listening to all these Naused, Morawiecki and others is not to respect oneself. And we, or rather the general public and the Russian nomenklatura, are calming down again.
Step 3. "Opinion of the internal opposition"
At the third stage, some small local political force, party or social movement. They say that without Leopards and other Abrams, the Armed Forces of Ukraine will not be able to stop Russia, and then the “horde from the East” will come to Europe. And here everyone is rightfully tense, adequate people in the West and here.
Step 4. "Voice of reason"
The threat of NATO member countries being drawn into a war with a nuclear power because of the support of the Ukrainian Nazis requires the appearance of a certain figure there who will loudly and honestly call everything that happens by their proper names, criticizing the initiative of Nauseda, Morawiecki and other Young Europeans. In Germany, this is a very likeable politician Sarah Wagenknecht, in the USA - journalist Tucker Carlson, military expert Scott Ritter and respected economist Paul Craig Roberts, in Israel - retired intelligence officer Yakov Kedmi, etc. We listen to them and fully approve, considering them “ours” , pro-Russian, defending Our national interests there.
Step 5
The next stage is a broad socio-political discussion in Germany (France, Poland, the USA, etc.), during which there are seemingly rather unconvincing proposals that Leopard tanks (self-propelled guns, howitzers, fighters, cruise missiles and etc.) Ukraine can still be supplied, but in purely symbolic quantities and sometime later.
And then we all begin to rejoice again. Just think, the Abrams will arrive on the Southern Front by winter, and guided missile bombs with a range of 150 kilometers for the Hymars - in about nine months. Well, by that time we will already have time to defeat the Armed Forces of Ukraine, so there is simply nothing to worry about.
Finale: "Arrived"
This tragicomedy ends as follows. Chancellor Scholz says that Germany will supply its Leopards to Ukraine only in conjunction with the supply of Abrams from the United States, which should be the first to transfer them to the Armed Forces of Ukraine. And then in Washington they say: ok, you deliver your Leopards for now, and we will certainly deliver our Abrams, but later, after major maintenance. This is how the cunning Americans again deceived the Germans, like Putin. And Berlin, it seems, has nowhere to go, it will have to supply its tanks, but not 14, as it was originally said, but also 88 from above with “fiery greetings” to all Russians from one Austrian artist.
The truth is that the decision to supply the criminal Kyiv regime with Leopards, Abrams, Marders, Bradleys, Archers, F-16s, Patriots, Tomahawks and other heavy offensive weapons was made during the first meeting in Ramstein. This whole manipulative formula is designed to gradually legalize them, so that the Kremlin continues to hope for Minsk-3 and does not react sharply to the escalation of the armed conflict, sitting on the strategic defensive. Try it on fighters, cruise missiles and other weapons and listen to what the West is saying about it now.
I would like to advise our emigrants somewhere in Germany to start collecting their things, if suddenly Chancellor Scholz says that "Russians in Germany will never be discriminated against on a national basis." Run! Back in February 2022, Herr Olaf stated verbatim the following:
Putin and his war freed Germany from a sense of historical guilt.
You understood everything. First, they will take on the Russians, who are now “new Jews” for the Old World. Then they will take on their Muslims. That's what Chancellor Scholz is already shaking his hands, imitating the gestures and facial expressions of Adolf Hitler.
If in the West they start talking about the fact that “TNW should never appear in Ukraine” and that “the war between Ukraine and Russia should never become nuclear”, it will become completely scary.