The rapid evolution of Russian attack drones "Geran-2" and "Italmas"

16

Jumping on the bandwagon of a departing train, Russia hastily began to develop its unmanned aircraft, mastering Chinese and Iranian Technology, improving them and creating your own. This rapid evolution can be most clearly seen in the family of kamikaze drones of Iranian origin, known as Geranium-2.

Iranian "flower"


“Kamikaze” drones with a flight range of more than 1000 km appeared in Russia quite suddenly last summer, when the need arose to launch massive air strikes against critical Ukrainian infrastructure in the deep rear. Due to the presence of a serious air defense system in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the Russian Aerospace Forces cannot operate freely in the skies over Nezalezhnaya, glide bombs with correction modules appeared quite recently, and the stock of expensive missiles in the warehouses of the Russian Ministry of Defense is far from unlimited.



The Russian General Staff is forced to keep in mind the possibility of further escalation of the conflict and the involvement of NATO countries in it on the side of the Kyiv regime. Therefore, a reasonable decision was to try out Iranian strike drones to break through the enemy air defense/missile defense system with massive combined strikes. Shahed 136, called “Geran-2” in Russia, was almost ideal for this task.

These attack drones have many more advantages than disadvantages. Their 2-stroke engine is MADO MD 550 (a clone of the German aircraft engine Limbach L550E) with a power of 50 hp. With. capable of delivering a warhead weighing half a centner over a distance of 1000 to 2000 km. The cruising speed of an aircraft projectile is 150-170 km/h, and it flies at an altitude of 4000 to 60 meters, which makes it difficult to detect and intercept.

By the way, the term loitering ammunition for Shahed 136/"Geran-2" is not entirely applicable, since the drone does not have a patrol mode, setting off on its first and last suicidal flight to the target at given coordinates. What is important is the extreme technical simplicity and low cost of the attack drone, which allows them to be produced using a conveyor belt and used en masse, which has recently become very noticeable.

The disadvantages of the Shahed 136/Geran-2 are equally well known: relative to any missile, low speed and a specific, clearly audible “moped” sound during flight, as well as the absence of a loitering mode. Apparently, domestic designers were able to solve these problems by radically increasing the tactical and technical characteristics of attack drones.

Russian selection


A couple of days ago it was published on Reporter publication, which spoke about the prospects opening up for domestic drones after the launch of a family of small-sized gas turbine engines developed at the Samara National Research University named after Academician S.P. Korolev. In particular, it was indicated that the installation of more powerful engines will increase the performance characteristics of “kamikaze” drones such as “Geranium” and “Lancet”.

Surprisingly, there were people who knew better from their sofas and sharply condemned the intentions of the Samara developers of the MGTD. Their reasoning and fascinating discussion can be found in the comments. I had to return to this topic so soon after an interview with the Sputnik agency of the honored military pilot of Russia, retired Major General Vladimir Popov, in which he spoke about the emergence of a new generation of “kamikaze” drones, already equipped with a jet engine:

Previously, with first-generation piston engines, the speed of the Geranium was 180-200 kilometers per hour. During a dive it reached 300 kilometers. Now it’s 450-600 kilometers per hour, up to 800 is already developing, and during a dive it can be even more.

Here are those times, and here are those two. Real, and not armchair, military experts rightly point out that such a significant increase in the speed of an aircraft projectile by 2,5 times reduces the time “window” for timely detection, establishment of routes and capture for accurate auto-tracking of drone data using radar detectors and multifunctional TRML-4D radars and AN/MPQ-64F1 Sentinel, included in the radar architectures of multi-element air defense systems IRIS-T SLM, NASAMS-2, etc. Also, remotorization will increase the operating ceiling of the Geranium jet to 8500 m, which will allow it to operate beyond the high-altitude limit of intercepting self-propelled vehicles SAM Crotale-NG, Stormer HVM and ZAK Gepard. Not a bad increase in performance characteristics.

The disadvantages include the reduction in the combat radius of the drone from 1000-2000 km to 600-850 km, but this is enough for the conditions of the Northern Military District. The problem of increasing the infrared signature in connection with the emergence of a high-temperature jet stream can be solved by giving the tail section with the nozzle block a “beaver tail” type layout with a top-oriented cut, as well as by installing an additional cooling circuit filled with the oncoming aerodynamic flow through specialized air ducts associated with the air intakes in leading edges of the wing. Thanks to this technical solution, the infrared signature from the jet engine will be slightly higher than that of the MD550 engine. At the same time, the absence of a radio-contrast engine crankcase will even make it possible to reduce the image intensifier when irradiated into the rear hemisphere of the UAV.

In parallel with the remotorization of promising drones, experiments are being conducted with new types of warheads. One of the most promising areas can be considered the installation of a thermobaric warhead on the Geranium, which burns everything around with a temperature of several thousand degrees. Why do we need drones with such warheads if we have Solntsepeks and MLRS?

Then, the destruction range of the TOS-1A Solntsepek and TOS-2 Tosochka MLRS is only 6–7 km and over 20 km, respectively. “Smerch” can launch a rocket with a thermobaric warhead at a distance of up to 70 km. The flight range of the Geranium can reach 2000 km, depending on the type of engine. At the same time, the weight of the drone’s warhead is comparable to that of Tosochka and is only half that of the thermobaric charge of the Smerch MLRS.

As for the problem of the absence of a loitering regime, it seems to have been solved by the younger brother of “Geranium” in the flower family - “Italmas”, about which we will discuss in detail told earlier. Judging by a number of signs, the Russian drone will be a functional analogue of the Israeli Harop reconnaissance and strike drone, capable of conducting reconnaissance and patrolling, attacking detected enemy air defense systems, and also returning back to base if it was not possible to find a worthy target.

Thus, the domestic unmanned aerial industry was able to make a huge evolutionary leap in just over a year.
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    10 December 2023 11: 18
    Interesting. In order to increase the combat value of a drone, is it possible to manufacture body elements of a kamikaze drone from explosive materials or their combinations with structural materials?
    I think special attention should be paid to ammunition for different types of drones. After all, it’s weight, range, speed, power.
    Nowadays, standard, off-the-shelf ammunition is often used. Special ones wouldn't hurt either.
    1. -1
      10 December 2023 23: 05
      Dropping by on the running board of a departing train, Russia began hastily developing its unmanned aircraft, mastering Chinese and Iranian technologies,

      People, aren't you tired of "guessing by the tea leaves"?
      If you don’t constantly fall apart “jumping”, maybe marking time will “turn” into movement. Aren’t you tired of counting “three steps forward, then a couple back?”
      Who needs economically unprofitable “temporary” emergency jobs?
  2. 0
    10 December 2023 12: 02
    Surprisingly, there were people who knew better from their sofas and sharply condemned the intentions of the Samara developers of the MGTD. Their reasoning and fascinating discussion can be found in the comments

    I agree, not all professionals are experts in these matters.

    I had to return to this topic so soon after an interview with the Sputnik agency, honored military pilot of Russia, retired Major General Vladimir Popov, in which he spoke about the emergence of a new generation of “kamikaze” drones, already equipped with a jet engine

    Since when did pilots become specialists and engineers in the field of aircraft and UAVs? This is tantamount to the fact that I, having fired from a machine gun, will give expert assessments, discussing and condemning designers and engineers. Although I can say some opinion using the machine, but this will not make me an expert.
    1. 0
      11 December 2023 20: 02
      As for me, the disclosure of details of technical characteristics, participants, addresses of developments, materials should be equated to the disclosure of military secrets and be prosecuted by law. Because it puts projects at risk.
  3. +1
    10 December 2023 12: 24
    Surprisingly, there were people who knew better from their sofa, who sharply condemned the intentions of the Samara developers of the MGTD

    Surprisingly different. Out of curiosity, I looked through the comments to the article indicated by the author. I saw nothing like what the author is talking about. Yes, people express their opinions without claiming to be experts, but there is no judgment.
  4. 0
    10 December 2023 12: 39
    The great advantages of these drones come from their low production costs. The Geranium kamikaze drone costs much less than a missile and also costs less than an enemy anti-aircraft missile, so even if it is intercepted, theoretically the enemy will be the loser. To judge the effectiveness of a weapon system, one should also calculate the cost of its construction. Cheap loitering kamikaze drones will allow us to replace artillery systems. we also need quadcopter drones capable of carrying a large load (powerful bombs for bombing enemy forces, transporting military equipment).
  5. +3
    10 December 2023 12: 44
    I had to return to this topic so soon after an interview with the Sputnik agency of the honored military pilot of Russia, retired Major General Vladimir Popov, in which he spoke about the emergence of a new generation of “kamikaze” drones, already equipped with a jet engine:

    Retired Major General Popov sometimes has trouble understanding what he is talking about.
    I am ready to listen to his opinion when it concerns airplanes. But when he talks about something to which he is not directly related, his opinion should be divided by approximately 5.
    Everyone can listen to this video, and many have listened to it.
    In the video he mentions, for example, the non-existent Russian X 37 rocket. This is approximately 31:05 in the video.
    And in the last fragment, which pleased the author so much, Popov openly confuses Geranium and Lancet.
    The author does not perceive numbers and technical details well. Otherwise I would have noticed that Geranium’s combat load never was not equal to 1,5 or 3 kilograms. Even the Lancet has a warhead of 3 and 5 kg, depending on the modification.
    And the Geranium engine has never been electric. The electric motor of the Lancet is exactly that.
    Popov frankly believes that speed is all. The USSR stepped on this rake before the Great Patriotic War, when speed was put forward as the only criterion for evaluating a fighter. And the young “talented” tried. As a result, the commander of the 1st Air Army (Stalingrad) Khudyakov raised the issue of resuming production of the I16 to Headquarters. This autumn 1942. Popov should know this as a pilot. In addition to speed, there are many other important parameters.
    I have no doubt that the developers of the new turbojet engine (a completely necessary and useful thing, as I pointed out) will try to get involved in the Geranium topic. Just business, nothing personal. They can proactively build a UAV based on it. The money is very small, they can afford it. Front-line tests will show its applicability. But with a sharp increase in speed, it may be necessary to change the aerodynamics. For example, reducing the wing area, changing its shape.
    As I wrote, in the end it will most likely work out other UAV. WITH other application concept. That does not negate its possible usefulness.
    A range of 1 km allows Geranium to fly to targets in western Ukraine, bypassing all air defense zones. With a range of less than 500 km this will be a problem.
    Ukro channels sometimes show the trajectories along which Geraniums fly to the target, how they cut circles around the air defense zone, driving Ukro air defense officers crazy. It's nice to see this.
    Well, it is not yet clear how much a turbojet engine costs compared to an internal combustion engine. This is also important.
    1. +1
      10 December 2023 12: 49
      Anyone who hasn’t come across this video can find it as “Military pilot Popov about the updated Su-57, F-16 for Kyiv and the boom of the Russian aviation industry” on the Sputnik cable and listen.
    2. 0
      10 December 2023 21: 35
      From the extreme western border of the Russian Federation with Ukraine to the extreme western border of Ukraine with NATO is 800 km in a straight line. Well, it is obvious that at extreme range the warhead will be lighter, but at closer range it will be much larger. At least this is the case with artillery shells. However, the control system is not much different from a cruise missile. If you limit yourself to only GPS-Glonass, then obviously it’s simpler and cheaper, but you shouldn’t forget about electronic warfare. As a result, the navigation set can be different, including inertial and optical-electronic.
  6. 0
    10 December 2023 12: 59
    The domestic unmanned aerial vehicle industry has been able to make a huge evolutionary leap in just over a year.

    Which is definitely encouraging.

    And how much talk there was that they say we fight OURS only the Soviet legacy, that the current Russian Federation is generally incapable of doing anything, and all that.
    1. +1
      10 December 2023 13: 54
      This happens in any war. Then it serves as an impetus for development.
      And it cannot be said that Russia stood still. Especially considering the economic robbery of the country. We managed to do a lot.
  7. +1
    10 December 2023 13: 08
    One of the most promising areas can be considered the installation of a thermobaric warhead on the Geranium, which burns everything around with a temperature of several thousand degrees.

    Apparently, the author was guided by the report about the use of a TB warhead in Geranium-2! But, for some reason, the author did not receive the subsequent message that YKP made a mistake in identifying the warhead as thermobaric!

    the term loitering ammunition for Shahed 136/"Geranium-2" is not entirely applicable, since the drone does not have a patrol mode, setting off on its first and last suicidal flight to the target at given coordinates.

    The term “loitering munition” refers to aircraft-type drones (DST, “dust”)... Perhaps the more acceptable term is “kamikaze strike drone, kamikaze drone...”! Because there are, in general, few kamikaze drones that would satisfy the author’s requests for loitering ammunition! By the way, there are loitering ammunition with the possibility of return (BBVV)
    By the way, when there were no reports about Geranium-2 yet, I had to read something about Iranian UAVs, incl. and about Shahed-136... It was not called a kamikaze drone! It was called a drone with a self-destruct device! In this I see a “clear hint” that “Shahed-136” was designed to return!
  8. +1
    10 December 2023 13: 48
    Real, and not armchair, military experts rightly point out that such a significant increase in the speed of an aircraft projectile by 2,5 times reduces the time “window” for timely detection, establishment of routes and capture for accurate auto-tracking of drone data using radar detectors and multifunctional TRML-4D radars and AN/MPQ-64F1 Sentinel, included in the radar architectures of multi-element air defense systems IRIS-T SLM, NASAMS-2, etc. Also, remotorization will increase the operating ceiling of the Geranium jet to 8500 m, which will allow it to operate beyond the high-altitude limit of intercepting self-propelled vehicles SAM Crotale-NG, Stormer HVM and ZAK Gepard. Not a bad increase in performance characteristics.

    Read more ukro channels. With the help of their owners, the Ukrainians discover the takeoff of Geraniums (and indeed any long-range weapons, except for the Dagger/Iskander) at once, upon takeoff. And in the future, online, they report through the media about the direction of their movement.
    The air raid situation brings serious economic losses to Ukraine (enterprises do not work).
    The longer Geranium flies, the greater the losses. And it flies mainly past air defense zones.
    According to Ukrainians, air raid warnings on MiG 31 takeoffs cause losses in the billions of hryvnia. Our planes are scrambled, and the air defense is sounding the alarm on the threat of Dagger. To the full depth of a possible launch. The plane flies and flies... Then it refueles in the air... Enterprises do not work. Then the plane just lands. Without releasing the Dagger. This isn't the first month we've had this much fun.
    So is Geranium. It flies for a long time, there are many of them, they fly past the air defense. While they are flying, there is an air raid alert, the radars are working, they are being taken bearings.
    The altitude of 8 m allows enemy aircraft to engage UAVs. When Geranium flies low, the plane can collide with another plane or with the ground. There were such cases. An altitude of 500 requires additional fuel costs, which are not recouped. It's simply not needed.
    At higher speeds, it becomes more difficult to navigate around the terrain; the equipment on a cheap UAV is simpler than on advanced cruise missiles. And the minimum height will be greater than that of Geranium. The UAV shelling time will be longer.
    1. 0
      10 December 2023 14: 08
      Here, by the way, is one of the latest examples of games with Mig31.
      https://t.me/stranaua/134826
  9. DO
    +1
    10 December 2023 15: 58
    The disadvantages include the reduction in the combat radius of the drone from 1000-2000 km to 600-850 km, but this is enough for the conditions of the Northern Military District.

    HIMARS APU has a range of up to 300 km. Consequently, counter-battery warfare units that are relevant today must have weapons with a range of approximately up to 350 km.
    The greater the range of the drone, the greater its dimensions and weight, therefore, it is more noticeable both to air defense systems and to MANPADS operators and enemy shooters; there are more problems with transporting the drone; drone is more expensive.
    Italmas with an internal combustion engine (5 kg warhead) has a range of 200 km, and with a turbojet or RD, the range will be reduced perhaps by 2 times, and will be 200/2 = 100 km. And it takes 350 km.
    Geranium-2 with internal combustion engine (warhead 35 or 50 kg). From the wide variety of range figures for this drone on open resources, we will take the value most similar to reality as 850 km. To estimate approximately half the range of Geranium-2 with a turbojet engine or RD, 850/2 = 425 km, which is excessive for the required range of 350 km.
    Geranium-1 with internal combustion engine (warhead 15 kg). Its range is less than that of Geranium-2, and being equipped with a turbojet or RD, this drone may well have the required range of about 350 km.
    To destroy counter-battery targets, in most cases the power of a 5 kg cumulative warhead, like that of Lancet-3 and Italmas, is sufficient. Therefore, the mass of the 15 kg Geranium-1 warhead is sufficient.
    Output.
    In the set of weapons to equip counter-battery units, in addition to MLRS and cannon artillery, autonomous kamikaze drones with different ranges may be required - the stealth and quiet “electric” Lancet-3 with a range of 40 km, the fast Italmas drone with a turbojet engine or a medium-range RD about 100 km, and a fast drone, conventionally Geran-1, with a turbojet engine or taxiway with a range of approximately 350 km.
    At the same time, the conventional Geran-1 drone must be equipped with electronics (orientation, search, target selection and destruction, with a swarm function) taken from the Lancet family. Specifically, it would probably be advisable for the Kalashnikov concern to undertake the filling of the mentioned counter-battery conditional Geranium-1.
  10. +1
    10 December 2023 20: 02
    I believe that the most important requirement at the moment should be the ability to operate in low temperature conditions.

    The vast majority of Ukrainian UAVs are homemade. Somehow I doubt that they will be able to work normally at altitude at 20 degrees below zero. And even if they take off, due to the physical properties of lithium-ion batteries in the winter months, the Banderaites will be deprived of aerial reconnaissance and attack drones in a very short time.

    As opposed to homemade drones, drones produced in factories should be better adapted to low temperatures. This will allow you to gain an advantage when attacking on a wide front.

    For example, you can wrap the battery in a chemical heating pad, this will allow you to obtain the desired temperature locally at high altitudes.