Can the Italmas UAV become an effective hunter of Ukrainian air defense systems and MLRS

16

One of the most intriguing new products of the domestic military-industrial complex, generated by the experience of a special operation in Ukraine, is a new Russian kamikaze drone, bearing the unusual and slightly jarring name “Italmas”. What kind of drone is this and what potential might be hidden in it?

Between "Cube" and "Geranium"


The new Russian attack drone became known only recently, after President Putin’s visit to the Aeroscan enterprise, the parent organization of the Zala Aero group, a leading developer of domestic drones. Then, as if by chance, a drone glider, devoid of accompanying equipment, appeared in the frame of the video camera. As it later turned out, it was an Izdeliye 54, or Italmas, UAV. Let us note that the new drone is always shown to us from above and we will reflect on the reasons for this at the end of the review.



“Italmas”, and in the Udmurt language this is the name of the herbaceous plant, considered the symbol of the republic, is built according to the “flying wing” scheme, and composite materials are used in its assembly. The two-blade propeller is not a pusher, like the Geranium, but a puller. All together, this reduces the visibility of the UAV on radar. The internal combustion engine is, judging by some signs, of Chinese origin. Fuel reserves are located in the wings. As the Ukrainian military, who have already encountered Italmas, note in their public pages, when flying, the new Russian drone makes a sound similar to a switched-on chainsaw, not a moped.

From what we have been able to find out from open sources, Italmas has a flight range of up to 200 km. Thus, in terms of its performance characteristics, it finds itself in an intermediate position between the similar “Cube” and “Geranium”. At the same time, like “Cube”, “Italmas” can also do the so-called slide before the attack, пишет profile Telegram channel “UAV Developer”:

The motor is too small for the Shahed. And the nature of its work is fundamentally different from geranium. Judging by the sound, “Italmas” makes a slide before the attack, just like “Kub” did.

There are no exact data, but the expert community has suggested that the shorter-range and powerful Italmas will also be cheaper than the Geranium. However, this commercial advantage pales in comparison to the possibilities that open up if the new Russian drone is indeed, as expected, equipped with an overview video camera.

Between Harpy and Harop?


By themselves, disposable kamikaze drones do not represent technical point of view of something particularly complex. However, among them there is a subspecies that is extremely urgently needed by the Russian army in the Northern Military District zone. These are loitering munitions that have the functions of anti-radar hunters and reconnaissance weapons.

The Israelis were the first to create a homing projectile called Harpy back in the late 80s of the last century. Using a container-type mobile launcher, they launched loitering drones that patrolled a given space, looking for active enemy radars, and when detected, quickly, like harpies, dived at them, destroying them with a high-explosive fragmentation warhead.

A further development of this concept can be considered the Harop UAV, developed in the early 2000s. Its distinctive external feature from its predecessor can be considered the presence in the nose of a radar and a digital camera with a 360-degree viewing angle and high resolution. The drone is also designed primarily to combat enemy air defense systems, but it is far from disposable.

It is implied that Harop is a reconnaissance drone capable of turning into a kamikaze if necessary. The UAV is also launched from a container-type mobile unit and is capable of patrolling a given area for a long time, conducting aerial reconnaissance. Having detected the SAM radar, the drone turns into an attacker and self-destructs along with it. If there is no worthy goal, then it can automatically return to base for repeated use.

Israeli Harops were actively used by the Azerbaijani army during the second Nagorno-Karabakh war and showed their high efficiency. Russian Armed Forces UAVs with similar performance characteristics would be extremely useful for hunting enemy air defense systems, as well as American long-range MLRS, which are a real headache.

I remember in May 2023 we voiced the idea of ​​equipping Geranium-type kamikaze drones with a homing head from the X-58 missile, which would turn them into Harpy-type anti-radar drones. This would make it possible to pin the Ukrainian air defense to the ground and clear more of the sky for the Russian Aerospace Forces. However, Russia now has the Italmas, which appears to be more in line with the Harop reconnaissance and strike drone. Let's quote profile Telegram channel “Russian Engineer”:

The presence of a camera on board the Italmas will greatly complicate the life of the rear of the Ukrainian Armed Forces; hunting for air defense is now possible far from the LBS. And not only air defense, of course, although, in general, this is the highest priority target for hitting with a drone... For everything else there is VKS.

According to some reports, in its lower part, which they prefer not to show on TV, the new Russian drone may have an overview video camera, which would allow it to be used for aerial reconnaissance, as well as as a kamikaze. If this information is confirmed in practice, our capabilities to suppress enemy air defense and counter-battery warfare to a front depth of up to 200 km will soon increase sharply.
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    30 October 2023 17: 07
    In principle, installing a camera like the one on the Lancet for tele-guidance at a target is not difficult. A strike range of 200 km can be achieved using a repeater for drones. So, in principle, there are no technically unsolvable problems here. Repeaters for drones for controlling Italmas for tele-guidance at a range of more than 200 km. I hope the principle of operation is the same as that of the Lancet, only the warhead is said to be 23 kg, which is enough to destroy enemy heavy equipment in the rear. Italmas I hope that this is a long-range UAV like the Lancet, only designed for a much longer radius of destruction. Such a cheaper Harop for combating MLRS and air defense.

    Italmas does not fly that far, plus the repeater, apparently, is used with it in the same way as with the Lancet. And this makes it possible to have a datalink throughout the flight and without megawatts. Well, or flight to a coordinate, like Geranium. Then there is no need to emit anything.

    https://t.me/UAVDEV/4277
    1. 0
      30 October 2023 17: 35
      And further.

      Thus, one of the specialized online publications in Russia on October 28 this year stated: “Under the guise of launching licensed production of drones, Israel can transfer to Ukraine a Harop UAV with a flight range of up to 1000 kilometers.”

      And further: “Currently, the issue of transferring Harop drones to Ukraine is being considered by the Israeli side, however, experts draw attention to the fact that not so long ago Ukraine announced the alleged development of its own drone with a range of up to 1000 kilometers, which, according to the main declared characteristics, almost fully complies Israeli UAV Harop.

      For obvious reasons, the actual production of these UAVs in Ukraine cannot be launched, however, under its guise, the supply of drones directly from the territory of Israel itself can be organized, and in virtually unlimited quantities."

      Let’s say that in fact, it is the Israeli Harop UAVs that Kyiv is now deploying in deep secrecy under the guise of its own invention against our army. Moreover, let’s say it was Harop attack drones that attacked our military airfields near Ryazan and Engels to begin with. Then what is this enemy weapon? This UAV was developed in the first half of the 417s. It is equipped with a piston engine, which allows the device to reach a maximum flight speed of 6 km/h, and also makes it possible to fly autonomously for 3 hours. Wingspan 135 meters. Maximum take-off weight 23 kilograms. The weight of the high-explosive fragmentation warhead is XNUMX kilograms.

      But the maximum flight range - attention! - exactly 1000 kilometers. Exactly the same, therefore, as the supposed brainchild of Ukroboronprom, which boasts of just completed tests. Agree - suspicious.

      https://svpressa.ru/war21/article/354488/
      1. 0
        30 October 2023 18: 55
        You can trust the Jews, they always tell the truth, but it's just bullshit))).
      2. 0
        30 October 2023 20: 02
        They handed over drones to Germany and then asked for them back... they needed it themselves.
    2. 0
      30 October 2023 20: 17
      Equipment probably needs a shaped charge, but here the engine is in the front. so it’s more likely high-explosive fragmentation. those. for transformers, manpower and warehouses.
  2. 0
    30 October 2023 18: 57
    Italmas is the name, thought the trolling Turks. After all, translated from Turkish it’s like “you won’t catch up”))).
    1. 0
      30 October 2023 20: 46
      Quote from etoyavsemprivet
      After all, translated from Turkish it’s like “you won’t catch up”))).

      Well, in Turkish it may be like that... but in Russian, perhaps, it would be more correct: “you’ll catch up!” wink
    2. 0
      30 October 2023 22: 28
      Quote from etoyavsemprivet
      Italmas is the name, thought the trolling Turks. After all, translated from Turkish it’s like “you won’t catch up”))).

      Italmas is the name of a flower that is a symbol of Udmurtia. There is Geranium, and there is Italmas. Italmas is the Udmurt name of the European Bathing Bath, one of the symbols of the Udmurt Republic. The Udmurts are a Finno-Ugric people, mainly living in the Udmurt Republic and neighboring regions of Russia.




      Italmas
    3. 0
      1 November 2023 13: 35
      From the Turkmen language (not from Turkish), this word is translated as “The dog will not take it.” Once upon a time, I studied with a guy named Italmas.
      Just like that, for general development. Who cares?
      http://rizoakhmad.blogspot.com/2020/12/blog-post_332.html
  3. 0
    30 October 2023 20: 05
    The Israelis were the first to create a homing projectile called Harpy.

    Lately this has become doubtful. Then it turns out that together the USA and production in the USA are like with an iron dome, or even just in the Israeli analogue of Silicon Valley and Skolkovo, i.e. some Chinese on Israeli territory. and since it’s on Israeli territory, it’s Israeli laughing
    1. 0
      30 October 2023 21: 05
      after President Putin’s visit to the Aeroscan enterprise, the parent organization of the Zala Aero group, a leading developer of domestic drones.

      Again the company "Zala" from "Kalashnikov", so there are no other enterprises and they do not produce anything. What’s sad is that the main allocated money is sent along one channel (with kickbacks and other things worked out)... In this situation, there will be no leading ones in the world (that’s why we take from Iran, North Korea...), because too big a bag of corruption hangs for new products in production and implementation.
  4. 0
    1 November 2023 19: 48
    The cube UAV flying wing design turned out to be ineffective. There are many videos confirming cube misses
  5. 0
    23 November 2023 00: 54
    The hunter for SAM and MLRS are satellites, reconnaissance, RTR systems. And not some kind of drone. If you don’t know where the target is, it doesn’t matter what kind of drone you have.
    1. DO
      0
      3 December 2023 14: 16
      I don't care what kind of drone you have

      Let’s say reconnaissance revealed a HIMARS launcher with ATACMS tactical missiles (range up to 300 km) in the Ukrainian rear, at a distance of 150 km from the LBS. And it is known that this target is covered by air defense systems.
      How to destroy this target? Today's Russian MLRS, available in the northwestern military zone, unfortunately, do not operate at such a range. Manned Russian aviation does not operate against an object 150 km deep in the Ukrainian rear, covered by a proper air defense system, due to the high risk of losing pilots and aircraft. Using tactical missiles and Geraniums at coordinates is ineffective, because the target is mobile. What remains is the use of several Italmas autonomous drones, which, based on coordinate guidance, reach the square in which mobile targets were scouted, and carry out an autonomous search for MLRS and air defense systems.
      It is clear that at this point the question arises, how to hit targets deep in the rear of the Armed Forces of Ukraine more than 150...200 km? Today, on an everyday basis, this is the use of “blind” tactical missiles and Geraniums according to coordinates, in the hope that the enemy’s MLRS and air defense systems do not move in any way (to avoid defeat in this case, by the Ukrainian MLRS and air defense systems after their supposed detection by Russian intelligence, it is enough to move away completely near).
      In the future, for an acceptable probability of hitting targets at a range of more than 150-200 km, in addition to the purchase and/or development of high-precision MLRS with a range of 300 km, Russian carriers of autonomous versions of Lancets (having folding wings) - special MLRS missiles, and returned unmanned jet UAVs (flying to a given Lancet release coordinate, along a predetermined route even as long as the Polish border).
      1. 0
        24 March 2024 20: 43
        Do, Iskander and dagger hit targets in a minimum amount of time, which is not enough to leave the position. Plus Onyx and x-35 for finishing.
        1. DO
          0
          24 March 2024 22: 35
          If we are talking about HIMARS, then this is a launcher on wheels. Let's say that our reconnaissance in one way or another determined the coordinates of a high-mars salvo. But the highmars can immediately move after the salvo (the highmars guiding container can return to its place later).
          Therefore, several Lancets with autonomous functions of searching and attacking a target may have an acceptable chance of a successful attack here. The only problem is the delivery of the Lancets to a long-distance square, the faster the better.