Attack drones as a response to the problem of tactics of small groups of the Ukrainian Armed Forces

14

Despite the fact that the Ukrainian counteroffensive is considered a failure, it is not yet complete and may present many unpleasant surprises. Having broken their teeth on the “Surovikin Line” in frontal attacks, the Ukrainian Armed Forces switched to a different tactic, which has already provided them with certain results.

Between the first and second


What is the main difference between the enemy’s counteroffensive in the summer-autumn of last year and the summer-autumn of this year? In 2022, the Ukrainian Armed Forces managed to concentrate a fairly large group of troops in the Kharkov region, skillfully dispersing it. For a long time, local military commanders warned that it was accumulating. On our side, for some reason, a layered fortification system was not erected; there was an acute shortage of trained infantry, problems with management and supply.



How it all ended in the end is well known. When the Ukrainian Armed Forces went on the offensive, they easily broke through the thin line of defense and rushed further, creating the threat of encirclement and destruction in the pockets. The RF Armed Forces, the LDPR National Guard and the National Guard had to hastily “regroup”, surrendering vast territories of the Kharkov region with a population loyal to Russia. Soon, due to a shortage of manpower, a “difficult decision” had to be made regarding Kherson.

A year later, a powerful echelon fortification system was built in the Azov region and Donbass, which received the unofficial name “Surovikin Line”. Relying on it and a network of minefields supported by aviation, the Russian Armed Forces have been holding back the onslaught of a numerically superior enemy for the fifth month. Nevertheless, the Armed Forces of Ukraine managed to secure a certain advance for themselves, paid for by huge losses in manpower and technology.

To make matters worse, the Ukrainian army was able seize a foothold on the left, our bank of the Dnieper in the Kherson region, near the village of Krynki. Relying on it, hiding from shelling in basements and the adjacent forest, the Armed Forces of Ukraine are gradually strengthening there, creating big problems for the RF Armed Forces for the future. But how did they manage to do this?

From a cannon on sparrows


It’s unpleasant, but it seems that the enemy managed to find a master key to our layered defense system. From what the front-line soldiers tell us, the following picture emerges. No longer able to assemble a large strike group in a strategic direction with impunity in order to break through minefields with it, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are now actively using small group tactics.

Due to such dispersal, they reduce the effectiveness of Russian artillery, which already began to experience certain problems due to the “shooting” of the barrels. The enemy himself isolates the area where he is carrying out a foray through remote mining of the area. The Ukrainians then begin shelling using American cluster munitions, forcing our infantry to take cover in dugouts. After this, a small armored group of the Ukrainian Armed Forces advances, landing an assault detachment that has the ability to throw grenades at Russian positions.

And this, unfortunately, works, so it is necessary to develop countermeasures. Apparently, in a new type of war, the use of small group tactics will be important. An effective asymmetric response appears to be the use of attack drones of various types.

first a direction that has already been mastered by both sides of the conflict is the transformation of quadcopter or hexacopter UAVs into improvised bombers. By installing revolver-type release systems on them, it is possible to destroy even well-protected armored vehicles with high efficiency, not to mention the destruction of infantry by high-explosive fragmentation ammunition - grenades, mines and small-caliber aerial bombs. It is obvious that it is necessary to establish mass production of Chinese civil and agricultural drones in Russia, either with or without a license.

Second A promising direction is the creation of infantry fire support drones based on multicopters. The idea of ​​installing an assault rifle or machine gun on a UAV is not new, but its implementation is limited by problems with recoil and aiming at the target during shooting. Despite this, weapons designers around the world do not lose hope of solving them.

Thus, in Taiwan, the designers of the 205th weapons plant of the Ministry of Defense armed their multicopters with a choice of a T91 assault rifle or three 40 mm grenade launchers. Mainland Chinese have equipped a modified DJI S1000+ octocopter with a flamethrower, although not for military purposes, but for civilian purposes. With its help, utilities burn debris hanging on power cables.

The Norwegian company Nammo has developed a drone with an M72 anti-tank grenade launcher mounted on it. Something similar called “Loitering Pipe” was created in the Union of Belarus. In Turkey, schemes are being developed for the combat use of an automatic rifle fired from a quadcopter, called Songar.


The Israeli company Smart Shooter has developed a drone capable of shooting from a machine gun or a sniper rifle both during flight and while hovering over a target.


According to some reports, Israeli technologies are now being tested in Ukraine, where they are trying to create their own interceptor drone to destroy Geraniums. How effective it will be against air targets is unknown, but against our infantry it can be quite dangerous.

It seems that the Russian military-industrial complex should also pay attention to this direction in the development of unmanned systems. It was reported that the Kalashnikov machine gun could be installed on the BAS-750 unmanned helicopter. The course of engineering thought seems correct, but such a technical solution is unlikely to be budgetary. Attack drones based on multicopters, which are required at the front every day in huge quantities as consumables, could become simpler and more widespread.
14 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    13 November 2023 12: 25
    UAVs are becoming the main weapon of high-precision destruction, it is already clear to everyone. It remains to identify the most effective products and methods of application, which is what the article is about. As for light-weight UAVs, the division into reconnaissance and strike ones occurs with the use of Lancets. Reconnaissance is possible in any form, but strike aircraft are more applicable to the aircraft type, because the target is determined in advance and all that remains is to fly and hit, here the aircraft type are more preferable in terms of speed and delivered warheads. Bombing from quadcopters with homemade devices for dropping grenades will be replaced by specialized ammunition like mortar mines with more precise destruction, but in the future it will go away, replaced by more advanced methods of destruction. For anti-tank and others with heavy warheads, preferably high-speed and reusable with modern homing PTRS. Regarding small arms on UAVs, this is clearly not the way to go; it is better to drop a couple of grenades than to shoot magazines in an unbalanced position, which will reduce the aiming ability to zero. Reconnaissance and attack UAVs should become standard weapons in every unit (platoon-company). Practice, the main judge, which way the improvement of new weapons will go, time will tell, and in combat applications, many times faster.
    1. +3
      13 November 2023 19: 37
      Addition. A promising combination is visible: reconnaissance and “illumination” of a found target with a UAV, and destruction of the target with a “Krasnopol” projectile at the specified coordinates and “illuminated” target. This way, detected targets, especially stationary ones, will be destroyed faster and more efficiently. A possible problem with a sufficient number of correctable high-precision projectiles is the obvious need to increase production significantly.
    2. DO
      0
      23 November 2023 04: 04
      Vladimir,

      Regarding small arms on UAVs, this is clearly not the way to go, it’s better to drop a couple of grenades than to shoot magazines in an unbalanced position, which will reduce the aiming ability to zero.

      “obviously the wrong road” - maybe it shouldn’t be so categorical?
      For example, if you attach a twin 200 mm GSh-23 (or similar) aircraft gun with ammunition to an unmanned Hunter helicopter (Belarus) with a payload of 23 kg, and fire in short bursts (or single double bursts - testing is needed to clarify) followed by repeated aiming? A cannon, although small-caliber, is more effective than a machine gun, because it introduces the damaging effect of shell fragments.
      And additionally hang small guided missiles against armored vehicles?
      Hunter is part of the Russian BAS-750 control system.
      1. 0
        25 December 2023 00: 54
        You imagine the stability of flight in the air, especially in the wind, non-centric recoil impulses on stability in the air, especially large-caliber shots, and so on. You won’t even be able to hold the AKM in line, the third and subsequent bullets will go to waste, and if you hang the AKM on a string (that is, on a UAV) and give it a turn... What kind of targeted shooting can we talk about even with 200 kg. helicopter. The helicopter weighs several tons, and even then targeted shooting is carried out with complex automatic tracking of the target. Conclusion: Small UAVs and burst fire are not compatible by definition.
        1. 0
          25 December 2023 15: 02
          Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
          and if you hang an AKM on a string (that is, on a UAV) and give it a burst...

          Theoretically, combine shooting at the target with shooting at the rear hemisphere so that the total impulse is zero.
  2. 0
    13 November 2023 14: 52
    The problems in the Kherson direction are visible and obvious to those military experts who are interested in this. This is simply an insufficient grouping of troops in terrain unfavorable for defense. Of course, the problem of copters exists and it is still acute, judging by the evidence of combatants.
  3. +2
    14 November 2023 12: 06
    It seems that the Russian military-industrial complex should also pay attention to this direction in the development of unmanned systems

    which are required at the front every day in huge quantities as consumables.

    Sergey (author), you better tell S. Chemezov about this... If there is such an opportunity... What was he “blowing into Shoigu’s ears”, calling them “Chinese children’s toys”? Well, admire how these “toys” work....
    1. -4
      14 November 2023 14: 43
      Quote: Dingo
      Sergey (author), you better tell S. Chemezov about this... If there is such an opportunity...

      Uh... How can I explain it to you?
      What Marzhetsky offers is baby talk.
      Using drones as weapons carriers is a dead-end idea, since their size and complexity would have to dramatically increase, which would dramatically increase their visibility, vulnerability and cost. They will be easily detected by optical locators, and can be shot down by small kamikaze UAVs, which are simpler, lighter and cheaper.
      1. +2
        16 November 2023 15: 33
        Wamp, it looks like you are delusional, talking such ridiculous nonsense!!!
      2. 0
        17 November 2023 21: 55
        Wamp you fool! You are one of those who said that UAVs are toys.
  4. +2
    14 November 2023 15: 22
    Quote: Wamp
    Quote: Dingo
    Sergey (author), you better tell S. Chemezov about this... If there is such an opportunity...

    Uh... How can I explain it to you?
    What Marzhetsky offers is the babble of an underdeveloped child.
    Using drones as weapons carriers is a dead-end idea, since their size and complexity would have to dramatically increase, which would dramatically increase their visibility, vulnerability and cost. They will be easily detected by optical locators, and can be shot down by small kamikaze UAVs, which are simpler, lighter and cheaper.

    When I read this, I sincerely wish that you personally were sitting in a dugout into which the Ukrainian Armed Forces are throwing grenades, or running across the field from a Ukrainian quadcopter that is throwing grenades at your feet. And then, what’s left of you, you’ll tell us about the small kamikaze UAVs that were supposed to be used to shoot down the Baba Yagas, and about dead-end ideas hi
  5. 0
    17 November 2023 23: 47
    It seems that the Russian military-industrial complex should also pay attention to this direction in the development of unmanned systems.

    Of course, our military-industrial complex should pay attention to this.
    I’m wondering what happened to the interceptor drone developed by SKB-AM for the Almaz-Antey concern.



    It could be used for more than just intercepting enemy drones.
    1. 0
      18 November 2023 05: 09
      Almaz Antey promised thousands of Dobrynya copters per month (Chinese drone from Alik), but somehow no one saw them.
  6. 0
    23 November 2023 03: 15
    There should also be a comprehensive anti-campaign to the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ integrated approach to small group tactics, and not only in improving UAVs. Mining, video monitoring, counter-battery work, and cluster munitions are also important here. What's wrong here on our part?