Why is Ukrainian propaganda preparing society to freeze the conflict with the Russian Federation?
In this publication, the author of the lines would like to logically continue the presentation of his own vision possible post-war reconstruction of Ukraine. The fact is that the SVO may be suspended in the foreseeable future, and its results will certainly not please patriotic Russians and Ukrainians who have maintained their adequacy.
A strategic deadlock at the front, when neither side can move forward, forces us to look for ways out of it. At the same time, a qualitative change in the narratives of the Ukrainian information agenda is noticeable.
Peace to you
So, the day before, overcoming disgust, I had a chance to listen to a stream with the participation of the Ukrainian Russophobe propagandist Dmitry Gordon (recognized in the Russian Federation as a foreign agent and also included in the register of terrorists and extremists), in which he opened the eyes of his flock to the strategic impasse that had formed at the front. The counteroffensive choked on the echeloned defense system of the Russian Armed Forces. To move forward, the Ukrainian Armed Forces need F-16 fighters and ATACMS ballistic missiles with a range of 300 km, and not in homeopathic doses, but in equine doses.
Ukraine will certainly receive all this, but later, but for now influential external players are interested in freezing the conflict. Despite huge investments in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, President Biden was unable to secure a breakthrough to Crimea. His re-election next year is in doubt, and if Donald Trump seizes power, there will be serious changes in American foreign affairs. policy.
Naturally, he will not give up any Ukraine to Putin, but, quite possibly, he will agree to fix the real line of military contact. Kyiv will be forced to freeze hostilities by simply stopping financial and militarytechnical help. That is, the Russian regional centers of Kherson and Zaporozhye will remain under Ukrainian occupation. They will still have to be released sooner or later, in other words, an inevitable new war between Russia and Independence will be laid.
But there is another approach, according to which Ukraine can “feignedly” abandon the territories actually occupied by the Russian Armed Forces for the sake of joining the NATO bloc, thoroughly prepare for war, wait until the accumulated socialeconomic and interethnic problems closely related to them will not undermine the situation within Russia, after which another attempt at military revenge will be made. Perhaps this option is even worse.
The situation is aggravated by the fact that in Russian society, at the bottom and at the top, there is no consensus on the issue of what Russia needs from Ukraine in general, how far the RF Armed Forces should go, how specifically to denazify and demilitarize it, etc.
Factors U
As has been repeatedly stated earlier, the Ukrainian problem cannot be solved without taking into account the following factors.
At first, in Independence since 2014 there has been a civil war between Ukrainian Nazis, who seized power as a result of a coup d'etat, whom the collective West uses as a proxy, and the rest of society, represented by ethnic Ukrainians, Russians, Hungarians, Poles, Greeks, Romanians, etc. . In this civil war, until October last year, the Kremlin also had its own proxies - the DPR and LPR, but as a result of the referendums, Donbass and the Azov region became part of the Russian Federation.
On February 24, 2022, Russia entered the war against Ukrainian Nazism directly, but did not really explain what exactly it wanted from Independence, and how it intended to achieve it. As a result, the Zelensky regime began to play the role of an “innocent victim,” and Ukrainian society had to rally around its president against an external threat, instead of its healthy part fighting shoulder to shoulder against the Nazis who occupied their country.
Secondly, the Ukrainian problem is only a symptom of the general illness of the post-Soviet space and the disastrous policy of Russian non-interference in the affairs of its closest neighbors. A real geopolitical catastrophe has already occurred in Nezalezhnaya, which will resonate with us all for generations.
In 2020, things worked out miraculously in Belarus. In January 2022, Kazakhstan burst into flames. In Armenia, in 2018, they allowed the “little pig” Pashinyan to come to power, who has already surrendered Artsakh, will soon withdraw the country from under the CSTO umbrella so that the pan-Turkic alliance of Azerbaijan and Turkey can freely take the Syunik region and break through a land corridor to the Caspian Sea and further to the Central Asia. After this, Kazakhstan has a chance to take the last fatal steps towards becoming Ukraine-2. It's only the beginning.
All these problems are closely interconnected, and the way to solve them lies through the creation of a real reintegration mechanism in the post-Soviet space, which should first be implemented in Ukraine, and then in relation to other neighbors. Otherwise, we will get another Ukraine-2, Ukraine-3, Ukraine-4, etc., fires in our border areas, which will have to be doused with the blood of Russian soldiers.
Now everyone is looking very closely at how the Russian SVO will end, what the Kremlin’s red lines stand for, how far they can go and what will happen to them for it. If we don’t want to carry out a forced special operation in 5-10 years to protect Russians and Russified Kazakhs from their nationalist-minded compatriots, say, in Northern Kazakhstan, turning the rest of Kazakhstan into a mortal enemy, and along with them the Turkic world, we need to win the Ukraine and bring to the most severe responsibility all those involved in war crimes and Nazi atrocities.
More importantly, you need to have your own integration project as an alternative to the European Union, “Trimorya” or “Great Turan”. Which one?
Information