"Ukrainization" of the Black Sea: are landing operations of the Russian Navy and Airborne Forces possible?

17

Another and, alas, quite successful attack, staged by Ukrainian terrorists on the ships of the Black Sea Fleet, raises the question of the need to cut off the Kyiv regime from its last sea gates in Nikolaev and Odessa. But is it possible to do this now, after leaving Kherson, with the existing detachment of forces?

"Banderization" of the Black Sea


Recall that the refusal to liberate Odessa would lead to the "Ukrainization" of the Black Sea, we warned back in ARTICLES dated July 18, 2022. This was even before the conclusion of the ill-fated grain deal, but the author of these lines already saw what was going on, and felt that nothing good should be expected from “constructive” negotiations in Istanbul. As you can see, this is how it turned out.



Since then, three warships of the Black Sea Fleet have been lost for various reasons. Remaining undergo the ever-increasing terrorist attacks by maritime drones. Tonight, the impact of a Ukrainian firewall filled with 450 kg of TNT on board the Olenegorsky Gornyak large landing ship led to the formation of a hole and its roll. Now the Kiev regime intends to also attack civilian Russian ships in order to de facto lead to a blockade of our Black Sea ports. How ironic.

It is obvious that the “debanderization” of the Black Sea is possible only by the complete liberation of historical Novorossia and the end of the Ukrainian occupation of the Russian cities of Zaporozhye, Kherson, Nikolaev, Krivoy Rog and Odessa. But how to do this if the RF Armed Forces left the right bank, leaving the most convenient bridgehead located on the higher right bank of the Dnieper?

Marine landing?


The simplest solution as of the end of February 2022 seemed to be a large-scale landing operation near Odessa. In the Black Sea, several large landing ships were transferred from the Baltic and Northern Fleets for reinforcement. At the beginning of the NWO on February 24, the flotilla went to sea towards Odessa, but the landing operation did not take place. Why?

According to one version, a strong storm interfered, but weather data on those critical days refute it. Most likely, the command of the Black Sea Fleet was simply not confident in the ability to carry out such a complex operation. An amphibious assault is a most serious undertaking requiring concerted action by the fleet and the aviation supporting it. Judging by the effectiveness of the actions of the Black Sea Fleet over the past year and a half, its command simply did not dare to take this step.

If you look at how the offensive of the RF Armed Forces developed at the same time on land in the Kiev and Kharkov directions, perhaps this was the right decision, which saved both ships and personnel, which could have fallen into a difficult situation on an isolated theater of operations near Odessa, where three brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine prepared to meet them at once. To make an attempt today, when our BDKs are under the gunpoint of the Ukrainian "Neptunes" and the American "Harpoons", and the coastal waters are mined, looks like a complete gamble. It turns out that everything should be forgotten, in principle, both about amphibious assaults and about Odessa?

In fact, there are two more options, complex and dangerous, but a little less adventurous.

First

- this is an operation in the Black Sea region, but not near Odessa, but in South Bessarabia, its southernmost tip. The connection of this territory with the rest of Ukraine is provided by a bridge over Zatoka, which can be disabled by a series of powerful missile strikes. Having destroyed the military infrastructure of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in South Bessarabia with air and sea-based missiles, it is possible to carry out a large-scale landing operation there jointly by the forces of the Airborne Forces and the Navy. But first you have to do some serious preparation.

It will be necessary to ensure complete air supremacy by establishing interaction between the Russian Aerospace Forces and the Naval Aviation of the Russian Navy. Il-38N patrol aircraft and AWACS A-50U aircraft should continuously circle over the Black Sea under the cover of fighter aircraft. So that the enemy could not even raise his head, he would need to be continuously bombarded with rockets and glider bombs. The composition of the Black Sea Fleet, which today is insufficient for such an operation, will have to be strengthened by transferring 3-4 new corvettes, 3-4 Karakurt RTOs, small anti-submarine and small landing ships from the Baltic. The Black Sea frigates of project 11356, together with the Baltic corvettes and RTOs with their Redut and Pantsirs, are able to provide a sufficiently dense layered air defense / missile defense system so that the landing does not turn into a beating with anti-ship missiles.

With such an approach with decisive goals, there are chances that the adventure will not be doomed to failure. There is also a small bonus in the form of Transnistria, where there is a certain number of Russian military who, at a certain moment, could strike at the rear of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, making a breakthrough to the estuary, the distance to which is only 30 km. If successful, the picture would change very seriously in favor of Russia, and our troops would be near Odessa.

Only then will the question of their supply arise. There are also reasonable doubts about the possibility of such a complex operation being carried out in cooperation between various branches of the troops by the current command of the Black Sea Fleet, which lost the Saratov large landing ship at the berth in Berdyansk and allowed a strike on the Olenegorsky miner right at the base of the Russian Navy in Novorossiysk. It is necessary to start seriously discussing such projects with the setting by the country's top military-political leadership of decisive goals and objectives and rotation among admirals.

Second option is a landing operation near Ochakovo, which seems to be less of a gamble than in southern Bessarabia. It plays in our favor that the Kinburn Spit, which blocks the exit from the Dnieper-Bug Estuary, is under the control of the RF Armed Forces. True, due to the threat of shelling from the Armed Forces of Ukraine, it will be problematic to concentrate large forces there at once, but still it is much more realistic than storming Izmail.

The key conditions for success are still the same: it is necessary to overtake from the Baltic to the Black Sea additionally more ships with missile and artillery weapons and a decent air defense system to support the landing and create an anti-missile umbrella against enemy anti-ship missiles. We also need complete air supremacy due to the joint actions of aircraft of the Naval Aviation of the Russian Navy and the Russian Aerospace Forces. The main load at the first stage of the operation will fall not on the BDK, but on small landing ships, primarily hovercraft, which allow you to pass over minefields. After minesweepers will have to clear the mine setting of the Ukrainian Navy.

In order for the amphibious assault near Ochakovo to have a chance of success, a second strike is desirable, a distraction, which can also become the main one. Logic suggests that this could be an operation to force the greatly shoaled and narrowed Dnieper.

After the destruction of the Kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station, the reservoir actually ceased to exist, turning into a gradually drying up dirty swamp and a mass of small lakes. In winter, if not all, then most of it will freeze and become more passable for equipment. Airborne units of the Airborne Forces in helicopters could seize and hold a foothold on the right bank until the main forces of the RF Armed Forces approach. Frontal and army aviation will have to support the offensive, knocking out enemy positions with rockets and planning bombs, while pontoon crossings are being built.

The occupation of the bridgehead on the other side of the Dnieper will open the way for the Russian army to Kherson and Nikolaev, to Krivoy Rog and Zaporozhye and will make it possible to liberate Odessa as a result of a land offensive operation already in the coming winter. The amphibious assault near Ochakovo in this case may be in the nature of an auxiliary strike.
17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    4 August 2023 15: 19
    a drone can be launched from the coast of Bulgaria / Turkey, and pretend that it was launched from some truck anywhere near the Black Sea. so it doesn’t make much sense to deprive the Sun of access to the Black Sea for this. This large ship is visible from the satellite where it was moored.
  2. +2
    4 August 2023 15: 51
    It's all beautiful. But, if something goes wrong - and the ships are cut off from the landing - the landing will become suicide bombers.
  3. +2
    4 August 2023 19: 36
    Mr. Marzhetsky is true to himself)). The right bank is inaccessible for the Russian Federation, logistics decide everything. We perfectly see the capabilities of the RF Armed Forces near Donetsk, which have been hammered for 9 years now, therefore the breadth and courage of the author in planning strategic operations in the fantasy style does not leave readers indifferent)).
    1. 0
      5 August 2023 21: 21
      If you peck your forehead into a fortified defense, then of course you can break through it, but only with a large mass and with heavy losses, which the musicians showed earlier. For example, the Nazi troops, bumping into the dense defenses of the Red Army, were looking for weaker places to break through. Very rarely did they try to break through well-fortified defenses. It seems to me that breaking like a sheep's forehead in the cities of Donbass is a failed tactic. As for Odessa, it seems to me that its liberation is not in the immediate plans of our Armed Forces.
  4. Owl
    +3
    4 August 2023 20: 39
    Block cities from land and sea, repel attempts to break through and deblockade and cut off from access to the sea, connect with the PMR.
  5. +4
    4 August 2023 21: 04
    A landing operation is necessary to conquer a bridgehead and expand it further, or to divert enemy forces and deliver the main blow elsewhere. So far, unfortunately, we have neither the material opportunity nor the personnel in sufficient numbers to carry out a successful offensive operation using landing forces, and the landing itself, carried out by small forces, will not lead to anything, or rather, it will only lead to vain victims.
    1. -3
      4 August 2023 21: 45
      that no one will send troops in frontal attacks through minefields and fortifications (each house is a small fortress. Mariupol, Artyomovsk ...).
      what is not visible how such offensives end?

      Besides. as soon as a full-scale begins, then Poland can go into the west. shed. and then there will be a priest!

      they wrote that Poland and the Baltic states could be "excluded" from NATO. continue to fight with Russia when the Ukrainians run out.
  6. +1
    4 August 2023 22: 50
    Are landing operations of the Russian Navy and Airborne Forces possible?

    Theoretically possible, but unfortunately the theory does not always become a reality.
  7. +4
    5 August 2023 07: 35
    If you gouge the bridges across the Dnieper, cut off Ukraine from the Black Sea, cut off the supply of weapons through the Carpathians, let Wagner roam, the war in Ukraine will end in a very short time.
    And this is not by to the plan.
    How then to earn?
  8. +1
    5 August 2023 08: 29
    The author is right, the first version of a gamble in the style of a totalitarian destructive sect of aircraft carriers, who think that the surface fleet can go somewhere and "project" force, have already projected a lost cruiser, all the more criminal to load an infantry battalion onto a large landing ship and risk losing an entire battalion from one missile mines or a firewall ... I always wrote that the very concept of the BDK, and even more so the UDC, is vicious, but how many MDK (Dugong Chamois) are in the fleet? once or twice and counted ... the reason is the criminal technical policy of the Navy for cutting budgets for the senseless large surface ships Kuzya and UDC, while saving on MDK and minesweepers .... there are seven modern minesweepers, for 6 water areas ..... and still possibly modernized old people, in order to clear the sea near Odessa, you need to collect all the minesweepers of the Navy, exposing the PMO of all oceans and seas, and that doesn’t call, so the Navy is simply technically incapable of combat operations due to the failed technical policy of parquet admirals ... and after all, money for 30 MDK and 50 minesweepers would be quite enough with the most modest budget, serial ships, that is, with a fixed price, but they squandered everything on UDC and Kuzya, it’s more convenient to cut there, because the ship is unique and no one will figure out how much they stole, "they stole had fun, counted, shed tears",. .. since there is almost no MDK, then there is nothing to force the Dnieper either, that is, not only the first but all three options, the respected author will not work, so it remains only to hope for the ground forces, methodically destroying the enemy with rockets, bombs, mines and artillery, and submarines wetting the fascists in the toilets with their calibers, you will have to fight to the last Ukrainian (subject to conscription) and then occupy the territory where there will be only women and old people, and even there it will also look like scorched earth as in Mariupol and Artemovsk, they write that the Zeli has left only 4 brigades, 6 brigades were destroyed over the summer, the West knew in advance that Ukraine would not defeat Russia, but wants to kill more Slavs so that recovery can take longer, so glory to our victorious warriors, sooner or later the Nazis will run out of steam, like the Teutons on the ice of Lake Peipsi how Napoleon ran out of steam, how the Nazis ran out of steam in 1942,

    Russia has no friends. They are afraid of our vastness.

    — Alexander III
    Source: https://ru.citaty.net/avtory/aleksandr-iii/
    so it is precisely the greatness of Russia, which is capable of mobilizing, although not quickly, that destroys all those who went to Moscow.


  9. +1
    5 August 2023 20: 54
    In the article of plans, one more mobilization and a five hundred thousandth corps from the DPRK are indicated. In principle, if there is political will, it is real. But, again, where to get a sufficient number of ships and aircraft? There is a feeling that no large-scale offensive operations are planned in principle, the task is to wear out the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the West and force them to sign an agreement on more or less days off for us. Some kind of demilitarization and denazification... To denazify about twenty million creatures that hate us with a fierce hatred and their children? Fresh legend... This is without taking into account the plans of the West. And they have only one plan - to wipe us off the face of the Earth.
  10. +3
    6 August 2023 02: 10
    Strange. That is, the use of Bandera in the Battle of Chesme is terrorism? This is a military trick. So admit that crests outsmart every time. Why, if sofa troops are waiting for this? They write about it. The feeling that the authorities live in a different reality. Well, either it's worse than crime. These are mistakes! Not too much?
  11. +3
    6 August 2023 12: 51
    Articles and comments are filled with words if, yes, if only. War is the economy, personnel, army, goal, strategy, where is all this? The Russian authorities have no desire to win. Hence the lack of opportunities and everything else to win. The authorities of the Russian Federation and all the capitalists agree to sign an agreement, only Ukraine and NATO are against it. The media have lied, they are preparing the population for a shameful agreement ...
  12. 0
    7 August 2023 11: 12
    it is necessary to overtake from the Baltic to the Black Sea additionally more ships

    Dry?
    1. 0
      8 August 2023 17: 13
      Through internal channels, you can overtake patrol ships from the Baltic Fleet and Northern Fleet, even from the Pacific Fleet along the NSR, they are just designed to destroy drone boats and protect drones. Minesweepers, some destroyers and frigates will pass through the internal channels of the Varshavyanka submarine. Do we have ships to transport? There is a desire of the Kremlin???
      1. +1
        9 August 2023 19: 42
        Quote: vlad127490
        Pass through internal channels

        only ships of the third rank, minesweepers, MPK and MRK, boats, MDK, and corvettes, frigates and submarines will not pass
  13. 0
    9 August 2023 02: 12
    Judging by the talented operatives for Fr. Serpentine and Gostomel landing is possible, but Moscow is not rubber.