Does the Russian Navy need unmanned missile carriers and torpedo bombers?

7

A series of attacks on ships of the Black Sea Fleet by Ukrainian naval drones has put on the agenda the question of how to defend against them and whether similar unmanned boats are needed in the arsenal of the Russian Navy. Sea-based BPA - is it pampering or the future of the "wunderwaffe"?

Marine Drone Fleet


Recall that the Armed Forces of Ukraine began to use unmanned sea drones last year, attacking the main base of the Russian Navy in Sevastopol. Then, rather unexpectedly, video cameras recorded a fire-ship attack on the bridge in Zatoka, which the Kiev regime attributed to Russia. After a short lull, Ukrainian naval UAVs began to pursue small reconnaissance ships of the Russian Navy located in Turkish economic zone. Fortunately, both "Ivan Khurs" and "Priazovye" were able to get rid of them, but the trend, as they say, is alarming.



The fact that our SRKs were attacked near the Bosporus indicates either the launch of drones from the sides of civilian ships participating in the grain deal, or the very high range of unmanned boats led to the target by American strategic reconnaissance UAVs. The latter means that such firewalls pose a threat to the entire Black Sea area. In the fall of 2022, President Zelensky announced the start of a fundraiser to create the world's first fleet of marine drones:

How it works, everyone has already seen. And this is only for our protection - we do not pretend to someone else's.

Sounds alarming. On January 29, 2017, the Saudi Arabian Navy frigate Al Madinah of the French project F2000 was attacked by the Houthis using a remote-controlled fireship. The unmanned boat filled with explosives successfully reached the target and hit it on board, exploding. You can see how it looked from the deck of the ship on the video.


Undoubtedly, the shooters of "Ivan Khurs" and "Priazovye" are real Heroes who managed to save both of our SRKs. But does this mean that unmanned firefighters have become a kind of "wunderwaffe"?

No, to say that would be an exaggeration. Maritime kamikaze UAVs are a threat to defenseless civilian ships, as well as to coastal infrastructure. A real warship will easily beat them off. Problems can arise for almost unarmed SRKs in the event of an attack by a large “wolf pack” of fireships, and even at night, when it is difficult to shoot by eye. I really hope that the command of the Black Sea Fleet is more won't send reconnaissance ships without escort.

In general, maritime drones as firewalls are rather a weapon not of war, but of terror. The only way the Russian Navy could really use them is to destroy the pillars of the Ukrainian bridges across the Dnieper, but such actions should have been taken a long time ago in a comprehensive and serious manner. Does this mean that the Russian fleet does not need unmanned boats?

Almost a wunderwaffe


In fact, marine UAVs can be extremely useful if they are mass-produced and inexpensive and applied to the case.

first direction is the use of unmanned boats as patrol boats. An Israeli remote-controlled boat Protector USV can be used as an example to follow. It is based on a fiberglass landing craft, has a speed of 40 knots, a carrying capacity of 1 ton and is equipped with a wide range of sensors and sensors that allow it to detect, identify and track both coastal and offshore objects. The Protector USV is capable of delivering naval special forces to the required location, participating in rescue missions and guarding large ships. For self-defense, the unmanned boat is armed with a 7,62 mm machine gun. Probably a similar remote-controlled technique would find its application both in the Russian Navy and in the Border Guard Service of the FSB of the Russian Federation.

Second direction, even more important, involves the creation of an unmanned mine defense boat for the needs of the navy. The mine threat from the countries of the NATO bloc, and now Ukraine is one of the most serious, especially in the face of a clear shortage of modern minesweepers in our country. As a platform for BEC mine defense, a promising unmanned boat "Typhoon", presented in 2015 by PKF Mnev and K LLC, is supposed. There is still work to be done on it, but the project itself is extremely promising.

The third the direction that requires discussion and comprehensive study is the idea of ​​creating an attack marine drone based on a small missile and / or torpedo boat. To understand the prospects for its use, let's turn to the family of Iranian boats Zolfaghar, based on a North Korean export license.

The performance characteristics of Iranian missile boats are as follows: a displacement of 13,7 tons, a boat hull length of 16 meters, a speed of about 52 knots. Torpedo boats, respectively, have a displacement of 29 tons, a hull length of 21 meters, and a speed of about 52 knots. The crew both there and there are only three people. The IPS-18 torpedo boats differ from the IPS-16 missile boats by having a detachable 12,7mm machine gun in the bow. Their hulls are built taking into account the requirements of low radar visibility. The armament of the missile boats is represented by two anti-ship Nasr-1, presumably a copy of the Chinese C-704 short-range anti-ship missiles.

Both North Korea and Iran, for a number of reasons, have relied on a small “mosquito fleet”, which should attack an enemy that is superior in striking power with a “wolf pack”. But what if we take this idea to a more technologically advanced level?

What if you take these or similar high-speed missile and torpedo boats and make them unmanned? Imagine how much more effective Ukrainian fire ships, which need to literally stick into it to hit a target, would be a remotely controlled high-speed and actively maneuvering torpedo boat that fires a couple of modern torpedoes? In the unmanned version, it is quite possible to afford to exchange several inexpensive boats for some kind of NATO frigate.

And how much higher will the efficiency be if the Russian Navy sends a “wolf pack” of dozens of unmanned missile boats each carrying a pair of modern anti-ship missiles to attack enemy ships? This would make it possible to strike at the enemy fleet remotely, without risking a direct collision with our ships. In closed water areas such as the Baltic, Black or Mediterranean Seas, such naval drones equipped with anti-ship missiles can become a truly formidable weapon.
7 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    14 June 2023 13: 19
    Drone boats with speeds of 55 knots per hour can only operate in calm weather. Even with a storm of 3 points. it is already dangerous to release them into the sea.
  2. 0
    14 June 2023 13: 47
    Everything is empty again.
    Single successful attacks, as in the video, are associated with surprise on an unready ship

    And the tactics and equipment of such boats have already been considered during the 20th century, and many times.
    So far, all parties are using them mediocrely, not taking into account the experience of using such boats in history.

    One of the waves of repressions against the leadership of the Soviet Navy is precisely connected with radio-controlled boats in the Black Sea.
    Unmanned boats, torpedo boats, missile boats....
    Always needed. Especially when there is no money for normal ships. But they do not require kickbacks, but normal brains ...
  3. +2
    14 June 2023 23: 34
    The author touched upon the topic of the future navy. While it is possible to predict from the initial actions of the sea without crewed ships and boats, today they are often not very successful, but their potential and future prospects are unlimited. Firstly, the direction of attack naval assets in the surface version is less promising, much more effective in the underwater version (less dependent on weather and detection, underwater monitoring is more convenient, etc.). As an example, we have a Poseidon nuclear strategic vehicle without a crew of unlimited radius, then Poseidon-type tactical weapons already suggest itself, and further downward, strike weapons of a smaller caliber and capabilities, using ships and other targets. Here is a bouquet without crewed underwater strike assets, which will obviously be more effective for surface assets. Often in the Russian Federation, pioneering design and manufacture of advanced weapons are started, but the trouble is that bringing to serial production and use drags on for decades, and as a result, we trail behind new weapons. The reason for such a disease is the corruption and irresponsibility of the highest officials of the Ministry of Defense and the military-industrial complex, which have not been replaced for decades, under such conditions, the main task of armament fades into the background when personal interests dominate.
  4. 0
    15 June 2023 10: 47
    Does the Russian Navy need unmanned boats

    Of course needed. So many "partner" gas carriers and tankers roam the sea with impunity.
    For "SP-2" one must once adequately answer.
  5. 0
    26 June 2023 08: 50
    PMO unmanned boats are not news, they need more like their minesweeper carriers, of course, in the 21st century, more and more unmanned weapons are needed
  6. 0
    2 July 2023 08: 25
    Does the Russian Navy need unmanned boats?

    Definitely needed!!! If ours cannot, they do not know how, and the lack of electronic components prevents this, then it is advisable to purchase them from anyone possible, and in huge quantities, underwater, all sorts of surface.
  7. +1
    5 July 2023 05: 09
    Until our Defense Ministry begins to see clearly, our potential enemies can go far with the development of such types of weapons. As an example, the development of UAVs, the organization of the mass production of combat and reconnaissance drones. We missed a lot, playing tanks and building temples, all this turned into a lot of blood for our soldiers. Such omissions are unforgivable for an agency on which the country's security and our future depend. We have a lot of smart and technically literate young people, they need funding and flexibility in organizing the production of new types of weapons.