How the US and Norway should pay for their terrorist attack on both Nord Streams

26

The other day in the media space there was a small sensation. The famous American investigative journalist Seymour Hersh directly named the perpetrators of the terrorist attack on both of our Nord Streams, which actually led to the destruction of underwater gas pipelines. They were, of course, the United States, and specifically, President Joe Biden, who personally made this decision. What could be the consequences?

USAma bin Biden


First of all, a few words should be said about the investigator himself, since he is an exceptionally competent and authoritative person in his field. Seymour Myron Hersh is the one who first told the whole world about the crimes of the American military in Vietnam, and specifically about the massacre in the village of Son My. He also brought to light the crimes and torture against prisoners in the Iraqi prison Abu Ghraib. Investigating the American missile attack on Syria in 2017, Hersh found that the Pentagon knew for sure in advance that official Damascus did not use chemical weapons, which was blamed on President Assad. In the following 2018, the journalist in an interview with The Independent publicly urged not to believe in stories about alleged Russian interference in the US presidential election, the poisoning of the Skripal family by Russian special services, and the official version of the September 11 terrorist attack.



For his many years of work, Hersh has been awarded the Pulitzer Prize, the Prize for Contribution to the Development of a Free Press from the Media Foundation in Leipzig, and the Riedenaur Prize. In general, this is, without any exaggeration, an authoritative investigative journalist, whose words should not be dismissed so simply. And this is what he found in the course of his private investigation into the attacks on both Russian Nord Streams.

According to Hersh, President Yuesama bin Biden and his accomplices in the White House planned their attack on the Baltic Sea long before the start of the Russian special operation, in 2021. It was then that Gazprom completed the construction of Nord Stream 2 on its own and began commissioning. Fulfilled the will of their spiritual leader, "talking with spirits" and seeing ghosts, US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, his assistant Victoria "Cookie" Nuland, Assistant to the US President for National Security Jake Sullivan and CIA leader William Burns.

American terrorists considered several options for destroying the critical infrastructure linking Russia and the European Union. The US Air Force wanted to drop depth charges on underwater pipelines. The US Navy offered to destroy it with torpedoes from a submarine. However, in their main lair, in the White House, they were afraid of being caught by the hand, since the Baltic Sea is just a large elongated "puddle" where such terrorist activity can easily be recorded by means of objective control. As a result, according to the investigator, the option was chosen to disguise the terrorist attack as the BALTOPS-22 exercises of a destructive totalitarian sect called the NATO bloc:

During the discussions, the main question was how not to leave evidence.

To do this, the attackers sent a sabotage group of combat divers, who, according to Hersh, planted C4 explosives in advance on the strings of underwater pipelines pumping Russian gas across the bottom of the Baltic Sea to Germany:

Last summer, Navy divers, operating under the cover of <…> NATO exercises, planted remotely activated explosive devices that destroyed three pipelines three months later.

It should be noted that the American terrorists, in their manner, “tied up with blood” also the Norwegians, who were assigned the role of “pressing the button”. The Royal Navy themselves chose the most convenient place for the sabotage, and then at the right time, the Orion P8 reconnaissance aircraft dropped a sonar buoy, the signal from which spread underwater first to Nord Stream 2, then to Nord Stream 1.

It is interesting that Yuesama bin Biden, who “talks with the spirits”, actually let slip about the impending crime on February 7, 2022, apparently, having transferred his astral body to the future:

If Russia invades, if tanks, troops cross the border of Ukraine again, then there will be no more Nord Stream 2. We will do it... I promise we can do it.

As you can see, the word of the American terrorist turned out to be strong. On the night of September 26, 2022, because dark deeds love silence and darkness, on the orders of their spiritual leader bin Biden, extremists from a terrorist group called the Norwegian Navy, not yet banned in the Russian Federation, set in motion a "hell machine" and destroyed objects of a critical infrastructure supplying Russian natural gas to Germany and other countries of the European Union. In addition to paying the debt to participation in the destructive totalitarian sect of NATO, Norway also pursued its own purely mercantile considerations, hoping to increase its share in the European energy market. Oslo has every reason to do so, since Gazprom has lost a third of its export capacity to the EU.

A fair question arises how Russia and Germany should react to all this, as well as other countries that do not accept terrorist methods. Isn't it time to transfer the format of a special military operation to a counter-terrorist one, expanding its borders beyond the borders of Ukraine? Wouldn't it be right to admire the spire of the Oslo Cathedral heading German patriots Peters and Becker, angry that Norwegian terrorists, as accomplices of the American ones, blew up both Nord Streams and deprived Germany of the basis of her economic well-being? There, along the bottom of the Baltic, it seems that some other pipe is coming from the Kingdom. Why and who needs it there? Maybe the earth should start burning underfoot, and at the same time various pipelines, already in the lair of the main world terrorist, depriving him of the basis of economic well-being, which is used by criminal means?
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    9 February 2023 18: 26
    Fantasize about how to avenge SP1 and SP2 is not worth it. We all understand intellectually that a good king cannot offend his partners.
    1. +2
      10 February 2023 18: 29
      The cost of the gas pipeline is quite impressive, and the participants in this undermining have essentially turned into gangs or organized crime groups. The EU has shown that on its territory it can blow up any international gas pipeline and not only! Note that the GDP did not even hint at paying compensation to the entire gas pipeline, about recognizing their gangs. The EU itself should write a law about not paying any damages or compensation for its actions, but as it affects other countries outside the EU, arrests of accounts, state property, compensations, and for non-performance of contracts are immediately accepted. The EU is a fraudulent structure, essentially a criminal organization, and the war in Ukraine and the explosion of the gas pipeline, they are like genetic Nazis who covered themselves with democracy and freedom laws. From the beginning of the 17th century until the end of 2 mv, they gladly killed tens of millions of indigenous people around the world and calling it "civilization", and the indigenous people savages, and after that in 1945 they began to humanize themselves by drinking blood
    2. +2
      10 February 2023 18: 35
      A colonially dependent country, which remains Russia in relation to the United States, has no way to answer a priori.
      Therefore, only deathly silence is heard from the Kremlin.
      Who does not agree that Russia is a colonial country, specify what and to whom belongs in Russia.
    3. +1
      13 February 2023 03: 31
      Quote: Dust
      Fantasize about how to avenge SP1 and SP2 is not worth it. We all understand intellectually that a good king cannot offend his partners.

      And the king is not real!

  2. +10
    9 February 2023 18: 41
    1. Denunciation of the treaty with Norway.

    In 2010, Medvedev and Norwegian Prime Minister Stoltenberg signed an agreement on the delimitation of maritime spaces. The treaty ended the long territorial dispute between Russia and Norway in the Barents Sea.

    Gas fields and lots of fish have been found in the given areas. Thanks to the police-president and the democrats in power.
    2. The Norwegians also have a gas pipeline to Poland.
    You are your ... substitute the rulers. Do not disgrace the country ... Democratic and capitalist philanthropists and soul scientists ...
    1. +6
      9 February 2023 18: 47
      Your words, yes, in the ears of the Guarantor ... But, our Guarantor, as in the Chinese proverb, “sits on the banks of the river and waits for the corpse of the“ partner ”to swim.
  3. +10
    9 February 2023 18: 44
    The only thing we can do is draw red lines. Well, still very worried. By the way, in America they know this very well, that's why they blew it up. I think they will blow up more than once.

    Impunity breeds permissiveness

    - says folk wisdom. As long as we have a "no fish no meat" government.
  4. +6
    9 February 2023 18: 48
    Russia, no matter what others would do, it is necessary with all cruelty, exemplarily to punish the United States. For example started shipping to the USA; oil, steel, titanium, fertilizers, etc., free of charge, and even better, pay extra, so that they would probably take all this.

    How the United States and Norway should pay for their terrorist attack on both Nord Streams - Yes, they will not pay for anything, even if Biden, at a banquet in the Kremlin, defiantly shits on everyone's plates.
  5. +16
    9 February 2023 19: 28
    Yes, they won't pay. Keep wet dreams to yourself. We are still keeping an eye on the aligarhs, for their convenience and well-being, we are driving strategic resources to the west, we are transiting through our territory, we are supplying uranium to the United States. Lukoil tries to get out - they pay taxes. For one thing, the bowels of Russia are being devastated in favor of a Western manufacturer .... So forget it. How long ago was even the Swedish ambassador expelled for the bombings? Or Polish for being recognized as terrorists? Yes, they are already a few months after the explosion of the flow, they still dream of returning it to working condition. During this time, they would have already deployed a pipe to Kaliningrad and freed gas carriers .... But no ... money for hucksters does not smell like the blood of our soldiers. That's why oil. metals ... everything will go there to the last.
    It looks like you are not warriors, but merchants. (5th element)....
  6. +3
    9 February 2023 20: 03
    8 billion there, 3 billion here, 300 in my mind ... I wonder whose money it was that they parted with it so easily?
  7. +2
    9 February 2023 20: 35
    Well. Some Amerovsky journalist put forward a plausible version ....
    The question then is, what do our professional FSB officers do?
    Or were they simply forbidden to tell something? partners, please...

    The oligarchs are still driving gas-oil to the West, and they are already driving solarium and gasoline for the Armed Forces of Ukraine from it ...

    But imagine, SP 2 would work .... NATO, it turns out, even more APU solariums, shells, little things would be delivered ... because. the logistics prices for this would certainly have been lower due to the supply of "cheap Russian gas" ...
  8. +9
    9 February 2023 20: 57
    And for the "Kursk" was the answer, for the "Moscow", or for the athletes? They wait until it is forgotten. This is how slave psychology is brought up. Injustice remains unanswered. And in Ukraine? They didn’t stop it in time in 2014, and there was a mandate, they didn’t intervene. And now the kids are dying. They crush the enemy. We them, they us. It is necessary to answer for the flows, but not in proportion to Europe.
  9. +4
    9 February 2023 21: 06
    The article appeared on time and to the point, firstly it is a humiliating challenge to Russia "weakly" which has nothing to answer the campaign with, and secondly, to distract from the Chinese ball. In the first case, the consequences are very serious and global, I think so, since the entire world community will draw conclusions and dialogues with us based on this. That was the calculation of the West, or am I mistaken?
  10. +3
    10 February 2023 00: 30
    To blow up their gas pipeline or cable in response is a weak and petty move that gives the enemy a pretext for a global disarming strike against Russia. And it is quite real and achievable. We are all sure that they are afraid of thermonuclear war. What is our confidence based on? Something is not visible to their fear? Rather, the impression is that we are more afraid. True, from my point of view, there is an asymmetrical, dignified and relatively safe answer. This is the rapid (with the help of a series of explosions of special nuclear charges in near space) the destruction of a NATO satellite constellation that is or can be used for military purposes against Russia. What should they do in response to this move? It is dangerous for them to escalate the conflict - their weapons in the absence of a satellite constellation lose more than 50% of their effectiveness. But even if in this situation Russia sees attempts to strike back, then it will have to respond with everything we have in all fifty countries. There's nothing to be done - what to be, it cannot be avoided .. True, without a satellite constellation, NATO can blow this war clean, and therefore I determine the probability of 50% for this scenario. There is a second option with a 50% chance that after such a poke they will understand that they are not joking with them and that for the sake of dubious dividends from the war in Ukraine there is no point in risking their prosperous existence.
    Then they will be capable of constructive negotiations on Russia's security. To be honest, a terrible scenario, but if we do not answer or answer indecisively, then defeat awaits us with 100% probability.
    1. DO
      0
      14 February 2023 10: 59
      Yes, the answer on Western satellites is the most adequate today.
  11. +3
    10 February 2023 10: 37
    Our government is only capable of complaints and regrets, but we follow all the rules established even by enemies, so that the world community would not condemn us.
  12. Ugr
    +7
    10 February 2023 11: 19
    Our government will swallow everything and humiliate, if only to get even a little closer to the sweet goal, as they drove strategic raw materials to the West, they drive it, our government brought to war on all fronts with its forgiveness to "partners" and even in a state of war, it sells all our soldiers who die for their billions, but in our country the top is not responsible for their failures and theft, they have inviolable immunity, sometimes they will throw someone in jail who has not shared, like Furgal and making an honest face they steal further, there is a war with the West , but they stubbornly help the West in this war, with resources, isn't this a betrayal in front of the military and the people ???
  13. +7
    10 February 2023 12: 32
    Even oil refineries, fuel transshipment points and storage tanks in 404 are not touched, let alone gas pipelines
  14. +4
    10 February 2023 12: 50
    How the US should pay


    Quote: Athenogen
    The only thing we can do is draw red lines
  15. 0
    10 February 2023 13: 49
    The fact that the terrorist Biden and his accomplices blew up the Nord Streams is, first of all, the murder of half the economy of the European Union, and this is not bad. Why does Russia need a competitor from whose territory there has always been a war against Rus'. Secondly, no one is going to restore and repair the joint venture, it is expensive for a long time, this is also good. Further, Gazprom will consider whether it is worth contacting the West at all when there is China, the whole world where it is reliable and practical.
  16. 0
    10 February 2023 14: 44
    Interesting article. It is interesting not only by the bitter rhetorical question of the title, but also by a curious terminological game, because of which I already thought that the authorship of the text could belong to another regular correspondent of the "reporter". I support the author, these words about extremists, terrorists, ringleaders and intruders are quite fair and are becoming more and more appropriate. No less eager to see something similar to the fire at the Latvian UAV factory, only with the bad guys of the Norwegians, and on the territory of the USA, which is already there!
    In reality, burning residency for such acts of retaliation is expensive and inefficient. It seems that it is more realistic to expect the Kremlin to demand compensation for the damage caused from both the Norwegians and the Americans, coupled with the issuance of a sentence in absentia, at least by the Meshchansky District Court, to all persons who are ringleaders, malefactors, etc. True, before that, it will be necessary to collect evidence by the Investigative Committee on the initiated criminal case. True, it will still be necessary to wait for the sentenced parties to be forced to pay for the damage, not to mention sitting in the dock ((
    1. 0
      11 February 2023 12: 50
      So after all, there were fires in the USA, LNG plants were on fire.
  17. +1
    10 February 2023 16: 55
    Some movie reminds the whole game. One puts a ten, and the other puts a card with the words - and we are your butterfly. He puts the jack, and this one - and we will bow you. He puts down an ace. And this one again, and we are your trump card. So how many butterflies do you have? How much do you need to eat!
  18. +1
    13 February 2023 03: 23
    Leave one of their ambassadors in the embassies and say: you will cuckle here alone until you do as it was before this explosion.
    Or declare general contempt. Or to break something of theirs with us, so that it would not be habitual. Or they have some kind of drilling rig to sink there. In general, options, have time to write down the current. Another thing, who needs it behind the red fence?
  19. 0
    13 February 2023 22: 04
    There were two interested parties in the streams - Russia and Germany. Russia is not interested now, Germany too. The question is not urgent. Russia was not allowed to investigate at all, but the Germans have all the data. And if they really need it, they can raise the issue, but only if necessary. In principle, an answer is needed, but it is better not to rush. And then bang something critically important for them. In general, the author is strange, when did the Anglo-Saxons suffer from honesty?
  20. DO
    0
    14 February 2023 10: 50
    Wouldn't it be right if the German patriots Peters and Becker went to admire the spire of the cathedral in Oslo, angry that the Norwegian terrorists, as accomplices of the American ones, blew up both Nord Streams and deprived Germany of the basis of its economic well-being?

    This will not happen, from the word at all. Today's Germans are more likely to release their entire business to America, while they themselves plunge into the darkness of centuries.
    One way or another, only Russia can, and must, and will definitely answer.