Retaliatory strike: Russia "will land" American "Boeing"

10
On April 13, State Duma Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin and four parliamentary factions submitted a bill on retaliatory measures against US sanctions. The document is called "On Measures of Impact (Counteraction) on Unfriendly Actions of the United States of America and (or) Other Foreign States".





This bill will be considered at a meeting of the State Duma Council, which will be held on April 16.

What does the bill include?

The initiative of parliamentarians provides for the adoption of a package economic и political measures:

  • Restrictions on the import of products manufactured in the United States. This included agricultural, alcoholic, tobacco products, as well as pharmaceuticals. Reservations have been made that the ban will not affect goods imported by Russian citizens for personal use. The restrictions will not affect drugs whose production of analogues is not established in the Russian Federation;
  • The prohibition of American auditing and law firms or having 25% or more of the American property to provide consulting and other services to Russian state-owned companies and other entities;
  • Prohibition of entry for US citizens on the sanctions list;
  • The ban on attracting foreign specialists from the USA or other countries to work in the Russian Federation;
  • Lack of technological equipment and software manufactured in the USA;
  • Reduction or stopping of Russian-American cooperation in the field of rocket science, nuclear energy and aircraft manufacturing;
  • Raising tariffs for air navigation services for cargo aircraft from the United States or other countries using Russian airspace.

What might be the consequences?

It is worth emphasizing that the bill is not a law yet. The President has yet to sign it, but Putin and his spokesman have not yet expressed their attitude towards him. Nobody can guarantee that the law will be signed and adopted, but the probability is high. Even if this bill is rejected, a response to US sanctions is necessary, and no one denies this need.

The question is only in the details. Many points require a very careful study. Any sanctions have several parties. Any restrictions create inconvenience for the limiting party, therefore, all consequences should be calculated.

For example, a clause on the termination of cooperation in the field of nuclear energy, rocket and aircraft of technologies not as simple as it might seem. On the one hand, such a move can firmly press the United States.

Indeed, Russian titanium, supplied for the needs of American aircraft construction, is superior in quality to similar raw materials from other countries. About half of the titanium parts used in American aviation are made of Russian titanium. Replacing Russia with another supplier is almost impossible, at least very difficult.

On the other hand, supplies of titanium to the USA bring substantial profit to our country. Of course, it will be easier for us to find a different market for titanium than the United States to find another supplier, but this will not be done quickly, which means losses are inevitable.

The same goes for nuclear energy. Russia supplies enriched uranium to the United States for the needs of nuclear energy. In the context of increasing confrontation with the West, we must be sure that such cooperation does not harm our security. After all, this raw material is used not only for peaceful purposes, but also for the production of weapons.

I am sure that these and other considerations come to the heads of decision-makers. And they will find the right way out, after calculating all the possible consequences.
10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. +3
      April 15 2018 16: 01
      I don’t know, the consequences are different. If you do not answer, the Americans finally become insolent. But the answer must be thoughtfully and as efficiently as possible.
  2. 0
    April 15 2018 16: 09
    And to whom exactly is the supply of titanium (titanium products) to the USA profitable?
  3. +1
    April 15 2018 16: 11
    And even earlier, everyone in the Government responsible for import substitution should be removed from work and not taken anywhere else, except for auxiliary specialties ...
  4. +1
    April 15 2018 16: 58
    The "deputies" of the State Duma have once again shown their blatant stupidity. Can titanium shipments be banned to Boeing? Can I have any problems? Here are just the result will be with a minus sign, and for us.
    Firstly, there is China with its titanium production, the Chinese will only say "thank you" to us, and we will remain with our production volumes, which simply have nowhere to stick.
    AVISMA has already protested. Naturally, who will pay the salary, not to mention the threat of mass cuts.
    Another Boeing’s most likely response to the discontinuation of titanium supplies is a FAILURE TO DELIVERY OF SPARE PARTS, and a FAILURE TO SERVICE and REPAIR.
    Russia currently flies on Boeing (and Watermelons), and, as a rule, leased. International leasing companies are definitely not happy about this turn of events, and planes may demand back.
    Americans will find a titan somewhere, but civilian air transportation with us will be paralyzed immediately. Such a trifle.
    It is necessary to answer the sanctions, whoever argues, you just need not to be hysterical, but think carefully so as not to be stupid to ridicule the world.
    1. 0
      April 20 2018 04: 13
      Yes, there is a lot of titanium in the world. He also exists in the USA. But this is not about titanium, but about the technology of its processing. Anyone with a technical education understands what technology is. And in order to get a titanium part with certain characteristics, one must master a certain titanium processing technology. The technologies that Boeing needs are available only in Russia. And no China can replace Russia here. If I could, the States would have taken from them long ago.
    2. 0
      22 May 2018 19: 39
      Burnt shed, burn and hut !!!
  5. 0
    April 15 2018 23: 25
    Same thing with

    software. And a lot more with what.
    By the way, the author is in this context also need to write SEPARATELY - ALSO MOST.

    I am sure that these and other considerations come to the heads of decision-makers. And they will find the right way out, after calculating all the possible consequences.

    Happy for you. Starin remembered a song The party is our helmsman!
  6. -1
    April 20 2018 00: 24
    Our economy is microscopic compared to the US economy. Therefore, they do what they want with us. You don’t have to answer like that It’s necessary, as in Israel - it’s more smart and smarter ... Absolutely insignificantly - Reducing or stopping Russian-American cooperation in the aircraft industry - I agree - only a minus for our state and people living in Russia - that is, it is an act against the Russian Federation and citizens.
  7. +1
    April 21 2018 20: 03
    This is called - to evil grandmother frostbite ears. It’s necessary to pick up an iPhone from Medvedev and solemnly break it, let America be worse.
    1. 0
      22 May 2018 19: 37
      And the iPhone taken about whom and what part to break that solemnly is not subject to discussion!