The blockade of Ormuz: Tehran prepared the US "nuclear surprise"?

13
The situation in the Middle East is rapidly escalating. Unidentified persons "similar to the IRGC fighters" were spotted by US intelligence taking out mounted mines from a ship after a series of attacks on tankers in the Gulf of Oman. The Pentagon has decided to send additional forces to the region. Then Washington significantly threatened a military strike on Iran if at least one American soldier who was so far from his native home suffered from Tehran’s actions. Now it is reported that Iranian air defense shot down either the RQ-4 Global Hawk UAV or the MQ-4C Triton U.S. Air Force UAV.





The air clearly smells of an impending war. Is the Islamic Republic resistant to a massive strike by the United States and its allies?

The Iranians must be given their due, they are not stewing in front of a very serious threat. The Chief of the General Staff of the Republic said that in case of aggression, Tehran will close the transit of oil through the Strait of Hormuz:

If we decide to block the passage through the straits, then we are strong enough to do this, firstly, publicly, and secondly, block it altogether.


The possibility of blocking the strait is a significant trump card in the Iranian deck. Most of the hydrocarbons produced by the Middle Eastern monarchies go through Hormuz. Stopping oil exports could lead to a global energy crisis. However, this will be the trigger for starting a full-scale military operation of the United States and its allies against Iran.

Is Tehran resistant?

Technically, the strait blockade can be carried out in several ways. In the narrowest part of Hormuz, the Iranians are able to flood several large-tonnage vessels. To discourage the desire to raise them, all approaches will be mined, and fire control will be established with the help of artillery and missile forces.

However, the United States has the most powerful army and navy in the world. Thanks to the total superiority in the air, the US Air Force will spread Iranian positions, the Navy will sweep the fairway and blow up the flooded ships. Most likely, Israel and Great Britain will also act on the side of the American military. Together, they are able to quickly “squeeze” part of the coast from Iran.

So why is Tehran so calm? Russian military expert Mikhail Khodarenok makes an interesting judgment:

The situation, however, may look different if you imagine for at least a minute that Iran possesses at least tactical nuclear weapons.


Indeed, if Iran had tactical nuclear weapons, it could take into account not only the channel of the Strait of Hormuz, setting up a controlled nuclear minefield in advance in it, but also the US military infrastructure in the region. This is an extremely serious argument against armed aggression.

The key question is, does Tehran have its own nuclear arsenal? Officially, no, and Washington is doing everything to prevent it from appearing. Some time ago we toldthat there is a theory according to which Iran can already actually possess nuclear weapons. The fact is that Tehran worked very closely on a missile program with Pyongyang. Experts note that the Iranian and North Korean missile programs are surprisingly complementary: the DPRK relied on ICBMs, and Iran - on medium- and shorter-range missiles.

We can assume that the cooperation between the two "rogue countries" was not limited to this, and Tehran received its own nuclear weapons developed for them in the framework of cooperation in North Korea. It is rather difficult to explain the confidence of the Iranian leadership with something else.
13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    20 June 2019 14: 06
    It is rather difficult to explain the confidence of the Iranian leadership with something else.

    In any war, the human factor is important, the winner is the one who has a stronger spirit, who is ready not only to fight, but also to die. The Persians are ready, but the Americans? How do you like this explanation.
    1. +4
      21 June 2019 18: 05
      ... who has a stronger spirit ...
      The Persians are ready, but the Americans?

      There is no doubt that the Persians are morally and psychologically more prepared for war than the Americans.
      But these are the Persians, and what are the other peoples of Iran? After all, the Persians themselves, according to various sources, from 40 to 60%. And everything else is a national minority. Who will they be for? The same Kurds? Recall Syria. There are about 8 million Kurds. But the Kurds are not the largest minority in Iran. The second after the Persians are Azerbaijanis. What position will they take in case of war? Good if just neutral. And if not?
      And the armament of the Iranian army is not so simple. It’s old (in short) for the most part.
      There are more questions than answers. One spirit may not be enough.
      One hope that Russia will still help.
  2. +2
    21 June 2019 12: 24
    Do not forget that Iran is Russia's ally in Syria, its neighbor and strategic partner.
    Putin has already stated in a straight line that Russia is not trading in its allies. Iran is also a candidate for the SCO, which is in the sphere of interests of both China and India.
    Consequently, the Russian Federation and China can help Tehran with modern weapons against the military aggression of the United States and its vassals in the West, as the interventionists in Syria do, arming the gangs of ISIS and al-Qaeda terrorists.
    1. +2
      21 June 2019 17: 06
      Why did you decide that Iran is an ally of the Russian Federation? We are cooperating in Syria. Cooperation is still not an alliance involving military support. These are different concepts.
  3. +2
    21 June 2019 16: 20
    If Iran is an ally, then it needs to be helped now, openly and to China too! After all, China openly said that it had deployed troops to Venezuela. I. And the USA was also preparing a blow to this country.
    1. 0
      21 June 2019 17: 02
      Interesting! The United States almost openly helps terrorists in Syria with weapons and money. And Russia is not helping a friendly country undergoing aggression by the United States. Churchill was right:

      Whoever chooses shame between war and shame will receive both war and shame!
      1. +4
        21 June 2019 17: 53
        But Russia does not help a friendly country ...

        Why such a conclusion? Or should they personally report to you?
        Such assistance is not always open, but more often than not it is advertised.
        1. 0
          22 June 2019 06: 39
          Quote: gorbunov.vladisl
          Why such a conclusion?

          But this conclusion is only due to the fact that the entire domestic economic policy of the country, whose success is trumpeted from each iron, is riddled with lies. We did not advertise that Moscow was going to bring its shit to the North. So there, in the North, ordinary Russian citizens, crushed by the care of the party and government, and here are foreign powers. Before them, bluffing is more expensive.
          And a clear example of this strange collaboration is the refusal of S-400 supplies to Iran. And here - oh, what a field for advertising the technical characteristics of the complex, and for mutually beneficial assistance ...
          1. +2
            22 June 2019 10: 34
            Would deliver the S-400 to Iran and the United States would whine in the corner! And the whole world would see that it is beneficial to be friends with Russia!
          2. +4
            23 June 2019 08: 03
            And a clear example of this strange collaboration is the refusal of S-400 supplies to Iran.

            Lying is bad.
            Moreover, the Minister of Defense of Iran announced his reluctance to purchase this complex back in 2016.

            Tehran said it would not purchase S-400 Triumph anti-aircraft missile systems (SAM) from Russia. According to the Minister of Defense of the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI), Hossein Dehgan, there is no need for these air defense systems in the country.

            https://www.gazeta.ru/army/2016/08/25/10158377.shtml
            But about Putin's "refusal" was trumpeted by the Western media, and our liberals picked up this yelp.

            Russia refused Iran a request for the supply of S-400 missile defense systems, fearing that this deal would lead to increased tensions in the Middle East. It is reported by Bloomberg with reference to two informed sources, one of which is a "high-ranking Russian official."

            https://www.rbc.ru/politics/30/05/2019/5cf0056d9a7947507f3bc9a5

            According to the chairman of the Federation Council Committee on Foreign Affairs, Konstantin Kosachev, the information that the Kremlin refused to supply S-400 systems to Iran is similar to a stuffing box. He is not aware of such a refusal.

            https://www.mk.ru/politics/2019/05/31/sovfed-soobshheniya-ob-otkaze-rossii-prodavat-s400-iranu-vbros.html
        2. 0
          4 August 2019 14: 29
          I'm just tired of these basic comments. But glimpses of intelligence should at least be.
  4. Ygm
    +1
    23 June 2019 09: 00
    Calm down gentlemen, Russia will not allow Iran to fall.
    As well as NO other state (even such as Israel or Ukraine).
    And there will be no more change of "Mode" - ANYWHERE.
    The rules have changed - and it began with Syria, and so it will continue!
  5. -4
    25 June 2019 18: 06
    In general, when the Americans kill ISIS and Assad in Syria, it is very likely that they will be relocated to Iran.
    Therefore, preventive measures are taken correctly.