First response from Russia to US strike: response will follow

5
So it happened. The Americans turned from words to deeds and, as part of a coalition with Britain and France, launched a missile strike on the Syrian Arab Republic. The reason for military aggression was a clear provocation with the use of chemical weapons during the liberation from terrorists by government forces of East Guta. On the eve there were reports of the possible involvement of the British special services in the staging of the use of chemical weapons against the Syrian people with the aim of accusing the regime of Bashar al-Assad and his allied Russia of this crime.





The Englishwoman, chemical weapons, Russia's accusation: how familiar this is with the Skripal case. It is noteworthy that a military strike was struck on the same day when the experts of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, which could bring out the fact of provocation, were to start investigating a chemical attack in Eastern Ghuta. However, Washington and London, as well as Paris that joined them, were satisfied only with the fact that the use of chemical weapons as an occasion had taken place and carried out military aggression against Syria, without waiting for the results of the investigation.

According to preliminary data, from 100 to 120 Tomogavk-class missiles were fired at facilities in the Arab Republic. According to available information, cruise missiles aimed at the Homs province were intercepted by air defense forces. The Russian military contingent located in the territory of allied Syria was not affected by the attacks of the Western coalition.

Despite the fact that a direct military clash between Russia and Western forces has not yet occurred, the situation is taking an extremely negative development trend. Deputy State Duma of the Russian Federation Alexander Sherin, first deputy chairman of the defense committee, commented on the military aggression against the Syrian Arab Republic:

This is the second Belgrade, today is a turning point, the Russian Federation received an act of aggression, because by all international standards this is a violation of all international rights, this is a declaration without declaring war on an independent state, in respect of which the nuclear power fulfills its obligations to provide assistance and assistance


In the Russian Federation Council, they are in solidarity with the position of Deputy Sherin. Representatives of the upper house of Parliament intend to take all possible diplomatic efforts in order to consolidate the international community and condemn the military aggression of the Western coalition. Andrei Klimov, the head of the commission for the protection of state sovereignty, draws the attention of foreign parliamentarians to the illegality of the actions of the United States, the United Kingdom and the Fifth Republic:

Inter-parliamentary Russian senators will discuss the situation in Syria with colleagues from other countries, especially given that Western leaders gave the order to attack without parliament’s permission, bypassing constitutional procedures


The Russian ambassador in Washington, Yuri Antonov, spoke sharply of Western aggression against allied Syria, considering it an insult to the Russian president:

The worst fears came true. Our warnings were ignored. A script prepared in advance has been implemented. And again they threaten us. We warned that such actions would not be without consequences.


At the same time, Antonov draws attention to the fact that it is the United States of America that today is the owner of the world's largest arsenal of chemical weapons. In 2017, Russia completed the process of eliminating its arsenal of toxic substances, and also contributed to the destruction of its reserves in official Damascus.
5 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    April 14 2018 11: 25
    What answer is there! There will be only another blather! UNABLE to protect neither its citizens nor its allies! Glory to the great Putin!
  2. +2
    April 14 2018 11: 55
    do not get off with tomatoes, wait uhhhh what will happen to you ...
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. 0
    April 14 2018 21: 29
    Time will tell which is stronger - the fear of our hucksters before the common people of Russia or the fear of our hucksters in front of "colleagues and partners" ...
    1. +1
      April 15 2018 08: 40
      What to fear if 76% vote as it should?
  5. +2
    April 15 2018 07: 11
    You know colleagues, I, too, was indignant at the lack of a clear answer to the actions of the Western coalition, but ... After thinking and weighing the facts, I came to the conclusion that the West attacking the ATS only showed its animal fear of Russia. After all, not a single missile was sent to the territory of the Russian contingent and none of the Russian citizens were injured, and out of 103 missiles 71 were intercepted by Soviet-made Syrian air defense systems of another 70-80 years of production. And where are the smart rockets Donald Trump was so proud of? Yes, they are worthless on a market day if they are shot down by air defense systems that were withdrawn from service in the 80s of the last century. What does this mean, but only that the West is afraid, afraid of us like fire, it has an animal fear of Russia and the Russian man, and he should do it in such a way that his place will always be the last.