The Kremlin attended to the poverty of the Russian population

30 May 2019 21

The data of statistical and sociological studies on the decline in the income of Russians, appearing with enviable frequency in the Russian media, seriously alarmed the country's leadership. After all, a poor population is the key to the emergence of numerous social and economic problems.

So, according to a Rosstat study, about half of Russian citizens have enough income only for food and clothing, and 15% of the money polled is only enough for food. In the risk category are pensioners, large families, people with disabilities, and provincials.

A spokesman for the Russian president, Dmitry Peskov, was even forced to specifically emphasize that the Kremlin soberly assesses the situation with the incomes of Russians.

Undoubtedly, the general decline in incomes is noted by many organizations that are involved in statistics, including Rosstat. It is not always possible to understand this or that information, although, in general, this is a general background, which, indeed, is the object of very close attention,

- noted Peskov.

However, among the main reasons for the decline in the well-being of the population, the head of state’s spokesman highlights international trends, trade wars and anti-Russian sanctions.

Of course, all these factors really affect the Russian economy. But for some reason, the question of the effectiveness of the economic management of the country, the very path of its development is not asked, and the Russians could not boast of a high standard of living even before the imposition of sanctions.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

maiman61

-1

30 May 2019 20: 38

The poverty of Russians is explained by only one thing - nineteen-year stagnation!
1. Nick
  
  +2
  
  30 May 2019 21: 16
  
  Quote: maiman61
  The poverty of Russians is explained by only one thing - nineteen-year stagnation!
  
  GDP from 2000 to 2018 increased by 14,18 times. Gold reserves increased by 39,6 It is difficult to call stagnation.
  1. maiman61
    
    +1
    
    1 June 2019 14: 04
    
    Let it grow on paper! And people are living harder every year. Love to listen to fairy tales, listen to more Americans! They generally lied. And our stagnation is worse than Brezhnevsky!
    1. gorbunov.vladisl
      
      -1
      
      1 June 2019 15: 21
      
      And our stagnation is worse than Brezhnevsky!
      
      Under Brezhnev there was no stagnation, but stability.
    2. Nick
      
      +1
      
      2 June 2019 19: 30
      
      Quote: maiman61
      Let it grow on paper! And people are living harder every year. Love to listen to fairy tales, listen to more Americans! They generally lied. And our stagnation is worse than Brezhnevsky!
      
      In Brezhnev’s stagnation, there was a shortage of certain consumer goods and dairy and meat products. But the paradox was that on the collective farm markets, almost everything could be bought, only at prices higher than state ones by 15 times. But overall, life was pretty decent. And now people are buying apartments, cars, and are not starving in one word.
Bakht

+1

30 May 2019 20: 44

However, among the main reasons for the decline in the well-being of the population, the head of state’s spokesman highlights international trends, trade wars and anti-Russian sanctions.

There are two troubles in Russia - Medvedev and Siluanov. Well, also fools and roads ...
April 25 2019 years

The head of the Russian government, Dmitry Medvedev, allowed the First Deputy Prime Minister, Minister of Finance Anton Siluanov to take another deputy, the corresponding resolution was published on the official portal of legal information.
According to the document Minister of Finance will be able to have 11 deputies instead of the current 10.
1. Oleg RB
  
  -1
  
  30 May 2019 21: 16
  
  Hm, but fabulous? No, it doesn’t matter?
Bakht

0

30 May 2019 22: 51

PORTAL OF GOSPROGRAMS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND ENHANCEMENT OF ITS COMPETITIVENESS
Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated March 31.03.2017, 382 No. 13-XNUMX

PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
creation of a competitive, sustainable, structurally balanced industry in the Russian Federation (in the structure of industries related to the subject of the program) capable of effective self-development through integration into the global technological environment, development and application of advanced industrial technologies aimed at the formation and development of new markets for innovative products effectively solving the problem of ensuring the economic development of countries
----------------
PROGRAM TASKS
improving the national standardization system, ensuring the uniformity of measurements in the interests of improving the quality of life of the population and the competitiveness of the economy, maintaining the metrological sovereignty of the Russian Federation, promoting the introduction by industry of the best available technologies, technical modernization of industries while reducing negative environmental impact

stimulating the export of high value-added products, taking into account the limitations of the World Trade Organization, removing regulatory barriers and creating parity conditions for introducing innovative products to the market;

stimulation of scientific research and experimental development aimed at providing industry with new technologies and product samples;
expansion of production of modern high-tech industrial products;

providing industry with means of production, coordination of technological development programs of industries with trends in demand for technological products;

the accelerated creation of innovative infrastructure for the development of traditional and new industries;

updating the technological and material base of sectors of civil industry;

meeting the needs of industry for affordable, technologically advanced and environmentally friendly traditional and new materials

And where is welfare improvement here?
1. Victor N
  
  0
  
  31 May 2019 10: 49
  
  I can’t imagine with my meager mind that someone would increase my well-being! Who might need this ?! Rather, I would be scared - it’s not good for that. Improving your well-being is possible only personally. And in general, from a moral point of view, this topic is shameful - to admit one’s own poverty and, on the basis of this, to hint at concessions and alms is the same as admitting one’s own squalor: shame!
  1. Bakht
    
    +3
    
    31 May 2019 11: 13
    
    Improving your own well-being is, of course, your personal responsibility. Let's say get a good education, change work to a higher paying one, do business (not in a stall to trade, but to establish production or services). This is all that you can and must do in order to live well and provide for your family.
    
    But increasing personal welfare of the country's population is beyond your personal strength. This is a direct DUTY of the state. That is, to create good schools and institutes, to ensure high salaries in the workplace or school (science), and to create conditions for business development (taxes, loans). Increase the number of jobs, stop the export of capital). And a lot of other interesting and useful things.
    
    The first and main condition for this is the presence of a national-patriotic power. And not the comprador bourgeoisie.
    
    Currently, the words “comprador” and “comprador bourgeoisie” are stable negative expressions, are interpreted as “bureaucrat officials and oligarch businessmen who make their capital by selling domestic natural resources abroad and trading foreign goods, storing their money in foreign banks motivated by their own interests and not reflecting on the consequences for the country's economy ”
    
    https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Компрадор
    1. Victor N
      
      +1
      
      31 May 2019 17: 01
      
      Society is very heterogeneous, so I think it's wrong to define everyone as "compradors". I agree: there are manifestations, but not all of them. We have few initiative people, and even those are often oppressed. Society only demonizes successful businessmen (entrepreneurs). Who will create "new jobs"? Kink, however .....
Monster_Fat

+1

31 May 2019 03: 21

That's right, the State Department is to blame for the pension reform and the increase in VAT, and the annual compensation of tariffs of "natural monopolies", housing and communal services and prices in stores for "the amount of inflation," and Trump does not personally allow Russians to raise wages ...
Vladimir T

+3

31 May 2019 10: 08

The people receive a salary in rubles and wants to buy mainly Russian goods and for rubles. Maybe it's time to build production in Russia and for the people? And stop nodding gas to oil.
1. Victor N
  
  +1
  
  31 May 2019 10: 56
  
  But who is bothering you? Or are they only able to consume? Imagine: they give you money to create production - are you able to? What, where, from what, with whom will you produce? To whom to sell? And if after that. how is it that you will be called an oligarch, they will demand everything to be taken away and put to the wall? Real questions?
  1. Bakht
    
    +1
    
    31 May 2019 11: 56
    
    This is what we are talking about.
    The STATE interferes with me. It does not give money ("You hold on"). The loans are huge (the central bank rate is 11% or something like that). What to produce and to whom to sell is also the concern of the state. Where is the logistics, transportation costs, imports, in the end. And then they will call him an oligarch and take everything away - also problems in state legislation.
    So, to your question "Who is stopping YOU"? I answer. The STATE prevents me from improving my personal well-being.
    PS I do not live in Russia, but in Azerbaijan. The same picture.
    1. Victor N
      
      0
      
      31 May 2019 17: 10
      
      No, dear, it’s not the state that bothers you, but the idea of business: what you expect from the state is the businessman who must do it, otherwise you will be a simple performer, which is inexpensive.
      1. Bakht
        
        +1
        
        31 May 2019 17: 54
        
        Argue no mood. But your words
        
        And if, after it turns out, you will be called an oligarch, they will demand everything to be taken away and put to the wall?
        
        - they say that I'm right.
        My understanding of business is based on a little experience of my own business. When they pressed me closer (government officials), I got rid of the business. And as a "simple performer" I earned myself a piece of bread with black caviar. But not in the former USSR. In the West. Where my work was adequately appreciated and paid ...
Ivan Ivanov_16

+3

31 May 2019 10: 28

In the morning I smear a sandwich
Immediately thought: what about the people?
And caviar doesn’t go down my throat
And compote does not pour into your mouth!
I will stand at the window at night.
And stand all night without sleep
All worry about Russia
How is it, poor, is she?

L.Filatov
kriten

+2

31 May 2019 14: 35

The Kremlin is only concerned about one thing - the process of robbery of the population is slowing down. Many already have nothing to take. It would not be necessary to print grandmothers hidden for a breakthrough (apparently to the West) in order to maintain power.
AICO

+2

31 May 2019 18: 49

It worries that the chair suddenly does not turn out to be electric - in the gas chamber !!!
nikolaj1703

0

1 June 2019 19: 17
All for the good of man! (Forbes Russia List).