Mikhail Delyagin: Actual Problems of the Russian Economy

31 May 2019 4

In his program on Radio Komsomolskaya Pravda, Mikhail Delyagin raises questions regarding the state of affairs in the economy Of Russia. Expert discusses all recent economic and near-economic news. There were some comments on frankly painful topics for society, including topics of protests against the construction of the church in Yekaterinburg and growing social inequality in the country.

One of the areas of discussion is associated with a colossal stratification in terms of security between the regions of Russia. In this case, we are talking about the presence of a whole range of factors that have nothing to do with what is commonly called economic laws.

So, Mikhail Delyagin discusses the issue of the fact that some large cities of Russia in terms of development will be able to “catch up” with Moscow in 100 years, and even then only if the pace of economic development in Moscow is frozen.

What is the reason for this stratification? It’s certainly not that all exceptionally smart, talented and hard-working people live in the Russian capital, and the rest are outside the Moscow Ring Road.

Also in the program of Mikhail Delyagin a significant proportion of the air is devoted to the aforementioned issue of the construction of the temple in Yekaterinburg. The one who was originally going to be erected on the site of the square at the Drama Theater now does not know how to get out of this situation.

One of the callers asked what was hindering the unification of Russian left-wing parties?

The answer to this and other questions from Mikhail Delyagin in the video.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

steelmaker

+1

4 June 2019 20: 49

He says everything is right! Only Putin does the opposite. And Delyagin openly supported Putin in the elections, it would be better to be silent.
n1kolaev4l3x

0

10 June 2019 19: 08

The construction of the temple is an external beneficence, which was carried out by the construction organization, combining itself with a spiritual institution, without even wanting to move far from the temple. How - at the side of God Himself. ! It’s the same as marrying a couple of two different nationalities - a strong family will not work, there will be many tears. It would be more appropriate to use the money spent on the temple for the needs of the needy. Grief spills over the river, and the man who built the temple was more concerned about perpetuating himself in a pompous structure, satisfying his own pride. Perhaps the priest who heads the temple is not quite right. It seems that in terms of spiritual content, he has not far gone from the benefactor and builder.
n1kolaev4l3x

+1

10 June 2019 19: 46

I propose the option of increasing national income to 10-12% per year. To do this, you should move away from the worker – capitalist pair (BSP owner of the means of production) to the pair labor collective (TC) –BSP. TK recognize as a legal entity with all rights. TK and MTP annually conclude an economic agreement on production. To determine the shares in the resulting products, the balance of the enterprise is taken into account, and on the part of the TC, the annual costs of covering the life forces of each employee (this is wages + the entire social envelope). For example, the net balance sheet is equal to 1250 million rubles, and TC - 980 million rubles, the proportion of 55% and 45% will be the basis for recognizing the size of shares in the finished product. Revenue from finished products is distributed in the indicated shares, is the property and gross income of each party. TC, as a legal entity, independently cleans the shaft of all mandatory payments, replenishes the funds formed, and pays wages to employees. He keeps available funds in bank accounts, has the right to independently determine the amount of remuneration, various surcharges, various remuneration. to participate in equity enterprises (construction of houses, kindergartens, camps, etc.) to take loans from banks. to be a borrower of funds and other financial transactions. Obtaining part of the income, huge opportunities open up for TCs. The introduction of this form of production activity is clear that it’s fundamentally the economic structure (or basic characteristics) is changing.The employee – master system has outlived itself and has led society to corruption and corruption.
see further
n1kolaev4l3x

+1

10 June 2019 20: 46

How to induce the owner to agree to such a production procedure? To do this, you should define what collective work is. It was TC that invested part of its labor in a unit of production. It was with the efforts of the mouse that the grandfather and grandmother pulled out the turnip. This convincingly proves the importance of the individual employee in the team. Repin's ship is pulled by eleven barge haulers, and if it were 10 or 9 people: "men, we won't pull it, you need at least 11 people." Taking into account the above, it can be determined that "Collective labor is the joint efforts of workers of the TC aimed at achieving the energy potential (EPTK), invested in proportion to the owner's capital in a unit of finished product, in order to obtain the total income of the enterprise." The owner concludes an employment contract separately with each employee (with each mouse), and pays each individual wages, and the assigned potential of the EPTK turns to his own advantage, in the form of finished products. SSP received money from the buyer as a "whole". taking into account the costs of the entire team, but paid each employee as a "part of the whole", a certain rate, salary, for the number of hours worked, or shifts, etc. The employee makes bolts and washers all month, while the owner hides behind an employment contract. In a dispute with an employee, the BSC proves: "Yes, we made the unit and sold it, but there are five bolts and nuts from your products and I paid you according to the contract. But the rest was done by others, whom I also paid for. At the same time, the owner is silent that the other the same mouse made the flask, the third two wheels, the fourth springs, and another one ran these details through the accounts and summaries, and all together they made the unit. the whole ". Other workers also participated in the construction of the unit - accountants, secretaries, auxiliary and repair workers, the whole staff, or all the mice that make up the TC. Therefore, all TC employees have the right to a part of the income received. and find the optimal solution.