Putin's rating plunged to historic lows

25 May 2019 72

The rating of confidence in the president of the Russian Federation has reached a historic low since 2006. This is evidenced by the results of surveys conducted in May.

According to VTsIOM for the period from May 13 to 19, this figure is 31,7 percent. The year 2006 was taken as the starting point, since before this study, the rating of confidence in various politicians not carried out.

At the same time, Putin’s figure is higher than that of other politicians. The second place in this rating is occupied by Minister of Defense Sergey Shoigu, and the third - by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. Almost 15 percent of respondents trust Shoigu, and thirteen percent trust Lavrov.

Despite the fall in the rating of trust in Putin, almost 69 percent of respondents approve of his activity.

The rating of confidence in the president began to decline steadily since June last year, when the population of Russia was announced to raise their retirement age.

The trust survey was conducted according to the “soft” version. Respondents were asked to name the politicians they trust.

Experts, commenting on the dynamics of changes in the presidential rating recorded by various sociological studies, note that the sharp drop in the indicator occurred after the adoption of the pension reform, and then it practically “froze” in one place, showing some fluctuations within the margin of error.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Gunter prereen

+1

25 May 2019 17: 37

The result of the attitude to the economy on the residual principle!
1. Valentine
  
  +3
  
  25 May 2019 18: 07
  
  This attitude to his people on a residual basis.
sergeu2

-4

25 May 2019 19: 05

Yes, the man is calm. I wish I spit Khokhlov in the face.
Syoma_67

-5

25 May 2019 22: 39

However! People began to reach through the refrigerator.
1. The comment was deleted.
2. Valentine
  
  +1
  
  26 May 2019 10: 54
  
  And that Semen, you are no longer accepted on the "Censor"?
Kim Rum Eun

-4

25 May 2019 23: 25

Recently I read an interview somewhere with Korzhakov, in which he recalled how this character ended up in Moscow, and who added him there.
And after that one can only be surprised: what rating can he have there at all?
1. Kim Rum Eun
  
  -6
  
  26 May 2019 15: 34
  
  This good sorcerer, who dragged an unknown St. Petersburg figure to Moscow and appointed him his deputy, was the head of the presidential administration and who is also a casual namesake of almost all red cats in Russia since the beginning of the "saints of the 90s" of the last century.
  1. The comment was deleted.
2. A.Lex
  
  +5
  
  26 May 2019 17: 45
  
  Korzhakov? And why is he better than those who betrayed the USSR? But he is older than the GDP (in rank) and held the corresponding posts ... But how did he say? Let us quote his words:
  
  “In the history of modern Russia, I participated in three conspiracies against the existing government. An instructive and memorable experience ”
  
  Such a normal traitor general!
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. The comment was deleted.
3. Sake
  
  -7
  
  26 May 2019 19: 29
  
  There is a Jewish curse! This is how Abramich made friends with him (he himself is now out of reach for Him, and the peoples of Russia take risks with Him every day, not knowing whether there will be tomorrow!), This is how he made friends with his candidate, not only did they smear his neck with "Novichok", so much they - Petersburgers brought the dough over the hill ...?
  But the most dangerous thing about him is that no one knows how often and for how long He plays with the "red button", and after all he has already threatened to send all the people of Russia to Paradise ... it is not entirely accurate, maybe to Hell, in smoke- the flame cannot be disassembled!
  1. A.Lex
    
    +2
    
    26 May 2019 20: 10
    
    ... one called himself "port wine" ... the other - Japanese rice vodka ... something you have a bias ... alcoholic ...
Nikolaevich I

-2

26 May 2019 03: 26

Unfortunately, too many people still do not understand that Russia needs another "manager"! That "Putin's rule" is leading the country to economic collapse, and through this factor, to the country's political collapse on the "international arena"! Now it has become obvious: Putin and the good of the country are not compatible concepts.
1. Victor N
  
  +3
  
  26 May 2019 11: 22
  
  Something not to see programs for "the growth of benefits for the country." "Economic collapse" is kept at a distance, there are no hungry or beggars. The "external enemy" also does not win in anything. If you don't like who - suggest an option, and we will evaluate and vote. And without this - slander according to the State Department manual, no more, especially if you pay attention to the time and the Latin alphabet in the nickname. I suppose you will be from emigrants?
  1. Kim Rum Eun
    
    -1
    
    26 May 2019 13: 23
    
    .. there are no hungry and poor ...
    
    - Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev said at a meeting with governors on the theme “Implementation of national social projects” in Sochi.
    
    We have over 19 million people whose income is below the subsistence level
    
    - said Medvedev.
    1. Victor N
      
      +1
      
      27 May 2019 09: 33
      
      According to the same estimates, more than 30 million do not work, therefore, they have no income at all. Only sometimes messages appear that millions are being stolen from the unemployed ....... Sly figures must be understood.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Kim Rum Eun
        
        +1
        
        27 May 2019 15: 01
        
        And whose are you going to open your mouth at the premiere?
  2. A.Lex
    
    +5
    
    26 May 2019 20: 13
    
    Victor, and for them - the main thing is "changeability", but for what, on whom ... the main thing for them is to jump like their neighbors ... they want FREEDOM as neighbors - they wanted to throw off, they wanted to "lustrated" ... for them - life is a computer game ...
  3. Nikolaevich I
    
    +1
    
    27 May 2019 12: 44
    
    Quote: Victor N
    Something not to see programs for the "growth of benefits for the country"
    
    And here what? "All-Russian Economic Forum" or a page for short comments?
    
    Quote: Victor N
    The economic collapse "is kept at a distance, there are no hungry or beggars. The" external enemy "also does not win
    
    Oh, and "master" you confuse "God's gift with scrambled eggs"!
2. Valentine
  
  +2
  
  26 May 2019 11: 23
  
  No, Vladimir, many have opened their eyes, even the most stubborn, that all of His election promises have gone to steam, and no more. Remember how immediately after the presidential elections there was a rapid rise in prices for everything and everyone - for fuel, and, accordingly , for all products and consumer goods, pension "reform", the rise in prices for all housing and communal services, the announced increase in VAT - that's when the scythe went to stone .... At the last economic forum, he said that the state did not have the money in the required amount to raise the state, and that he gives the last "vacation" to our business, i.e. the oligarchs, to return all the exported money and assets back to Russia by February 2020, otherwise all production and enterprises belonging to them will be nationalized in favor of the state , without reimbursement of any losses. And if this really is so, then there is still some hope that the country will break out of this poverty ... And about "another manager is needed" -and who, from whose? There the main communist Zyuganov, also a millionaire, warmed up in the Duma, with only one thought, to fill their pockets, and they are all there, except for Natalia Poklonskaya, and even then for a long time, or will gobble up, or join the "friendly" team.
  1. Victor N
    
    +3
    
    26 May 2019 16: 26
    
    Dear Valentine, where did you see the "rapid rise in prices"?
    "To return ALL the money and assets taken out" is an unhealthy fantasy: would Rosneft abandon its assets in Venezuela? What for? Or should it have been forbidden to invest? I recommend not to panic, you are not a professional economist.
    I see another serious misfortune: there are not enough people who want to implement innovative projects! Few people want to do business in the field of production! Even among students there were few who wanted to not only open their own business (!), But also to become TOP managers. How Without this, can the economy grow? How did our society come to this? What needs to be done so that people dream not of a peaceful place of work, but of achieving worthy goals?
    1. A.Lex
      
      +1
      
      29 May 2019 10: 19
      
      Victor, here Valentin is right - right after the re-election of GDP in our Orenburg region (certainly in our area) fuel prices jumped by 25% (mainly for gas) and 15 for gasoline.
  2. Sake
    
    0
    
    26 May 2019 19: 38
    
    how can you believe promises that are repeated from year to year? In addition, the system he developed for pumping out financial resources does not provide for financing state programs, where all social programs are! In addition, if you look closely at him when he is lying (and he is lying all the time), then a number of questions arise regarding his competence - knowledge of the topic, health and involvement in organized crime groups?
  3. Nikolaevich I
    
    0
    
    27 May 2019 13: 43
    
    Quote: Valentine
    "another manager is needed" - and who, of whom?
yuriy55

+3

26 May 2019 05: 29

Putin's rating plunged to historic lows

The historical minimum was 1-2% when he was still heading the government. Today, talking about a rating of 30% is silly. For no one (with the exception of 5-10%) already believes in the cunning of his plans, and the real rating of the current policy (approval) can be 5-10%. It all depends on how the question is posed.
It is gratifying that people began to wake up. He began to refuse Moscow shit and other government plans for how to live happily ever after, ~~of death~~ pensions ...
1. Victor N
  
  0
  
  26 May 2019 12: 06
  
  If people thought about "living happily ever after", they would rely more on themselves and not on a good uncle. The size of the pension depends entirely on everyone - how much you have earned, you get that much. The specialists in demand are in no hurry to quit when they reach retirement age. If EVERYONE regularly paid to the Pension Fund and taxes to the budget, many modern problems would not exist.
  1. yuriy55
    
    +6
    
    26 May 2019 14: 33
    
    Right on the list and let's go:
    
    Quote: Victor N
    If people thought about "living happily ever after", they would rely more on themselves and not on a good uncle.
    
    I will give the son to the teacher and wife the nurse ...
    
    Quote: Victor N
    The amount of the pension depends entirely on everyone - how much you have earned, how much you earn.
    
    See the first answer ...
    
    Quote: Victor N
    Demanding specialists upon reaching retirement age are not in a hurry to quit.
    
    I know ... Putin, Matvienko, Zhirinovsky, Zyuganov ... So how are we without them, but who will they leave us for ...
    
    Quote: Victor N
    If EVERYTHING had been regularly paid to the Pension Fund and taxes to the budget, there would be no many modern problems.
    
    Pension is not a feeder, the state is not a cash cow. These are different positions and different salaries at work, and seniority in years is important in retirement ... The pension law itself turned into a drawbar ... By the way, how did Naina Yeltsin secure a decent old age?
    1. Victor N
      
      +1
      
      26 May 2019 16: 07
      
      What is the objection? Everyone chooses a profession and even a place of work himself, the level of qualification, too, we work almost all my life (seniority). Machine-tool grandfathers are in demand, as are good teachers. And do not align ourselves with Yeltsinomia, Zyuganov, Zhirinovsky - we are much closer to the ground.
  2. Nikolaevich I
    
    +3
    
    27 May 2019 13: 53
    
    Quote: Victor N
    many modern problems would not be.
    
    With your "sayings" you reminded me of a certain official from the work of Saltykov-Shchedrin ... the very one who had an organ in his head ... A handy thing! Put the required "program" and play as much as you like!
  3. A.Lex
    
    -1
    
    29 May 2019 10: 23
    
    Victor ... we have a market, not the USSR ... and the market does not provide for ALL pensions ... Why then destroyed the USSR, if we want the state to provide us with all THIS set of social benefits?
2. Bts
  
  +2
  
  26 May 2019 16: 57
  
  Your reasoning is certainly entertaining, but the trouble is that you talk about your environment ...
  Then you need to say this: the people around me approve of Putin by 5-10% ...
  But I immediately object: and in my environment, Putin is approved by 90% ...
  1. Digital error
    
    -4
    
    26 May 2019 22: 09
    
    Quote: Bts
    in my environment, Putin approve of 90%
    
    Well, we’ll measure our surroundings in the Duma elections, and if you are lucky, then in September Why would this government suddenly take care of the massive construction of hospitals and kindergartens - is it really bothering about the Constitution and the welfare state, sparing no stomach? This is what a single life-giving voting day does.
    1. Bts
      
      +1
      
      31 May 2019 02: 03
      
      Why is it suddenly bothered? the construction of kindergartens, nurseries, etc. was planned at the same time as the introduction of maternity capital. It was assumed that there was a surge in the birth rate, and they were building it ... What is incomprehensible?
      Likewise about closed schools and hospitals, the whole screech about these institutions closed in DYING villages, where the number of inhabitants is less than the number of staff of a hospital or school.
      Maybe you know at least one school closed in the city for no reason?
Port

+1

26 May 2019 06: 10

Quote: Syoma_67
However! People began to reach through the refrigerator.

GDP did your refrigerator break?
Port

0

26 May 2019 06: 11

Quote: Nikolaevich I
Unfortunately, too many people still do not understand that Russia needs another "manager"!

Such as in Svidomochnik? No, thanks ...
1. Digital error
  
  0
  
  26 May 2019 09: 04
  
  Quote: Port
  Such as in Svidomochnik?
  
  Do not take away bread from Solovyov, he still has to pay a tax on foreign real estate
  1. Bts
    
    +2
    
    26 May 2019 16: 54
    
    But why didn’t Solovyov please you?
    1. yuriy55
      
      -1
      
      27 May 2019 05: 24
      
      Quote: Bts
      But why didn’t Solovyov please you? Asya. Bendyazhka?
      
      I will answer you for the environment in which there is no place for you or Putin with his minions, because among friends and like-minded people they don’t go around with security. And on the fact that in the people he moves only under supervision, I will insist on my opinion.
      Speaking of singers. Yes, nothing and no one (except PUTIN) your beloved Solovyov does not please. Moreover, with simple people (such as Yekaterinburg), he behaves like an ordinary boor, using the right of an unrequited blow, like those to whom he sings hosannah, not tire of advertising his belonging to a famous nation. This does not mean that his sermons are positive and truthful. Flattery, anger, swagger, humiliation, manipulation of facts, shuffling events, retelling false information, appealing to the opinions of other people posing as the source - all this pathetic set of propagandists. My grandmother was a milkmaid. She gave birth to six children. Died at 98 years old. The letter was trained in the 30s. Survived the war, the death of his grandfather, military hunger and cold ... One with two children ... She married a second time and lived all her life in the village, sometimes leaving for her daughters in the city. But the benefits for the country and people brought an order of magnitude more than this speaker with false teeth (which he first showed to the audience with his mouth wide open) ...
      Perhaps she lived poorly, perhaps she didn’t finish her studies somewhere — there was such a time. But she never blamed anyone and did not reproach, much less taught life from someone else's experience. Your Solovyov is rare rot. Not in terms of relics, but in terms of the fact that people like him in the country must be looked for ...
      1. Victor N
        
        -1
        
        27 May 2019 09: 42
        
        Borrow your trick - to compare with your grandmother ....
      2. Bts
        
        -1
        
        31 May 2019 01: 59
        
        I will answer you for the environment in which there is no place for you or Putin with his minions
        
        - that is, you nerus? Funny ... And how much aplomb!
      3. Bts
        
        -2
        
        31 May 2019 02: 11
        
        Vladimir Solovyov has postgraduate studies at the Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the USSR Academy of Sciences and work as a researcher at the Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the USSR Academy of Sciences ..
        He has the right to speak in a mentoring tone with people like you ..
  2. bobba94
    
    +3
    
    26 May 2019 21: 50
    
    Speaking of birds. One chubby African-American TV presenter, Oprah Winfrey, is her name, personal fortune of $ 2,7 billion, real estate in France and the UK. I looked in YouTube a panoramic view of her estate in California .... the Romanovs had such palaces. I looked at how other famous TV presenters live in the States and in Europe. He concluded that Soloviev with his Italian villa was a tramp and a rogue.
    1. Digital error
      
      +1
      
      26 May 2019 22: 00
      
      Quote: bobba94
      Soloviev with his Italian villa is a tramp and a rogue.
      
      But a guardian who allows himself a mentor tone in his judgments. He could have turned back in history with "recklessness", but continues to persist, making himself a fool, although he is not. A simple conclusion follows from this - he, too, is in the "looking glass" like the characters he protects.
      1. Victor N
        
        -2
        
        27 May 2019 09: 45
        
        I can't figure out: in your coordinate system - where will Mikhalkov and "Besogon" be?
        
        Digital error
        
        -1
        
        27 May 2019 10: 19
        
        Quote: Victor N
        where will Mikhalkov and "Besogon" be?
        
        In the same place, in the looking glass - he was always loyal to the authorities, until, apparently, the flashing light was taken away from him. Apparently, the time has come for him to think about the soul, so he decided to drive the "demons". His behavior is similar to the hypocrisy of someone who has sinned all his life, and then suddenly fell into faith. An artist, and they are rarely sincere.
        
        Victor N
        
        +2
        
        27 May 2019 16: 39
        
        Yes, this is usually the case: in old age they go to a monastery. Which of us has never sinned ?! And Mikhalkov raises topics very significant for society.
        
        Digital error
        
        +2
        
        27 May 2019 17: 59
        
        Quote: Victor N
        topics Mikhalkov raises very significant
        
        I do not argue with this, but 2 questions remain:
        1. Do they perceive his criticism or dismiss it as an annoying fly (some episodes of "besogon" are simply removed from the air, for example, an episode about the ex-minister of the Ministry of Emergency Situations Puchkov)?
        2. Where was he with his criticism 10-20 years ago, when he could really influence something? In general, did they pay attention to the statements of some officials (military, cultural workers, etc.) with the prefix EX? Isn’t it time to start depriving such people of state awards for subservience and falsehood previously allowed in the (state) service?
        
        A.Lex
        
        0
        
        29 May 2019 10: 32
        
        Eugene, although he gave you a plus, but there is one thing but there. We are all human beings, we can all make mistakes, make mistakes. Including at such an age. No one is immune from mistakes. The question is - how much will we persist in our delusions?
    2. A.Lex
      
      0
      
      29 May 2019 10: 29
      
      Vladimir, add - "... compared to this Oprah ..."
2. A.Lex
  
  -1
  
  29 May 2019 10: 26
  
  The port, mind you - how many minuses they told you - it is most likely that they (and those who "allied" them) came running here. Yes, maybe even our kreaklovaya liberda maybe. Normal people will not put "-" on your comment.
Port

-1

26 May 2019 10: 10

Quote: DigitalError
Do not take away bread from Solovyov

So Solovyov is there precisely to destroy ratings. And it is unlikely that he had grown such a kosher bakery on bread.
Dzafdet

-3

26 May 2019 14: 20

Anyway, he falsifies the results of the next elections ..
1. Kuzmitsky
  
  +4
  
  26 May 2019 15: 14
  
  Are you talking about 2024? It is unlikely that age will not be the same. Only two options remain: retirement or a return to the monarchy.
  1. Digital error
    
    +3
    
    26 May 2019 20: 30
    
    Quote: Kuzmitsky
    Only two options remain:
    
    If you look at the law, there are more of them: you can rename the president to the chairman, or you can rename the Russian Federation to Russia. In general, everything that is not prohibited by the law can be changed.
    1. Kim Rum Eun
      
      -2
      
      26 May 2019 20: 49
      
      According to Article 1 of Chapter 1 of the supreme law, the country of Russia or the Russian Federation are the identical names of our state that have the same legal status.
      1. The comment was deleted.
    2. A.Lex
      
      0
      
      29 May 2019 10: 35
      
      Eugene, is there another option - the Union State of the Russian Federation-RB - here you can still ... The question is different - with the economy, what do we have ... so we will hope for the "free hand of the market"? Or will we create something normal, and not this portrayal?
      1. Digital error
        
        +1
        
        29 May 2019 10: 42
        
        Quote: A.Lex
        Or do we create something normal
        
        With the recently approved "plan for the implementation of the May supercase" - definitely not. It is necessary to change people who call creative decisions populist - to increase the turnout in elections ("days of responsibility")
  2. Citizen Mѣshkov
    
    -2
    
    26 May 2019 20: 32
    
    Quite right - a return to the monarchy. At the same time, it is noticeable to correct, or change, the economic model from the current brutalized-capitalist to the economic model, where there is no speculative basis.
Bts

-3

26 May 2019 16: 53

Funny ... I wonder who has this "trust rating" Putin falls? It seems that the liberal community has the journalist-author of this opus.
1. yuriy55
  
  0
  
  27 May 2019 05: 34
  
  Quote: Bts
  Funny ... I wonder who has this "trust rating" Putin falls? It seems that the liberal community has the journalist-author of this opus.
  
  This is your party led by Putin-liberals and propagandists. You can compare with the words from the source:
  
  We lived only real life, and we can demonstrate the fruits of our labor. This is your party hiding behind other people's affairs and successes, passing them off as their own plans and breakthroughs. But in reality you do not have personnel that could even replace "irreplaceable" ones. You, like encephalitis ticks, have stuck to a healthy body, and the trouble is not that you have already swollen from someone else's blood, but that after your "activity" the body undergoes irreversible destructive changes ...
  1. A.Lex
    
    0
    
    29 May 2019 10: 37
    
    Liberal and Creak liberda - different concepts.
  2. Bts
    
    -1
    
    31 May 2019 01: 58
    
    Yurik ... Do not buzi! Slap on the ass!
General Gau

-3

26 May 2019 19: 17

What is there to be surprised at. It is easy to be a leader against the background of Lukashenoks, Poroshenoks, Nazarbayevs, ... But when a person not from the nomenklatura is elected president in a neighboring country, all the "advantages" go down to the floor. It becomes clear that this power is for the beautiful life of the Zolotovs, Mizulins, Peskovs, Solovyovs ..., and not ordinary workers.
1. trampoline instructor
  
  +2
  
  26 May 2019 20: 04
  
  But when in a neighboring country a person who is not from the nomenklatura is elected president, all the "advantages" go down to the plinth.
  
  Don't make me so funny! The "neighboring country" will be there with this "not from the nomenklatura" slurp until it chokes. And you will be alone to rejoice at the clown on the throne.
  1. General Gau
    
    -10
    
    26 May 2019 21: 28
    
    Transparent figures in the leadership of the state, this is not about Russia. Alas, our people are worthy only of despotism.
    1. A.Lex
      
      0
      
      29 May 2019 10: 38
      
      Gau, and here you’ve been instructed by the minus ... and those who are "for" the liberals and those who are "against"
2. Digital error
  
  0
  
  26 May 2019 20: 26
  
  Quote: General Gau
  It's easy to be a leader on a background of a cunning
  
  The worse the background, the brighter your own dull gray shine, I agree.
Sake

-3

26 May 2019 19: 17

I will allow myself to show "disrespect for the authorities" with this comment .... What kind of respect can we talk about the criminal pyramid of power he created, where the vertical of power, security officials and rich robbers and criminals are woven into a single ball, and the country's financial resources are in the same hands , sorry pocket! Therefore, He does not know what his wages are!
1. Victor N
  
  -2
  
  27 May 2019 09: 50
  
  Change the optics!
Oleg RB

-7

26 May 2019 19: 56

Cord for the President of the Russian Federation! He will disperse this gosdepovskoputenskoy shushera once
Sergey Latyshev

-4

26 May 2019 22: 53

Ha. The rating may have fallen, but they will still choose the one who is ordered.
Little-known Medvedev once - and chose ... A brand new GDP once - and chose ....
And in 24 m they will choose who they need ...
1. Kim Rum Eun
  
  0
  
  26 May 2019 23: 37
  
  In the 24th? Eka you dreamed :). Until the 42nd there was nothing left. And there he will be only 90.
Screw

0

27 May 2019 06: 43

And where is the signature of the director of the research office? Straaaaaaashno him.
Therefore, Anglo-Saxon scholars write, the rest pick up (a choir of boys ....).
Priests, however.
gorenina91

+1

27 May 2019 15: 02

- I will not go for a walk with him .., I will not come to the blockage ... - They say that his "rating" is very small ...

-Siberian ditty ... -Hahah ...