Where did so much water come from on Earth?

19
Probably the most valuable resource on our planet is water. Without it, life on our planet would not have been possible, because it forms the internal environment of any living organism, including humans. We are not able to live without liquids for more than three days, and the loss of 15-20 percent of water can lead to death.





The Earth was originally anhydrous


Water reserves on Earth are simply colossal. But if we recall the history of the origin of our planet, it turns out that the presence of such an amount of water here contradicts the laws of physics.

It is considered established and undeniable that the Earth arose from a protoplanetary disk, which is a cloud of hot gas and dust. He was red-hot for the first few million years. When the surface formed, it was in molten form due to constant collisions with cosmic bodies. The center of the earth is still in this state.

Even if there was some water on Earth, it should have evaporated under the influence of high temperatures.

It turns out that the young planet, which we today call the Earth, was absolutely waterless.

Two theories of the appearance of water on Earth


Recently, the American scientific journal Science Advances published a new hypothesis on the occurrence of water on Earth. It says that earth's moisture has a cosmic origin.

The authors of this version do not question the fact that the earth's surface was originally absolutely dry. But they believe that later water came to our planet along with asteroids. This hypothesis has been known for a long time. In parallel with it, there is a version according to which water fell to the surface of the planet from its bowels through volcanoes.

But lately, more and more evidence and arguments have appeared in favor of cosmic theory.

The search for cosmic moisture


Hayabusa's Japanese space mission in 2010 was a great success. She managed to deliver samples of particles collected from the surface of the asteroid Itokawa.

Using an ion microprobe, they found microscopic particles of moisture in low-calcium pyroxene delivered from far space. Previously, this mineral was considered anhydrous. Moreover, the water in this breed turned out to be much more than expected.

A comparative analysis of the isotopic composition of hydrogen contained in water from Itokawa turned out to be identical to hydrogen in the composition of the earth's water. According to researchers, this indicates that it has a common source of origin.

It turns out that the minerals absorbed water from the protoplanetary disk and retained it.

The assumption is logical, but one question remains. How did moisture stay in the mineral at ultrahigh temperatures?

Studies of samples from an asteroid have given an answer to this question. Computer simulation showed that the mineral, even under such conditions, loses no more than ten percent of its moisture content.

Even if the conducted studies are not able to prove the indisputability of the cosmic hypothesis of the occurrence of water on Earth, they significantly change our idea of ​​outer space. It turns out that there is much "wetter" than we thought before.
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    19 May 2019 08: 54
    The "space" hypothesis is very, very crude. The main opinion today is the process of degassing the mantle.
  2. +1
    20 May 2019 13: 25
    This is how many asteroids with a microscopic moisture content are needed to fill the oceans on earth?
    1. 0
      20 May 2019 16: 18
      This is how many asteroids are needed ...

      And where to rush? The age of the Earth is 4,54 billion years. The volume of the oceans is 1,349 billion km3.
      Do you need a calculator? wink
      1. 0
        20 May 2019 17: 45
        Of course you need. Not every asteroid will reach the surface of the Earth. This is not the moon.
        1. +1
          21 May 2019 20: 25
          This is just one version. Not claiming absolute truth, neither better nor worse than the rest.
          1. +1
            21 May 2019 20: 45
            A hypothesis is a hypothesis. As our head of the department said, "of the unrecognized hypotheses, mine is the best."
            But the hypothesis must have at least some kind of justification. The surface of the Earth is not pitted with craters. Less than 1% of space debris reaches the Earth's surface. So the "cosmic hypothesis" has a very, very weak argument. On the other hand, the process of degassing the mantle is quite a proven thing. Some Siberian traps are worth something. Plus two types of crust. Plus 4 mass extinctions of the Earth's biosphere. Putting it all together, geologists (not all. This is also just a hypothesis) made a conclusion about the impact origin of the oceans and the connection with mass extinctions. Academician Khain also linked all this with the formation of an oceanic crust.
            That is why I personally do not believe in "continental drift" and therefore could not pass the test for geology in Schlum. Wegener's idolaters are sitting there.
            1. +1
              21 May 2019 20: 48
              Not quite the topic, but there is a terribly interesting film by Cameron "Aliens from the Abyss". About underwater volcanoes, "black smokers" and other forms of life. Search the internet. You will surely find it. Really interesting and exciting.

              https://fullfilmhd.space/2017/04/16/chuzhie-iz-bezdny.html
            2. +1
              23 May 2019 03: 15
              The surface of the Earth is not pitted with craters.

              Full of.
              There is an atmosphere on the planet. With precipitation and winds. And these phenomena are known to destroy any crater.
              Here is a list of only surviving (largest) ones. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_Crater_List
              Given that 29,1% of the surface is land, and the rest is the oceans, most of the fallen cosmic bodies left no residue. Or they are hidden under the thickness of water.

              On the other hand, the process of mantle degassing is a well-proven thing.

              So, most likely the truth is somewhere in between. It is possible both hypotheses have a place to be.
        2. 0
          23 May 2019 03: 02
          Not every asteroid will reach the surface of the Earth.

          But even if the asteroid evaporates in the atmosphere, this water will still remain on the planet. The atmosphere is part of the planet. And then all the same in the form of precipitation it will be on the surface.
          1. +1
            23 May 2019 06: 51
            This is an interesting topic .... for geologists. If you want more detail, look at how geologists explain the origin of the oceanic type crust.
            In addition to the film by J. Cameron, there is also a good film "Volcanoes in the depths of the sea".
            https://rezka.ag/films/documentary/22071-vulkany-v-morskih-glubinah-2003.html
            And I have a good photo that I personally shot from the sonar screen. How an underwater volcano breathes.
            The process does not stop now. This is an ongoing process that goes on for millions of years.
            Yes, these are all hypotheses. A lot of them. But you still need to choose from the most likely ones.
      2. +1
        21 May 2019 21: 41
        Quote: gorbunov.vladisl
        Do you need a calculator?

        Use the calculator yourself. If there are a microscopic amount of water in asteroids, and the rest are solids, then in order to fill these 1,349 billion km3 of oceans, so many of these solids should have come to Earth that it would have exceeded 100/500 Jupiters in size. Or do you think that only water remained on Earth from the contents of the asteroids, and the rest was dumped in a landfill? request
        1. +1
          23 May 2019 11: 52
          So many of these solids should have hit the earth ...

          Full of cosmic bodies consisting practically of one water.

          .... to fill these 1,349 billion km3 of oceans, ....

          Read the comments carefully.
          No one insists that only space was a source of water for planet Earth. All theories are accepted. But space should not be neglected either. Some part of the water could really get in this way.
  3. 0
    20 May 2019 21: 04
    after the Holocaust and water became abundant
  4. +1
    22 May 2019 21: 56
    Great job! Serious work! Important, necessary. Otherwise, we drink water, but we don't know where it comes from. But these hard workers did not have enough money to hike, otherwise they would have learned where the air came from. But no, the small budget did not allow! Give a certain number of billions and we will "know" where the water on the asteroids came from!
  5. 0
    23 May 2019 07: 04
    While scientists break their foreheads, Svidomo continue to dig the sea ...
    1. 0
      23 May 2019 19: 35
      Nah, they are looking for gold. Or oil.
      1. 0
        23 May 2019 19: 54
        My neighbor traveled all over the Union.
        He is looking for something, but what is not visible!
        I don’t bother with other people's affairs
        But it really hurts and offends me.

        He has plush and silk on his windows,
        Baba roaming around in his bathrobe.
        I would have found uranium with a pick in Moscow
        With such an increased salary.

        And it seems to me that people are lying:
        He is not looking for anything on purpose.
        For what? After all, the money goes -
        Oh, what big bucks!

        "A physicist is a person who satisfies his curiosity at the expense of the state."
  6. +1
    6 June 2019 15: 03
    I won’t go down to where I don’t wash anything. Sometimes I really do not like highly educated people. They are well versed in complex patterns, but they have completely no peasant thinking. Volga shallowed in the regions of Ulyanovsk, Kazan. Our scientists decided that since the winter was snowy, there would be plenty of water. March showed sunny days, and frosty nights. Every man will say that in such weather the snow will melt during the day and freeze at night. That is, a large amount of snow will go into the atmosphere.
  7. +1
    30 July 2019 10: 07
    How many billion tons of asteroids must fall on the planet in order to deliver billions tons of water to it? Every time an asteroid collides with a planet, huge energy is released that will evaporate and throw some of the water back into space. The theory of space delivery of water by asteroids is only partially true, most of the water appears in other ways.