Reverse side of the USA: Americans are massively “moving” to the street

15
In the near future, the next presidential campaign will start in the United States. Democrats will make every possible effort to arrange revenge. A huge country is split in its relation to Donald Trump: some people adore him, others hate him. To be re-elected for a second term, Trump needs positive results from his work as head of state. But here everything is not quite clear.





On the one hand, the American president is consistently trying to fulfill his election promises. He carried out tax reform, withdrew from the Paris climate agreement, protects national producers through active protectionist measures, etc. On the other hand, the results of its activities are distributed among the Americans, so to speak, unevenly.

Opponents of trump say:

Republicans only care about the rich.


And in these words there is a lot of truth, but this is not only about Republicans. The United States of America is a classic capitalist state where the rich only get richer and the poor get poorer. Turn to the numbers.

According to American statistics, the unemployment rate under Trump began to decline. However, these indicators are calculated according to the U-3 scheme somewhat mischievously: only those who receive benefits are considered unemployed. As soon as the terms of its payment cease, the unemployed cease to be considered as such, but this does not mean that they were able to find work. There are other ratings according to which the unemployment rate in the US today reaches 7,3%.


Even with a job, not every American is able to secure a decent standard of living. You have to take everything on credit, and, according to Time, every third US citizen remains in debt to the grave. According to CBS News, the average American cannot afford to buy housing in most of the United States. There are cities where real estate is simply not available to them: New York, San Francisco, Philadelphia, Chicago, Houston and others. For example, in San Francisco, only 103% of average income would have to be spent on housing.

And there is such a thing as the cost of living, which includes not only the payment of square meters and taxes on them. It is clear that the states and cities are different, for any wallet, but in New York, according to a recent sociological study, 41% of its residents do not "draw" the high cost of living in it, despite the fact that from morning to evening they rush from work to work.


The flip side of the success of some is the social bottom, where many others find themselves. Recently on the "Reporter" came out publication, where our compatriot, who moved to the USA, spoke about a serious problem with homeless people and drug addicts. Now we have the opportunity to reinforce his subjective opinion with numbers.

So, on New Year's Eve in the United States, authorities counted 2019 homeless people, of which 552% were in the same New York, which attracts many, thanks to Hollywood. That is, 830 homeless people roam the streets of the richest city in the United States. We must pay tribute to all kinds of charitable organizations that care about homeless people, arranging shelters for them. In February of this year, 14 people went through such shelters in New York.


On the other US coast in San Francisco, there are "only" 28 thousand homeless people, but the crime rate among them is four times higher than in New York. In Los Angeles, there are about 55 thousand, and in Seattle - 13 thousand. There are not enough shelters at all, people are dying on park benches, at stops and just in the streets. Moreover, the mortality rate among young homeless people under the age of 45 years doubled. Among the main reasons can be called the massive use of drugs. So the tent camps of tramps in a suburb of Los Angeles are scattered with used syringes.

American researchers note:

We are seeing an increasing number of chronically homeless people living on the streets, with serious physical and behavioral health problems.



Our compatriot also spoke about the high criminogenicity of this contingent. As a result, more and more cities and even counties in the US are starting policies “Zero tolerance” for the homeless, forbidding them to organize their spontaneous tent camps and distributing food to them.

It turns out that the United States has its own half-million “semi-criminal army” of people thrown into the social margins.
15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    10 May 2019 22: 14
    But some visitors here are shouting that everything is bad in Russia, there is a guard and a disaster ... Here's an example for you - the Americans. Look how "great" everything is! So we are looking ... Looking at the whole world, only one thing can be understood now - in the USSR they were punished for TUNE. And there was enough work for everyone - constant announcements "Wanted" near every factory or collective farm board. The USSR was bad ... bad ...
    But now you can get settled ... And unemployment - so what do you want from capitalism? This is one of the accompanying factors of it.
    1. 0
      11 May 2019 07: 14
      ..so what do you want from capitalism ?.

      We want him (capitalism) to die, once and for all. am
      1. 0
        11 May 2019 20: 32
        ... it remains only to convey this your desire to this very capitalism ...
      2. -2
        28 June 2019 02: 43
        if we want it, who’s it? Read the classics! To change capitalism to another ec-system, you still need to have it and the old model must completely exhaust itself. It ends, but it’s not its end yet. So, firstly, what other ? And secondly, the primary changes should begin in the leading capital. This is a classic of the genre. The USSR tried to neglect the axiom and tried to build its own closed eco-system. The result is known. Today, the leading country is the USA. The next 20-30 years this is completely unrealistic for them.
    2. -2
      28 June 2019 02: 36
      yeah, we found a job for everyone: one to roll square, and the other to wear round - the main thing is that in any, but deed. Well now let's praise the same capitalism, but Soviet. For in the USSR there was stupid state capitalism. And in the USA it is private. All the main difference between honey by them only in the mechanism of redistribution of goods. And at the core - also lending to the ec-ki for the accelerated development of scientific and technical progress .. Rzhunemagu from these admirers of Seseser’s kind of socialism.
      1. -5
        28 June 2019 12: 13
        Quote: Barmaley_2
        For in the USSR there was stupid state capitalism.

        No, the USSR under "socialism" functioned on the basis of the slave system of TVET. Which was disguised as a theocratic "superstructure".
        Of course, economically, ANY (with any superstructure) the slave-owning OEF will lose not only the bourgeois (capitalist), but even the feudal OEF. As a result, it happened with the USSR.
        And state capitalism can be called the first phase of bourgeois society (in the USSR this phase was also called fascism). But this is still very far from the Russian phase. And if it does occur in Russia, it is EXACTLY not during our lifetimes.
        Russia now has a more modest task - to move forward into the feudal OEF. And then stamps in the interphase, is no longer a slave OEF, but also not feudal.
        Such "trampling" in the interphase usually ends with either the collapse of the state (final), or a harsh dictatorship. If a dictatorship, then in the current situation either new slave owners (movement back) or new feudal lords (movement forward). It depends on which of them wins in the interphase. If no one wins, the state will almost certainly fall apart.
        The interim government in Russia in 1917, this is a typical interphase. The Kornilov rebellion (moving forward, into capitalism) failed, after which the old (this is important) Bolsheviks (moving backward, into feudalism) took over.
        And the story with Dzhugashvili, his invented "socialism" and the new Bolsheviks, is a completely different story. To the events of October 1917, January 1918 having nothing to do. This was only later, later, starting from the late 20s. The dictatorship of Dzhugashvili and the new Bolsheviks then (already in the 30s) harshly (and bloody) transferred the USSR from feudal TPO to slaveholding. Which existed in the USSR until 1987.
        Then came the Gorbachev interphase, better known as "perestroika".
        Then the failure of the putsch GKChP (an attempt to move back to the slave-owning TPO).
        Then in 1991 the USSR collapsed because in the interphase, no one won.
        Since then, Russia has been trampling in the phase between the slave-owning TPO and feudal TPO. From the point of view of the development (evolution) of society (and the preservation of the integrity of the state), it would be better for it to finally move forward to feudal TVET.
        1. The comment was deleted.
  2. +3
    11 May 2019 07: 19
    ... in the US, authorities counted 552 homeless people ...

    Why don't I trust the US authorities. They lie as usual. Apparently the number of homeless people is already so great that it is impossible to hide this fact. So they publish the "combed" figures. If we add a zero, I think we will not be mistaken. crying
  3. +1
    11 May 2019 07: 52
    Quote: A.Lex
    But some visitors here are shouting that the ffsjo is bad in Russia, there is a guard and a catastrophe ... Here's an example for you - the Americans. Look how "great" everything is! Here we are ...

    Well, the fact that the US has this problem does not mean that everything is straightforward for us, there is no direct relationship here. But we have less homeless people.
    But in the USA the middle class is more, and in our country it is quite small.
    1. +1
      11 May 2019 20: 43
      Sergei, but such a "class" is not possible with us. It ended with the end of RI. Our people are just used to working for the state. But the current leadership somehow shakes off this resource. I am not in any way calling for Maidans or revolutions ... it's just a shame that the state does not really need us. Getting rid of the "ineffective" is the current motto of the authorities (be it people or factories). There was no such thing in the USSR - everyone would be arranged, everyone will have work ...
      1. +1
        12 May 2019 07: 01
        alas ... We have either very rich or poor ... The state of the victorious oligarchy, although "we have no oligarchs," according to Peskov.
        1. +1
          12 May 2019 11: 23
          I understand that this is the bestial grin of capitalism .... but socialism can not be returned ... at least without a lot of blood ...
      2. The comment was deleted.
  4. +1
    13 May 2019 06: 45
    Quote: A.Lex
    I understand that this is the bestial grin of capitalism .... but socialism can not be returned ... at least without a lot of blood ...

    According to my personal inner feelings, a reconfiguration is underway in the world before TMV. It will hardly be totally nuclear, rather, a series of regional conflicts, but very serious and with a lot of blood. The key question is that we approach TMV not as the USSR under Stalin, but as the Republic of Ingushetia under Nicholas, that is, unprepared. And the result will be corresponding ....
    1. 0
      30 June 2019 16: 03
      ...those. - with a lot of blood ... however - as usual ...
  5. -1
    28 June 2019 02: 02
    I want to be an American homeless! What tours are there on this topic?
    1. +3
      28 June 2019 12: 04
      Barmaley_2 (Barmaley)
      I want to be an American homeless!

      fool





      Go there.
      Flag in your hands and a steam locomotive to meet. crying