In the new war for Libya, NATO countries may already face

8
The troops of the Libyan field marshal Haftar, who last week unexpectedly launched an attack on Tripoli, are gradually continuing to develop success. The capital of the country is lined with them on three sides, the outskirts of the city and the Tripoli international airport are taken. Despite resistance from some armed groups that sided with the Government of National Accord, the victory of the Libyan National Army (LNA) seems more likely. Unless, of course, the NATO countries intervene again.





There are no reliable and comprehensive data on the real combat capabilities of the Haftar army. It is known that many military men who served in the Libyan Armed Forces under Muammar Gaddafi joined it. Technique for the most part left over from the same times. In addition, the LNA purchased weapons through all channels available to it.

However, do not experience illusions about the combat effectiveness of this Libyan army. If desired, NATO can scatter it through the desert in a few days. The aviation and naval forces of the North Atlantic Alliance are able to launch powerful missile and bomb attacks on the positions of the Libyan National Army right now. Thanks to Libya's convenient location on the Mediterranean Sea, NATO ground forces can be deployed in less than a week, and they will send the “Tripoli Liberators” home, at best.

But will it be this time that NATO will bomb Libya together, as it was in 2011? It seems that the conflict around this North African country is already happening within the North Atlantic Alliance itself.

The Americans hastily withdrew their contingent from Tripoli and demanded to stop the onset of the LNA. The British urgently convened the UN Security Council, while Italians accused Paris and Riyadh of standing behind Haftar. By the way, it was in France that the meeting of the GXNUMX foreign ministers took place, which demanded an end to hostilities against the Libyan capital Tripoli.

Difficulties in understanding the ongoing processes are added by the ambiguous figure of Haftar herself. Field Marshal managed to visit both a friend of Muammar Gaddafi and his opponent. According to available information, at one time he collaborated with the CIA. Haftar has recently sought patronage in Moscow, and is now surrounded by French military advisers. It is not clear whether he still carries out someone’s instructions, or is the so-called “untied agent,” and is already acting at his discretion.

It is also necessary to determine why all the fuss is? Because of oil? In Libya, the former colony of Italy, the position of the Italian company Eni is traditionally strong. But after the defeat of Libyan statehood in 2011, British BP and French Total came to this unfortunate country. Competition for control over energy is an important motive, but it is not the main one. Russian orientalist Boris Dolgov explains:

The war is going on for power in Libya, for the reconstruction of the Libyan state. And Haftar is a supporter and consistent fighter for the restoration of the country. Under its auspices, of course; perhaps under the auspices of those forces that support it.


Today, Libya is a few city-states, disintegrated by tribal grounds, and constantly at war with each other. By the end of 2019, elections were to be held in the country, which are designed to establish political unity. But in the realities of the Libyan civil war, this is simply impossible. No matter how cynical it may sound, the restoration of Libyan statehood can only be achieved by military means, when one of the parties wins and subjugates all the others. And all the oil will be a pleasant bonus to the winner.

The reaction of NATO countries to Haftar’s campaign will be a litmus test that will determine which of them actually stands behind the field marshal.
8 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    April 9 2019 13: 28
    It is a pity that, apparently, we are not standing behind him. Libya is the richest in reserves and the key country in its position in North Africa.
    1. +2
      April 9 2019 17: 02
      ... Libya is the richest in reserves and the key country in its position in North Africa.

      The fact that Libya is the richest country is indeed true. But this is hardly "key in its position". From a political point of view, Egypt is the key here. They have a more powerful economy (21st in terms of GDP in the world) and a larger population (much).
      Therefore, the Russian leadership correctly makes the main bet in this region on Egypt.
      1. +1
        April 10 2019 11: 51
        At the same time, Egypt is too independent, and has always been "ours and yours." It is difficult to negotiate with him, as well as to rely on the agreements reached. This is the historical experience of the USSR. And Libya, if you fit in in time, can be put in a position more dependent on the Russian Federation, it sounds cynical, but such are the layouts. Coast in the middle of the Mediterranean Sea, huge reserves of premium oil, little population, etc.
        By the way, Egypt also sympathizes with Haftar, not the "pro-Western" government in Tripoli, so by supporting the right person, you can strengthen relations with your neighbors, with Egypt in particular ...
  2. +1
    April 10 2019 19: 24
    Western spiders jumped in the struggle for Libyan oil. Well, Russia did not give them Syria to be torn to pieces, and now they want to profit from it. Something the Turks are silent something.
  3. +1
    April 10 2019 20: 55
    If desired, NATO can scatter it through the desert in a few days.

    Apparently, how was it in Syria? Or is it happening in Iraq? But these forces themselves do not disperse in the desert?
    1. -1
      April 10 2019 22: 54
      What is in Syria? What is in Iraq? In Syria, the tasks of conducting limited military operations are being carried out. In Iraq, in 1991, we all know very well what the Allied forces did to the army of Saddam. In 2003 they repeated more than successfully. The fact that today in Iraq is a completely different story, people simply do not want to live peacefully. Sometimes they lay improvised explosives on the roads and that's it.
      1. +1
        April 11 2019 16: 25
        Yes ... that's how they take and lay explosives on the roads with nothing to do, instead of watching the TV at home, so what? And those who brought democracy to them there on the wings of bombers sit and admire all this at their bases and in the protection of the fields where they pump their oil ... Under Saddam, there was horror-horror, people were tormented, nobody wanted to lay explosives , boring things, and now everything is OK, everything is at work ... They live as they like, they plant explosives and everyone is fine ... fool
        You’ll go to Iraq and ask the people there on the streets whether they want to live peacefully or not ... Both in Afghanistan and in LDP ... also ... or because of nothing to do, they go and fight ... they lay mines ... because what they like so much ...
  4. 0
    April 11 2019 08: 57
    Yeah, dreaming, colliding ... Until now, they somehow decided without it ...