NASA has developed the "ideal" wing for the aircraft

2
The wing of the aircraft has a rather complex internal system consisting of numerous wires, various mechanical elements and engines for controlling the flaps. Naturally, this directly affects the amount spent on creating it and the complexity of the process of further maintenance. However, developers from NASA and researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology proposed the option of an “ideal” wing, which could significantly reduce the cost of the final cost of the aircraft.





It is a design that does not contain separate moving elements, but it is lightweight, flexible and adaptive. This option does not need additional motors to change the position of the flaps. The wing structure consists of thousands of hollow miniature triangles and is very durable.

Due to the flexibility of the material, the "lattice" structure independently adapts to changes in aerodynamic pressure. And for the “correct” deformation of the wing under the influence of the aforementioned loads, the designers worked on its optimal location and provided a different level of ductility to the internal struts.


As a result, thanks to the use of lightweight materials, the wings of the new generation will be less massive. In addition, the innovative design does not include the installation of ailerons and other additional controls. And creating a separate “triangle” using a 3D printer takes no more than 17 seconds. All this, according to developers from NASA, will significantly reduce production costs.

It is worth noting that the innovation has already been tested in a wind tunnel. A model of a wing about 5 meters long participated in the tests.
2 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    April 2 2019 18: 29
    This is good if true. And then the NTP has been frozen for 50 years. So, the little things are new only :(
  2. 0
    April 3 2019 00: 21
    Something I did not understand, what is the Filipina from MIT collecting there? It would not be bad to look at the original source. Either the author has problems with the worldview, or with the translation. How does the wing, due to the fact that it "adjusts to the change in aerodynamic pressure", does not need mechanization? The area of ​​such a wing does not change, and how does it support maneuvering?
    The Germans on the Heinkel He 162 Volksjäger in 1944 used such a wing, only at the base not "triangles" (they are flat, the author), but hexagons, and not plastic, but paper.