Kaliningrad defense: NATO will take the Russian air defense number

Judging by the recent actions of the US military, a plan of how they can win the “small victorious war” with Russia has finally matured in the heads of some high-ranking strategists from Washington. Today we live in a world where it is virtually impossible to hide large-scale military preparations - although, in truth, the Americans are not really trying to do this. Their militaristic fuss in Europe, which has sharply intensified recently, leaves no room for doubt as to how and where those who are going to kill us want to come.





At first glance, the deployment of six B-52H Stratofortress strategic bombers at the British military airbase and the "sudden" transfer of one and a half thousand American troops to Germany right from the Texas Bliss military base do not have much in common. Well, Uncle Sam frolic, plays in front of Europe with his military “muscles”. Planned exercises, probably ... However, it is so careless to relate to these two facts, and not notice their obvious relationship only if you do not own the third, most important piece of the "puzzle" called the "strategic plan of the Pentagon against Russia."

As it became known, the US military department made a very eloquent order the next year - more than 10 thousand guided land-to-ground missiles for multiple launch rocket systems. As experts suggest, we are probably talking about MLRS M270 MLRS or a very similar complex M142 HIMARS. The difference between them is, in fact, that the first is located on the basis of the Bradley tracked infantry fighting vehicle, and the second on light tractors with a wheeled drive. However, the point is not in these subtleties, but in what these systems are intended for in principle. And their purpose consists in delivering massive strikes, not only and not so much even to accumulations of manpower and equipment the enemy, how much is suppressing his air defense and artillery means in a situation where aviation actions for one reason or another are impossible or difficult. The key point here, of course, is the destruction of the air defense and missile defense systems.

The S-400 air defense missile systems and, all the more, the S-500 systems expected in the near future in the troops are a source of a very specific headache for NATO. Let's not forget - the Alliance’s ground forces (above all, the US Army) come into action only after achieving absolute air supremacy and the destruction of any foci of potential resistance with the help of missile and bomb strikes. However, the air defense systems available today in the arsenal of the Russian army make such a scenario completely unrealistic. And now - in the Pentagon, it seems, they have found a "panacea", Purchases of relatively cheap, but at the same time sufficiently powerful and accurate munitions for MLRS are growing every year at an impressive pace. If in 2018 the US Armed Forces made an order for less than 6 thousand such missiles, then this year they needed more than 8 thousand of these ammunition. About the next year is said above. It seems that the positions of our air defense plan to literally bombard rockets - so that certainly there is nothing left alive and alive.

Nobody, of course, plans to unleash a global nuclear war with Russia. This, without a doubt, will result in suicide - especially taking into account the presence of the Vanguards, Daggers, Poseidons in our arsenal, against which the defense systems of the United States and NATO as a whole are not only ineffective, but simply helpless. Most likely, they will try to “trick” Russia, “put it in place” during a transient and local military conflict, in which extremely painful losses will have to force our country to abandon any geopolitical ambitions, as such. The ideal theater of operations for the Pentagon in the implementation of such a plan, of course, seems to be Europe. Most likely, the Kaliningrad region, the borders with the Baltic states, possibly with Ukraine. However, the first option is most likely. It will hurt us, and why shouldn’t we sacrifice some Poland or Lithuania for the triumph of world democracy?

In this case, the main task for the Americans will be the rapid hacking of our air defense system, so that later “strategists” and other Alliance aviation could come into action in advance. Well, and after they diligently work out their goals - and hurriedly, students quickly appear on the European theater of operations for the ground forces. A weighty confirmation of this version are the statements of Curtis Scaparroti - the commander of the combined forces of NATO in Europe (though already the former). This American general has not been tired of repeating lately that Russia intends to "use nuclear weapons in limited conflicts," calling it "part of the military doctrine" and the "method of warfare" of insidious Russians. According to Scaparroti, Moscow plans in such a way "to gain quick victories over weaker opponents."

It has long been known for sure - if the Americans suddenly decide to ascribe to someone some "sinister intentions", then this suggests that they intend to do just that. All actions of the White House and the Pentagon - from the exit from the INF Treaty to the moments mentioned above, alas, fit this hypothesis in the most beautiful way. We are not crazy to make war - no matter with the use of nuclear weapons or not, at our fingertips. For Washington, however, provoking another slaughter in Europe is a common thing. It is very likely that the United States is ready to make the last bet on defeating our country with "little blood, a shameful blow." It is unfortunate that they don’t understand that the chances of winning the game are far less than even in the notorious “Russian roulette”.