Wars on distant approaches: Russia has already begun to act

31
The objective reality of the 21st century, alas, is such that the conduct of hostilities outside their borders, on a remote theater of operations, for all regional countries, not to mention the world powers, should not be considered as aggression, but as defense. Defense at distant approaches. This is the specificity of modern warfare - the opponents are trying to reduce the swords in a foreign territory, preferably also with the wrong hands. Nobody wants to fight on their territory! Why should the Russian Federation be an exception to this?





War for the right to wage war on a remote theater

There was an idea at the beginning of the year to write a review article summarizing the results of the past 2018 political year, where I wanted to give out earrings to all the sisters, running through all the most important geopolitical events of the past year, ranking according to their results all the leaders and losers of the political Olympus who political and real battles of varying intensity in the interests of their countries ... But it didn't work out. Alas! Now, from the height of the past two months, I can say that it can be for the better. Because the course of history is not limited by time frames and has a continuous character, and what was obvious on January 1, on March 1 is no longer so.

You will be surprised, probably, but according to my estimates, Russia and its president did not finish the past year in the leaders of this conditional rating. Yes, there were local successes, both in Syria and in military construction (the famous cartoons from Vovka), but on the whole the Russian Federation failed this year, initially choosing a wait-and-see foreign policy position that was losing for itself, doomed to strike back, and sometimes even not to answer altogether, substituting already for new blows. So it was in the Skripal case, and in the position on the Donbass, and in Ukraine as a whole with its impossible Minsk-2, and even in Syria, where we had to compromise with the Turks, yielding to their interests to the detriment of our own, (about Assad’s interests, I’m already silent!). The Kremlin this year somehow imperceptibly lost the strategic initiative it took in 2014 and 2015 with the annexation of Crimea and joining the military campaign in the SAR, switching to the game “second number”, which, ultimately, the chances of success for him did not leave. You can, of course, recall Putin’s victory at one wicket and the World Cup, successfully held by the Russian Federation, but all these are internal successes that were immediately crossed out by the pension reform inside the country and outside by our sworn “friends” who did everything so as not to notice and denigrate them.

Last year’s champions, according to the results achieved, were, do not be surprised, the Turkish Sultan Erdogan and the leader of North Korea, Kim Jong-un, but, oddly enough, the vaunted America, who announced through her president’s mouth that she was withdrawing her troops from Syria, and maybe even from the DRA, humbly swallowing before that all the antics of the North Korean “man-rocket.” The evolution of the relationship between Trump and Kim Jong-un, who from the psycho and the “evil dwarf” over the past six months has grown to the “great leader of the nation” and “best friend” Donald Ibrahimovic, I will consider a little below, but for now let's focus on how the hegemon reached before such a life.

Fortunately for us, Trump, whom we “helped” America choose, turned out to be a complete isolationist, completely devoid of imperial thinking. And imperial thinking dictates to all who profess it the need to achieve maximum results. An empire, therefore an empire, because it cannot afford to lose, even in a small way. The outcome of any conflict she enters into is possible for her only “with a shield”. Because in the opposite case of leaving it “on the shield” or retreating, there is a real threat to get a “domino effect”. Since, if an empire retreats, then very often it turns into an escape for it, followed by an inevitable collapse and inevitable fragmentation. One can cite not one example from ancient history, but the most revealing one that most of you still remember was the collapse of the USSR after it left Afghanistan in 1989. It is clear that there were many factors, but it was this brick that became the last, after which the empire collapsed. Whether the exit from Syria for the United States will become a reference point, we will see, but, if we proceed from the position of the American empire, it was a rather risky step. Although Trump tried to give this defeat the appearance of success, even in his kingdom he did not find the proper understanding. All smart people understand that failure, dressed in the form of a strong-willed decision, still remains a failure, so the imperials opposing Trump tried to do everything to slow down this process. But, nevertheless, the process has begun, the empire has cracked, and, from the inside, and everyone has seen that the king is naked, having drawn the appropriate conclusions for himself. Remember this.

But the main loser of last year was still not the United States, but Qatar, which was appointed the main sponsor of terrorism, Saudi Arabia, mired in the war with Yemen and scandals with the murder and dismemberment of a journalist in Turkey, and Ukraine, which is confidently heading towards its inevitable end . The Sultan, having shown the wonders of diplomatic resourcefulness and played on the contradictions between the Russian Federation and the USA, received from one Turkish Stream, S-400 and funding for the construction of Akkuyu NPP, and from others fifth-generation F-35 fighters, Patriot missile defense systems and access to neighboring Syrian territory to create a buffer zone there, with which he topped the list of political champions last year. I have always said that the only worthy opponent of GDP on the political Olympus, equal in caliber and tasks that he sets for himself, is only the possessed sultan. By the way, he is not inferior to Putin in this age and the time he was on the throne. If it were not for his impulsiveness and therefore easy predictability of behavior with the possibility of turning him into a victim of manipulative control, then he would not have had a price. But what the Sultan achieved last year even makes the GDP take off his hat. America, in fact, leaves the SAR, freeing this zone of influence for Turkey. At the same time, how the Sultan deftly played on the scandal with Khashoggi that arose, or perhaps even inspired by him, is indicative and impressive especially. The Americans agree to do a lot to save the honor of the uniform of the Crown Saudi prince, dirty in this matter, to save it for themselves and tie this story for the rest of their lives (in what, in what, and in this they are masters!). To do this, they are ready to pay even the fate of the unfortunate Kurds, who had previously been supported, and are now throwing at the mercy of Erdogan (betray their second nature, tens of regimes loyal to them behind the States! history, apparently, did not teach anything to the Kurds!). The Kurds themselves will not stand against Turkey and this is a chance for the Russian Federation and Bashar al-Assad. By the way, now, 2 months after the Americans announced their withdrawal from the SAR, it becomes obvious that Assad took advantage of the opportunity and the territories previously held by the Kurds are smoothly under the control of his government forces, which may even suit Erdogan, if only there there was a Kurdish armed opposition (the Kurdish Workers Party - equated in Turkey with terrorist organizations, and the creation of an independent Kurdistan on its own borders is something that the sultan cannot allow under any circumstances). These territories, at the same time, are also terribly rich in oil, these are the main oil-bearing regions of Syria and their transfer under Assad’s control can definitely be included in the Russian asset.

To make it clear how difficult it is in the Middle East, I must outline the current balance of power there. Our current allies in the anti-igil coalition, Turkey and Iran, are not allies to us at all. I would call them temporary companions, (we must already come to terms with the fact that we have no allies except our own army and navy), they are friends with us, so long as it suits them. At the same time, Turkey already in the near future risks taking its enemy’s usual place for her, and Iran, unlike her, is a potential friend of ours in the short and medium term (and strategic for a long time!). Israel in this combination is not an ally for us yet, but it’s not an enemy, but even our friend is potential (both strategic and for a long time, through it we can influence the White House, and even its court backstage). See how complicated it is. The fact is that Russia returned to BV in earnest and for a long time and not in its interests, now I will tell you a big secret, the establishment of a long-term peace there. What is our reason for this? Only when speaking from the position of an arbitrator who has influence on all parties to the conflict, Russia can and will dictate its conditions. And BV is a global weather barometer that also sets oil and gas prices. There lies the key to governing the world (here the word is used in context - the globe). And while the Shiites will fight with the Sunnis, there will be no peace (and they will always fight!). But the keys to this box are already with us. The former master of the keys seems to be cleaning up with BV. We will see. But his former vassals are already looking, and some have already found, the way to the Kremlin (I'm talking about Saudi and Qatari princes now). And, thank God that they are all afraid of Iran, they can negotiate with it only through the mediation of Moscow (this also applies to Israel - again, nothing personal, it's just business).

Therefore, one should not be surprised at the behavior of the Sultan, who, playing on the contradictions between the Russian Federation and the USA, was able to achieve phenomenal successes for himself. About the Kurds betrayed by America, I already said, now I’ll say how he threw the Russian Federation. On December 18 of last year, it became known that the US Department of State approved a contract worth $ 3,5 billion for the purchase by Turkish aircraft of four sets of Patriot missile defense systems, which include 20 M903 autonomous launchers, 4 interception control stations, 4 AN / radar fire control stations MPQ-65, 10 AMG antennas, 80 Patriot MIM-104E anti-aircraft guided missiles, 60 PAC-3 missiles, not counting other related equipment. Thus, by blackmailing the United States with the purchase of Russian S-400 air defense systems, Erdogan was able to achieve favorable conditions for the supply of Patriot systems, which the Turkish army had long dreamed of. Well, the Sultan masterfully used Russia in his interests and only a clinical idiot can then believe his assurances of eternal love and friendship. This all fully applies to China. Both the Sultan and Comrade C think the same imperial categories, so they are not friends to us at all, but just fellow travelers. Here, I hope, of course, there are no illusions?

By purchasing these missile defense systems, Turkey actually “closes” its sky, changing the obsolete MIM-14 Nike-Hercules, manufactured in the USA, to slightly less ancient “Patriots” (I don’t know why the S-400 didn’t suit her?). The next decision of the State Department may well be the green light for the sale of the F-35 (Turkey is ready to purchase up to 120 of these fighters, each of which, depending on the configuration, costs from $ 83 million to $ 108 million). Together with Patriot, these fifth-generation fighters will significantly strengthen the military potential of Turkey, and, therefore, consolidate it in the status of a powerful regional power that even Washington will have to reckon with. I’m not talking about Russia anymore - Turkey is our potential strategic enemy and adversary in this region. All war in Syria for her is nothing more than the creation of a buffer zone between them and the Kurds. I draw your special attention to this - no one wants to fight on their territory. Everyone prefers to do this on a remote theater. In this case, the Syrian theater of operations has become a theater of war for all parties involved in the conflict, starting with regional countries and ending with world powers that hold their defenses on the far approaches to themselves. This is the specificity of modern warfare - the opponents are trying to reduce the swords in a foreign territory, preferably also with the wrong hands. That is why the slurred, to put it mildly, the behavior of the Russian Federation in the conflict with Ukraine is fraught with the transfer of this conflict already to the territory of Russia, which is what the sponsors are seeking from having lost their own subjectivity. Nobody wants to fight on their territory, why and how the Russian Federation was able to admit even a hypothetical threat of the like, for me a big question and a riddle? This threat had to be strangled in the bud! Now it will be possible either at the cost of a lot of blood, which we would not want, or by transferring the confrontation with the sponsors of these processes to a remote theater, closer to them, for example, to Venezuela, and why not? And for some reason, what is allowed to Jupiter is not allowed to the bull? And it’s still necessary to see who is, in fact, a bull ?!

I can express an seditious thought now, but an unsuccessful attempt by the Russian Federation to stake a jump airfield for its strategists on the territory of Venezuela, which ended in an attempt to remove the legitimately elected president of this country with the potential threat of a new hotbed of military tension on its territory into which the United States will be drawn, Colombia and Brazil, on the one hand, and Cuba, Nicaragua, Mexico, El Salvador, the Russian Federation and China, on the other hand, are a completely successful attempt by the Russian Federation to draw our sworn “friends” into the conflict on a remote theater, even at the cost of well-being and peace of a friendly country.

Again, nothing personal, this is just an objective reality that the world is faced with in the 21st century. The harsh reality, alas, is that the conduct of hostilities outside their borders, in a remote theater of operations, for all regional countries, not to mention world powers, should be viewed not as aggression, but as defense. Defense at distant approaches. In the BV in the SAR, everyone is on the defensive - Shiite Iran is defending itself from the Sunni Gulf countries (this is a confrontation on a religious basis, it is forever); Turkey is defending itself against the threat of creating a Kurdish state on its borders, which, having a quarter of its own population of Kurds, is quite understandable; Israel is also preemptively bombing Syria in its own interests, destroying pro-Iranian proxy groups and Hezbollah units that are trying, with the support of Iran, to create an enclave of confrontation with Israel on the territory of the SAR; world powers, all except China, are also solving their problems there. The only losing side in this situation is only Syria. Let's sympathize with her. Do you want such a fate for the Russian Federation? Then it was necessary to solve the problem with Ukraine on its territory, and better on the territory of its puppeteer. But the puppeteer will never allow the latter, so the site of Venezuela for us in this case can be considered optimal. Let Trump get bogged down there! Let Venezuela become for him the second Vietnam, or at least Afgan, from which the Americans have not been able to get out for 18 years. It would be an ideal task for us to tie up the enemy forces in a theater of operations that is remote for us, and even fighting with someone else's hands. This is what the Americans wanted to achieve in Ukraine, dragging us into a conflict with it, while fighting with the hands of Ukrainians. We missed the X moment to prevent this in the spring of 2014. Further, the situation through our fault acquired a protracted character and it will only get worse, and the decision on its aggravation or not aggravation will be taken, by no means, by Kiev. This is the worst outcome for us, to live under the constant threat of confrontation with our closest neighbor, and even close to us by blood, despite the fact that we have no levers of pressure on him. But the United States can always use this lever, but for now even the hypothetical probability of this has already become for them an element of pressure and bargaining with us. This is the worst result and there is no way out of it yet. You are waiting for the disintegration and fragmentation of Ukraine under the weight of growing economic problems? Wait! Somalia has been rotting and falling apart for 30 years. And it will rot further, poisoning all the space around, so what? The economic problems of Ukraine will affect only the downtrodden, disenfranchised and without the right to vote, the population of this underemployed, the curators do not care about it, as, in fact, the Russian Federation. I hope there are no idiots here who believe in fables about the "Russian world" and the fraternal people, which we will not give offense? These are all fairy tales for internal use, in real life the director of the Russian Federation should and will solve the problems of the Russian Federation, and let the president elected by the Ukrainians solve the problems of Ukraine. If they have no choice, then this is their problem, and the director of the Russian Federation does not care about them, like the Americans! To deal with your problems! (Everything that I have written here above, for me, as a citizen of this unfinished person, is very sad to write, but it's all true, bitter, cruel, but true!).

But back to our wars on remote theater. I hope it’s already clear that the countries fighting there are not attacking, but defending themselves, not wanting to allow the creation of bridgeheads to attack themselves. Iran, for example, in Syria conducted a successful defensive operation, as a result of which it sharply tempered Israel’s desire to conduct another military operation in Lebanon. And the results of a massive missile attack by pro-Iranian proxies, when 400-450 missiles launched simultaneously broke through the vaunted Israeli Iron Dome system in the Gaza Strip, generally compelled Israel to revise its military doctrine and seek leverage over Iran through the Kremlin. Those. The Russian Federation also turned out to be in pluses in this campaign, winning not only in the military component, having tested the latest weapons and personnel on a real theater, but also in the diplomatic one (I already said above about the role of Moscow as an arbitrator, equidistant from all conflicting parties ) Turkey also solved its problems in Syria, avoiding the creation of a single Kurdistan in the adjacent territory. Bashar al-Assad was also not in trouble, defending his independence, however, at the cost of destroying the country. I already said about the losers - some leave the ATS, others seek support from the new owner of the BV. Who we have become the new owner of BV as a result of this local war, you already understand. But these are the successes of the Russian Federation related to 2015-2017. In 2018, except for the sultan, only comrade could boast of such. Kim Chen In.

What the North Korean leader has achieved in the confrontation with the hegemon will be written in a separate line in History. He began this year as the “evil dwarf” leader of the rogue state under sanctions, and ended as the “greatest leader of the nation” and “best friend” of Donald Ibrahimovic (in this case, I quote the source). After their first meeting in Singapore, it was clear that this was a breakthrough (Putin still has not been able to hold such a summit!). Moreover, a breakthrough from a position of DPRK strength. It would seem that the Russian Federation has 8000 nuclear warheads, the United States - 7300, the DPRK has only 8, but comrade. Eun clearly and unambiguously made it clear that he was ready to use them, and the great and terrible Trump crawled to him on his knees and licked his hand. Vietnam demonstrated this a couple of days ago. We have not seen such Trump. Moreover, I will say that no one has seen such Trump yet. The Fat and Evil Dwarf (I quote the source again) did not know where to hide his hands so that Trump would not lick them. And just lit up a couple of missiles that could fly over the Pacific Ocean. And the hegemon swam. I have only one question - why doesn’t it float from our missiles? Maybe we are not insane enough? Maybe we need Zhirinovsky at the head of our state to start reckoning with us? Does he seem to be about to wash his boots in the Indian Ocean? Maybe he will also wash them in the Hudson Strait? Well, or at least promise.

Comrade example But for all, science is how to behave with a hegemon. I think if Maduro had missiles, then the United States thought a thousand more times to set up a state there. coup or not. Although Comrade There were two more arguments against Trump that Maduro did not have. The first iron argument is total control over the domestic political situation in the country, and the second even more significant is the land border with world powers such as Russia and China, none of which is interested in destabilizing the situation and escalating the conflict at its own borders. Although the world between the United States and the DPRK is not included in their plans either. An insane neighbor, and even with missiles, which only you can influence, is an ideal argument in a dispute with the hegemon. It’s foolish to agree to refuse such an instrument.

You are waiting for conclusions from me - I do not have them for you. I just took an instant photo at the moment, measuring the pressure on the ward, it is elevated - it will certainly explode somewhere. It may be necessary to conduct artificial bloodletting in the right place to avoid hemorrhage in the unnecessary - for sure! Only I am not a doctor to indicate this place. The question is what is called non-salary. Agree, in 2015, few could have imagined that Putin would enter Syria. If in 2014 Crimea was still somehow visible, it was not even clear why the GDP was limited only to Crimea, and could have taken all of Ukraine to itself by returning the fugitive Yanukovych to the throne, then the Syrian military campaign was already a bolt from the blue for everyone, especially for Obama's. Laurels from her we reap to this day. And we will reap for a long time. It turns out that we can when we want.

Why don't we want it now? How to behave with the hegemonic comrade Eun has already shown. I do not propose to shoot at America, but to restore order on our own borders, God himself commanded. The bifurcation point will be March 31. I think everyone understood what I'm talking about. It’s no longer necessary to shoot anywhere, it was necessary to shoot earlier, in 2014, now it will be enough just to not recognize the presidential election as unfinished. There are more than enough reasons for this. Well, and hope, of course, on Comrade. Trump, who, on the instructions of the Kremlin, will destroy America from the inside. I hope to see at least one of these in life.
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    5 March 2019 09: 41
    I feel a complete consonance of the author’s thoughts with my own, however, I would like to express a different point of view on some issues. In 2014, we got the most out of the events in Ukraine: Crimea and rebel Donetsk republics. For actions in the style of blitzkrieg with the capture of Kiev, at that time we had neither sufficient strength nor, most importantly, the support of the population, who for the most part accepted Yanukovych's overthrow with enthusiasm. This is now, after five years of nationalist rule, which brought the country to its current coma, the Ukrainians began to slowly understand what they got into. And then - well, if we had restored Yanukovych on the throne then - Crimea would have remained Ukrainian, perhaps forever, to our great regret, no matter how cynical it may sound. And the significance of Crimea for Russia can not be especially extended: both to us, and to our enemies it is clear without words. As for the prospects in the Ukrainian question ... we will complete the northern stream - 2, produce and equip the army with the same weapons that the president spoke about, and, as you know, perhaps the people of Ukraine will be waiting for us as liberators by that time. That is, there will be all
    prerequisites to restore the status quo we need in this country ...
    1. +2
      5 March 2019 10: 31
      Yes, about the Ruin, the author of the article has something left and right. It was necessary to fight Kiev, then it was not necessary, because the United States did just that. I agree that in Ukraine we were not at war in 2014. There were not enough resources. Yes, and the assessment of leaders and losers at a specific time-event site can be carried out, but is it necessary? The result of the whole party is not yet obvious, and no one has canceled the gambits in politics. But in general, the article is interesting, analytical, and many of the author's conclusions, in my opinion, are correct.
      1. +3
        5 March 2019 16: 50
        Nikolay, you’re right, somewhat overshadowed the accents regarding Russian interference in the events in Ukraine. It was understood that in 2014, even before the Confectioner's election, the GDP should have been used by the permission of the Federation Council of the Russian Federation and the request of the fugitive Janek for the use of troops. Then it would be bloodless. But the moment was missed. Now it’s too late to drink Borjomi. Alas and ah! Details with evidence of my findings here - https://topcor.ru/6041-rokovaja-oshibka-putina.html
        1. +1
          6 March 2019 07: 50
          Quote: Volkonsky
          Meant that GDP was supposed to use the permission of the Federation Council of the Russian Federation in 2014 before the confectioner's election and the request of a runaway Janek on the use of troops. Then it would be bloodless. But the moment was missed.

          Are you proposing to occupy Ukraine? Or "free" her from the hated regime? VVP loves the Russian Federation, therefore, did not embark on an adventure and did not receive 42 million spinnogs (usually always dissatisfied) on the neck of taxpayers ...
          Ukrainians themselves will understand (or not understand) their problems ...
          Ukraine will lose the Left-Bank Ukraine and Novorossiya only if it starts Operation Clear Field (by analogy with the war on 08.08.08) against the LPNR .... but this will be a different story with other tasks being solved by the Russian Federation. ..
          1. 0
            6 March 2019 17: 53
            But especially for you and for people like you, I left a link - https://topcor.ru/6041-rokovaja-oshibka-putina.html, where it is written in black and white what I wanted or did not want. But the Chukchi is not a reader, the Chukchi writer, apparently.
    2. +3
      5 March 2019 16: 43
      It is felt that Michael does not live in Ukraine. Therefore, there is some misconception regarding the desire of Ukrainians to overthrow the criminal Panda. This is the result of technologies applied in Ukraine by overseas technologists. Believe me, they are preparing the same for you. They will start downloading on the eve of 2024. To close these two questions, I give you two links, read, much of the secret will become apparent - https://topcor.ru/6041-rokovaja-oshibka-putina.html, https://topcor.ru /5272-ukrainskij-fashizm-kak-za-55-dnej-iz-ljubogo-naroda-sdelat-stado-ovec.html. Texts published here.
      1. +2
        5 March 2019 23: 23
        It is felt that Vladimir is a young man, in recent history he is poorly oriented. These technologies were used on us in the 80s - 90s. There is some immunity, which was updated after the Maidan. Everyone understands who and why is rocking the situation. The leadership of the Russian Federation, as a whole, is no longer perceived. They understand who is driving where. There were not many people who wanted to ride with pots on their heads and on Bolotnaya, and there would be no further fools. Only the most stupid. They are not sorry.
        1. 0
          6 March 2019 00: 44
          https://topcor.ru/5272-ukrainskij-fashizm-kak-za-55-dnej-iz-ljubogo-naroda-sdelat-stado-ovec.html

          You can see that you didn’t follow the link, Boris. The technology was invented in 2003, published three years later, the last 10 years began to be actively used. Read, you won’t regret it. The author of the concept, Joseph Overton (a famous American lawyer and public figure, died in 2003, without having seen how his followers disposed of his idea). The successors of Overton's ideas used his technology to change the attitude of society to questions that were once unacceptable to him. A technology that allows you to legalize absolutely any idea. For the destruction of established human values, moral principles, as well as the ideological principles on which entire states and civilizations are based, such a technology can be more effective than nuclear war. Proven in practice! In Ukraine over the past 5 years, this is precisely what we are observing. There is a run-in of this technology in experimental rats. As the latter, 40 million unsuspecting Ukrainian citizens are used (some rats, however, do not survive and flee from a sinking ship, as a result of which the population of Ukraine has already decreased by 10 million, but the experiment continues). Overton showed that for any idea, even for the most absurd, in society there is a so-called “window of opportunity”, thanks to which the darkest idea can be gradually clarified, washed in the public mind and, finally, legislated.

          Overton’s technology of brainwashing of the population is that any unacceptable idea is systematically and methodically broadcast through information windows, like a series. As a result, people’s attitude towards this idea changes over time: if initially it was “unthinkable”, then it becomes “radical”, then “acceptable”, “reasonable”, “popular” and, finally, “right”. The latter is fixed by law, after which it becomes the norm and binding on all, even disagreeing. That is, using this technology, any idea in people's minds can be turned upside down - turn black into white and vice versa. How this happens in practice, I showed on a simple example of fascization of Ukraine. Read and find. By the way, I'm not young at all, but thanks for the compliment. I found the war in the DRA, and the collapse of the Union. Both on their own skin.
      2. 0
        6 March 2019 15: 02
        Quote: Volkonsky
        It is felt that Michael does not live in Ukraine. Therefore, there is some misconception regarding the desire of Ukrainians to overthrow the criminal Panda. This is the result of technologies applied in Ukraine by overseas technologists. Believe me, they are preparing the same for you. They will start downloading on the eve of 2024. To close these two questions, I give you two links, read, much of the secret will become apparent - https://topcor.ru/6041-rokovaja-oshibka-putina.html, https://topcor.ru /5272-ukrainskij-fashizm-kak-za-55-dnej-iz-ljubogo-naroda-sdelat-stado-ovec.html. Texts published here.

        Vladimir, thanks for the article, I have something to think about, I'll go read "how in 55 days .."
        1. +1
          6 March 2019 18: 19
          Well, at least someone helped! It is sad to observe the position of people who have formed their point of view from television (even Russian) and are trying to judge the events and moods of people in Ukraine, never having been there.
      3. 0
        12 March 2019 12: 14
        Alas and ah !!! wink Writer ... You better write about the counted Maduro watches that you promised !!!
  2. +2
    5 March 2019 14: 33
    Well then. Let's start in order (from the end i.e.):
    ... Crimea in 2014 was not visible ... in general - that there is a gift of the lame on the head of the maydauns. Even the Americans did not expect such a gift from them (what can we say about us, about Russians?) ...
    ... Taking off the "instant photo" the author forgot to mention one point - the statement of the RF Ministry of Defense about the strike "on the decision-making centers" .... This is not a direct warning to amers? (and this, for a minute - not some 8 North Korean missiles) ...
    ... Speech about "remote" theater of operations for Turks and Israelis does not work. from the word AT ALL - this all happens DIRECTLY on the borders of these states (unlike the Russian Expeditionary Force) ... that's why we are in no hurry to unleash hostilities on our border ...
    ... Regarding the 30 years of waiting for the fragmentation of the former USSR ... We are RUSSIA and we exist on this planet (according to some assumptions) for more than one millennium, certainly not one hundred years - that's for sure ... And so we can wait VERY long. ..
    ... Now about Venezuela and all sorts of strategists ... This is a provocation. Russia provoked amers. And now they are FORCED to answer - they react, so they are secondary ...
    ... What can I say about air defense systems? And here there are several options:
    - "purchase" (which in fact may not be) may be a joint agreement between the BBP and the "sultan". so that the Americans sell their air defense systems at a cheaper price (this rubbish does not threaten Russia with almost anything). What interest Russia has in this - the question (as you, Vladimir, say) - is not in my finances.
    - the purchase may take place after the acquisition of the F-35th by the Turks ... t.s. and eat a fish and swallow a bone ...
    - simple blackmail of amers ... simple - blackmail (why? ... I don’t know - not enough information) ...
    Everything else - again, little data ...
    Now the most important question is the question of occupying "first place" on the pedestal of cunning ... Remind me - why Erdogan is still on the throne? Who helped him stay there, in fact SPAS?
  3. +1
    5 March 2019 17: 00
    Quote: A.Lex
    . Taking the "instant photo" the author forgot to mention one point - the statement of the RF Ministry of Defense about the strike "on the decision-making centers" .... This is not a direct warning to amers? (and this, for a minute - not some 8 North Korean missiles) ...
    ... Speech about "remote" theater of operations for Turks and Israelis does not work. from the word AT ALL - this all happens DIRECTLY on the borders of these states (unlike the Russian Expeditionary Force) ... that's why we are in no hurry to unleash hostilities on our border ...

    I reviewed the events of last year, the GDP statement was already in the current one and I already wrote about it, and you read, Alex, and was pleased with the conclusions I made.
    Regarding the wars on a remote theater, the operation in Ukraine is the simplest in terms of logistics and escalation opportunities for the Russian Federation, and no matter how cool it is, it’s still someone else’s territory, not your own. And no one will solve this problem for us. I am writing on behalf of the Russian Federation, because the Russian Federation and my land, and I, like you, are not scattered with my lands.
    1. +1
      6 March 2019 21: 51
      Vladimir, but I don’t say that I don’t like EVERYTHING in your reasoning. Much is purely emotionally close to me. But you can’t get emotional at work? And moving away from emotions, let's take a look at a certain unattractive, for both of us, given:
      Everything that happened in the lands of the south-west of Russia is the essence of a long-term development of the Catholic-Protestant west. (by the way, I have one information copied from the book, which I consider to be a TRUE LIFE in VK I have it there. It's called "WHAT IS PROTESTANCY, WHO ARE PROTESTANTS, WHERE THE CURRENT CIVILIZATION OF ANGLOSAKS AND OTHER WESTERN EUROPE COME FROM" , - successful. There is an assumption that Russia was much more extensive than the USSR and RI known to us. And gradually the west chops off the edges. Take the same Porussians and (already known to us) Czechs and Poles - the same Slavs! Now we have taken on you and the Belarusians. Also from within Russia is infected with the virus of "Western worship". The problem is much broader than it is shown to us by the media and the Internet (and this garbage can in general is a lie on a lie). The problem is in the weakened civilization fortress of the SPIRIT. The eternal pity of the Russian people will one day bring us to the final defeat. After all, pity is weakness. And pity for your enemies is inevitable death from a blow in the back. DO NOT LEAVE AN ENEMY UNDER THE BACK! And we forgave everything and continue to forgive ... we regret everything ...
      1. +1
        6 March 2019 22: 06
        I forgot one more moment.
        The worst dream for Russia and the sweetest one for amers is to make parts of the Russian people cease to consider themselves RUSSIAN. What has been done with Ukrainians, Belarusians. Now they will work with Mordovians and Chuvashs ...
  4. +2
    5 March 2019 17: 07
    Quote: Camo Gryadshi (Michael)
    I feel a complete consonance of the author’s thoughts with my own, however, I would like to express a different point of view on some issues

    I am pleased that an audience is slowly gathering here, inclined to analysis and reflection and not inclined to brandish brooms in search of traitors-ukrov who have received what they deserve and can please only overseas puppeteers who, even in their wildest erotic dreams, could not hope for such an outcome. But the news portal and analysis is not a priority here, unfortunately. We do not yet reach VO in this sense.
  5. +1
    6 March 2019 18: 11
    All a priori believe that the events in the Crimea will be mirrored when we send troops in 2014 to Ukraine. I think this is a very erroneous view. Firstly, this is aggression (Yanukovych is not serious), secondly, of course, the West would not go to war with us, BUT it would solder such sanctions against the Russian Federation that the current ones would seem calm after the storm. SWIFT would be cut off, progressive Europe would slow down the 2nd stream, aggravation in Syria, etc. etc. They have a lot of measures for us, unlike us.
    Ukrainians are sick with independence, just like the Poles. You can sing at Skabeeva & Co. a show that we saved Poland, that Ukrainians have Nazism, that they were zombified, but these two countries do not want to live in friendship with the Russian Federation and will not. We can say that they were Russian-Rusyns, whom they turned into not to understand who. Everything is useless. And I think that the authorities in the Russian Federation have already understood this and are slowly retreating. It could be sharp, but the people will not understand.
    Of course, one could get ahead of the Americans and slow down Ukraine even earlier, but thereby shift the solution to this problem onto the shoulders of the next generations, as Khrushch did. But this is not a way out.
    1. +1
      6 March 2019 18: 23
      And how is the entry of troops into Ukrainian different from the deployment of troops and the airborne forces in the SAR? Both there and there was a request from a legitimately elected president, you see the results for yourself - the Yankees were removed from Syria and strengthened in Ukrainian and prepare for us future hemorrhoid. You must be able to admit your mistakes! What to do now, I don’t know! Borjomi is too late to drink!
      1. +2
        6 March 2019 19: 56
        Do not compare ATS and Ukra. In the SAR, our group fought real terrorists, almost the whole world recognized them as such. Assad was in serious condition and at least had power. Yanukovych de facto was no longer the leader of Ukraine since fled the country. So who would we fight in Ukraine? From the point of view of the West - with the people. A Bandera picture for the media provided the type of chlorine attacks in Syria. And Europe recognized the rebels and guarded the mouth of the Bra Russia against the entry of troops into Ukraine. And Syria and Ukra cannot be equated in the sense of international support.
        1. +1
          7 March 2019 00: 51
          https://topcor.ru/6041-rokovaja-oshibka-putina.html - это читали? ваша версия чисто теоретическая, что могло быть или не быть на укре, введи туда РФ войска. А это слова человека, знающего ситуацию изнутри на тот момент, и я тому живой свидетель, подтверждаю, так и было! Не воспользовались моментом, теперь выгребаете, рассказывая сами себе, что вам плевать. А вот не плевать совсем!
      2. +2
        6 March 2019 19: 59
        What is there to do? Nothing ... Maybe in 20 years Ukraine will become an adequate country. Maybe after the coup in Kiev, it was necessary to curtail relations with them. Maybe it’s not necessary. We don’t know this ...
        1. +1
          7 March 2019 23: 55
          Explain to me an unreasonable idiot why some shabby Hungary, which has neither intercontinental missiles, nor oil, nor gas, which is almost invisible on the world map, (except, perhaps, under a microscope!), With resources a thousand times smaller, than that of the Russian Federation, it can fight with Ukraine in the trash because of some unfortunate 250 thousand ethnic Hungarians locally living in the Transcarpathian region, for their right to receive education in their native language. At the same time, blocking and torpedoing all decisions in Ukraine, both in the EU and NATO, creating a special ministry for Transcarpathian affairs and issuing passports of Hungarian citizens to everyone who confirmed their Hungarian origin (and there are already 180 thousand of them!), And the great and invincible Russia is not maybe, silently watching how the rights of 15-20 million Russian and Russian-speaking citizens of a neighboring country, connected with the Russian Federation not only with a common language, culture and history, but also with family ties? This is such a failure, such a defeat that no success in Syria and in the international arena can close! Moreover, the consequences of this failure you will reap for many more, many years to come. Not only do you lose your last supporters and sympathizers in Ukraine, you also lose future generations, and you lose them forever! This is not something that is not imperial, God bless her with this empire! It is simply not state-owned. A politician of the rank of Putin cannot look so narrowly, under his feet. He must have a planning horizon of at least 50 years. What will happen to Ukraine in 50 years? And there will be a black hole that will draw into itself, like any antimatter, everything around. Why does Russia need such problems in the future? I dont know! One hope is that I don’t know Putin’s plans either. I hope for its adequacy to the expected threats. Believe me, this is not about military and terrorist threats (Russia will cope with them, then).
          1. +1
            8 March 2019 02: 02
            You still do not understand? Yes, they want to merge with Europe and the United States. Capitalism supposedly built, what are we worse? To live there, to teach children ... And here, how to come to work on a shift. But for some reason these dolbyotyatly from the Old and New Worlds cove howl against them. Moreover dill they confuse cards. I’m thinking, but if Petro wins the elections, will they recognize them or not? It seems that the previous ones recognized ....
      3. +1
        6 March 2019 21: 55
        Quote: Volkonsky
        And how is the entry of troops into Ukrainian different from the deployment of troops and the airborne forces in the SAR? Both there and there was a request from a legitimately elected president, you see the results for yourself - the Yankees were removed from Syria and strengthened in Ukrainian and prepare for us future hemorrhoid. You must be able to admit your mistakes! What to do now, I don’t know! Borjomi is too late to drink!

        The difference is, Vladimir, that Assad Fought, I am a vegetable - I escaped. (Yes, and did not try to stop the MAYDOWNS FORCE)
        1. +1
          7 March 2019 00: 48
          All this bullshit - ran away, did not run away, the Russian Federation had a formal occasion. Not used, now rake.
          1. 0
            7 March 2019 08: 42
            I think we’ll rake it ... wink
            1. +1
              7 March 2019 13: 26
              To rake, you need some kind of event. Election of Ukrainian President? So choose Poroshenko. Both the Old and the New World are interested in it. Once again, let's chase gas through Ukra, 3 billion to help them. Trade is growing. The USSR is reproached with the fact that until the last they drove the trains to Germany. What now?
              The rifle hanging on the wall will shoot sooner or later. So ukra. It reminds me of the situation in the late 30s with Finland. Having Germany as an ally, attacked the USSR. The Germans nauskali. Or the recent one, Georgia. Attack Ossetia? I knew that the Russian Federation would not stand aside. But not afraid. Moreover, it attacked our military group. Saakashvili suffered a sentence. Not. By the way, the day before the attack, the US diplomatic corps went on vacation.
              I have been amazed for a long time by our topmen. In the 90s and later, their speeches sounded like: "Why would the Russians fight the Ukrainians and vice versa. It's just incredible" Pure empiricism!
              Have to rake through the war or some kind of miracle. The main thing in the first case is not to get stuck like the Red Army in Finland. In this case, the West will come to the rescue. In case of a blitzkrieg, he will be afraid of World War III ...
              1. 0
                7 March 2019 17: 49
                Rake ... We have no choice ...
                1. 0
                  7 March 2019 19: 01
                  You had a choice in 2014! Clicked! Now just rake it!
                  1. 0
                    8 March 2019 19: 45
                    lol So I say - we will rake ... Because. no choice.
  6. 0
    10 March 2019 00: 30
    Do not you think that with a plump dictator you were deceived? Where is the logic. Trump has his own game and he plays it. After all, the state apparatus was faithfully imprisoned under the old course, which old Clinton should have continued.