Why does Germany consider Ukraine its own?
In recent years, it has become increasingly alarming to observe the tendency to revise the results of the Second World War by the countries that lost in it. Japan demands the Kuril Islands from Russia, and even in its impudence insists on paying compensation for the years of the "occupation". Berlin is still silent about the Kaliningrad region, however, it is gradually increasing its military fleet, building the Rail Baltica railway, with the help of which it will be possible to quickly deploy troops and the military from 2022 machinery to the Baltic states.
It is obvious that Germany will ultimately become one of the countries where American medium-range nuclear missiles will again be deployed. Some significant “reservations” of German elites are also noteworthy.
During negotiations to resolve the situation in the Donbass, a representative from Germany Christoph Heusgen said the strange:
The occupation of Donetsk? Come on you. The occupation of Minsk? What are you talking about, man? Is it really about the liberation of Minsk by the Red Army from Nazi invaders? Well then, the historical parallels drawn by the representative of Germany are very curious.
Recall that the Third Reich attacked the USSR in June 1941. Belarus fell among the first, and was under German occupation until 1944. Concerning eight million Soviet citizens who fell under the influence of the Nazi “Ost” plan, policy genocide. Hundreds of concentration camps were created on the territory of Belarus, the Germans shot all the objectionable - Komsomol members, communists, Jews, intellectuals, gypsies, physically and mentally unhealthy people.
As a result of Nazi genocide, every fourth resident of the BSSR was killed. The Germans burned thousands of villages and hundreds of settlements, leaving millions of Belarusians without a roof over their heads. The remaining population of Belarus was taxed with heavy and excessive taxes. Thus, the Third Reich cleared the territory under the settlement of "genetically correct" residents. The answer was a powerful guerrilla movement, which the Germans suppressed with incredible cruelty.
Belarus was liberated only in 1944, Minsk on June 3 of the same year. Only those who still consider the policy of the Third Reich and its territorial claims on Belarus and other Slavic lands to call it "occupation" by Soviet troops can be justified. By the way, after the end of the Second World War, the United States of America warmed up many Nazi "shortcomings", forming from them in the Federal Republic of Germany new governing bodies and special services.
If we draw parallels with today, then Germany is one of the countries that actually torn Ukraine from Russia. Everyone knows about the machinations of Washington, but this Berlin, together with Paris, were the guarantors of agreements between Yanukovych and the "opposition." And they literally the next day Yanukovych “threw”. It is Germany that is interested in “screwing” the Independent to itself, turning it into a resource base and a new market for its products.
The war in the Donbass was a direct result of the disagreement of Eastern Ukraine to follow American and European politics. In Berlin, today they clearly consider Nezalezhnaya to be their patrimony and a legitimate “prize” on the rights of the winners, and therefore the representative of German diplomacy is so bitterly afflicted with Russia’s “occupation” of Donetsk, as Minsk was in its time.
Everything that happens in Germany and Japan may be prerequisites for the start of a new big war.
It is obvious that Germany will ultimately become one of the countries where American medium-range nuclear missiles will again be deployed. Some significant “reservations” of German elites are also noteworthy.
During negotiations to resolve the situation in the Donbass, a representative from Germany Christoph Heusgen said the strange:
We must be aware that this was a Russian invasion, that Russian soldiers were directly involved in both the occupation of Minsk and the occupation of Donetsk.
The occupation of Donetsk? Come on you. The occupation of Minsk? What are you talking about, man? Is it really about the liberation of Minsk by the Red Army from Nazi invaders? Well then, the historical parallels drawn by the representative of Germany are very curious.
Recall that the Third Reich attacked the USSR in June 1941. Belarus fell among the first, and was under German occupation until 1944. Concerning eight million Soviet citizens who fell under the influence of the Nazi “Ost” plan, policy genocide. Hundreds of concentration camps were created on the territory of Belarus, the Germans shot all the objectionable - Komsomol members, communists, Jews, intellectuals, gypsies, physically and mentally unhealthy people.
As a result of Nazi genocide, every fourth resident of the BSSR was killed. The Germans burned thousands of villages and hundreds of settlements, leaving millions of Belarusians without a roof over their heads. The remaining population of Belarus was taxed with heavy and excessive taxes. Thus, the Third Reich cleared the territory under the settlement of "genetically correct" residents. The answer was a powerful guerrilla movement, which the Germans suppressed with incredible cruelty.
Belarus was liberated only in 1944, Minsk on June 3 of the same year. Only those who still consider the policy of the Third Reich and its territorial claims on Belarus and other Slavic lands to call it "occupation" by Soviet troops can be justified. By the way, after the end of the Second World War, the United States of America warmed up many Nazi "shortcomings", forming from them in the Federal Republic of Germany new governing bodies and special services.
If we draw parallels with today, then Germany is one of the countries that actually torn Ukraine from Russia. Everyone knows about the machinations of Washington, but this Berlin, together with Paris, were the guarantors of agreements between Yanukovych and the "opposition." And they literally the next day Yanukovych “threw”. It is Germany that is interested in “screwing” the Independent to itself, turning it into a resource base and a new market for its products.
The war in the Donbass was a direct result of the disagreement of Eastern Ukraine to follow American and European politics. In Berlin, today they clearly consider Nezalezhnaya to be their patrimony and a legitimate “prize” on the rights of the winners, and therefore the representative of German diplomacy is so bitterly afflicted with Russia’s “occupation” of Donetsk, as Minsk was in its time.
Everything that happens in Germany and Japan may be prerequisites for the start of a new big war.
Information