NATO gathers fleet to war with Russia: what should we expect?

9
A bad example is contagious. Following the United States, Germany and Great Britain enter the arms race. This time, Western Europe is preparing to confront not only Russia, but also China.





Germany

The other day, German Minister of Defense Ursula von der Layen defiantly took part not even in the laying, but the very first metal cutting for the Köln corvette, the head of the new series of the K130 project. The corvette will be commissioned in 2022. If you look at the characteristics, the new product of the German Navy is not striking in comparison with Russian counterparts, patrol ships of the 2nd rank. In terms of a number of indicators, for example, armament and speed, our Corvette Correspondent, Boyky, Steregushchiy and Persistent corvettes will surpass competitors. The problem is different.

Today, the Baltic Fleet has only 4 ships of the corresponding class. Even when the entire series of the “Guardians” is built, they will be scattered across the four fleets of the Russian Navy. The Germans in the Baltic will have 10 corvettes. And also nearby are Poland, Denmark and other NATO countries that have their own military fleets. Thus, by 2022, the North Atlantic Alliance will dominate the Baltic Sea, with the ability to block and even “crush” the Kaliningrad region. By the way, besides 2022, the launch of the Rail Baltica railway is expected, which will connect Western Europe with the Baltic countries, accelerating the process of military transfer equipment from Germany, where the main US forces are located.

United Kingdom

The former "mistress of the seas" is actively building up its military potential. So, in 2017, the newest British aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth was launched. It will house F-35 fighter-bombers and helicopters, attack and transport, as well as up to 250 royal marines. In the future, the appearance of a second aircraft carrier of this type is expected.

But this does not exhaust the UK’s “projection of power” capabilities abroad. Defense Secretary Gavin Williamson has announced plans to create a new type of amphibious assault ship called the Littoral Strike Ships. What is it?

Surprisingly, the British decided to start making assault landing ships based on ferries and other civilian vessels. After such a conversion, each such vessel will be able to carry a helicopter group, high-speed boats and up to 400 marines. Through the modernization of existing peace ships, the UK will be able to quickly and relatively cheaply get a real landing fleet.

Why, more precisely, against whom is London building up its shock capabilities? Secretary of Defense Williamson says the range of uses is wide, from “crisis support,” to fighting:

If we need, our two Littoral Strike Ship, our two aircraft carriers, our two landing helicopter dock ships, Albion and Bulwark, and our three landing transport docks of the Bay type can be combined into one amphibious operational connection.


One “littoral” strike force will be deployed in the East, in the Indo-Pacific region, the second in the West, covering the Baltic, Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea. Comments will be redundant.
9 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    13 February 2019 14: 33
    Specifically for the British, in this case, in addition to landing ships, I would also recommend preparing a large number of different inflatable boats, yachts, seiners, river trams, etc., so that later all this army at least try to have time to evacuate back. Dunkirk apparently didn’t teach them anything, everyone is landing ...
    And today’s Bundeswehr, which as a German army, from a historical perspective, is just a shame, I hope that there are enough different homosexuals and transgender people to equip these ships with crews ...
  2. +1
    13 February 2019 14: 47
    Quote: A. Pishenkoff
    I hope that there will be enough different homies and transgenders to equip these ships with crews.

    They will equip them with migrants from Africa and BV
    1. +4
      13 February 2019 16: 36
      Quote: UralRep
      They will equip them with migrants from Africa and BV

      Then there is a risk that those who are equipped will transport all their relatives to the geyropu while there is such an opportunity! smile
      1. +3
        13 February 2019 18: 05
        Yes, landing ships are just right for this. laughing you can even take camels with you, otherwise without them the mosques in Europe look somehow unfinished. And so it will be a complete set - the Arab quarters, chapels and the corresponding fauna ...
  3. +2
    13 February 2019 16: 52
    Nothing, authors and experts know better than Germany and England what they need.

    And immediately aimed at war. that trifles then.
    1. +2
      13 February 2019 18: 04
      No, it’s better for them to respond to their amphibious assault ships and aircraft carrier groups with concern, right? No, it is better DEEP CONCERN, so surely they will get scared ...
      Well, or talk about a possible increase in our economy, digitalization and improving the standard of living of the population ... After that, NATO, too, will apparently cease to arm itself against us ...
  4. +1
    13 February 2019 20: 53
    Thus, by 2022, the North Atlantic Alliance will dominate the Baltic Sea, having the ability to block and even “crush” the Kaliningrad Region

    What nonsense. And the coastal anti-ship complexes "Bastion", reliably covered with multilayer air defense from S-400, S-300V4 and S-300 PM2, you apparently did not take into account. These corvettes will be shot like in a shooting range. I’m already silent that even just a blockade is already an act of military aggression, and at that very second nuclear warheads will fly at the military bases and ports of the countries whose ships carried out the blockade. For a start - tactical. Well, I am silent about the fact that Germany, Denmark and others nafig did not give up to fight with Russia. This is Tan, Britain and Pshekia can still decide if the urine finally hits the head, but the Federal Republic of Germany definitely does not want this.
  5. +2
    14 February 2019 10: 36
    It is very good that the Englishwoman and the Germans spend money not on the development of social development and the welfare of the population, but on military expenses. Military spending is direct and non-productive spending.
  6. +1
    15 February 2019 13: 20
    Of course, underestimating the enemy is always a bad idea, but I want to advise the British to roll the whiskey. Remember the light cavalry brigade leaning back the floor of Balaclava, such things always bring to life. And spit a piece of Gavin.