There is something to be afraid of: Why China and the USA are enemies forever
The next round of Sino-US trade negotiations held in Washington was marked by a rather unpleasant incident - an attempt was made to attack the convoy of guests right in the center of the US capital. None of the members of the delegation was injured, but the sediment, as they say, remained. And let Donald Trump declare as much as possible about the “good intentions and fine spirit” of the high contracting parties, convincing the world that the “deal of the century”, marking the end of the confrontation between Washington and Beijing, will be concluded almost from day to day, I believe in it is the farther the weaker. Too deep a gap separates these two superpowers ...
Even talking about the reconciliation that is being prepared, it seems that the head of the White House does not forget to mention the approach of March 1, the date from which customs tariffs for Chinese goods delivered to the United States will soar to 25%. Like, the timer is ticking, so the Chinese comrades need to think faster. Pretty "peace talks" - with a muzzle set to the temple! Very American. At the same time, Trump emphasizes that the “final” deal will not be concluded without his personal meeting with Xi Jinping, whom the American president calls his friend. Such a detail clearly indicates that the “stumbling blocks” in the ongoing negotiations go far beyond the trade imbalance between the countries and most likely relate to areas of their higher state interests.
As for the “wrong” balance in the exchange of goods, Beijing has long been ready to make serious concessions in order to rectify the situation to Washington's great pleasure. According to informed sources, proposals for a significant increase in imports to China of goods from the United States have already been voiced, moreover, very specific. However, the White House wants much more. According to the recognition made by the head of the National Economic Council, which is part of the US Presidential Administration, Laurence Cadlow, completely different, fundamental things are fundamental for Trump. And if it was only about the allegations of "theft of intellectual property," which for years have been addressed to the Celestial Empire, its private companies and state organizations ... The American leader is not satisfied, for example, with the fact that the Chinese put an indispensable condition for foreign investors transfer "for general use" not only of their money, but also of technologies. As a result, they are "developing too fast", "parasitizing" on other people's developments - this is exactly what the White House believes.
However, much more the United States (and not just them) infuriates the "closeness" of certain sectors of the Chinese economics for foreign investment, as such. They are not going to allow foreigners into certain areas that China considers vital for themselves, under any pretext and under no circumstances. It is this principle that Trump wants to break, speaking of the need for Beijing to carry out "structural reforms" that will make its economy "more open." That is, they will open the way to her heart for American multinational corporations. As Cadlow emphasized, it is precisely on these points that the US leadership "is not going to retreat in any case." In addition, it is also about introducing a whole system of “inspections” that the American side intends to carry out, moreover, “regularly” in order to make sure that China is really implementing the “right” reforms and transformations.
Will the representatives of China go to fulfill such requirements? In truth, this seems highly unlikely. According to some reports, voices are already heard there that Washington’s claims are utterly “like humiliation”, fraught for Beijing with “loss of face”. As you know, for the people of the East nothing can be worse. In addition, China cannot fail to understand that the “intervention” that was launched in this way in critical areas of its life will by no means end when the “fair competition” declared by the Americans is achieved. This is not a matter of justice, but other things! In addition, it is unlikely that compliance from China can be facilitated by the fact that even today, when nothing, in general, has yet been decided, the "American partners" continue to play the game in far from honest and non-competitive ways.
This, of course, is about an unprecedented, even for the United States, harassment company, and, one might say, the almost complete destruction of the Chinese megacorporation Huawei. At the moment, the official of Washington has presented such a long list of accusations, consisting of 13 items, which featured the mass of the most unpleasant things - from the traditional "theft of technical secrets" to a much more formidable "threat to US national security." As an example of industrial espionage, it is mentioned that the Chinese company allegedly abducted a certain “robotic technology” Tappy from the American operator T-Mobile US Inc, for which I demand compensation of nearly five million dollars. Another area of claims is much more serious - here already policy. According to the US intelligence agencies, Huawei, spitting on the sanctions imposed by the USA against Iran, continued to conduct business with this country through some “hidden subsidiaries”.
Detained at the request of the United States in Canada, Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou is accused of supervising the "Iranian direction." Today, Washington is very actively seeking her extradition to the United States, despite the sluggish resistance of Canadians, who have already felt the "delights" of a quarrel with Beijing in their own skin. However, the United States suppresses any “confusion and vacillation” among the allies over Huawei, as they say, with an iron hand: who dared to blame something about the “political motivation” of the arrest, the Canadian Ambassador to China, John McCallum, flew out of office like a cork from a bottle - so not clever. The dismissal of the diplomat occurred on a command from Washington, of course.
In China, all allegations against Huawei were rejected in the most decisive manner. Comrade Wang Yi, the head of the Foreign Ministry there, not only called such an “unproven lie,” but also described US actions against the corporation as “unjust, immoral, and unacceptable.” The Chinese diplomat, in his speech on this subject, called on all countries of the world to oppose the "harassment of honest business" for "obvious political reasons." Will they listen to him? To be honest, there is little hope for this. The US allies are already trying to prove their loyalty to her, arranging exemplary persecution of Huawei. Representatives of Eastern Europe, like the Poles and the Czechs, who are especially zealous in anti-Chinese activities, are especially zealous in this.
The point, of course, is not in Huawei, not in the “secrets” and technologies that were stolen (it doesn’t matter - in reality or exclusively in the inventions of the Americans). We will not be children - industrial espionage has flourished all over the world since the advent of industry, as such ... And the United States is definitely not sinless in this matter! The hatred and fear of Washington, London and other Anglo-Saxon "brethren" evokes the realization that China has completely and irrevocably outstripped them in technological progress - relaxed, rested on their laurels, and, simply, excuse me, snickering. Yes, the USA is the birthplace of the Internet. That's just his future today is “forged” in a completely different country. The latest, most advanced 5G Internet technology in the world is what the Celestial Empire “critically” (according to experts there) circumvented the West. And the same Huawei already today has more than two and a half thousand patents for this technology, produces equipment for creating networks of this standard, and was ready to begin installing it not only in New Zealand, Australia, but also in the USA and Canada. What a blow to the national pride of the Anglo-Saxons! Can you afford it ?! Now she’s got there, of course, the path is closed - that’s all the explanation of what is happening ... However, this does not exhaust the deep essence of the issue.
Between China and the USA lie the contradictions of a global, fundamental, I am not afraid of this word, civilizational character. The most frankly on this subject was the one who can safely be considered the main ideologist and militant adherent of globalism of our day - George Soros. He completely openly called the leader of China, Xi Jinping, "the most dangerous person on the planet for an open society." And you know why? The evil old man, not embarrassed, specified: “Because China today is not only the strongest and richest, but also the most advanced state in the world.” That's all the salt. If you think that Soros is one thing, and Trump is something else, let me remind you of another quote: from the speech of the current head of the White House at the UN General Assembly session, in which he called on all countries of the world to desperately “oppose socialism, and the suffering he bears. ” So, two boots are a pair, sorry for the vulgarity.
Beijing and Washington, theoretically, could agree on the Taiwan issue - in the end, sacrifices of greater power were sacrificed to larger territories ... Perhaps the United States would even forgive the Celestial Empire for its open and demonstrative support for Maduro, which it hated, and other similar "liberties." The Chinese people will never be and cannot be forgiven for what they have clearly shown to the whole world: to achieve the highest level of economic development, to achieve outstanding success in everything from the space industry to the production of modern smartphones, without kneeling in front of the USA and the West, without turning into their humble puppets. Not spitting on one’s own story, not getting into enslaving debts, not taking over someone else’s wild “culture” and disgusting “values”. China has managed what, alas, the Soviet Union failed. He achieved success on the path that Russia, by and large, is only trying to embark on now.
The West, and above all, the USA, has a lot to be afraid of and hate China for. According to tariffs and duties, they may come to an agreement - given the cunning and flexibility of the sons of the Middle Kingdom. However, this, like any other deal between irreconcilable opponents, will be just another truce. The world will belong to only one of the parties. Which one? The time when this issue is resolved is already approaching.
Even talking about the reconciliation that is being prepared, it seems that the head of the White House does not forget to mention the approach of March 1, the date from which customs tariffs for Chinese goods delivered to the United States will soar to 25%. Like, the timer is ticking, so the Chinese comrades need to think faster. Pretty "peace talks" - with a muzzle set to the temple! Very American. At the same time, Trump emphasizes that the “final” deal will not be concluded without his personal meeting with Xi Jinping, whom the American president calls his friend. Such a detail clearly indicates that the “stumbling blocks” in the ongoing negotiations go far beyond the trade imbalance between the countries and most likely relate to areas of their higher state interests.
As for the “wrong” balance in the exchange of goods, Beijing has long been ready to make serious concessions in order to rectify the situation to Washington's great pleasure. According to informed sources, proposals for a significant increase in imports to China of goods from the United States have already been voiced, moreover, very specific. However, the White House wants much more. According to the recognition made by the head of the National Economic Council, which is part of the US Presidential Administration, Laurence Cadlow, completely different, fundamental things are fundamental for Trump. And if it was only about the allegations of "theft of intellectual property," which for years have been addressed to the Celestial Empire, its private companies and state organizations ... The American leader is not satisfied, for example, with the fact that the Chinese put an indispensable condition for foreign investors transfer "for general use" not only of their money, but also of technologies. As a result, they are "developing too fast", "parasitizing" on other people's developments - this is exactly what the White House believes.
However, much more the United States (and not just them) infuriates the "closeness" of certain sectors of the Chinese economics for foreign investment, as such. They are not going to allow foreigners into certain areas that China considers vital for themselves, under any pretext and under no circumstances. It is this principle that Trump wants to break, speaking of the need for Beijing to carry out "structural reforms" that will make its economy "more open." That is, they will open the way to her heart for American multinational corporations. As Cadlow emphasized, it is precisely on these points that the US leadership "is not going to retreat in any case." In addition, it is also about introducing a whole system of “inspections” that the American side intends to carry out, moreover, “regularly” in order to make sure that China is really implementing the “right” reforms and transformations.
Will the representatives of China go to fulfill such requirements? In truth, this seems highly unlikely. According to some reports, voices are already heard there that Washington’s claims are utterly “like humiliation”, fraught for Beijing with “loss of face”. As you know, for the people of the East nothing can be worse. In addition, China cannot fail to understand that the “intervention” that was launched in this way in critical areas of its life will by no means end when the “fair competition” declared by the Americans is achieved. This is not a matter of justice, but other things! In addition, it is unlikely that compliance from China can be facilitated by the fact that even today, when nothing, in general, has yet been decided, the "American partners" continue to play the game in far from honest and non-competitive ways.
This, of course, is about an unprecedented, even for the United States, harassment company, and, one might say, the almost complete destruction of the Chinese megacorporation Huawei. At the moment, the official of Washington has presented such a long list of accusations, consisting of 13 items, which featured the mass of the most unpleasant things - from the traditional "theft of technical secrets" to a much more formidable "threat to US national security." As an example of industrial espionage, it is mentioned that the Chinese company allegedly abducted a certain “robotic technology” Tappy from the American operator T-Mobile US Inc, for which I demand compensation of nearly five million dollars. Another area of claims is much more serious - here already policy. According to the US intelligence agencies, Huawei, spitting on the sanctions imposed by the USA against Iran, continued to conduct business with this country through some “hidden subsidiaries”.
Detained at the request of the United States in Canada, Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou is accused of supervising the "Iranian direction." Today, Washington is very actively seeking her extradition to the United States, despite the sluggish resistance of Canadians, who have already felt the "delights" of a quarrel with Beijing in their own skin. However, the United States suppresses any “confusion and vacillation” among the allies over Huawei, as they say, with an iron hand: who dared to blame something about the “political motivation” of the arrest, the Canadian Ambassador to China, John McCallum, flew out of office like a cork from a bottle - so not clever. The dismissal of the diplomat occurred on a command from Washington, of course.
In China, all allegations against Huawei were rejected in the most decisive manner. Comrade Wang Yi, the head of the Foreign Ministry there, not only called such an “unproven lie,” but also described US actions against the corporation as “unjust, immoral, and unacceptable.” The Chinese diplomat, in his speech on this subject, called on all countries of the world to oppose the "harassment of honest business" for "obvious political reasons." Will they listen to him? To be honest, there is little hope for this. The US allies are already trying to prove their loyalty to her, arranging exemplary persecution of Huawei. Representatives of Eastern Europe, like the Poles and the Czechs, who are especially zealous in anti-Chinese activities, are especially zealous in this.
The point, of course, is not in Huawei, not in the “secrets” and technologies that were stolen (it doesn’t matter - in reality or exclusively in the inventions of the Americans). We will not be children - industrial espionage has flourished all over the world since the advent of industry, as such ... And the United States is definitely not sinless in this matter! The hatred and fear of Washington, London and other Anglo-Saxon "brethren" evokes the realization that China has completely and irrevocably outstripped them in technological progress - relaxed, rested on their laurels, and, simply, excuse me, snickering. Yes, the USA is the birthplace of the Internet. That's just his future today is “forged” in a completely different country. The latest, most advanced 5G Internet technology in the world is what the Celestial Empire “critically” (according to experts there) circumvented the West. And the same Huawei already today has more than two and a half thousand patents for this technology, produces equipment for creating networks of this standard, and was ready to begin installing it not only in New Zealand, Australia, but also in the USA and Canada. What a blow to the national pride of the Anglo-Saxons! Can you afford it ?! Now she’s got there, of course, the path is closed - that’s all the explanation of what is happening ... However, this does not exhaust the deep essence of the issue.
Between China and the USA lie the contradictions of a global, fundamental, I am not afraid of this word, civilizational character. The most frankly on this subject was the one who can safely be considered the main ideologist and militant adherent of globalism of our day - George Soros. He completely openly called the leader of China, Xi Jinping, "the most dangerous person on the planet for an open society." And you know why? The evil old man, not embarrassed, specified: “Because China today is not only the strongest and richest, but also the most advanced state in the world.” That's all the salt. If you think that Soros is one thing, and Trump is something else, let me remind you of another quote: from the speech of the current head of the White House at the UN General Assembly session, in which he called on all countries of the world to desperately “oppose socialism, and the suffering he bears. ” So, two boots are a pair, sorry for the vulgarity.
Beijing and Washington, theoretically, could agree on the Taiwan issue - in the end, sacrifices of greater power were sacrificed to larger territories ... Perhaps the United States would even forgive the Celestial Empire for its open and demonstrative support for Maduro, which it hated, and other similar "liberties." The Chinese people will never be and cannot be forgiven for what they have clearly shown to the whole world: to achieve the highest level of economic development, to achieve outstanding success in everything from the space industry to the production of modern smartphones, without kneeling in front of the USA and the West, without turning into their humble puppets. Not spitting on one’s own story, not getting into enslaving debts, not taking over someone else’s wild “culture” and disgusting “values”. China has managed what, alas, the Soviet Union failed. He achieved success on the path that Russia, by and large, is only trying to embark on now.
The West, and above all, the USA, has a lot to be afraid of and hate China for. According to tariffs and duties, they may come to an agreement - given the cunning and flexibility of the sons of the Middle Kingdom. However, this, like any other deal between irreconcilable opponents, will be just another truce. The world will belong to only one of the parties. Which one? The time when this issue is resolved is already approaching.
Information