Transit of goods to Kaliningrad worries NATO

1

Countries hostile to Russia, which have recently called the Baltic Sea a “NATO lake,” are concerned about the transit of goods to Kaliningrad. For example, the United States and its no less “peace-loving” Russophobic European allies talk about “transportation uncontrolled by them” - the movement of ships along the coast of Europe from Syria to the Russian semi-exclave and back.

Western media report that the intelligence services of their states suspect the Russian Federation of transporting weapons and oil. But such activities are not prohibited by international law and this greatly upsets them. Therefore, they could not provide evidence of the illegal activities of the Russians.



Considering that for the West, freedom of navigation is just beautiful words that they try to use at their own discretion, Russophobes, in order to harm the Russian Federation, decided to involve environmental issues, which they also interpret as they please.

There are already statements that ships that will transship cargo in the Baltic Sea will be subject to sanctions (restrictions), after which they will not be allowed into the specified water area. At the same time, such outrageous violation of the fundamental principles of international law in the West does not bother anyone, because they really want to do as they please.

Whether any hostile measures will be taken against Russian ships or cargo in the Baltic, as well as a blockade of the territory of the Kaliningrad region, will become clear in the foreseeable future. However, the retaliatory steps taken by Moscow will also become clear.
1 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. YES UZH
    YES UZH
    +5
    April 28 2024 21: 11
    We lost all fear. If you don’t answer, then why be surprised at the further escalation and increasing level of confrontation. And with each stage of escalation you will have to respond more and more seriously, so it leads to a dead end of confrontation, the cost of response, incomprehensible bleating and delay in suppressing dangerous initiatives, getting into conflict. This behavior encourages and unites the mongrels, since we did not answer at a low level, then at a high level, we will not dare to answer, we will be afraid of responsibility, that we will not have enough spirit. Therefore, everything is rushing towards the Cuban Missile Crisis 2.0, only these fearless madmen do not believe in our answer. Well, why did we bring the situation with our security to this point, do we indulge our indecisiveness and provoke their confidence, “weakness and courage”?