There is a massive exodus of foreign capital from China: the geopolitical factor is costing Beijing $0,5-0,7 trillion a year

13

In recent years, the West has begun to radically change its long-term strategy towards mainland China. All this time, for the first time in the past 40 years, there has been a mass exodus (outflow, flight) of foreign capital from China in such huge volumes.

It should be noted that at the beginning of 2022, numerous closures of various investment positions in Chinese jurisdiction began by non-resident investors. For 2022-2023, the net closure of non-resident monetary transactions in China amounted to $132 billion, compared to net lending of $254 billion in 2020-2021 and an influx of investment of $78 billion in 2018-2019. At the same time, in 2022-2023, net sales in the portfolio investment segment amounted to $95 billion against the influx of portfolio investments in 2020-2021 at the level of $424 billion and $308 billion in 2018-2019. Moreover, the influx of foreign direct investment into China in 2022-2023 amounted to $233 billion, compared to $597 billion in 2020-2021 and $423 billion in 2018-2019.



Thus, in 2022-2023, the net inflow of foreign capital was only $6 billion, although in the Covid years 2020-2021 it was estimated at $1,3 trillion, and in 2018-2019 – $0,8 trillion. On average, the net inflow of foreign capital into China over the five-year period before was about $0,5 trillion per year. Therefore, $6 billion over the past couple of years indicates a virtual zeroing out of foreign investment in the Middle Kingdom.

There has already been one negative investment cycle in China in history, when the net inflow of foreign capital in 2015-2016 decreased to $156 billion. Moreover, in 2015 there was an outflow of $100 billion. But since the beginning of the 80s of the twentieth century there has not been a near-zero investment flow to China over the course of a couple of years.

Moreover, in 2022-2023, the lowest net flow of investment capital into the PRC in history was recorded in relation to the capacity of the financial system and cross-border turnover. Such gigantic capital flows and disruptions in financial activity cannot be associated with economic prerequisites (market mechanisms). This is probably influenced political disagreements with the West (degradation of communication between Beijing, on the one hand, and Washington and its allies, on the other), expectations of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan, and the situation around the Russian-led North Military District in Ukraine. It turns out that the geopolitical factor is now costing China $0,5-0,7 trillion a year. However, the Chinese economy, even in this situation, still looks quite stable.
13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    April 25 2024 16: 38
    This is understandable; the West cannot invest in the Chinese economy forever, as a result of which China has become its main competitor and adversary in the world. Now, on the contrary, Washington and its vassals are imposing sanctions against China to curb its development.
  2. -1
    April 25 2024 17: 13
    The geopolitical factor now costs China $0,5-0,7 trillion a year. However, the Chinese economy, even in this situation, still looks quite stable.

    Well, how stable it is - nominal GDP in 2023 is lower than both 2022 and 2021. But this does not take into account inflation, which is quite noticeable.

    2021 17,759 trillion
    2022 17,849 trillion
    2023 17,662 trillion
    1. -1
      April 26 2024 16: 56
      Moscow. 5th of March. INTERFAX.RU - In 2023, China's GDP increased by 5,2%, taking one of the first places - in terms of growth rates - among the world's largest economies, said Premier of the State Council of the People's Republic of China Li Qiang.
      1. +1
        April 26 2024 19: 09
        Quote: smart fellow
        said

        A lot of people say a lot of things.
        And comparing series of absolute values ​​(without the left PPP markups, but taking into account inflation $) gives different results.
        1. -1
          April 27 2024 04: 44
          A lot of people say a lot of things.

          Those. For you, the Prime Minister of the State Council of the People's Republic of China is "many people", and some Western economists or agencies are an indisputable authority?
          1. +1
            April 27 2024 09: 26
            Quote: smart fellow
            Premier of the State Council of the People's Republic of China

            The basis is taken as a completely official GDP in local currency, in yuan in particular.
            It is recalculated into $ at the average rate for the year (or quarterly), resulting in a GDP value in $. And so every year. A sequence of annual GDP values ​​is formed, which is used to estimate the dynamics of that GDP.
            Moreover, the data is published with a delay (until everything is carefully calculated) by about 1 quarter.
            There is also data on inflation $, and these series of nominal values ​​have all the reasons to recalculate into $ one year, and evaluate the dynamics already with $ inflation.

            Quote: smart fellow
            Western economists or agencies

            They really don’t like this method, because their whole blissful picture about the continuous growth of their Western economies is pouring out.

            And everything that big officials (of any country) say publicly is pre-election campaigning/propaganda.

            Well, returning to China - back in 2015, GDP per capita there reached 87% of Russia’s, and it seemed that very soon they would overtake us and go ahead.
            At the end of 2023, China’s per capita GDP is as much as 92% of Russia’s.
            And this despite all the sanctions against the Russian Federation.
            1. 0
              April 27 2024 09: 43
              2022 17,849 trillion
              2023 17,662 trillion

              China's economic growth rate in 2023 was about 5,2 percent, exceeding the government's target.

              According to the National Bureau of Statistics,

              China's GDP in 2022 was about 17,01 trillion dollars, in 2023 it reached about 17,71 trillion dollars.
              https://tinyl.io/Ah1j

              Taking inflation into account, there are no reliable data yet; Wikipedia only provides data up to 2022.

              And everything that big officials (of any country) say publicly is pre-election campaigning/propaganda.

              These are government statistics and government sources are considered highly reliable (there is, of course, cheating, for example, when the Pentagon estimates its own and others’ military losses in the Korean War, but in modern China, unlike the United States, they do not indulge in this) according to Google methods.
              1. 0
                April 27 2024 10: 25
                Quote: smart fellow
                Inflation-adjusted data is not yet available

                https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/

                China's GDP in 2022 was about 17,01 trillion dollars, in 2023 it reached about 17,71 trillion dollars.

                And the entire data series for at least the last 10 years?
                1. 0
                  April 27 2024 11: 30
                  https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/

                  Reliable data would be reflected in the corresponding Wikipedia article, but so far they are not there.

                  And the entire data series for at least the last 10 years?

                  What for? I drew your attention to the fact that you provided inaccurate data.
                  1. 0
                    April 27 2024 12: 26
                    Quote: smart fellow
                    you provided incorrect information.

                    I provided data from the latest (April 2024) IMF summary table, which is now on the wiki.
  3. 0
    April 25 2024 18: 39
    I wonder where he's running? laughing
    1. 0
      April 26 2024 01: 31
      Interest Ask. There is no noticeable growth in investment in such volumes anywhere.
  4. +1
    April 25 2024 22: 05
    Another complete lie, they lie like they breathe......