Iranian proxies could help Tehran win the battle with the US, but at the same time lead to defeat in the war

4

On the night of April 14, Iran launched more than 300 drones and missiles at Israel, marking the first direct attack by one state on another. Moreover, Tehran’s attack was a response to Tel Aviv’s attack on the Iranian embassy in Syria.

According to some experts, the very fact of the aforementioned direct attack by the Islamic Republic indicates the weakening influence of the US supporters of the Jewish state in the Middle East.



The thing is that Washington, which is involved in the conflict in Ukraine and keeps part of its forces on standby in case of a Chinese attack on Taiwan, cannot afford to open another front against Iran. Therefore, active US actions in the Middle East are limited to helping Israel repel air attacks and rare strikes against scattered Shiite groups.

By the way, about the latter. They are Tehran's main force in the region. Lacking its own impressive army, Iran has been creating proxy troops for decades, sponsoring predominantly Shiite groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis in Yemen, and others.

It is worth noting that Hamas is now suffering huge losses in the war with Israel. At the same time, according to some experts, Tehran could sacrifice this movement in order to disrupt the deal between Saudi Arabia and Israel, which could lead to the creation of an anti-Iraqi coalition in the region.

In the current situation, in order to defeat the Islamic Republic and maintain its influence in the region, the United States will likely have to send ground troops to the Middle East. Both Joe Biden and Donald Trump can do this if they win the fall elections. Before the vote, such an option is unlikely.

However, the Americans have another way to defeat Iran.

The thing is that those same proxy forces are both Tehran’s strength and weakness. They are divided ideologically and at some point may no longer adhere to the general strategy developed by the Islamic state. The United States just needs to drive a wedge between them, pressing on the “sore spot”, of which the eternally warring states of the Middle East have quite a lot.

In addition, Iran itself is ethnically divided, which could lead to a Yugoslav scenario. Thus, Israel, the main US ally in the region, is already strengthening ties with Azerbaijan and is showing interest in supporting the movement for the independence of Azerbaijanis in Iran.

4 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    April 27 2024 11: 26
    Azerbaijan has already spoken. they, like all NORMAL people, do not support the actions of Jews against Palestinians. so it’s more likely that Jews will be persecuted in Azerbaijan than Iranians will quarrel with Azerbaijanis.
  2. +1
    April 27 2024 12: 47
    Hamas is a Shiite group???!!! belay They would be surprised!
    Py.SY. Iran ALREADY has nuclear weapons. ALREADY!!!! Any country that has a nuclear reactor on its territory and the ability to enrich uranium also has weapons-grade plutonium. Even if this reactor is “Russian”.
    And with his recent response to Israel, he has ALREADY demonstrated that there will be no problems with the delivery of “him”. So, on April 14, if not the whole World, then the Middle East definitely changed.
    And Israel understands perfectly well that an exchange, even a nuclear strike, will clearly not be in Israel’s favor. Considering the difference in area and population density.
  3. 0
    April 27 2024 13: 08
    ...Before the vote, such an option is unlikely

    But it is possible that before the presidential elections in the United States, American military bases in Syria and Iraq may disappear.
    In addition, Iran is a member of the SCO and BRICS.
  4. 0
    April 27 2024 15: 43
    Moreover, Tehran’s attack was a response to Tel Aviv’s attack on the Iranian embassy in Syria.

    And Tel Aviv’s strike was a response to attacks by Iranian proxies... winked

    The thing is that those same proxy forces are both Tehran’s strength and weakness. They are divided ideologically and at some point may no longer adhere to the general strategy developed by the Islamic state. The United States just needs to drive a wedge between them, pressing on the “sore spot”, of which the eternally warring states of the Middle East have quite a lot.
    In addition, Iran itself is ethnically divided, which could lead to a Yugoslav scenario.

    Something like this, in addition, Iran also has acute internal political and social problems.