The United States stated that after the end of the Northern Military District, Odessa will come under the control of the Russian Federation

60

Odessa will be under Russian control after the end of the special military operation. This forecast was made by former CIA analyst Larry Johnson. According to him, this city has always been Russian.

They will take Odessa. I have no doubt about it. This city has always been Russian

Johnson said.



He added that, despite all the efforts of Kyiv to erase everything Russian in Odessa, the population of the city carefully preserves the historical memory.

The ex-CIA analyst also predicted the timing of the end of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. In his opinion, hostilities may end by the end of this summer, since the Ukrainian Armed Forces will run out of resources to actively confront the Russian army.

Let us remind you that earlier it became known that Washington is preparing to provide Ukraine with a new record package of military assistance, which will presumably include long-range missiles, armored personnel carriers and a large amount of ammunition.

At the same time, Great Britain is preparing its package for delivery to Kyiv. Local media publications emphasize that London will also transfer long-range missiles, boats and a large amount of small arms ammunition to Ukraine.

Military experts, however, argue that the efforts of Washington and London to prolong the agony of the Kyiv regime will not bring the expected results. According to experts, Western technique will be destroyed by the Russian army by July of this year.
60 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    April 23 2024 11: 25
    After the end of the Northern Military District, the entire territory of Ukraine, within the borders of 1975, will return to Russia as an integral part of it, including the city of Odessa, and the Russian city of Lvov, and Kharkov, and all others.
    1. RUR
      -3
      April 23 2024 11: 39
      It’s clear from the architecture of Lviv that this is not a Eurasian city... and even from the chronicles it doesn’t turn out that it’s Russian
      1. +2
        April 23 2024 11: 50
        Quote: RUR
        Lvov... it doesn’t turn out that it’s Russian

        And Warsaw is Russian...)
        1. RUR
          -2
          April 23 2024 11: 55
          We would have reached Kyiv... But Odessa will be a pity - it will turn into ruins
          1. +4
            April 23 2024 14: 54
            Odessa is definitely more important for us than Kyiv, although we shouldn’t give up Kyiv either.
      2. +2
        April 23 2024 11: 56
        The city of Lviv was founded in 1256 by the Russian Kyiv prince Daniil Galitsky and named after his son Leo. The founder of Lvov is a Russian prince.
        1. RUR
          -4
          April 23 2024 11: 58
          look what the cities of Cherven are... and whose they were originally
          and don’t forget to issue a new law...
          1. +1
            April 23 2024 15: 53
            In 981, the Kiev prince Vladimir Svyatoslavich went to war against the cities of Przemysl and Cherven and subjugated them. From this date they were included in the borders of Ancient Rus'. For three centuries, Red Rus' was an integral part of the rest of Ancient Rus'. Then the hosts were the Poles and Austrians. After World War II, the border was drawn in such a way that Kholm, Yaroslav, Przemysl, Cherven and Volyn, as well as other significant points, were left to the Poles. Are you proposing to give Lviv to the Pole? Have pity on the Poles, they will get indigestion. History is a spiral, new generations of Russians can return these lands to the Fatherland.
            1. RUR
              -3
              April 23 2024 15: 54
              There I already wrote about the Cherven cities in the Poveseti of Bygone Years - not Russian
      3. +3
        April 23 2024 12: 33
        Lviv was founded by Daniil Galitsky, a Russian prince, and named after his son Leo.
        1. RUR
          -2
          April 23 2024 12: 43
          look what the cities of Cherven are... and read the chronicle The Tale of Bygone Years... Daniil Galitsky received the royal title from the Pope in 1253. - only Popes were confirmed as kings in Europe, - hence the first step towards Uniatism and Catholicism in the west of Ukraine...
      4. +2
        April 23 2024 13: 02
        Lviv is just a Russian city - read Lev Gumilyov.
        1. RUR
          -1
          April 23 2024 13: 10
          Also read:
          Rus' got lost in Mordva and Chud - author Valery Davydov

          Rus' got lost in Mordva and Chud*,
          Erza, Vodya, other Tatars,
          All these people have been Russian for a long time,
          On the Dvina, Moscow or Neva.


          Yesenin, Blok, etc. wrote about Rus-Chud - It is genetically confirmed, the closer to the Moscow region, Do you think that means there is one people in Lvov and on the Dvina, Moscow or Neva?

          read Lev Gumilyov.

          Do you think that this Tatar dreamer is capable of outweighing the authority of the Tale of Bygone Years?
          1. 0
            April 23 2024 13: 25
            Thanks, be sure to read it.

            read Lev Gumilyov.
            Do you think that this Tatar dreamer is capable of outweighing the authority of the Tale of Bygone Years?

            - are you talking about Lev Nikolaevich Gumilyov? - you are wrong - he was the son of a white officer and poetess Anna Akhmatova, for which he served 15 years in the camps! And yes, I also forgot to say that Lev Gumilyov was not so much a writer as a scientific archaeologist, and in his books he described his expeditions, research, finds and not only his own.
            1. RUR
              -1
              April 23 2024 14: 05
              Well, he is known as the author of dubious theories - it is believed that this is folk history, a term in this meaning, by the way, of Russian origin, and in English it is something like folk legends .. accordingly, science of this type is so determine. The fact that he was sitting and that his son does not give weight in the scientific sense...
              He sang the positive and most important, in his understanding, significance of the Mongol yoke, which, given the Tatar origin, is not surprising... only after entering the Asian empires and their dominant cultural influence right up to the time of Peter, the Kingdom of Moscow and Russia had to Europeanize 2 (TWICE), adopting almost everything - this is one of his dead-end theories
              1. 0
                April 23 2024 15: 07
                It’s not a matter of Europeanization, moments of passionarity (according to Gumilyov) happened before, and are happening now, it makes sense to note that Chinese civilization is more than 5 thousand years old, and now African civilizations are still very poorly studied, and European “civilizations” were still stuck in stone century, and there is no need to rely on Europeanness as the navel of the earth, to use modern jargon - Europeans, for once, have caught the steering wheel!
                1. RUR
                  -2
                  April 23 2024 15: 35
                  you shouldn’t rely on Europeanness as the navel of the earth,

                  - this is exactly the history of Russia
                  1. 0
                    April 23 2024 15: 59
                    I agree, Russia has always been chasing a ghost that always eluded.
                    1. RUR
                      -2
                      April 23 2024 16: 41
                      Not quite so - Peter’s modernization/Europeanization was forced, since post-Horde Muscovy was extremely backward - no science, not even just secular education, no modern army, no industry, etc., etc.... had to be borrowed. The second attempt at Westernization - after the collapse of the USSR... it is difficult to say whether it was forced or not
                      1. +2
                        April 23 2024 16: 53
                        Petrine modernization/Europeanization was forced, since post-Horde Muscovy was extremely backward - no science, not even just secular education, no modern army, no industry, etc., etc.... had to be borrowed. The second attempt at Westernization - after the collapse of the USSR... it’s hard to say whether it was forced or not

                        - this is a very philosophical question - the fact is that the Horde did not have such a strong influence on the development of Rus', Rus' waged wars not only with the Horde, and not so much with the Horde, but with itself - Russian princes with each other, but also with their neighbors, and this did not lead to economic or scientific development, since all the most developed sons of our land, as a rule, went to the ground and lay down.
                      2. RUR
                        -2
                        April 23 2024 17: 48
                        No, I don’t agree, it was Moscow that strongly curried favor with the Horde, thanks to which it rose to prominence, and after the Horde, the Principalities and the Kingdom of Moscow were almost Asian states - and so on until the Europeanization of Peter, but his Europeanization was also partially successful... In the process of expanding the Kingdom and Empire Moscow tried to broadcast its Asian ideas, especially about the state and society, to a vast territory where many did not have such experience and did not want it, but indigestion resulted
                      3. +1
                        April 23 2024 17: 59
                        You know, it’s very interesting for me to communicate with you, if it weren’t for our dependence on time, you gave me your sources - I offer you mine, these are Lev Gumilyov’s books “Rus and the Great Steppe”, since Gumilyov was still a scientist, then on his books can be relied on as a document, and another of his books is “in search of the lost kingdom”, this book describes his (Gumilyov’s) expedition in which he is looking for traces and remains of the Khazar kingdom, it says where it was located, why it collapsed, and who the Don Cossacks are is very interesting.
                      4. RUR
                        -3
                        April 23 2024 18: 06
                        Thank you, but I didn’t give you anything from the sources, but you can read here:

                        On the question of the Mongolization of Rus'

                        https://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_16518.html

                        Correct link to the article: Korolev S.A. On the issue of Mongolization of Rus' // Philosophical Thought. 2015. No. 9. pp. 81-106. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2015.9.16518 URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=16518
      5. +1
        April 24 2024 18: 38
        D Galitsky was crowned King of Russia by Pope Pius in 1253.
        D. Galitsky agreed to accept this title, counting on the help of the West in the fight against the Mongol invasion.
        1. RUR
          -3
          April 24 2024 19: 43
          Then Western Ukraine has rights to Russia, if Russia included Muscovy, which is doubtful, it was already sub-Mongolian at that time, and, by the way, accepting this title means subordination to the Vatican... The Pope in Europe then stood above the kings - this was the case before the invention of Protestantism. .. Catholicism, by the way, is a combination of science-logic, philosophy and faith, while Orthodoxy and Protestantism with Judaism are only blind faith
          1. +2
            April 25 2024 17: 04
            I don’t even know how to explain the phenomenon of belief that it was the proto-Ukrainians who dug up the Black Sea, either by blind faith, or

            a combination of science and logic, or maybe it’s just the dominant philosophy and belief in one’s own exclusivity.

            There are people whose worldview was shaped by science, but there are also many for whom science is their personal worldview. Was the Pope so powerful? In the early Middle Ages, certainly yes, but not for absolutely all of Europe. Waltz believed

            the combination of moral philosophy and the theory of international relations does not exist, anarchy between states does not allow trusting each other

            Even in the Middle Ages, relations between states were subject to the principles of political realism.
            1. RUR
              -3
              April 25 2024 17: 36
              What Europe are you talking about? Europe in the strict sense is only Catholic, later - Catholic and Protestant... since all of it originated and developed there
              civilizational components... Byzantium and its heirs are a separate world, especially with the Horde component, where this Byzantium is least of all... Western historians and civilization specialists do not consider Byzantium to be part of the West/Europe

              Rus' is also INITIALLY a separate Eurasian entity... it is only moving towards Europe with difficulty / is becoming Europeanized, its different parts are at different speeds and the difference is quite significant
            2. RUR
              -3
              April 25 2024 18: 28
              There are people whose worldview was shaped by science, but there are also many for whom science is their personal worldview.

              You don’t understand what science is, European science is a desire for objectivity and not for subjectivity (personal opinion), it’s difficult to write anything more ridiculous about science
              1. +2
                April 25 2024 19: 27
                How can we understand you Europeans-Ukrainians. However, you yourself are not always able to understand each other.
                1. RUR
                  -3
                  April 25 2024 19: 44
                  Like, none of you are clairvoyant... and then, I wrote about Catholic countries - do you think that Ukraine is Catholic? Although there have always been Uniates... Then what is the commonality with you? and even the east of Rus' is Turanian (Ugric-Turkic) in origin (Muscovy and further to the north and east):

                  the people of the Russian land are not only Slavs, but also Finno-Ugric tribes on an equal basis: Chud Merya all and others

                  - Likhachev, from the article You Can’t Get Away from Yourself...
                  like, you can understand yourself... don’t tell me...
                  1. +2
                    April 26 2024 18: 18
                    If you had read Likhachev’s article, you would not have taken his words out of context. It was Likhachev who wrote that in Russia there were traditions of democracy and the agreement of 945 between the Russians and the Greeks was concluded not only from the princes, but also from all the people of the Russian land, these are not only the Slavs but also the Finno-Ugric tribes Chud, Merya, Ves and others. Don’t believe the Ukrainian agitators, read for yourself. By the way, Likhachev believed that Russia received more Scandoslavia than Eurasia; Russia received negligibly little from the nomadic tribes of Asia. Read the political testament from the founder of the Russian land in the article.
                    1. RUR
                      -3
                      April 26 2024 18: 56
                      Likhachev does not understand, like you, that the princely council is not a parliament, he does not understand that Russia did not exist before Peter 1, that absolutism in Europe and in Russia are different things, Scandoslavia does not stand up to criticism - after the Mongols and the Horde it simply does not exist became, Turanian/Eurasian civilization is not only a powerful scientific movement in the Russian Federation, it is also analyzed in foreign science, Scandoslavia is only Lizachev - ... - so I read, and I understand that Likhachev is not a historian, I just gave you there’s a link to it because he mentioned the Turanians/Ugrofins, so I read it, and I read it a long time ago... and I didn’t just read it, like you

                      Check it out and you will understand that Scandoslavia does not exist as an important component in the post-Horde history of Russia
                      https://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_16518.html

                      Correct link to the article: Korolev S.A. On the issue of Mongolization of Rus' // Philosophical Thought. 2015. No. 9. pp. 81-106. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2015.9.16518 URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=16518
                      1. +2
                        April 26 2024 21: 28
                        I pointed out that Likhachev, by mentioning the Ugro-Finns, meant that already in 945 in Russia the interests of not only the Slavs were taken into account. In my opinion, if you read it, you either didn’t understand the meaning or missed it. But if, in sending me to Likhachev, you wrote something, albeit incorrectly, then what to look for in Korolev. In our historiography there have always been supporters of the theory of the Eurasian path of Russia, for example Karamzin, Solovyov and Klyuchevsky were against it. There was also a theory about Byzantine influence.
                        Vernadsky wrote about the convenience of the administrative system left over from the Mongol invasion. In the historiography of Russia there are more monumental personalities than Korolev, they did not come to a common opinion. Proving your own, or believing someone is a matter of personal preference, it’s like whether there is life on Mars, whether there isn’t it is unknown to science.
                      2. RUR
                        -4
                        April 26 2024 21: 32
                        It’s not a matter of monumentality, but of logic - everything in Korolev’s article is conclusive... and Solovyov and Klyuchevsky wrote schematically and unconvincingly on this topic, see Korolev again
                      3. RUR
                        -4
                        April 26 2024 22: 04
                        To prove your point or to believe someone is a matter of personal preference,

                        Science is built on facts, evidence and logic, and faith is for you to go to church or mosque, synagogue, or it will remain ONLY your private opinion (unscientific and unimportant)

                        From the point of view of Eurasians, the Russian nation cannot be reduced to the Slavic ethnos (now confirmed genetically), since Finno-Ugric and Turkic peoples played a large role in its formation - Turants
                        Therefore, the separation of Ukraine and Belarus, or at least significant parts of them, is inevitable
                      4. +2
                        April 27 2024 17: 44
                        Korolev is not a historian at all; he is a Doctor of Philosophy in writing his article, using the works of Karamzin, Solovyov, Grekov, Nasonov, and Klyuchevsky. Learn before you write, find out what the authors wrote and the sources they relied on.
                      5. RUR
                        -3
                        April 27 2024 18: 49
                        Philosophy of history (also historiosophy) - a section of philosophy designed to answer questions about objective laws and the spiritual and moral meaning of the historical process - have you never heard of?

                        science is his personal worldview.

                        - with such concepts you MAY be better off refraining from discussion
                      6. +2
                        April 27 2024 21: 47
                        What does philosophy of history study (historiosophy) You partially answered. All that remains is to understand what was written. History studies something else, as Mark Bloch brilliantly noted in 1953, history is a person in time. Based on the “linguistic turn” in the analytical philosophy of history, Likhachev, as a doctor of philology, is quite at his best. Well, maybe you have other arguments, or you are a moral or moral-spiritual leader, and someone is guided by your opinion. Find out what historiosophy studies, turn to specialists.
                      7. RUR
                        -3
                        April 27 2024 22: 07
                        My opinion is objective, based on facts, logic and authors who master this logic and facts... just write what has been preserved from that, like, Scandoslavia...

                        Read some history of the Russian language, for example, Academician Vinogradov’s history of the Russian literary language, and you will see that this linguistic turn is based on borrowings from European languages... naturally, the borrowing language will look similar to European ones - not a completely independent development.. basing a theory on this is an empty exercise.

                        once again: write what has been preserved from that, like, Scandoslavia... we are waiting....
                      8. +2
                        April 27 2024 23: 11
                        Sorry, I didn't ask your opinion. Each person has his own. Your opinion may not coincide with mine and vice versa. Which authors master logic and facts? In Korolev’s article, you wrote everything logically and demonstrably, but Solovyov and Klyuchevsky are not convincing. But the fact is that Korolev used in his work, including the works of Solovyov and Klyuchevsky. Based on this, the logical conclusion follows that Korolev has also become unconvincing for you, or do you forgive him for turning to Solovyov? What did Scandoslavia bring? Novgorod was in the union of Hanseatic cities. Administrative management. I don’t understand, you write about the Eurasian path of development, and at the same time about borrowings from European languages, this is Scandoslavia, or the Norman theory of development. The Eurasian theory is about borrowings from Turkic languages. Personally, I believe that EVERYTHING was at the intersection of cultures..
                      9. RUR
                        -3
                        April 27 2024 23: 39
                        What did Scandoslavia bring? Novgorod was in the union of Hanseatic cities. Administrative management. I don’t understand, you write about the Eurasian path of development, and at the same time about borrowings from European languages,

                        I wrote:

                        once again: write what has been preserved from that, like, Scandoslavia... we are waiting....

                        About the language: Eurasian - there must be a European element, which does not cancel Turanian.

                        Is Novgorod preserved in the Hansa? Administrative management? Veche, is it still going on? Do you speak Russian?

                        Likhachev makes mistakes:

                        Likhachev does not understand, like you, that the princely council is not a parliament, he does not understand that Russia did not exist before Peter 1, that absolutism in Europe and in Russia are different things, Scandoslavia does not stand up to criticism - after the Mongols and the Horde it simply does not exist became

                        Tell me at least one mistake Queen
                        and again: write what has STILL been preserved from that, like, Scandoslavia..
                      10. +2
                        April 28 2024 16: 44
                        First of all, I would like to note that there is no discussion between us. Discussion presupposes dialogue. I answer questions, but there is no answer from you. Let's try to trace what and who you wrote about. First they wrote a quote from Likhachev, I responded and quoted his full phrase. You didn’t answer anything substantively, you wrote that Likhachev is not a historian, but Korolev writes correctly. They didn’t write correctly what Korolev writes and what he writes about. I replied that Korolev is also not a historian. The answer I received was that I don’t understand anything about the philosophy of history, but historical studies studies the principles and rules of working with historical facts and texts. You know, there is a philosophy of mathematics, Leibniz believed that mathematics was able to explain everything. Again you start writing that you need to read Korolev, that he is right. However, I never argued that Korolev is wrong; who is more right, Likhachev or Korolev, is a question of history. But one thing is indisputable, both authors have the right to publish their point of view... Your arguments that Korolev is right are arguments from a children's sandbox, Korolev is right because he is right. I wrote the answer for your Kyiv curators, make the agitator study the material. I hope he is able to remember not two names, but more. As President Putin says, girls are bored.
                      11. RUR
                        -3
                        April 28 2024 17: 18
                        Well, why are you clinging endlessly to this Kyiv? I'm not from there... Your mind is wandering. That's not what we're talking about. You cannot answer - point out Korolev’s mistakes. LIKHACHEV IS FULL of mistakes, and you put him on a par with the QUEEN.. Here is the main mistake:

                        https://storage01.sb.by/medialibrary/221/2219d0c31afca1908f4eb9d5ff7a7096.jpg

                        The path went through Vitebsk and Smolensk
                        This was some kind of influence on the lands that now belong to the territory of modern Ukraine and Belarus - this has nothing to do with the Turanian civilization... And Novgorod was West Slavic at that time - birch bark letters testify to this - the language of Novgorod is not similar to Russian dialects.

                        You are not able to think logically...
                      12. +2
                        April 29 2024 17: 28
                        I read Korolev’s article, it cannot serve as any source on the Mongolization of Rus', by definition, it does not contain any author’s thoughts, let alone 30%, or even 1%. The article is a review, in which the author tries to summarize the works of famous historians on this period. How did it happen? Just read the summary and ending. The main and only thought of the author is “possibly”, that is, it was possible that the Horde had influence on Moscow, but perhaps it was not. I think this is not enough for science. The reader is sent to Karamzin, Solovyov, Klyuchevsky and others. The list of references used is impressive and meets the requirements for writing articles. The author does not plagiarize, he does not present what he has written as his own work. But the result of the work is one basic word “POSSIBLE”. The article did not bring anything new to genuine science. The works of the authors to whom Korolev refers have already been published. The article has nothing to do with historiosophy. Why it is recommended for reading, the only explanation is to increase the citation index, to raise the author’s prestige in the scientific community.
                      13. RUR
                        -3
                        April 29 2024 17: 58
                        The main and only thought of the author is “possibly”, that is, it was possible that the Horde had influence on Moscow, but perhaps it was not.

                        CONFIRM YOUR GUESS WITH A LINK TO QUOTES FROM THE ARTICLE

                        The reader is sent to Karamzin, Solovyov, Klyuchevsky and others,

                        this is in section - 1. To the history of the issue

                        Korolev does not mention these names at all outside of section - 1. To the history of the issue

                        About Klyuchevsky (a student of Solovyov) Korolev writes that he writes very little about Igo and his influence - you still speak Russian poorly

                        You avoid answering questions

                        (1) Tell me at least one mistake of Korolev and (2) again: write what has STILL been preserved from that, like, Scandoslavia..

                        (3) and a new question in connection with the statement that

                        the author’s main and only thought is “maybe”,

                        CONFIRM YOUR GUESS WITH A LINK to quotes from the article... and not forget about the answers, since you have to answer for speculation
                      14. +2
                        April 29 2024 19: 43
                        Young man! No need to be rude and threaten. You are not a judge, and I am not a defendant. There are 19 names on the list of works, is Klyuchevsky there or not? If there is, then there is. In addition, in part 2 Galperin “Fictitious kinship: Muscovy was not the heir of the Golden Horde.” Part 3 Byzantium. Taking into account the contradictions between these authors, the author of the article concludes, “Although undoubtedly, it is quite possible to consider the emergence and functioning of this machine as a stage in the formation of the Russian mega-machines of power" That is, the author does not assert, but admits that it is "COMPLETELY POSSIBLE" to consider. The decision is Solomon's, there are no offended people. Study the article and write adequately, I don’t need your moralizing. I understand that many are trying to convince the whole world that Russia is wildly Asian, but what’s interesting is that they don’t refuse paper, and this is Chinese Asianism. Does this mean that Asian culture has always been ahead of the world, and throughout the world the Asian path of development is decisive?
                      15. RUR
                        -3
                        April 29 2024 22: 04
                        Young man! No need to be rude and threaten. You are not a judge, and I am not a defendant.

                        - listen, if you undertake to assert something, then do not assert it unfoundedly, of course, we are not having a discussion, since you answer questions only 3 times, and not all of them... what you perceived as a threat was only -just a reminder that theses need to be supported by arguments, like, if you said it, prove it, if you can’t prove it, don’t say it...

                        And what contradictions does he have with Halperin if he criticizes him and shows his mistakes? Korolev directly points out that Galperin is wrong

                        The problem is that Galperin considers the continuity of the state, state territory, state institutions, without differentiating the state and power

                        The word problem, of course, is not familiar to you...

                        Your statements:

                        Although, undoubtedly, it is quite possible to consider the emergence and functioning of this machine as a stage in the formation of the Russian mega-machine of power." That is, the author does not assert, but admits that "IT IS COMPLETELY POSSIBLE"

                        Come on, doesn’t he really say so? A words

                        Although it is certainly possible

                        what is the meaning? And look in dictionaries for other meanings of the word “POSSIBLE”... are you blind or have real serious problems with Russian
                      16. +1
                        April 30 2024 15: 37
                        A person first learns letters, then learns to read, and then learns to comprehend what he read. The word "problem" is familiar to me. Your problem is that you do not understand that we are talking about the differentiation of state and power, that you can see this in Montesquieu or D. Locke. “Perhaps” can be divided, but the meaning will change. “It’s possible” is confidence, a complete statement. “Perhaps” is an assumption, probably, apparently. For example - “theoretically, it is quite possible to make an X-ray laser, but there is one significant difficulty. Or also, “judging by the fact that you often use a dictionary, it is quite possible that Russian is not your native language.” “Quite possible”, according to the interpretation, is equivalent to probably possible, it’s possible, it’s very possible. I’m tired of answering your comments about nothing, it’s not interesting, study the topic, learn to write to the point.
                      17. RUR
                        -3
                        April 30 2024 18: 07
                        I understand that many are trying to convince the whole world that Russia is wildly Asian, but what’s interesting is that they don’t refuse paper, and this is Chinese Asianism.

                        we must first determine what Russia is, where it should go, Korolev’s article gives some idea... You are in vain to think that paper is now made using that old or new Chinese technology

                        Although it is certainly possible

                        So you think that after the word “undoubtedly” Korolev creates the word “maybe” - you are in vain lowering him to your level...

                        https://www.vedu.ru/expdic/46925/

                        POSSIBLE 1. adverb As far as possible (usually with a comparative clause). 2. predicative 1) Assessment of any situation as seeming possible, acceptable, feasible. 2) Use. as an introductory word, corresponding in meaning to the following: maybe, probably.

                        https://orfogrammka.ru/блог/интересное/возможно-запятая/
                        If this is an introductory word meaning “maybe”, it needs to be separated by commas. Example: Perhaps you were right. If it is an adjective or adverb, no commas are needed.

                        Your interpretation of Korolev’s sentence does not work - “perhaps” is not an introductory word here, and therefore makes no sense
                        "maybe, probably"

                        Learn Russian before interpreting scientific texts of average complexity
                      18. +1
                        April 30 2024 19: 13
                        The article is written as it is written; no interpretations about what is written or what the author supposedly actually thought are suitable. Advise him to write more clearly, or you are the author. Then it is clear why there is so much fuss about an ordinary article that does not contain new information.
                      19. RUR
                        -3
                        April 30 2024 19: 23
                        All the rules of the Russian language related to the sentence that you do not understand are given above...
                      20. +2
                        1 May 2024 15: 07
                        The dictionary gives about 12 interpretations of the phrase “quite possible.” In addition to the meaning - “maybe” - there are other options: - “not excluded” - “probably possible”. Try to substitute, although what is written with a pen cannot be cut out with an ax. Teach the Great and Mighty One. With an unnamed RUR in Latin, this is simply necessary. You cannot choose the options that are appropriate in your answers, this is unscientific. Korolev is smarter; he does not categorically assert anything, realizing that new archaeological discoveries can refute, or at least cast doubt on, any theory.
                      21. RUR
                        -3
                        1 May 2024 15: 47
                        follow the rules of punctuation - kindly provided by me above...
                        But it seems to me that the Northern Military District, which threatens to degenerate into a large-scale war, was planned by people of your level
                      22. 0
                        2 May 2024 12: 46
                        You are being rude again and overestimating your importance. You have only one correct opinion, yours. Someone else's opinion is not interesting to you. Since these are symptoms of megalomania, we can conclude: this is not your FAULT, it is simply your TROUBLE.
                      23. RUR
                        -3
                        2 May 2024 13: 41
                        I have the brains and the rules of Russian grammar... expelling and destroying the educated classes is easy, but reaching an acceptable level is a problem
  2. -1
    April 23 2024 11: 27
    È un'esca; stanno anticipando le conclusioni di un possibile trattato di pace per attirare la Russia sul trattato stesso.
    Is the "carrot-and-stick" strategy; on the one hand they threaten aid to Ukraine; on the other they show a possible benefit from joining a peace treaty.
  3. +1
    April 23 2024 11: 49
    former analyst

    You don't have to read any further. Exes, they're all smart.
  4. 0
    April 23 2024 12: 35
    Larry Johnson said the right thing, I support his opinion.
    The liberation of Odessa and Nikolaev will not allow NATO to create military bases there in order to threaten and conduct military operations against Russia with the help of the Nazis and Bandera.
  5. +2
    April 23 2024 14: 54
    According to the wise and realistic version of former analysts, we are long-term world champions in all areas. It would be necessary to somehow help the West with its incompetent actors, otherwise it will disappear, it’s a pity.
  6. +2
    April 23 2024 19: 23
    This “analyst” is from the same cohort as the Ritters and other McGregors... winked