Lena Bridge: 40 years in the shadow of other projects

26

Most recently, President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin again raised the topic of building a bridge to Sakhalin; this happened during his online meeting with the head of the Sakhalin region Valery Limarenko. All this served as a reason to recall another major project, the implementation of which is much less covered in the media space. We are talking about a new bridge crossing over the Lena River in the Yakutsk region. This construction will allow connecting Eastern Siberia with the ports of the Sea of ​​Okhotsk.

The first plans for the construction of a combined bridge (for rail and road transport) across the Lena appeared back in the 80s of the last century; they were connected with the beginning of the construction of the Amur-Yakutsk railway (AYM). Unfortunately, those plans were not destined to come true; perestroika and the subsequent collapse of the Soviet Union prevented it. Already in the XNUMXst century, it was decided to abandon the railway part of the bridge crossing, since Yakutsk, located on the western bank of the Lena, would still turn out to be a dead-end station, and the AYAM in the future would have to be extended east towards Magadan.



In 2014, there was a feeling that things could move forward; the first documents were even signed on the upcoming construction of a road bridge in the Yakutsk region. However, the construction of the bridge crossing was once again postponed, and the already allocated money was redirected to the construction of the Crimean Bridge, the construction of which was considered a priority by the leadership of the Russian Federation in the geopolitical conditions of those years.

In 2020, the Government of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) and Eighth Concession Company LLC (part of the VIS Group) managed to conclude a long-awaited concession agreement involving the design, construction and operation of a road bridge across the Lena. Let us add that the state corporation Rostec also took part in that agreement, having specifically entered into a consortium with the same VIS Group for this purpose. It was assumed that the construction of the new road connection would be completed by 2025. It was planned to raise about 30 billion rubles from extra-budgetary funds alone, and experts were going to announce the exact cost of constructing a new facility after the project had passed all the necessary examinations.

At that time, only survey work was being carried out; everyone interested in the implementation of this project actively interacted with each other, resolving issues related to financing and preparation for the state examination.

A classic plot twist for such large projects occurred already in 2023. In February, the head of Yakutia, Aisen Nikolaev, in his interview with Izvestia, said that the completion of the bridge should be expected no earlier than the end of 2027. It should also be noted that in the same conversation he noted that this scenario is optimistic. By the end of 2023, it became clear that you won’t be satisfied with optimism alone; this conclusion can be drawn from the fact that the Minister of Transport and Road Facilities of Yakutia, Vladimir Sivtsev, in an interview with FederalPress, announced a new completion date for work - 2028.

By that time, the cost of the new bridge structure had become known. Thus, according to design estimates, the construction of the bridge itself and the right-bank approach to it will cost 122 billion rubles. Considering the high cost of the facility, the head of Yakutia, Aisen Nikolaev, made a request to Vladimir Putin, offering to cover more than half of the cost of this project from federal sources (at least 65 billion rubles).

At the moment, Yakutsk continues to be the only large city in the Russian Federation that does not have a permanent road connection with further access to federal highways. In addition, the whole of Yakutia feels virtually torn in this regard, since during the period of autumn and spring ice drift there is no stable land connection between the western and eastern parts of the region. The new bridge will solve these problems by connecting three federal and five regional highways, a railway, a city airport and a river port.

If we consider in more detail the technical characteristics of the new structure, then it is worth paying attention to the fact that the length of the main part of the bridge will be 2,49 kilometers, and taking into account the access sections - 4,6 kilometers. The bridge itself will be a three-pylon cable-stayed system with girder trestles on the two-lane approaches.

The new bridge, according to both federal and regional authorities, will solve a whole range of socialeconomic problems that currently exist in the region. Thus, its appearance will entail a reduction in the cost of consumer goods and services in Yakutia. Annual expenses for all activities carried out within the framework of the Northern Delivery will also decrease. In addition, useful deposits located in the western part of the region will become much more attractive from an investment point of view.

In conclusion, I would like to add that the Lena Bridge construction project has a rather difficult fate, like most infrastructure projects of this scale in our country. The good news is that real preparatory work has already started, and Vladimir Putin clearly announced the completion date of construction - the end of 2028. I would like to believe that no further postponements will occur, and the new bridge will delight the residents of Yakutia.

Let us add that there is one funny situation associated with the postponement of the completion of the construction of the Lena Bridge. Back in 2019, in his interview with the Yakutsk Evening publication, the head of the region, Aisen Nikolaev, offered the interviewer a bet. His conditions were simple: if there is no new bridge crossing by the end of 2025, then the leader of Yakutia will have to eat his own tie. Of course, there is still more than a year before the end of the dispute, sometimes miracles happen, but it will be quite problematic to complete such a project three years ahead of schedule. It turns out that Aisen Nikolaev found himself in an extremely ridiculous situation; it would be interesting to know if he even remembers his promise? And will local journalists be allowed to remember this bet at the end of 2024?
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    April 20 2024 11: 35
    The bridge across the Lena near Yakutsk is in all respects more necessary than the bridge to Sakhalin. It is necessary to start building the bridge today, because this metal and other production will benefit the economy of the Russian Federation, not to mention the development of the entire region. For A. Nikolaev, the problem is not difficult to solve, make a tie from edible (rice straw or other sea kelp) and fulfill the promise.
  2. 0
    April 20 2024 14: 34
    They haven’t even started building the bridge yet, what kind of miracle can we talk about by the year 25?! The Yakut froze stupidity for reporting, so let him sort it out. Because he is so close, he will easily forget about his promise!
    But we won’t build such a colossus across the great Lena, not only by 28, but by 30. If they start building at all!
    This is not a politically and strategically important bridge, like the Crimean one, it can wait another 40 years!
    1. +3
      April 20 2024 15: 33
      There is a concept: military, political, economic, corruption and other interests of construction, including bridges. The Crimean Bridge is an example of military-political and economic interests, the Lena Bridge, as military-economic interests. The Sakhalin Bridge does not reach the political-economic significance. The main thing is to tie all construction according to the general Russian planned development of the state. Here is the construction of a separate high-speed railway Moscow-St. Petersburg, a vivid example of damaging, ostentatious and corrupt interests, copying other people's decisions that are not typical of today's Russian problems.
  3. -1
    April 20 2024 16: 19
    There is a lot to build. If I were to choose the importance of where to build first, I would choose Sakhalin, because here, in addition to economic issues, there are also political issues and Russia's defense.
    1. +1
      April 20 2024 16: 34
      Replica. Sakhalin seismicity is complicated, plus during the first military actions in the Pacific theater, this bridge will be destroyed, which will be facilitated primarily by the Japanese. Economic interests do not reach for the construction of such a bridge, with 500 thousand people on the island. There are more significant places for the first construction of large bridges.
      1. 0
        April 20 2024 17: 03
        Have you personally been to those places? Are you a specialist in bridge construction, seismology, hydrology? Seismic activity is determined by numbers, time, phases. The war you predict between Japan and Russia in the next 100 years is from the realm of fantasy. It is imperative to develop DV, because The main and first inhibitor to the development of DV is isolation from the center. The plane flies nonstop for 9 hours, the fast train from Vladivostok to Moscow takes 7 days, and you will travel by car for 2 weeks. Tickets are expensive and there is a shortage. I hope you can guess why people are leaving en masse from the Far East to the center. The territory east of Chita, along the meridian, is home to 5 million people. Look at the map for the size of this territory. Southern Sakhalin and Southern Primorye are good places to live; even watermelons grow there. Vladivostok is located at the latitude of Gelendzhik, near China, the DPRK, Korea, and Japan across the sea. All these countries treated the residents of the Far East well. It’s easier and cheaper to go to China than to fly to Moscow or the Black Sea. That's why I chose the bridge to Sakhalin, because I was everywhere there.
        1. +2
          April 20 2024 19: 30
          The bridge will not fix the situation, and the money is enormous. The bridge also requires hundreds of kilometers of new roads, which will be no less than the price of the bridge. It would be better to spend them on the island's infrastructure, it will be more effective. Residents already travel by plane because of the distances, create benefits for this money, etc. Real problems need to be solved, and one expensive bridge will become a monument to economic and social illiteracy.
  4. 0
    April 20 2024 19: 19
    Sitting on the Russian Plain it is easy to reason: Lena, Sakhalin... Isn’t it clear that Russia does not have the people to develop Siberia. Especially those romantics who will leave the well-developed Muscovy-Stavropol region and go “for the smell of the taiga.” Under the Tsar and Joseph Vissarionovich, a solution was found - exile, hard labor. Then, under socialism, they began to lure people with “long rubles.” Now there is none of this. So Mother Siberia will remain completely uncontaminated for another five hundred years. AND THIS IS GOOD!
    1. 0
      April 20 2024 19: 46
      What's stopping you, for the sake of knowledge, at least once in your life, from taking a vacation and flying to Vladivostok at the beginning of August. See the city. Fishing, underwater hunting, you will swim on the islands in clean sea water. In the area of ​​the Gamov Peninsula, visibility under water, in good weather, is about 30 meters. If Russia does not develop the Far East, then China will develop it and pollute it. Go and you will see everything with your own eyes.
  5. -1
    April 21 2024 09: 09
    Road bridge? Not railway? not combined?
    i.e. you can’t bring or take away much, you can’t supply equipment to factories, etc.
    People are unlikely to drive cars in large numbers. But PR during the opening, and the use of money... (The price of construction 20 years ago, combined with all entrances, was calculated at 15-16 billion rubles, 10 times less)
    I wonder if the route will be tolled? or will they optimize during construction and not?
    1. 0
      April 21 2024 09: 13
      Oh, excuse me, why put a railroad there if there are no more railroads in this place on the west coast?
      Why is it there, what is it connected to?
      So far they say that tolls will be established only for heavy trucks.
      1. -1
        April 21 2024 15: 17
        When I inquired, I looked through the information - the first project was with a railway.
        And somehow they didn’t think, “What is it there for, what is it connected to?”
        T.K. railway is the development of industry.
        And cars are essentially transporting goods to the population.

        And it seems like the railway to Yakutsk is on the other bank... and it has supposedly already passed the future bridge... (according to the news on the Internet), but...

        And the simultaneous construction of a railway and road bridge is clearly cheaper than 2 bridges separately.
        By the way, many people on the Internet are also perplexed...
        1. 0
          April 21 2024 20: 31
          I still don’t understand why there is a railway line to the left bank?
          On the right bank they are trying, yes, they plan to reach Magadan.
          If private investors are ready to build something on the left bank of the railway (from the fields to Yakutsk), then, yes.
          In the meantime, why, a bridge to nowhere?
          For the future?
          This one would be built, at least there is a demand for it, but for railway transport there is not yet the necessary freight traffic, much less passenger traffic.
          And people are always perplexed about what else to do on the Internet.
          1. 0
            April 22 2024 00: 27
            Then it’s logical... the raw materials go to Magadan.
            and let people drive cars to the other side, to the station for shopping.
            30 km is not a detour for a crazy car.
            We can say that you are right, you convinced me.

            Raw materials - to Magadan. Industry... screw it with industry...
            1. 0
              April 22 2024 10: 04
              With what industry?
              There the industry cat cried.
              1. 0
                April 22 2024 15: 18
                Exactly. To hell with it, with the industry, which the cat cried for.)))
                The logic is clear.
                1. 0
                  April 22 2024 15: 30
                  Exactly, otherwise your logic can go far. Start building railroads to villages in the north, where the local sawmill produces two planks a year.
                  Whether it is profitable or not, who cares.
                  Vorkuta alone is enough for us, let it remain a model of total economic illiteracy for which the “Union of Free Republics Collapsed” was so famous.
                  1. 0
                    April 22 2024 15: 39
                    And Vorkuta... the birthplace of Russian fear....)))
                    And everything is logical and cost-effective, I agree.
                    More money is needed for export logistics.
                    and for new industrialization... but where is it, industrialization?
                    so write correctly.

                    And the cost would have skyrocketed. It already took off once every 10, and from the railway it will be once every 20. No budget is enough for “optimization”
                    1. 0
                      April 22 2024 16: 44
                      New industrialization in Yakutia? In its western part? The old industrialization has not yet reached there.
                      And in general, we need to deal with digitalization, the service sector, and the quaternary sector of the economy, but we have industrialization on our minds.
                      1. 0
                        April 22 2024 17: 55
                        Yes. That's right. When you remember the wild number of hairdressers in Odessa under the Romanians in WWII (they wrote), you understand - without the service sector, digitalization, and the quaternary sphere - no way.)))
                        In any case, there is no choice.
                      2. 0
                        April 22 2024 21: 54
                        It’s true, no way.
                        You can live comfortably in your city without a polymer plant, but it’s unlikely without a grocery store, cinema and hairdresser.
                      3. 0
                        April 29 2024 20: 37
                        Right. Right.
                        There are several pharmacies and shops in the village...
                        And to work... the buses are packed to somewhere in the centers.
                        Well, no way without a bunch of pharmacies, no way....
    2. 0
      April 29 2024 16: 34
      Greetings from Yakutsk hi
      The railways have long been brought to Nizhny Bestyakh - this is a village opposite Yakutsk on the other bank of the Lena, there is a railway station there, there is no point in bringing a railway to Yakutsk, the industry in the city is only local. This bridge is needed not only by Yakutsk, to the north of it there is more than half of the Republic, and this is 20-25 Sakhalin Islands in area, in terms of population it is necessary to count, in terms of mineral resources, Yakutia easily outshines more than one Sakhalin, and the Sakhalin bridge is clearly many times more expensive.
      Something like this, in short
      1. 0
        16 May 2024 21: 40
        You are right, but after Lensky you need Sakhalin
  6. 0
    16 May 2024 21: 39
    The North Military District goes and all the funds go to it and Nikolaev is not to blame, let the tie be green, but the bridge to Sakhalin is needed just like the Lensky bridge.
  7. 0
    22 May 2024 10: 37
    There's no need for a railway bridge there! no cargo. It’s generally cheaper to move Yakutsk to the other side than to build a bridge