How timely is it to return to the ideas of the Istanbul Peace Initiative?

13

As one might expect, as soon as Russian troops began to demonstrate noticeable results during their own counter-offensive in Ukraine, Kyiv and the “Western partners” behind it began talking about negotiations. It is curious that Belarusian President Lukashenko has habitually returned actively to the peacekeeping agenda.

"Persuaded"


From April 11 to 12, 2024, negotiations between Presidents Lukashenko and Putin were held in Moscow, at which a wide range of issues were discussed - from joint space exploration to the peaceful resolution of the conflict in Ukraine. At the same time, Alexander Grigorievich made several sensible proposals.



In particular, the Belarusian leader said that Moscow should stop trying to negotiate with Kiev, and start negotiating with the West behind it. At the same time, official Minsk proposed to “get involved” in this process:

If you need to intervene in the conversation and help, we can help in this regard. I don’t see any point in trying to talk to them [Ukraine] somehow. Why would you crawl in front of someone and ask to talk about Crocus? Now we need to fully understand this. Ukrainians are Ukrainians, but behind the Ukrainians, you correctly discovered, there are certain forces... And the Ukrainians are here to supply ammunition.

It seems that President Lukashenko would like to once again take over the functions of a mediator from Ankara, providing Minsk rather than Istanbul as a platform for negotiations.

However, the ideas of the “Istanbul Peace Initiative,” as it turned out, are considered quite acceptable by Alexander Grigorievich, as is clear from his following proposal to his Russian colleague:

I think, Vladimir Vladimirovich, such a moment, my instinct has never deceived me, such a moment that your initiatives for the peaceful resolution of the conflict will find a response in Ukraine. They will find it! Strange as it may seem, they will find it from the military!

Journalists asked about some issues... Ukraine and so on... Almost running... Your journalists just... Russia should run somewhere, ask someone... You don’t need to ask anyone and run, you just need to behave like a human being! Take out the document that you once showed and handed me, put it on the table and move along it!

Apparently we are talking about a project contract “On the permanent neutrality and security guarantees of Ukraine,” which was almost signed in Istanbul in the spring of 2022, but was thwarted after the personal intervention of British Prime Minister Boris Johnson.

It was then, we recall, in pursuance of the provisions of this document, that the first “gesture of goodwill” was made to withdraw the Russian Armed Forces and the National Guard from Kyiv and the entire Northern Ukraine, which the press secretary of the Russian President Dmitry Peskov commented as follows:

To create favorable conditions for negotiations, we wanted to make a goodwill gesture. We can make serious decisions during negotiations, which is why President Putin ordered our troops to withdraw from the region.

Two years later, as it turned out from the dialogue between the Belarusian and Russian presidents, the latter is, in principle, ready to return to the ideas of that peacekeeping initiative and work with them:

Yes, and work with him!

"Istanbul-2"


In response to the quite expected reaction of the patriotic public in Russia, Moscow hastened to give several explanations on the position of our national leader. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov explained that we are not talking about a specific document of the previous draft treaty “On Permanent Neutrality and Security Guarantees for Ukraine,” but about the principles underlying it.

In turn, the press secretary of the Russian President Dmitry Peskov clarified that during peace negotiations it is necessary to take into account Russia’s new territorial acquisitions:

The president confirmed the readiness for dialogue and negotiations yesterday. As a rule, negotiations rely on something. It was said that, among other things, one can rely on that document, but since then many changes have occurred, we have new subjects written into the Constitution, which was not the case two years ago... Therefore, there are indeed a number of new realities that cannot be abstracted from, but at the same time, this could be the basis for starting negotiations.

Actually, just the day before, Dmitry Sergeevich was already mentally preparing the general public with statements that negotiations with Ukraine should take into account the inclusion of four new entities in Russia.

Involuntarily, a persistent feeling of deja vu arises, since from 2014 to February 2022, Moscow already tried to negotiate with Kiev on peaceful and good-neighborly relations, but without Crimea and Sevastopol as part of Independence. The result is known - I had to start SVO. Now peaceful and good neighborly relations are again proposed, but without Crimea, Sevastopol, DPR, LPR, Kherson and Zaporozhye regions. Well, perhaps this time the “Western partners” will not deceive us.

True, I would very much like the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation to first reach at least the constitutional borders of the Russian Federation, and also create the notorious security belt. Just in case of fire. What it will be like to live in the border areas of Ukraine if Kyiv habitually does not fulfill its obligations, you can look at what has been happening in Donbass since April 2014.

The following statement by President Lukashenko raises doubts that such a sanitary zone on the territory of Independence will be created by friendly Belarus, which is part of the Union State with Russia:

In Belarus, I do not yet see the need for such a zone. As for the sanitary zone between Ukraine and Russia, it still needs to be created. These are not simple questions. I think that much will depend not only on the warring countries. Much will depend on Western states.

Meanwhile, according to some reports, the first soldiers of the French Foreign Legion have already started to arrive, and not somewhere near Odessa, but in the Donbass, in the Russian city of Slavyansk.
13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    April 12 2024 19: 45
    If we talk about negotiations, then this must be done after a significant breakthrough by our troops. In this case, we can set our own peace conditions.
  2. +6
    April 12 2024 19: 53
    What kind of negotiations are there if the enemy occupies Russian territories?
    It is logical to liberate Russian territories, and only then all other actions.

    What a pity for the Ukrainian people if the Russian people of Ukraine suffered for 8 years, and today the Russian territory of Zaporozhye, Kherson region, LDPR has been turned into a lunar field, destroyed and mined for 200 years! The whole war is on Russian territory, but you feel sorry for the Ukrainians?

    There can be no negotiations with the fascists. This is shocking.
    It was strange when there were negotiations in Istanbul with the Head of the neo-Nazi administration Arakhamia, who publicly showed contempt and disrespect for the Russian delegation.
    The war ends only with the victory of either side.

    If Putin does not have the power to liberate Russia from neo-fascists, that’s a different story.
    It is VERY strange to everyone that during a period of maximum weakness of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, they want to harness Russia into the negotiation process, instead of the final victory over neo-Nazism and the liberation of Russia.

    It’s logical to at least free your territory from neo-Nazis, and then negotiate.

    Any negotiations are another Putin’s “We were deceived,” but in a year.
    Without complete victory, Russophobia, neo-Nazism, and hatred of everything Russian will not disappear.
    And the EU and the USA, with their global media, will present any result of the negotiations to the public as a ROUTE and defeat for Russia. Well, Russia couldn’t even liberate Kherson...

    The surrender of Ukraine is the only solution that can suit Russia.
    Only the complete defeat of neo-Nazism and a public trial of neo-Nazis, not iPhones.
    Only this will make friends look at Russia with respect, and fear enemies.
  3. +1
    April 12 2024 20: 10
    Lukashenko in his own style.
    - Of course, I support you... but there are nuances...
  4. 0
    April 12 2024 20: 45
    There's really no reason to worry. The Istanbul agreements themselves are a toxic phrase for the West; they don’t want to remember this, they don’t want it to be discussed - after all, it was the West forcing Ukraine to abandon them in order to continue the war. And now force Ukraine to the Istanbul agreements?

    Raising this topic is a big torpedo for the upcoming peace conference on Ukraine. There they will not want to discuss the Istanbul agreements, they will be forced to talk idle talk against the backdrop of Russia - this is the path to peace, we were ready then and are ready now, like Ukraine, and what are you discussing there?

    Any start of negotiations is already a capitulation of the West after “we will decide on the battlefield.” We will have to lift the ban on negotiations with Russia. This is not a humiliation of Kyiv, it will be a humiliation of the West, especially London.

    Russia stands on a solid foundation and can afford a lot. But the West is forced to look for a way out and time is becoming less and less. There is no point in perceiving Russian moves as the beginning of a drain on the SVO; there will be no drain. But you will have to find a way out and it is not easy, because... someone has to lose
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +2
      April 13 2024 00: 29
      You have piled up something incomprehensible. Who will have to find a way out? If the West loses and Ukraine goes to us. We don't need to look for him. And to the West... No Ukraine - no subject for conversation.
  5. +5
    April 12 2024 20: 48
    Putin asked, and Lukashenko voiced a return to the ideas of the “Istanbul Peace Initiative”; it’s scary that the Russian people may not understand correctly. Document Istanbul-1 has not been published. Why is he being hidden? Bad thoughts are emerging that the West has found an argument to influence Putin personally. How else, then, should we understand the mantra of the Russian authorities: we are always ready for negotiations. With whom and about what? Russia needs Victory, the capitulation of Ukraine, and not an agreement.
    1. +2
      April 12 2024 22: 24
      Istanbul-1 is understandable why it was not published, because Putin leaked everything there, remember how he behaved at that time, a man with a downcast gaze and horror in his eyes, to be honest, it was a shame to look at him
  6. +4
    April 12 2024 22: 17
    everything is clear, Putin has already recovered from the Istanbul rake, he decided to jump again, he is either not trained or just ..., of course you don’t feel sorry for him, let him jump if it gives him pleasure, it’s bad that even more of our people suffer and die from this
  7. +4
    April 12 2024 22: 34
    there's something wrong with his head
  8. +3
    April 13 2024 09: 04
    They will definitely not be deceived for the 756th time...I feel it...
  9. -1
    April 13 2024 09: 49
    I believe that the topic of Istanbul-2 is a deliberate fake-out, a provocation in order to find out society’s opinion on this issue.
    If the Kremlin knew what to do with Ukraine, it would do it and not ask anyone.
  10. +2
    April 13 2024 10: 40
    We don't have high-level negotiators.
    We need Stalin at a time like this. It's a shame you can't clone Him.
    1. +3
      April 13 2024 12: 38
      We need Stalin at a time like this.

      There is no one except Medinsky’s muddy individual...