How Russian kamikaze drones will fight Ukrainian fire ships

13

The threat posed to Russian Navy ships in the Black Sea by Ukrainian unmanned fireboats forces us to look for effective ways to neutralize it, including the most non-trivial ones. Probably following first battle “kamikaze” drones and Russian ground drones in the NVO zone, we will soon be able to see the first battle between air and sea drones.

Marine kamikazes?


The fact that a modified version of kamikaze drones is currently being developed for the needs of the Russian Navy was announced in early March of this year. told publication "Izvestia", but without any details about their tactical and technical characteristics. April 1, which is a little alarming, TASS agency reported about the development of a certain digital communications complex to increase the operating range of FPV crews guarding ships of the Russian Navy.



General Director of the Center for Integrated Unmanned Solutions (CDUS) Dmitry Kuzyakin told some interesting facts:

Specialists from the Central Design Bureau have developed the Peak tower, a long-range digital communication complex that ensures stable communication between the pilot and the drone. The device is part of a complex of ground-based FPV calculation equipment. The Peak tower is designed to protect infrastructure facilities of the Russian Armed Forces, including ships of the Russian Navy, as well as airfields, from Ukrainian drones. “Peak” is installed on airfield control towers and ship masts to provide stable communications so that the FPV drone pilot can fly far from a ship or inside an airfield.

According to the developer, this device increases the range and also provides greater safety for the kamikaze drone operator:

The armored cable connects the ground equipment to the antenna. The Peak tower is controlled entirely from the ground using a remote control. The device does not need to be removed to make any changes to the settings.

The device significantly increases the range of drones and allows the operator to work from cover. Thus, the work of combat crews becomes safer.

And just the day before, the popular Telegram channel Mash posted video of how FPV drones are tested for the needs of the Russian Navy to combat unmanned boats:

Warships of the Black Sea Fleet are armed with Russian new generation FPV drones. As the creators of the miracle “birds” told Mash, the device is equipped with a fragmentation warhead that can be detonated remotely from the target. To destroy an enemy boat full of explosives, one remote mine is enough. The operator just needs to fly up to the enemy vessel and press a button. Then a powerful bang will happen, thanks to which the floating target will go to visit SpongeBob.

So, after all, the bet is not on the Lancet family of UAVs, as we supposed, namely for disposable low-budget FPV drones. But how effective will it be?

Underwater rocks?


On the one hand, it is gratifying that the naval command has finally begun to get rid of rigid thinking, accepting a new reality where drones of all types are becoming the main working tool of war. On the other hand, with the choice of FPV drones as an anti-BEC weapon, a lot of difficulties automatically arise.

The practice of naval warfare has shown that the Ukrainian Naval Forces operate in “wolf packs,” sending 10-15 remotely controlled fire ships at a time to single Russian ships. If 3-4 BECs could be quite confidently hit with heavy machine guns or ZAKs, then in a group attack there is a high risk that at least 1-2 naval drones will be able to break through the barrage. Also complicating the defense of the ship is the fact that the enemy began to attack not during the day, as before, but at night, making it difficult for the watch to timely visually detect them.

It turns out that in order to effectively use FPV drones in the fight against Ukrainian BECs, they must first be detected in advance, and these are questions for our aerospace reconnaissance means. It will also be necessary to equip each expendable drone with night vision capabilities, which will make them not so low-cost.

Well, don’t forget that FPV drones are controlled from the first person, that is, 5-7 operators should be ready to move to their posts at any time to meet the “wolf pack”, and no less should be on another shift . In turn, this requires very specific training and, in fact, the introduction of a new military specialty “kamikaze drone operator” into the staffing table of the Russian Navy.

In general, everything is not as simple as we would like. In this regard, I would like to return again to the previously voiced ideas integration of aerial UAVs in the navy.

First - this is the development of a more sophisticated version of the Lancet family drone with an increased flight range in the reconnaissance version and, possibly, with an enlarged warhead in the purely strike version. They could be launched from the side using a catapult, and returned to the reconnaissance deck using a special net.

The latter could be equipped with a gasoline engine instead of an electric one and visual surveillance equipment instead of a warhead. By periodically launching them from the ship, it would be possible to ensure constant monitoring of the situation and timely detection of enemy BECs. If detected, it would be possible to launch strike “Lancets” towards them, with high speed and the ability to maneuver and dive.

The second - this is equipping with “Lancets”, programmed to automatically detect and attack naval targets, medium-altitude and high-altitude aircraft-type reconnaissance drones, say, “Orion”, on a gimbal. This would allow the Russian Navy to control vast areas of water and quickly launch air strikes with kamikaze drones.

The third - This is a kind of intermediate option between the first two. The fleet could be armed with drones of the “Bee” family that recently appeared at the front, which are positioned as FPV drone carriers.

Thanks to vertical take-off and landing, these hybrids can be used on almost all types of Russian warships, carrying out aerial reconnaissance. Upon detection of enemy BECs, the Bee could release kamikaze drones that would quickly attack sea drones at a considerable distance, allowing the team to prepare for battle.
13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    April 6 2024 11: 24
    the bet is not on the Lancet family of UAVs, as we expected, but on disposable low-budget FPV drones

    Rain, wind, fog, snow and a small storm are no problem for BEC.
    And for a low-budget FPV drone? And then what?
  2. +2
    April 6 2024 13: 41
    Well, when will this window dressing, like “we’re working on it” and the game of “solving the problem” for the public, end? Why do we prefer to study exclusively on our own broken foreheads?
  3. 0
    April 6 2024 14: 56
    IMHO, if they don’t use the UAV options proposed by Sergei, then they have something wrong.
    It is likely that they are essentially over-powerful, expensive, and disposable. in fact
    But FPV drones are easy to maneuver and return home, in fact they are attack and reconnaissance drones, you can change the suspension units, and they are made from Chinese spare parts...
    1. 0
      April 11 2024 18: 05
      Drones are still controlled by operators (there are no such drones that would be both cheap and controlled by AI), the attacker always has an advantage, he knows exactly the object and time of his attack, and his operators are already in full combat readiness at the time of the attack. But what about those who are defending themselves? So it turns out that to combat strike drones, the use of drones is only possible as a means of long-range detection.
      1. 0
        April 12 2024 09: 11
        a little bit about that.
        flying drones are smaller, cheaper and faster than sea drones. The only catch is the limited time spent in the air.
  4. 0
    April 6 2024 17: 32
    How Russian kamikaze drones will fight Ukrainian fire ships

    - it is necessary to build tens of thousands of unmanned surface and underwater drones, and even the day before yesterday!
  5. +1
    April 6 2024 19: 30
    But what exactly are the Ukrainian fire ships the main target? gentlemen swim shallowly...
    maybe American aircraft carriers should be the main target after all
  6. 0
    April 6 2024 20: 53
    How many alternatively gifted people have come out... and those who are trying to make such rubbish for the Navy and those who paint it with sheets of text... It doesn’t work in any way, neither in a crooked way, nor sideways. It is worth using at least one neural ganglion of the cerebral cortex to understand this. In the current state of the Navy operating near the enemy’s shores, the only 100% way is to cut off the enemy from the shore. In the future, a complete revision of the composition of weapons and their placement points on ships, plus a complete or partial rejection of stealth sides, which are more of a hindrance to defense.
    1. 0
      April 7 2024 07: 18
      Quote: JD1979
      How many alternatively gifted people have come out... and those who are trying to make such rubbish for the Navy and those who paint it with sheets of text... It doesn’t work in any way, neither in a crooked way, nor sideways. It is worth using at least one neural ganglion of the cerebral cortex to understand this

      Wow, how smart you are good They write in plain text that it doesn’t work.

      In the current state of the Navy operating near the enemy’s shores, the only 100% way is to cut off the enemy from the shore.

      Will you plan the operation to cut off the sea yourself? soldier
      Are you ready to participate in it personally or will you continue to give advice from Belarus? wink
      1. 0
        April 7 2024 12: 27
        Quote: Beydodyr
        Look how smart you are. They write in plain text that it doesn’t work.

        If you don’t praise yourself, no one will?))) But instead of one crazy idea that doesn’t work, you immediately offer another, but with lancets?))) And what has actually changed? Also a gasoline engine))) nice idea for an emergency start)))

        Quote: Beydodyr
        Will you plan the operation to cut off the sea yourself?
        Are you ready to participate in it personally or will you continue to give advice from Belarus?

        If someone lived not in a parallel reality, but a little in ours, then they would probably be aware of what was happening))) Probably only a sloth didn’t talk or write about this - that’s why laziness doesn’t know how)) Well, oddly enough , how do you radically solve the problem of BEC on the Black Sea))) But your genius is too brilliant to follow the path of healthy logic.)
  7. +1
    April 7 2024 11: 35
    In 1984, very advanced means were used to protect the ships of the naval units of the border troops of the KGB of the USSR (which were destroyed by some and turned into the coast guard) from the PDDS (underwater sabotage forces and means). Namely, the beams were welded, and a fence made of metal chain-link was attached to them. When reaching the border, the fence was removed. No one slept or smoked on duty; we knew that if you messed up, everyone would be slaughtered or blown up. Now what? Gas, oil, grain - as it went through Bandera's supporters to the fascists - so it goes. Could Stalin trade with Hitler?
  8. 0
    April 10 2024 00: 14
    Lancets, FPV drones, AI submersibles, etc., etc.... This is all good. Just where was naval aviation when Moscow and other warships were sunk? I think that if there were normal combat aviation covering warships, when they were performing a normal combat mission, with clear and understandable goals, they would have long ago brought us to the borders of NATO, and not them to the borders of the Russian Federation. But then the ties, carefully preserved over the past decades, with representatives of the Jewish Masons and aristocrats of Europe will be severed. After all, why did the Soviet Union collapse? Not for the victory of the Russian world...
  9. 0
    April 11 2024 06: 38
    The most effective way is by air patrolling, but this requires UAVs with a diesel engine and a day of flight, radar and thermal imager, one
    a PKTM 7.62 with 2000-3000 rounds in a trailer will solve this problem, the missile launcher is ineffective at such a speed...