How relevant and realistic is the colonization of the Moon for humanity?

30

Some readers seriously consider the cases of Americans on the Moon as the result of the implementation of some Hollywood project, and this is their right. Others suggest creating a separate “Science Fiction” section for the topic of prospects for the development of the space industry. And yet, I decided to write this material, based on an analysis of trends in the exploration of the Moon, placing it in this section. Because what is already being realized cannot be fantasy.

Why is the Moon needed?


Soon, humanity will need a reliable extraterrestrial base for multi-purpose space exploration, especially long-distance space exploration. It is well known that the absence of an atmosphere and weak gravity are favorable conditions for the assembly and launch of super-powerful spacecraft. In addition, the mentioned phenomenon will help create on the Moon ultra-strong structural materials that are unavailable under terrestrial conditions - composites of foamed metals. Technology transforms the molecular structure of the substance, which gives it additional beneficial properties.



It is planned to organize the necessary infrastructure on the natural satellite of the Earth, and on its reverse side, for obvious reasons, to place research laboratories with telescopes. There is also a plan to build enterprises for the extraction and processing of natural resources, in particular, water contained at the poles in dirty ice and regolith. It will also be needed to obtain breathing oxygen, as well as fuel hydrogen. In addition, the lunar soil contains relatively easily extractable helium-3, and the rocks contain rare earth metals and unique minerals.

But this is in the future, but for now scientists are more interested in the polar regions (especially the Shackleton crater at the South Pole). The plain on them is constantly illuminated by the Sun, so it is rational to place solar generators here. And at the bottom of the dark crater there are explored deposits of ice, protected from evaporation by the rocks of its walls. The temperature there does not rise above -173оC, so the crater is the best place to place the sensors of an infrared telescope. On Earth, due to specific conditions, they are installed high in the mountains, but even there the sensors do not achieve the effect of ideal sensitivity. On the moon they reach.

Everything is getting cheaper and cheaper...


Currently, putting a disposable spacecraft into orbit and returning home costs an average of $62 million. If you need to deliver a heavy load into near-Earth space with a super-powerful launch vehicle, it will cost $90-110 million. Although SpaceX is already starting to talk about $20 million, which is understandable, since the Falcon 9 upper stage is suitable for secondary use.

But a flight to the moon is much more expensive. NASA will allocate $2025 billion for the implementation of the Artemis megaproject by 95. And the estimate for the construction of a lunar base equipped with everything necessary corresponds to a number with ten zeros. For a week-long stay on the Moon, 4 astronauts will have to allocate $700 million.

The ambitious Artemis lunar exploration mission involves the use of modern technologies and structures such as cryogenic engines, laser communications, miniature nuclear reactors, latest generation solar panels, habitable modules, 3D printers for printing large objects, jetpacks, rovers.

Lunar miracle accessories


Engineers from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California tested 3 lunar rovers in the form of 4-wheeled platforms. These small rovers are powered by artificial intelligence. Each of them is powered by solar energy, and among the on-board equipment are two stereo cameras with image transmitters, and a location radar for creating a 3D map of the lunar route. The devices can exchange information and also send it to the base station in the lander.

Especially for the upcoming mission for NASA astronauts, the Texas company Axiom Space invented more advanced spacesuits of the AxEMU series. They are wear-resistant and at the same time elastic, and the style is stylish and even elegant. New space clothing protects against hard rays and temperature changes in the range -170 – 120оC, as well as from micrometeorites.

But that is not all. They are equipped with sensor instruments, avionics systems, video equipment, communications and life support equipment. These are multifunctional products with wide capabilities for various manipulations in space. Finally, astronauts will use special tools designed for work on the Moon.

You provide comfortable lunar housing!


The first architectural structures on the Earth's natural satellite are planned to be made similar to the cylindrical modules of the ISS. They were designed by ESA together with Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, famous for their specialists who invented the tallest building in the world - the Dubai skyscraper Burj Khalifa.

The creators settled on a vertical 3-story, 9-meter version. In the center of the structure there is a technological well for stairs. Each level is designed for 3 separate rooms. To protect against cosmic radiation, the housing will be covered with regolith.

3D printers will sculpt a building monolith from the same material. Commissioned by NASA, Florida-based Redwire has discovered a method for creating modified regolith for landing sites, roads, building foundations and other infrastructure.

First steps of colonization


There is not long to wait: Elon Musk, as we are convinced, is a very quick guy. In no more than 5 years, Falcon Heavy launch vehicles from SpaceX will rush the blocks of the Lunar Gateway station to the Moon. The habitable module is already being developed by Northrop Grumman Space Systems from the USA, the service unit is being created by ESA with the involvement of mainly Canadian and Japanese scientists.

Mounted in lunar orbit, the Lunar Gateway will receive future colonists transiting in the Orion spacecraft. Before landing on the moon, they will replenish supplies at the station, conduct experiments, rest, etc. Subsequently, a robotic space tug will dock with the Lunar Gateway, which will shuttle autonomously between the station and low-Earth orbit, delivering cargo containers.

By the way, there is an opinion that on the Moon, in the event of a possible catastrophe on a planetary scale, it is worth setting up a museum of earthly civilization. It is proposed to store historical archives with texts and images on electronic media.
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. -1
    31 March 2024 10: 33
    Why is the Moon needed?

    To film the second episode of the film "Challenge", and there is nothing more.
    1. +2
      31 March 2024 20: 27
      By the way, the film is beautiful and wonderfully made. What a feat they pulled off in space!
  3. +2
    31 March 2024 10: 40
    Man is not a survivor in space.
    1. 0
      31 March 2024 12: 55
      The human body is not suitable for moving in space. An interesting experience that has been recorded by historical science. A certain character claimed that he was not of this world. The earthly body was used, how consciousness moved has not yet been studied. smile wink

      PS Our Earth, together with people, is in space. We live here.
      1. +3
        31 March 2024 14: 04
        Everything protects us here - the atmosphere, gravity, ozonosphere, magnetic field, the Moon. There is none of this in space. In the future, people will master the Moon on a rotational basis, but one can only dream about deep space until they come up with zero-transportation.
        1. 0
          31 March 2024 14: 35
          I am for a different path of development. Life is the union of matter and consciousness. What if Christ told the truth, and he is from another world? smile
  4. +1
    31 March 2024 10: 53
    The more favorable underwater environment of the Earth’s oceans has not been inhabited, where there are quite a lot of fossils, so there is no point in inhabiting the Moon. The race for the prestige of states in the exploration of the Moon, where the benefits and returns are only negative, today is the same prestige and nothing more. It is urgent to protect against contamination of the Moon, especially by private companies, such protection should be adopted by laws at the global level. The exploration of the planets of the solar system does not make economic sense, except for cognitive ones, and the actions are adequate.. It would be more correct to direct efforts to protect the Earth from possible space disasters (asteroids and others), and through the common efforts of states to create centers and facilities, under the auspices of the UN or other organization .
    1. -1
      April 1 2024 12: 22
      Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
      The more favorable underwater environment of the Earth's oceans has not been inhabited

      Oddly enough, the depths of the ocean are more hostile than outer space.
      But even in this case, the issue of colonizing the same Moon on a permanent basis is quite controversial. The shift method is quite sufficient. At least for the foreseeable future.
      1. 0
        April 1 2024 17: 17
        Replica. Cosmic radioactivity will not allow us to remain for a long time without consequences. In particular, when flying on a passenger airliner. I looked at the household radioactivity meter, and when I saw the numbers of tens of milli-roentgens per hour at an altitude above 8 tm, the desire to fly often disappeared (the norm is at 20 micro-roentgens per hour). Regarding depths, bathyspheres and others are sufficient for work at any depth, but there is no need to live at depth.
        1. 0
          April 1 2024 21: 05
          Yeah, and you compare the working volume of the bathyscaphe/bathysphere and the working volume of the space station. The comparison will be far from being in favor of underwater vehicles. Even the lunar station will be orders of magnitude larger in terms of working volume, which will make it possible not only to work, but also to provide some comfort for the watch.
          Further, the danger of cosmic radiation in your amateur circles is somewhat exaggerated. Even the 20 microR/h you mentioned will allow you to gain an absolutely safe 1R in 50 thousand hours of flight on an airplane (I hope you can convert it into years yourself). So fly and don't worry.
          1. 0
            April 1 2024 21: 16
            Replica. Read carefully.:.20 microdistrict. hour - Normal terrestrial surface exposure. Without an atmosphere in space, it increases THOUSANDS of times and goes into several tens of milliroentgens per hour, and the closer to the sun, the more so. . You first understand the basics and only then fantasize.
            1. 0
              April 2 2024 17: 07
              I recommend that you do a little research on the issue. The normal background at the Earth's surface is 3...4 μR/hour. This is only 5...6 times lower than at an altitude of 10 km, where most passenger aircraft routes usually lie. And some of them fly lower.
              1. 0
                April 2 2024 19: 09
                YOU personally measured it, so I personally measured it, and I am responsible for all my words. (background on the surface in cities is 20 micron hours (urban background is added), in rural areas 15 micron hours) You should be more responsible about different sources, because a lot of things are littered and slandered, but you don’t have your own knowledge.
                1. 0
                  April 2 2024 21: 49
                  I know more about this issue than you do. If only because I passed the exam on weapons of mass destruction and protection against them. And I studied the question, unlike you, not on your Internet, but on university textbooks. And I know what I'm talking about. And in terms of numbers too. And I saw the dried loaf with my hands and felt it with my eyes. And I can calculate the consequences of any nuclear explosion under any initial conditions based on weather and terrain. And to this day I can conduct a lesson on this subject with virtually no preparation. I wish the same for you.
                  Z.Y. Yes, and you have obvious problems with spelling wassat
                  1. 0
                    April 3 2024 13: 12
                    You are all about the paper side, just like the practical side, have you ever held a dosimeter or something similar, as you often measured under different conditions... Because your statement about the background of 4 μg.h indicates complete nonsense and lack of awareness.
  5. -1
    31 March 2024 11: 03
    How relevant and realistic is the colonization of the Moon for humanity?

    - For what? There is nothing on the Moon that could be useful to humanity. When they invent a means that can move in space at least 5% of the speed of light, overcoming weightlessness in space, then man has no business in space.
    1. -1
      31 March 2024 13: 16
      The body is a spacesuit for the human soul. Then the soul will continue its journey. drinks
  6. WFP
    +1
    31 March 2024 11: 53
    Is this a mega-advertisement for the Artemis mega-project and other NASA projects?
  7. 0
    31 March 2024 16: 05
    The standard of living on Earth has fallen "below the plinth." Hence both migration and local conflicts. World governments need to think more about how to solve earthly problems, and not spend money on fantastic projects. Space is needed, first of all, for defense, and everything else is on a residual basis.
  8. 0
    31 March 2024 20: 25
    All these are projects that are unlikely to take place in the next 30-50 years, given the current state of the world and its development trends. If only a little bit comes true. It's insanely expensive and complicated, with no economic gain in the foreseeable future. Just the costs! But then there is the development of science and technology.
  9. +1
    31 March 2024 21: 11
    What to discuss?
    If Musk and K succeed, they will find something to do.
    As a testing ground and intermediate base for astronautics, there is probably no price.
    Prices at $700 million??? this is now when there is nothing. And when will it be...how much does it cost to stay in Antarctica?

    Another thing: they have Musk, the Chinese have a lot of starts, and we have Rolgozin with his son and friends...
    This is the main problem...
  10. 0
    31 March 2024 21: 30
    Moon for space exploration? Nonsense.. The Moon is the same gravitational trap as the Earth... No need for anything... And all the fairy tales about helium3 are for idiots, humanity doesn’t have such technologies, well, they got it and brought it, then what?.. except to gnaw.. Be aware that humanity is still underdeveloped for deep space.
  11. +1
    April 1 2024 08: 32
    Not very soon... And human colonization is not relevant, literally at all. Rather, mastering it with the help of automatic machines, robots, it is more reliable and less expensive, there is no need to create special conditions. And for a person it’s only possible to maintain a base for entertaining wealthy tourists.
    1. +1
      April 2 2024 00: 13
      Exactly! How recently a submersible with a multimillionaire was crushed!
      Fools - and stupid death!
  12. +1
    April 1 2024 12: 55
    God forbid there will be people on the Moon... This is such an infection that the lunar landscape will then be defended by all sorts of Greta Lunbergs. This infection is still missing from there...
  13. 0
    April 1 2024 12: 57
    It is better to unwind multi-purpose space exploration immediately from the metagalaxy, why waste time on trifles? - We go there to get there. The question is why? - It doesn’t roll because it’s necessary. Like with Ukraine. You understand the temperature in the crater - just what the doctor ordered. Any movements of the United States come down to one thing. - Forcing partners to pay for things they don’t need from America, and at a very high price. Russian threat, climate change, space exploration, aliens, zombies from biological laboratories, artificial intelligence, thermonuclear fusion. - All these are excellent large-scale reasons for withdrawing funds: the loading of the military-industrial complex, IT, scientific and manufacturing companies with the coordination of processes by Washington. The Washington Regional Committee will ruin any sensible idea so that your own mother won’t know. Americans are the bosses. This is not a curse, but their business model that justifies getting the lion's share, that's all. A peculiar syndrome picked up after the Second World War. Yes, he and his partners are quite capable of pulling all this off without paying any attention to the costs, promoting the existence of a tiny station in orbit of the Moon. Their scientific program is still just being formed; there is no point in discussing something that does not yet exist. It is better to be interested in the reasons for the practical absence of yours.
  14. +2
    April 2 2024 00: 10
    What kind of “moon”! We have no order on Earth!
  15. 0
    April 2 2024 17: 21
    While there are wars, and many countries are investing billions of dollars and resources in weapons, while we live in discord, we cannot see a base on the moon, we must completely forget about Mars, first we need to restore order here on earth, and then dream about deep space
  16. 0
    April 3 2024 15: 45
    Large-scale exploration of the Moon is only possible with the use of ring-shaped launch vehicle assemblies. They are the ones who are capable of lifting a supermassive load into space with the help of one stage, and the spent tanks collected in a ring are the enclosing structures of future lunar cities and factories. There is no other way, because the existing methods of launching payloads into lunar orbit will delay its development for decades. The patent lies under wraps in Roscosmos, first with Rogozin and now with Borisov. The patent was published in the register of inventions of the Russian Federation.
  17. 0
    April 16 2024 17: 58
    I have read all the opinions and it is interesting the variety of opinions there are; mine will make no difference.

    The Moon does not belong to us, it is a garrison of other races; we can send robots the same way a soccer ball can fall into the neighbor's soil without making him angry, but if we try to put our feet on the lunar soil it will be our graveyard; we have already been warned in previous missions and at that time the US had some chance of coming back alive; now we don't.