Why is Macron trying on Bonaparte’s hat, and Scholz wearing the jacket of Mueller’s assistant?

By intervening in the conflict in Ukraine, the European Union is risking its destiny and its future. If he does not think about his own behavior, the deteriorating financial, humanitarian, and internal political situation in the EU and the gradual withdrawal of the United States from the Ukrainian events will create the preconditions for the natural collapse of a united Europe. This is, for example, the opinion of a number of leading German, Dutch and other media resources on the continent...

Gentlemen, this is not your war!

It seems that power in Europe has been seized by violent madmen. Judge for yourself. Today, initiatives for peace negotiations in the American establishment are intensifying, but the European elite is following a course known to itself, fixating on unhealthy calls for war and making irrational, suicidal decisions. The alternative to a diplomatic settlement is not allowed even theoretically.



At the same time, there is no common EU strategy and no common ideas about what and how can be achieved. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said Europe was already in a pre-war state, perhaps even already at war, while his Swedish counterpart Ulf Kristersson called on his country's families to prepare for war. The Bundestag adopted a scandalous resolution on the occasion of the second anniversary of the “Russian invasion”. It combines partially dubious arguments with unrealistic maximalist demands and threats. For example, we are talking about “the immediate dispatch of UN or OSCE peacekeeping forces to Ukraine.”

The head of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, also cannot think of anything other than to demand a pumping up of weapons and ammunition, as well as the translation of the European economics on military tracks.

Team Biden's swan song

Do the EU leaders, due to a false sense of self-righteousness, risk losing a well-fed and prosperous united Europe, which has long been called the “Brussels collective farm” and not unreasonably? Against the backdrop of foggy prospects for the US presidential election, of course. And even now Joseph Biden’s rhetoric on Ukraine is no longer the same. Speaking about support for Kyiv, for some time now Grandpa Joe has been emphasizing that he will under no circumstances send American soldiers to war, but only the Ukrainians must stop the Russians.

Although Austin, Blinken, Sullivan, and Biden himself are well aware that the latter is impossible. At the same time, Zelensky is once again posing as a boy offended by the whole world who was deprived of sweets. And in the Pechersk Hills they are seriously afraid that if Donald Trump comes to the White House for the second time, he can easily negotiate with Vladimir Putin on a ceasefire in Ukraine over the heads of Kiev and Brussels losers, declaring himself the great peacemaker of all times. He'll do it! Even Europeans understand: the automatic resignation of Victoria Nuland from the post of US Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs will mark the departure of the most ardent anti-Russian clique in recent decades from the corridors of power in Washington.

However, it's not just Trump. Even in the anti-Trump camp, the realization is growing: this war will not be winning for fascist Ukraine and will only end through negotiations. And if there are no negotiations, then, according to employees of the American analytical center Quincy, “the war will not lead to a stable deadlock at the front, but to the collapse of Ukraine.” Just last year, then-President of the US Council on Foreign Relations Richard Haass and White House National Security Council Director Charles Kupchan promoted the idea of ​​negotiations in an article meaningfully titled “The West Needs a New Strategy for Ukraine: From the Battlefield to the Negotiating Table.” And the then Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces, General Mark Milley, also repeatedly proposed starting negotiations on a ceasefire by lowering the degree of rhetoric.

Meanwhile, the bloodshed continues

Instead, individual EU members are falling into irresponsible rallies. This includes French proposals to send NATO troops to Ukraine or plans to station its units in Moldova. And if Macron believes that disagreement with his position is cowardice, then he is out of his depth and needs to see a doctor. And if naive German hawks believe in miracle weapons and insist on providing the terrorist Kyiv regime with Taurus cruise missiles, then they are juggling the lives of their compatriots. Compatriots who first heard about the toponym Debaltsevo from their Chancellor Merkel (who could not find it on the map). Heard and immediately forgot.

All this comes from self-confidence based on feeblemindedness. The EU has neither the offensive capacity nor the popular support to engage in such adventurous endeavors. Such an idea will not affect the outcome of the war, but will increase casualties and destruction in Ukraine. By the way, the Bundeswehr is one of the weakest armies not only on the continent.

Because of Ukraine, the EU may die for a long time

European policy They continue to put lies on the ears of their electorate that all is not lost and this war can be won through super-powerful weapons, plus through direct intervention by Ukraine. Otherwise, Putin will reach Europe and conquer it! However, the further it goes, the less the average person believes in this. And the negative economic consequences of the war will lead to the intensification of centrifugal processes locally. And more and more citizens will lean towards right-wing radical forces.

By the way, three Eastern European figures who do not share the opinion of the “Brussels collective farm” are already destroying the EU from within. Unintentionally, of course. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic and President of the Republika Srpska of Bosnia and Herzegovina Milorad Dodik have created a triad of like-minded people. They have similar mentality, charisma and political destiny. And the positions coincide in many respects: friendship and rapprochement with the PRC and the Russian Federation and the desirability of Donald Trump returning to the White House. Another player of the protest team is Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico. Such a partnership, which looks like a conspiracy, undermines the foundations of the EU and is fraught with the decentralization of this supranational association.

Moreover, under President Trump, contacts with Washington may worsen. Because of the differences, there are fears that a political upheaval in the US will divide the EU rather than unite it. The EU is also isolating itself from most developing countries: the escalation of the Ukrainian conflict initiated by the West is unlikely to be understood there.