Paris can send up to 20 thousand military personnel with aviation and artillery to Ukraine

March 20 2024 87

The introduction of troops of the French Foreign Legion into Ukraine could interfere with a possible operation of units of Russia and Belarus to advance through the western Ukrainian regions into Transnistria.

Also alarming are the words of French Army Colonel Vincent Arbaretier on the LCI TV channel that the number of military personnel being transferred to Ukraine could reach 20 thousand people. It is expected that the group will deploy in the Odessa region, on the right bank of the Dnieper and along the border of Ukraine with Belarus.

Apparently, the deployed French formations will be reinforced by an anti-aircraft missile brigade based on 15-20 SAMP-T and VL-MICA air defense systems and three to four squadrons of Dassault Rafale multirole fighters, because such a group of troops cannot be present without air cover.

The day before, the head of the Investigative Committee, Sergei Naryshkin, said that the Russian Armed Forces during the special operation would have every right to strike at French troops stationed in Ukraine. According to the governor of the Kherson region, Vladimir Saldo, Russian units will consider the Foreign Legion as a priority target for attacks.

The transfer by France (and in the possible future by other Western countries) of regular military groups to help the Armed Forces of Ukraine will significantly aggravate the situation and bring it to a new level of escalation.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

prior

+2

20 March 2024 10: 08

20 thousand possible French "cargo 200" certainly will significantly aggravate the situation and bring it to a new level of escalation.
It is not even possible that Paris will repeat the fate of Hiroshima.
1. Alexey Lan
  
  -4
  
  20 March 2024 11: 04
  
  It is not even possible that Paris will repeat the fate of Hiroshima.
  
  This is probably an extreme case, but strikes with tactical nuclear weapons against the French in Ukraine are a priority and may well be the case. Maybe the charred corpses will bring Paris to its senses.
2. L_L
  
  +5
  
  21 March 2024 00: 09
  
  Do we really care?
  Come on French.
  The crests are still our own, but I don’t feel sorry for these at all.
3. Vladimir1155
  
  0
  
  21 March 2024 09: 17
  
  what Macron and his stupid general said is an unconstitutional seizure of power in France, Macron is now a dictator worse than Pinochet, with his statements Macron trampled all the laws and, first of all, the Constitution of France, put the people of France under nuclear attacks,
  Is there democracy in France or will Macron get away with it? preparing for France to go into a state of siege
  
  French constitution
  
  Article 35
  A declaration of war is authorized by Parliament.
  The Government informs Parliament of its decision to use
  armed forces abroad no later than three days after the start of
  actions. It clarifies the goals being pursued. For this information you can
  discussion will follow without any voting.
  
  17
  If the duration of the military intervention exceeds four months,
  The government is asking Parliament for permission to extend it. It
  may ask the National Assembly to make a final decision.
  If, after a period of 4 months, Parliament is not in session, it issues
  its decision after the opening of the next session.
  
  Article 36
  A state of siege is imposed by a decree adopted by the Council of Ministers.
  Its extension for a period exceeding 12 days may only be permitted
  Parliament.
  
  Article 50
  If the National Assembly passes a resolution of censure or if it
  will not approve the Government program or its general political statement
  nature, the Prime Minister must hand over to the President of the Republic a letter of resignation from the Government.
  
  Article 68-1
  Members of the Government bear criminal liability for actions
  committed by them in the performance of their duties and qualified for
  the moment of their commission as a crime or offense of average gravity.
4. L_L
  
  +1
  
  21 March 2024 18: 41
  
  Paris can send up to 20 thousand military personnel with aviation and artillery to Ukraine
  
  We hope.
  We believe.
  We are waiting.
goland72

0

20 March 2024 10: 30

Mercenaries “work” for money, they have no motivation. Consequently, for our guys, mercenaries from France will be ordinary targets, the same as mercenaries from Poland, Georgia and other extinct countries. The guys will handle it. I would like the media to show them more often with their hands raised and at the logging site in Yan Autonomous Okrug.
1. EVYN WIXH
  
  +13
  
  20 March 2024 10: 37
  
  The Foreign Legion are not mercenaries. French Army unit. This is a full-scale war of France on the territory and on the side of another state.
  1. goland72
    
    +2
    
    20 March 2024 10: 59
    
    Formally, according to the laws of France tailored for them, they are not considered mercenaries. But in terms of who gets there, how they get there, and what they do there, from the point of view of a warrior’s honor, this is even worse than simple mercenaries. Even when concluding an agreement with the legion, their first name, last name, place and date of birth are changed. And only after 6 months of service the “person” has the right to restore his real name if he survives. What kind of soldiers are these for their country?
  2. Vladimir Tuzakov
    
    +6
    
    20 March 2024 11: 00
    
    This is not Africa, France, if they start transferring troops to Ukraine, it will be more than 20 tons, because such a quantity does not create a strategic advantage, and can be crushed in a matter of weeks, without sparing Daggers and other large aviation “thermobars”. France has no prospects of getting involved in a war alone, since defeat is more guaranteed. So they will push for joint action, but the United States will not agree, because the PRC, as a more serious problem, is looming. This means that E. Macron’s whole idea is like empty puffing out of one’s cheeks, and nothing more.
2. Watching
  
  0
  
  21 March 2024 23: 29
  
  We are not talking about mercenaries here, but about regular units.
  1. Michael_2
    
    0
    
    22 March 2024 18: 48
    
    The regular units will be impoverished, and the war will come to French territory.
bug120560

+9

20 March 2024 10: 54

Such statements should be made not by the Head of the Foreign Intelligence Service, but by the President of the country, the Minister of Defense and the Head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. And statements must be official and unambiguous - the appearance of foreign troops on the territory of Ukraine will be regarded as a declaration of war on us by those countries whose troops will be brought into the territory of Ukraine, creating a direct threat to the integrity and very existence of the Russian Federation. And remind the gentlemen in what cases, according to its nuclear doctrine, the Russian Federation can preventively use nuclear weapons. And our sworn “friends” must understand that Russia today no longer cares how they evaluate our position (whether it corresponds or not to some international standards), the main thing is how we evaluate their actions.
1. Olive
  
  0
  
  20 March 2024 12: 47
  
  You say everything correctly. Only up there they don’t think quite like that
  1. goncharov.62
    
    0
    
    21 March 2024 20: 42
    
    They don't think so at all. Trade in resources with France is in full swing, and you are here with “your nonsense.” I think I myself can’t decide to give the order to wash these... partners in the toilet.
2. Dima
  
  +2
  
  20 March 2024 22: 21
  
  The words of the head of state are worth more than the heads of intelligence. If Putin said something like that, it would cut off his freedom of maneuver.
3. TATARENKO64
  
  0
  
  21 March 2024 09: 56
  
  this is not our territory yet
  1. goncharov.62
    
    +1
    
    21 March 2024 20: 43
    
    There was no point in grinning then...
Emil

+2

20 March 2024 11: 11

I wonder “under what sauce” they will be sent there by order... in France there is already a scandal upon a scandal because of supposed volunteers...
Olive

+1

20 March 2024 12: 46

Why not 200 thousand? Write more, why feel sorry for them, the French?
Insolent in a jacket

+9

20 March 2024 13: 26

...They held out the rubber until the possible entry of French troops...
But - against the backdrop of the possible deployment of this contingent (More precisely, already under its cover.) the Poles will begin to behave an order of magnitude more impudently!.. (And then the Romanians will catch up.)
1. sannyhome
  
  -4
  
  21 March 2024 08: 09
  
  ...They held out the rubber until the possible entry of French troops...
  
  No, from the point of view of the Ministry of Defense everything is fine. They would have had to fight anyway, but now their logistics arm will be so long, the costs of delivering consumables are enormous.
2. goncharov.62
  
  +1
  
  21 March 2024 20: 44
  
  The “brotherly people” were looking for everything. But after that “we were ammanuled.” Byaki, what to take from them...
Vox Populi

-3

20 March 2024 17: 38

RBC, March 19, 20:42

Statements by the head of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service, Sergei Naryshkin, about France’s preparation of a military contingent to be sent to Ukraine do not correspond to reality, the French Ministry of Defense said in X.

“The data […] is another example of Russia’s systematic use of mass disinformation. We call for maximum vigilance,” the message said.
1. isofat
  
  0
  
  21 March 2024 09: 37
  
  According to Le Monde, French authorities have been studying the possibility of sending military personnel to Odessa since last summer. “In any case, I will have to send some guys to Odessa in the coming year,” Macron said in late February, sources told the publication.
  
  This is the end of what you quoted.
KLNM

+9

20 March 2024 18: 17

Regarding the introduction of troops of any country into Ukraine, Putin once promised at the beginning of the Northern Military District that there would be tragic consequences, the likes of which this country has never known in its history, or something like that, so let’s see what he meant.. I think that, as always, we will swallow it, dry it off and grind NATO mincemeat for years with great casualties and destruction..., I think after France Poland will catch up, and then the rest... The United States, as always, will appear at the very end, provided if NATO wins 100%, otherwise it will only help NATO in debt...
1. The comment was deleted.
Kiril

0

20 March 2024 18: 29

Well, if there are extra ones, send them
Fizik13

+3

20 March 2024 19: 57

Apparently, the deployed French formations will be reinforced by ..... and three to four squadrons of Dassault Rafale multi-role fighters,.... .

The question is, where will they be based, how will they be serviced?
Won't the base airfields, Moldavian, Romanian, Polish.... become a legitimate target for our missiles?
1. trampoline instructor
  
  0
  
  20 March 2024 22: 18
  
  In Moldova there was a military airfield in Marculesti, but now it is being converted into a civilian one, so we cannot talk about any of our missiles for lack of targets for attack on the territory of Moldova.
  1. isofat
    
    -1
    
    21 March 2024 09: 51
    
    Decision centers can look like they won't be shot at. Let the experts decide where to send our missiles. And whether you need to do it or not.
trampoline instructor

+3

20 March 2024 22: 10

may interfere with a possible operation of Russian and Belarusian units to advance through Western Ukrainian regions into Transnistria.

It’s hard to come up with a more stupid phrase than this. From Western Ukrainian Lutsk to Transnistrian Rybnitsa, the distance is about 600 km. If you can’t wait to get to Transnistria (or to Cahul?), then the route through Nikolaev-Odessa seems to me optimal: then at least along the way Ukraine will be left without a sea. Why Westernism is needed, only the author of this pearl knows.
1. k7k8
  
  0
  
  21 March 2024 09: 08
  
  Quote: Trampoline area instructor
  Why Westernism is needed, only the author of this pearl knows
  
  The author of this gem is an adherent of the idea of Belarus’ participation in this conflict (and judging by the style, the author of the untitled opus is Sergei Marzhetsky)
2. isofat
  
  -2
  
  21 March 2024 14: 50
  
  It's hard to say which of you is dumber. Or smarter, otherwise they’ll erase it again.
strange guest

0

20 March 2024 22: 28

Doesn’t Zelensky have the right to ask for help from France, like Assad from Russia? From a legal and legal point of view? Or is this prohibited by international law? Can anyone seriously answer this question? After all, if this is his LEGAL request, then the same French will not violate anything? Or is something wrong?
1. k7k8
  
  0
  
  21 March 2024 09: 09
  
  Quote: Strange guest
  Can anyone seriously answer this question?
  
  You do not understand. This is different
  1. strange guest
    
    +1
    
    21 March 2024 09: 31
    
    Thanks, ok in general - everything is as usual.
    1. isofat
      
      0
      
      21 March 2024 15: 15
      
      In fact, Russia has been calling for an end to the civil war for a very long time, eight years. And Comrade Zelensky as well. Russia has recognized one of the parties to the collapsed state and is conducting a special operation. An operation against the forces that started the civil war.
      
      Perhaps France should also formulate its presence in Ukraine. By the way, there are other characters acting there.
      
      Now to answer your question, the French need, first of all, to convince their population that they are needed there.
      1. strange guest
        
        0
        
        21 March 2024 15: 37
        
        I understand it. Simply - by analogy with Syria (there is also essentially a civil war there and Syria has not declared war on anyone) - what is legal? Does the legal authority have the right to turn to another state for help? Again, to Syria - not everyone recognizes Assad as the legitimate President... Is there no internationally recognized law at all in such cases? Who wants what and how his capabilities allow? "According to the rules"? Which Russia itself criticizes? Double standards? Or how? Purely from the point of view of international law? Or does it simply not exist as such?
        
        isofat
        
        0
        
        21 March 2024 15: 45
        
        An analogy is not proof; it is needed to explain your thought to another person, i.e. helps to understand the idea.
        PS By pretending to be a fool, you litter the site with verbal garbage.
        
        strange guest
        
        +1
        
        21 March 2024 15: 48
        
        Apparently, I failed to convey the essence of the issue to you.
        
        isofat
        
        0
        
        21 March 2024 15: 56
        
        And I understood you perfectly, you are trying to justify your atrocities.
        
        strange guest
        
        +1
        
        21 March 2024 16: 32
        
        In no case. Peace to the world! We had a lot of such slogans in Leningrad - I grew up with them.
        
        isofat
        
        -1
        
        21 March 2024 18: 18
        
        I checked, now I really can’t see what was written before.
        
        Michael_2
        
        0
        
        22 March 2024 18: 51
        
        You do not understand anything. Daesh and Russia are different magnitudes. You can fight with the Barmaleys and the Wagners. And with a nuclear power there is a risk of getting burned. Therefore, the option with Syria will not work here.
        
        isofat
        
        0
        
        27 March 2024 11: 29
        
        Comrade Zionists should not drag Syria in, but should leave the occupied territory. A SVO is being carried out with fellow Zionists in Ukraine, Bandera and Vlasovites. Shusher will not be recognized or declared war. Even if other Jews suddenly appear who love the Nazis.
      2. k7k8
        
        +1
        
        21 March 2024 17: 41
        
        Quote: isofat
        The French need, first of all, to convince their population that they are needed there
        
        Were you convinced when Russia sent its military personnel to Syria? And they even asked you personally? The same questions arise in relation to Ukraine.
        The only thing you accidentally turned out to be right about is that the country must be ready to provide military assistance to another state. The ideological pumping of the population is no less important than military-industrial potential and military power. This point was not fulfilled either in Syria or in Ukraine. Therefore, the issue of pumping up the population was resolved in Napoleonic fashion, as the play progressed. In the end, we have what we have.
        
        Michael_2
        
        +1
        
        22 March 2024 18: 53
        
        Um, barmalei and a nuclear power - don’t you think they are too different values? Barmalei will not launch hundreds of missiles and tactics on your territory. The level of risks is different, comprende?
        
        k7k8
        
        -1
        
        22 March 2024 19: 22
        
        Quote: Michael_2
        tact
        
        I don't communicate with schoolchildren. Adios
        
        Michael_2
        
        +1
        
        23 March 2024 03: 49
        
        Well, okay. He blended in like a schoolboy.
        
        isofat
        
        0
        
        27 March 2024 11: 49
        
        k7k8Get out of Syria, we are protecting our Syrian comrades. Get out of Palestine. There will be a Palestinian state.
        
        Get out of the land of Ukraine, the Soviet Union did not leave you this land without a Russian population, especially without the Russian language.
        
        isofat
        
        0
        
        27 March 2024 13: 50
        
        The authorities know our opinion. I wrote so that the French would also know the opinion of their people. If necessary, we convinced. But they didn't deceive me.
      3. Alexander Raikov
        
        0
        
        27 March 2024 00: 25
        
        In fact, Russia has been calling for an end to the civil war for a very long time, eight years.
        
        Well, we missed the golden chance in 2014-15. will solve the issue with the former Ukrainian SSR, and now it’s going nowhere...How many years will it take the RF Armed Forces to reach Kyiv and Odessa? Everyone understands that there is no way to speed up things with this small army on the LBS... and even then you need to give a command... so you just need to at least double, and not unnecessarily triple the army units, although until the beginning of autumn and then everything will somehow come together in their places!
2. Vladimir1155
  
  -2
  
  21 March 2024 11: 44
  
  you are strange, he can ask for something, and even France has the right to send its troops somewhere, although they will be destroyed, France has the right to send them in, and Russia has the right to destroy them, Russia brought a limited contingent of specialists into Syria, this is legal, because Russia is a great power , everything that Russia does is always legal by definition, for example, if it is necessary to push back the border in the Baltic states, as they once did in Finland, the Russian Federation is one of the three most powerful powers, and France, by the way, is not included in the list of great powers, its soldiers can be destroyed, we warn you, don't blame me later
  1. strange guest
    
    -1
    
    21 March 2024 11: 57
    
    So there is no law? I understand correctly? Only great powers can illegally send in troops? That is, you think that the United States legally sent troops to Iraq and Afghanistan? And in the same way they can legally introduce them into Ukraine? But France and others cannot, just because they are not great powers? Did I understand your logic correctly? I just want to figure it out) Here is our base in Tartus - is it legal? And if the States are in Odessa, is that also legal?
    1. isofat
      
      0
      
      21 March 2024 15: 35
      
      To defenders of justice and goodness throughout the world. Get out of Palestine.
      1. strange guest
        
        +2
        
        21 March 2024 15: 43
        
        This is understandable) about Palestine) but this, sorry, is not an answer to the essence of the question and if you have nothing to say, then just exchange barbs I always don't mind trolling everyone. And those who provide assistance to Palestine? Are they doing this legally?
        
        isofat
        
        -1
        
        21 March 2024 18: 55
        
        Your comments are also not worthy of an answer.
      2. k7k8
        
        0
        
        21 March 2024 17: 47
        
        Why the fright? Remind me who carried out the first terrorist strike? Who took a bunch of hostages? Israelis? Or are they Palestinians? Yes, Tel Aviv sometimes uses force inadequately, but it now has one task - to defeat the enemy (note, not the enemy). And they will then look into the validity or otherwise of the suppression methods used. Or maybe they won't. This is the winner's right. You are calling for an “idrenbaton” in Ukraine. But this is different? Or is it not?
        
        isofat
        
        0
        
        21 March 2024 18: 38
        
        Colonists arrived in Palestine at the beginning of the twentieth century. There were two major clashes with the Palestinians, who did not want colonists in their homeland. The British had a mandate to rule Palestine.
        After the end of the mandate, the Zionists with the “revived” Hebrew remained there, who announced the creation of Israel in 1948. Then everything is simple, they anger the Palestinians and, defending themselves from them, take away their territory.
        
        The Zionists had armed forces before the announcement of Israel. The Zionist brigade was trained while fighting the Nazis in Italy for about a year. The British gathered them, armed them and sent them to fight.
        
        The Palestinians today have nothing but their homeland, which they defend. They protect from Zionism, which was sown by the British, not from the Jews.
        
        k7k8
        
        0
        
        21 March 2024 18: 55
        
        Quote: isofat
        Palestinians still have nothing today.
        
        That's it. The natives (conventional) have nothing. And it wouldn’t have happened if it weren’t for the Nabredni, who brought with them and built everything in the desert. We need to learn from them how to treat our country, and not try to rob. And the locals again had nothing, and still don’t have anything. Well, who is the evil Pinocchio to whom?
        
        isofat
        
        0
        
        21 March 2024 18: 57
        
        Get out of there and don’t make excuses that you’re doing good.
        ...and you will answer for Ukraine, builders of a good life. Zionism and Nazism are related.
        
        k7k8
        
        0
        
        21 March 2024 19: 30
        
        And I’m not making excuses. I don’t have the right to do this, because... not a Jew and not a Zionist. And he paid his debt to his homeland in full, just like the one whom you pour slop on. Therefore, unlike you, I have every right to my point of view.
        
        isofat
        
        0
        
        21 March 2024 19: 40
        
        I'm also glad that I helped you understand the rights that you have. How beautifully you speak about your homeland and about your duty to your homeland, but my life experience does not believe you. Sorry.
        
        There is a shortage of slop today, the administrator takes it away. Otherwise I would have watered it, of course.
        
        k7k8
        
        +2
        
        21 March 2024 22: 06
        
        Quote: isofat
        my life experience doesn't believe you
        
        This resource has nothing to do with matters of faith. You, sir, need to go to church. Well, or to the synagogue. Don't believe me? Your business. No one here has to prove anything to you. And if you are interested, you can read my previous posts. They are not closed to anyone. And, as MY extensive life and army experience (22-odd years) shows, the most militant militants in the army are privateers, cooks and swineherds.
        By the way, about slops. I don’t pour them on you not out of fear of a ban, but out of principle. I think this should not be allowed under any circumstances in relation to anyone. And they banned me more than once for completely different reasons.
        Good luck.
        
        isofat
        
        -1
        
        22 March 2024 00: 09
        
        Your life experience can show me absolutely nothing. And when they say that they don’t believe you, it’s not a question of faith. Unless, of course, you consider yourself a divine person.
        Tired of it.
        
        k7k8
        
        +1
        
        22 March 2024 07: 07
        
        Quote: isofat
        Your life experience can show me absolutely nothing
        
        Naturally. Mine is not about you. I don’t have my own. That's how you live. Based on the Winnie the Pooh principle.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        isofat
        
        -1
        
        22 March 2024 15: 03
        
        My comment, in which I gave you the attention you deserve, has been deleted.
        Don't be offended, this is not my decision. I like that we now have something to talk about.
        
        k7k8
        
        +1
        
        22 March 2024 18: 29
        
        Quote: isofat
        I like that now we have something to talk about
        
        Don't flatter yourself. You and I have nothing to talk about.
        
        isofat
        
        -1
        
        22 March 2024 20: 09
        
        Zelensky is also stupid, he forbade himself negotiations.
    2. k7k8
      
      +1
      
      21 March 2024 18: 01
      
      Quote: Strange guest
      So there is no law?
      
      You are wrong again. There is a law. This is the "law of the jungle". And judging by the local controversy, he has quite a lot of supporters
      1. strange guest
        
        +1
        
        21 March 2024 18: 41
        
        It's a double-edged sword
      2. isofat
        
        -1
        
        21 March 2024 18: 44
        
        Two of the caskets are playing with one hand and distorting reality. Zionists are not Jews.
    3. Vladimir1155
      
      0
      
      21 March 2024 19: 02
      
      the NATO base in Odessa is illegal, for example, we destroyed the NATO base in Ochakov within a day and no one even blathered, the Russian base in Syria is legal, because it is a Russian base established at the invitation of Syria,
      1. isofat
        
        0
        
        21 March 2024 19: 11
        
        Today the United States wants and cannot restore its independence, but you are talking about the law and NATO.
      2. k7k8
        
        +1
        
        21 March 2024 19: 33
        
        Base? NATO?? In Odessa??? Under the agreement between NATO and Ukraine? Did I miss something?
    4. Michael_2
      
      0
      
      22 March 2024 18: 54
      
      They can. Because they are strong.
      There will be no states in Odessa. The US needs Shanghai. And Shanghai is 100 times cooler than Odessa.
Disinfo

+2

20 March 2024 23: 32

If that is the case, its is an act of war and the Russian subs need to hunt down and destroy the French Navy, wherever they can find them.
dubas

0

21 March 2024 00: 54

Quote: Insolent in a Jacket
...They held out the rubber until the possible entry of French troops...
But - against the backdrop of the possible deployment of this contingent (More precisely, already under its cover.) the Poles will begin to behave an order of magnitude more impudently!.. (And then the Romanians will catch up.)

There are enough FABs for everyone
Flight

-1

21 March 2024 02: 30

Makrosha decided to calm down the Parisian vandals with a lightning-fast walk through the steppes of Ukraine, having agreed on this, of course.
yo yo

0

21 March 2024 06: 49

If any country sends in its troops, as the Russian President said, they will remain there.
Muscool

+4

21 March 2024 08: 15

Quote: sannyhome
...They held out the rubber until the possible entry of French troops...

No, from the point of view of the Ministry of Defense everything is fine. They would have had to fight anyway, but now their logistics arm will be so long, the costs of delivering consumables are enormous.

The stupidest prank. What is the delivery, what are the costs, what are you talking about? They have been supplying ukrov for more than 2 years and have not gone bankrupt. The entry of NATO troops is bad, very bad. We have already fought to the point that we are fighting off Ukrainians on our territory, despite the fact that the Ukrainians receive weapons in homeopathic quantities and not the entire range, compared to what NATO has in its reserves.
1. Michael_2
  
  -2
  
  22 March 2024 18: 59
  
  Stupid alarmism. Nata is USA. Without the States, there is no Nata. As for our territory, half of the Zaporozhye, Kherson and Donetsk regions are under crests. And we have been fighting on our territory since ’22. If you've been sleeping all this time, I sympathize with you.
Vladimir1155

-2

21 March 2024 09: 08

I think Russia will have to deliver a demonstrative knockout blow to Lvov with nuclear weapons, then the fervor of all sorts of macronoms will calm down for a long time
vbgfv

+2

21 March 2024 12: 25

Until all the dams on the Dnieper are blown up and lowered and the land dries out, there is no point in moving to the right bank!!! Because of this, they left Kherson.
Siegfried

-1

22 March 2024 08: 35

strangely, the West thinks that Russia will be ready to negotiate, having a choice of either this or the entry of NATO forces. It seems they don’t even suspect that the entry of NATO could be an ideal scenario for overthrowing the current Western political elites. Not only a complete change of elites, but a complete reformatting of the West in an accelerated manner without war.
Earl

-1

22 March 2024 11: 23

Paris can send up to 20 thousand military personnel with aviation and artillery to Ukraine

but will everyone, as one, turn out to be cooks and drivers? Or, as is customary among the inhabitants of the “garden,” by journalists and volunteers?
Vadim Fedotov

0

23 March 2024 17: 13

First, we need to stop selling LNG gas to France and return Peskov’s daughter to Russia from her studies...
The comment was deleted.
Dust

0

24 March 2024 04: 28

The French will send troops into Ukraine if they know for sure that Russia will not attack them. And to know this, you need a behind-the-scenes agreement or an informant in the Kremlin under Putin who will leak the necessary information.