Russian S-500 Prometheus air defense system shot down a ballistic missile with a hypersonic unit

31

At the end of last month, an extremely significant event took place for our military industry, in fact, as for all of Russia as a whole. The newest S-500 Prometheus air defense system successfully hit a hypersonic target during recent tests.

It is immediately worth noting here that this capability of the S-500, like the S-400, was confirmed earlier. However, in this case we are talking about a special target - an intercontinental ballistic missile.



Thus, on February 22, the strategic submarine cruiser Tula launched the R-29RMU2 Sineva intercontinental ballistic missile with a hypersonic unit at the Chizha training ground in the Arkhangelsk region. It would seem, at first glance, an ordinary event. If not for one “but”. It was this missile that was hit by the S-500 complex as part of the tests.

Consequently, we can now say with confidence that Russia is significantly superior to its geopolitical opponents not only in the development of hypersonic weapons, but also in the creation of means of protection against this type of weapons. It turns out that even if the West ever manages to reduce the gap in this industry, this fact will not pose a threat to us.

In turn, it is worth adding that the Russian S-500 Prometheus air defense system can “boast” not only of its ability to intercept intercontinental hypersonic missiles. It was previously stated that the complex is capable of destroying space targets in low Earth orbit.

Given that all agreements not to place weapons, including nuclear weapons, in space will likely cease to exist soon, the above-mentioned opportunity will give Russia a huge advantage.

At the moment, the S-500 air defense system is already in mass production. It was even reported that deliveries of the complex to the troops had begun. Meanwhile, there is no exact information on this matter, since most information about Prometheus still remains classified.

31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    8 March 2024 09: 34
    We are preparing for a big war (God forbid)...
  2. +4
    8 March 2024 09: 48
    Modern world war is the path to the destruction of humanity.
  3. +4
    8 March 2024 09: 55
    What a Russian sees: Hurray! There is no need to be afraid of American missiles; the Russian Prometheus air defense system is capable of shooting down ballistic missiles!
    What an American sees: Hurray! There is no need to be afraid of Russian nuclear weapons; modern Russian missiles can be shot down!
    1. +4
      8 March 2024 10: 21
      Quote from Perun61
      What a Russian sees: Hurray! There is no need to be afraid of American missiles; the Russian Prometheus air defense system is capable of shooting down ballistic missiles!
      What an American sees: Hurray! There is no need to be afraid of Russian nuclear weapons; modern Russian missiles can be shot down!

      In principle, yes. Only Western air defense systems have not shot down a single hypermissile yet. The question is how many S-500 systems are needed to cover the entire territory.
      1. +1
        8 March 2024 19: 36
        Easy to calculate. Divide the number of intercontinental carriers by 0.9. Quite an achievable goal.
      2. +2
        8 March 2024 20: 17
        Approximately 6000 warheads. Approximately 7000 S-500 interceptor missiles. Taking into account false targets - about 15000. If you look at things realistically.
        1. +5
          9 March 2024 06: 57
          Approximately 6000 warheads. Approximately 7000 S-500 interceptor missiles. Taking into account false targets - about 15000. If you look at things realistically.

          They will create a local umbrella around the capital. Voronezh and the rest of the Russian Federation are an unaffordable luxury for those in power.
        2. 0
          10 March 2024 18: 06
          Quote: Strange guest
          Approximately 6000 warheads. Approximately 7000 S-500 interceptor missiles

          You don’t count anti-missile missiles, but complexes on duty. For example, one complex can launch 12 missiles with 12 launchers at a time. At the same time, 1 missiles are assigned to 2 target. I’m not talking about reloading, no one will wait for it. It turns out that we need to deploy 500 throughout the country -1000 pu. At the same time, no one canceled other air defense systems that are necessary to combat aviation and cruise missiles. In addition, some of the systems will inevitably be knocked out before a global strike
    2. 0
      8 March 2024 15: 37
      Of course, like in any war....but oooh, Russian weapons are wonderful weapons and military operations in Ukraine and Israel showed that Western bullshit....
    3. +1
      9 March 2024 09: 09
      Interesting American, but how (as he sees it) will disrupt the tone, what “can be disrupted”?
  4. +2
    8 March 2024 14: 50
    Thus, on February 22, the strategic submarine cruiser Tula launched the R-29RMU2 Sineva intercontinental ballistic missile with a hypersonic unit at the Chizha training ground in the Arkhangelsk region. It would seem, at first glance, an ordinary event

    Well, excuse me, the hypersonic unit on the Sineva ICBM is far from an ordinary event... - it would be if it really took place. In fact, there is no such hypersonic unit in nature, but the launch of a warhead along a flat trajectory (a kind of imitation). But the interception of the S-500 is really a very significant moment because... shows the possibility of intercepting Trident warheads moving along a flat trajectory, which is the most basic option for attacking our territory and is considered almost irresistible.
    1. 0
      8 March 2024 17: 10
      In fact, there is no such hypersonic unit in nature, but the launch of a warhead along a flat trajectory (a kind of imitation)

      ...tell me more. Preferably with links to sources...
      1. +4
        8 March 2024 17: 38
        Quote: Pacer
        ...tell me more. Preferably with links to sources...

        you can't...
        1. 0
          8 March 2024 20: 04
          you can't..

          that means everything you wrote -

          There is no such hypersonic unit in nature, but the launch of a warhead along a flat trajectory (a kind of imitation)

          only your wishes, fantasies and lies, right?
          1. +1
            8 March 2024 23: 58
            Quote: Pacer
            only your wishes, fantasies and lies, right?

            Well why? I think Mark 1 is right! To “believe” him, you must have knowledge about the Russian Strategic Missile Forces!
            1. 0
              9 March 2024 12: 48
              To "believe"he needs to have knowledge about the Russian Strategic Missile Forces

              those. do I understand you correctly that you confirm approval of this nickname -

              There is no such hypersonic unit in nature, but the launch of a warhead along a flat trajectory (a kind of imitation)

              ? ?
    2. 0
      8 March 2024 20: 10
      It seems that the concept of first strike has now changed. There will be no Tridents or Minutemen. It is planned to launch a strategic strike with tactical missiles. There are already enough of them to destroy all Russian launchers, and due to the short flight time, there simply won’t be time to respond.
      1. 0
        8 March 2024 20: 36
        strike with tactical missiles. There are already enough of them to destroy all Russian launchers

        In order not to assert unfoundedly, please provide absolute and relative values ​​of the number of US tactical nuclear weapons to Russian ones. With links so you can check...
        1. 0
          9 March 2024 07: 22
          It makes no sense to compare with Russian ones at all, since Russia, in principle, does not have the ability to strike with tactical nuclear weapons against the same America where strategic missile launchers are located.
      2. 0
        9 March 2024 11: 17
        It seems that the concept of first strike has now changed.

        Now, when is this? In 2003, the US Department of Defense defined a new concept, Prompt Global Strike, which involves delivering a conventional strike to anywhere on the planet within 1 hour. On April 11, 2010, US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates indicated that the United States is already capable of launching a rapid global strike.
    3. +1
      8 March 2024 20: 14
      The starting thrust of the first stage of the Minuteman reaches 92 tons, and when entering the ballistic section, the warhead has a speed of about 6.7 km/sec ~ 20 Mach. Moreover, the ICBM has a range of 9 km and apogee 1 km. This “classical” flight profile corresponds to an initial pitch angle of 15.5 degrees and an altitude of 450 km when entering the ballistic phase. The Minuteman's flight time is 28 minutes. With such modest speed characteristics, a flat trajectory of intercontinental flight is out of the question.
  5. +2
    8 March 2024 15: 02
    All this is good, but what if they don’t fire missiles at us, but instead fight with us with drones, because of which half of the Black Sea Fleet suffered?
    1. 0
      8 March 2024 15: 39
      According to Ukrainian reports, it suffered)))
      1. +4
        9 March 2024 07: 58
        According to the Russians, nothing was damaged at all
  6. 0
    8 March 2024 16: 17
    ICBM blocks were shot down back in the 70s. And yes, they are all hypersonic. Even the old Minutemen. Or was the S-500 shot down by Avangard?
  7. 0
    8 March 2024 17: 34
    superior then it is superior... just don’t scare these geopolitical opponents.

    does not affect the course of the SVO.
  8. 0
    9 March 2024 02: 57
    Not 10, but only 9 times now the adversaries will be able to kill us, and we can kill them whole, Konashenkov knows how many more times. The main thing is that the adversaries did not invent a mosquito missile fleet.
  9. 0
    9 March 2024 04: 44
    I wish I had the skill to knock down mopeds that reach Cherepovets.
  10. +2
    9 March 2024 06: 57
    Now the main thing is not to give the West time to eliminate the backlog. If the West wants a war with Russia, which is expressed in active assistance to the Ukrainian fascists, then isn’t it easier for Russia to wipe these macrons off the face of the Earth? Why should Russia be a parrot? They said it once. They said two. The third time, instead of words, a blow is needed. So oh so that every macron craps himself. There will be no war. Nobody wants a war whose winner ends up in the Middle Ages. Nobody wants to die. Or am I wrong?
    1. +1
      9 March 2024 09: 09
      Why no one? Some with pleasure. Will explain.
      There will be no winner in the war between NATO and the Russian Federation. Only losers.
      The winner will be the one who will not participate - China. He will become the hegemon in a completely preserved part of the world - Africa, South America, Australia, the Middle East, Hindustan, Central and Southeast Asia, Siberia, island states...
      1. +1
        10 March 2024 18: 19
        Quote: Strange guest
        Why no one? Some with pleasure. Will explain.
        There will be no winner in the war between NATO and the Russian Federation. Only losers.
        The winner will be the one who will not participate - China. He will become the hegemon in a completely preserved part of the world - Africa, South America, Australia, the Middle East, Hindustan, Central and Southeast Asia, Siberia, island states...

        It seems to you that he will not participate. In fact, no one will understand whether China is fighting or not. That part of the US missiles that are aimed at China will fly to China.
        But other countries like Pakistan and Bangladesh, where the population is larger than the Russian one, may well sit it out and begin expansion